| Literature DB >> 35732701 |
K S Aina1, A O Oladimeji2, F Z Agboola3, D O Oguntayo4.
Abstract
250 µm particle size of wood and polyethylene (PE) materials were compounded at mixing proportions of 60/40, 70/30, and 80/20 (with an increase in polymer to decrease in wood content) and extruded using a single screw extruder at a temperature range of 110-135 °C. The particles of Gmelina Arborea, Tectona grandis, Cordia milleni, and Nauclea diderichii with recycled Polyethylene were compounded and compressed at 175 N/mm to produce biopolymer composites. The biopolymer composites were subjected to dimensional stability test at 24 h of the water soak method and the ability to withstand load-bearing capacity was investigated. The outcome of the results shows that extruded-compressive biopolymer composites had values ranging from 0.06-1.43 g/cm3, 0.38-3.41%, and 0.82-6.85% for observed density, water absorption, and thickness swelling at 24 h of a water soak test. The mechanical properties values ranged from 0.28 Nmm-2-21.35 Nmm-2 and 0.44-550.06 Nmm-2 for flexural modulus and strength; and 191.43 Nmm-2-1857.24 Nmm-2 and 0.35 Nmm-2-243.75 Nmm-2 for tensile modulus and strength respectively. It was observed that moisture uptake and strength displayed by the composites vary accordingly in values obtained for wood species at different mixing proportions. As observed that the more polyethylene content is compounded to wood, the better its dimensional stability, and flexural and tensile properties. The wood particles of Cordia milleni compounded at a proportion of 60 to 40 (polyethylene/wood) performed best in dimensional stability and load-bearing capacity. This study confirmed the effect of methods on wood species and recycled PE for manufacturing wood polymer-based composite for both indoor and outdoor applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35732701 PMCID: PMC9218134 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14691-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Single screw extruder.
Figure 2Premix extruder.
Mean values obtained for physicomechanical properties of extruded-compressed biopolymer composite.
| Wood species | Plastic (%) | Wood (%) | Observed density (g/cm3) | Water absorption (%) at 24 h | Thickness swelling (%) at 24 h | Mechanical properties (N/mm2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexural modulus (N/mm2) | Flexural strength (N/mm2) | Tensile modulus (N/mm2) | Tensile strength (N/mm2) | ||||||
60 70 80 | 40 30 20 | 1.00 ± 0.01 0.90 ± 0.09 0.90 ± 0.05 | 1.18 ± 0.02 0.56 ± 0.02 0.76 ± 0.34 | 2.66 ± 0.28 1.28 ± 0.19 0.36 ± 0.17 | 224.48 ± 1.85 260.61 ± 1.82 540.89 ± 1.29 | 20.52 ± 2.60 12.85 ± 2.02 11.01 ± 0.87 | 1885.72 ± 300.35 1600.03 ± 395.54 1137.58 ± 333.05 | 24.38 ± 5.97 17.59 ± 2.78 14.65 ± 0.35 | |
60 70 80 | 40 30 20 | 0.90 ± 0.02 0.90 ± 0.01 0.90 ± 0.05 | 1.57 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.04 0.82 ± 0.13 | 6.85 ± 5.23 3.65 ± 0.32 1.96 ± 2.11 | 261.53 ± 2.44 285.30 ± 1.24 514.58 ± 2.54 | 18.85 ± 1.11 11.51 ± 3.47 8.34 ± 0.28 | 1291.88 ± 366.84 1330.03 ± 234.43 1416.62 ± 438.70 | 18.56 ± 2.64 17.34 ± 7.96 16.14 ± 4.51 | |
60 70 80 | 40 30 20 | 1.43 ± 0.27 0.80 ± 0.19 0.81 ± 0.23 | 1.25 ± 0.45 0.59 ± 0.22 0.28 ± 1.49 | 2.26 ± 0.58 1.45 ± 0.13 0.68 ± 1.22 | 433.85 ± 2.34 500.98 ± 2.17 550.06 ± 2.70 | 21.35 ± 2.31 19.51 ± 8.66 18.18 ± 1.55 | 1015.01 ± 381.79 1509.42 ± 353.42 1687.34 ± 309.28 | 23.94 ± 9.10 18.96 ± 4.52 11.43 ± 9.79 | |
60 70 80 | 40 30 20 | 1.00 ± 0.03 0.90 ± 0.07 0.60 ± 0.03 | 1.38 ± 0.10 0.69 ± 0.21 0.41 ± 1.34 | 6.73 ± 4.43 1.22 ± 0.26 0.82 ± 0.28 | 385.05 ± 2.34 413.56 ± 1.66 452.93 ± 8.44 | 16.68 ± 2.89 17.17 ± 0.29 13.68 ± 2.89 | 1059.00 ± 191.43 1200.88 ± 208.87 1560.99 ± 241.86 | 20.65 ± 9.72 18.96 ± 4.51 17.52 ± 3.89 | |
Each value represents the mean of five replicates with standard deviations.
Figure 3Density observed from extruded-compressed biopolymer composites.
Figure 4Dimensional stability observed from extruded-compressed biopolymer composites. WA water absorption, TS thickness swelling, PE Polyethylene, WD wood.
Summary of statistical analysis of variance carried out on data obtained for physicomechanical properties.
| Variable factors | Density (g/cm3) | Water absorption at 24 h (%) | Thickness swelling at 24 h (%) | Flexural strength (N/mm2) | Flexural modulus (N/mm2) | Tensile strength (N/mm2) | Tensile modulus (N/mm2) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F value | Sig | F value | Sig | F value | Sig | F value | Sig | F value | Sig | F value | Sig | F value | Sig | |
| Wood species | 169.106 | 0.00* | 0.800 | 0.50ns | 3.731 | 0.02* | 2.334 | 0.09ns | 3.288 | 0.04* | 0.827 | 0.49ns | 2.760 | 0.05* |
| Mixing proportion | 7.024 | 0.00* | 2.697 | 0.08ns | 3.777 | 0.03* | 3.549 | 0.04* | 3.168 | 0.06ns | 7.164 | 0.00* | 2.505 | 0.10ns |
| Wood sp. x Mixing P | 7.019 | 0.00* | 1.112 | 0.38ns | 2.090 | 0.09ns | 2.385 | 0.06ns | 1.657 | 0.17ns | 8.343 | 0.00* | 7.171 | 0.00* |
* represents significant, ns represents not significant at 5% level of probability, while sp represents species and P represents proportion.
Result of duncan multiple range test carried out on the outcome of ANOVA results for physical and mechanical properties.
| Variables | Levels | Physical properties | Mechanical properties (N/mm2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density (g/cm3) | Water absorption (%) | Thickness swelling (%) | Flexural Strength | Flexural Modulus | Tensile Strength | Tensile Modulus | ||
| Wood species | 1.008ab 1.012a 1.001b 1.001b | 0.835a 1.373a 1.492a 0.675a | 1.767a 2.130ab 2.932b 2.820b | 341.99a 494.97a 353.81a 350.52a | 14.79ab 19.69a 12.90b 12.52b | 18.83a 18.84a 17.35a 19.04a | 1541.10a 1404.21b 1346.75c 1273.25d | |
| Mixing proportion (PE/wood) | 60/40 70/30 80/20 | 0.204b 0.359a 0.103c | 0.845a 0.620a 0.416a | 4.282b 2.251a 2.204a | 457.29a 302.04b 396.62ab | 17.52a 11.97a 15.43a | 20.79a 17.02b 17.73b | 1481.87a 1398.59a 1294.76a |
The same letter represents no significance while different letter represents significance to one another.
Figure 5Flexural modulus of extruded-compressed biopolymer composites.
Figure 6Flexural strength of extruded-compressed biopolymer composites.
Figure 7Tensile modulus of extruded-compressed biopolymer composites.
Figure 8Tensile strength of extruded-compressed biopolymer composites.