Literature DB >> 35732840

Efficacy and safety of the endoscopic "wet-field" technique for removal of supratentorial cavernous malformations.

Kazuhito Takeuchi1, Yuichi Nagata2, Kuniaki Tanahashi2, Yoshio Araki2, Akihiro Mizuno2, Hiroo Sasaki2, Hideyuki Harada2, Keishi Ito2, Ryuta Saito2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cerebral cavernous malformations (CMs) presenting with focal neurological symptoms or mass effects require surgical removal. In recent years, cylindrical retractors have been widely utilized for the removal of deep-seated lesions during both microscopic and endoscopic surgery. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic transcylinder removal of CMs using a novel wet-field technique.
METHODS: We included 13 patients with supratentorial CMs who had undergone endoscopic transcylinder surgery between April 2013 and March 2022. One patient experienced recurrence of the CM and underwent a second endoscopic transcylinder surgery. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated 14 procedures. The surgical field was continuously irrigated with artificial cerebrospinal fluid to maintain expansion and visualization of the tumor bed. We termed this method as the "wet-field technique." Patient characteristics, symptoms, and pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging results were obtained from medical records.
RESULTS: The average maximum CM diameter was 35.3 mm (range: 10-65 mm). Cylinder diameters were 6 mm in eight procedures, 10 mm in four procedures, and 17 mm in one procedure. Wet-field technique was applied in all cases. The endoscope provided a bright field of view even under water. Continuous water irrigation made it easier to observe the entire tumor bed which naturally expanded by water pressure. Gross total resection was achieved in 13 procedures, while subtotal resection was achieved in one procedure. No surgical complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic transcylinder removal using wet-field technique is safe and effective for the removal of symptomatic intracranial supratentorial CMs.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cavernous angioma; Endoscopy; Navigation system; Port surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35732840     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05273-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.816


  20 in total

1.  Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note.

Authors:  N L Dorward; O Alberti; J D Palmer; N D Kitchen; D G Thomas
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Minimally Invasive Brain Port Approach for Accessing Deep-Seated Lesions Using Simple Syringe.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Oqalaa Almubarak; Abdullah Alobaid; Omar Qoqandi; Mohammed Bafaquh
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 3.  Supratentorial cavernous malformations.

Authors:  Jason A Ellis; Daniel L Barrow
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2017

4.  Minimal access to deep intracranial lesions using a serial dilatation technique: case-series and review of brain tubular retractor systems.

Authors:  Saleh A Almenawer; Louis Crevier; Naresh Murty; Amin Kassam; Kesava Reddy
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Population-Based Prevalence of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations in Older Adults: Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.

Authors:  Kelly D Flemming; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Jeremiah Aakre; Kejal Kantarci; Giuseppe Lanzino; Robert D Brown; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Walter Kremers; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 6.  Management of incidental cavernous malformations: a review.

Authors:  Richard T Dalyai; George Ghobrial; Issam Awad; Stavropoula Tjoumakaris; L Fernando Gonzalez; Aaron S Dumont; Nohra Chalouhi; Ciro Randazzo; Robert Rosenwasser; Pascal Jabbour
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Usefulness of Ultrasound-Guided Microsurgery in Cavernous Angioma Removal.

Authors:  Lina Raffaella Barzaghi; Jody Filippo Capitanio; Lodoviga Giudice; Pietro Panni; Stefania Acerno; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Endoport-assisted microsurgical resection of cerebral cavernous malformations.

Authors:  Dale Ding; Robert M Starke; R Webster Crowley; Kenneth C Liu
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 1.961

9.  Minimally Invasive Transsulcal Resection of Intraventricular and Periventricular Lesions Through a Tubular Retractor System: Multicentric Experience and Results.

Authors:  Javed Khader Eliyas; Ryan Glynn; Charles G Kulwin; Richard Rovin; Ronald Young; Juan Alzate; Gustavo Pradilla; Mitesh V Shah; Amin Kassam; Ivan Ciric; Julian Bailes
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 10.  Synopsis of Guidelines for the Clinical Management of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: Consensus Recommendations Based on Systematic Literature Review by the Angioma Alliance Scientific Advisory Board Clinical Experts Panel.

Authors:  Amy Akers; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Issam A Awad; Kristen Dahlem; Kelly Flemming; Blaine Hart; Helen Kim; Ignacio Jusue-Torres; Douglas Kondziolka; Cornelia Lee; Leslie Morrison; Daniele Rigamonti; Tania Rebeiz; Elisabeth Tournier-Lasserve; Darrel Waggoner; Kevin Whitehead
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.