Literature DB >> 35732195

Serial Intervals for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta Variants, Belgium, November 19-December 31, 2021.

Cécile Kremer, Toon Braeye, Kristiaan Proesmans, Emmanuel André, Andrea Torneri, Niel Hens.   

Abstract

We investigated the serial interval for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and Delta variants and observed a shorter serial interval for Omicron, suggesting faster transmission. Results indicate a relationship between empirical serial interval and vaccination status for both variants. Further assessment of the causes and extent of Omicron dominance over Delta is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Belgium; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus disease; respiratory infections; serial interval; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; vaccine-preventable diseases; variants of concern; viruses; zoonoses

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35732195      PMCID: PMC9328897          DOI: 10.3201/eid2808.220220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   16.126


The World Health Organization designated the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant (B.1.1.529) as a variant of concern (VOC) on November 26, 2021 (). Omicron shows a fast epidemic growth and has taken over as the dominant VOC from the previously dominant Delta variant (B.1.617.2) worldwide. In Belgium, the Omicron variant was the dominant circulating strain during December 27, 2021–January 9, 2022, identified in 88.5% of sequenced samples (). The Omicron variant is more efficient at evading immunity, acquired from previous infection or vaccination (,), compared with the Delta variant. Another epidemiologic characteristic that may contribute to the rapid spread of Omicron is increased transmissibility, possibly attributable to an increase in the reproduction number or a shortened serial interval (i.e., the time difference between symptom onset in an infector and infectee) (). In this study, we estimate the means and SDs of the serial interval for the Omicron and Delta variants and assess whether these variants are associated with different observed serial intervals. To gain more insights on the possible effects of vaccination, we also compare the observed serial intervals for different combinations of vaccination status in transmission pairs.

The Study

Belgium has a contact tracing system in place, where COVID-19 confirmed case-patients are asked about their contacts from 2 days before symptom onset until 10 days after. We used genotype sequencing to detect variants. If a variant was found in a transmission chain, all case-patients belonging to that chain were assumed to be infected by that variant. We collected transmission pairs that could be linked either to Omicron or Delta infections in which the infector reported first symptoms during November 19–December 31, 2021. During this period, Omicron started to spread in Belgium and took over dominance from the Delta variant (). The same nonpharmaceutical interventions were in place throughout this period; the stringency index (indicating the strictness of measures on a scale from 0 to 100) was 48. We assumed that the first confirmed case in a reconstructed transmission pair (i.e., the index case-patient) was the infector and the contact was the infectee. We excluded transmission pairs for which symptom onset was not available for either case, as well as pairs for which the observed serial interval was <−5 days or >15 days to ensure biologically plausible serial intervals (,). We assigned vaccination status to both cases in a transmission pair as unvaccinated (including partially vaccinated), vaccinated (i.e., completed vaccination cycle), and vaccinated plus booster (Appendix). Of the 2,495 included transmission pairs, 86.61% were linked to transmission of the Omicron variant (Appendix Figure 1). We report the means and SDs of the observed serial intervals; the median was 3 days for all stratifications. All reported p values are based on a Mann-Whitney U test. We further stratified transmission pairs by household and vaccination status (Appendix Tables 1, 2). The empirical serial interval distribution for Omicron had a mean of 2.75 days (SD 2.53 days), compared with 3.00 days (SD 2.48 days) for Delta (p = 0.019) (Figures 1, panels A, B). We estimated parameters of the normal distribution fit to both empirical serial interval distributions (Table; Figure 1, panel C). The empirical serial interval distribution for Omicron also was shorter than that for Delta within households (Table; Appendix Figure 2).
Figure 1

Empirical (A–B) and fitted normal (C) distributions of the serial intervals for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants, Belgium, for cases with onset date of infector during November 19–December 31, 2021.

Table

Estimated parameters of a normal distribution for the serial interval of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants, by different stratifications, Belgium, November 19–December 31, 2021*

VariantStratificationNo. transmission pairsPosterior median (95% CrI)SD (95% CrI)
OmicronNone2,1612.75 (2.65–2.86)2.54 (2.46–2.61)
Delta
None
334
3.00 (2.73–3.26)
2.49 (2.31–2.69)
OmicronWithin-household1,4122.80 (2.67–2.93)2.60 (2.50–2.70)
Delta
Within-household
278
3.04 (2.75–3.33)
2.43 (2.24–2.65)
OmicronBetween-household6722.72 (2.53–2.90)2.44 (2.31–2.57)
Delta
Between-household
50
2.78 (2.00–3.56)
2.78 (2.30–3.45)
OmicronBoth unvaccinated3462.69 (2.40–2.98)2.75 (2.55–2.96)
Delta
Both unvaccinated
61
2.54 (1.96–3.12)
2.29 (1.93–2.78)
OmicronBoth vaccinated7742.63 (2.46–2.81)2.45 (2.33–2.58)
Delta
Both vaccinated
97
3.38 (2.89–3.88)
2.47 (2.16–2.86)
OmicronBoth vaccinated + booster473.34 (2.58–4.10)2.59 (2.13–3.24)
DeltaBoth vaccinated + booster0NANA

*No Delta transmission pairs in which both case-patients had received a booster vaccine were reported. CrI, credible interval; NA, not available

Empirical (A–B) and fitted normal (C) distributions of the serial intervals for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants, Belgium, for cases with onset date of infector during November 19–December 31, 2021. *No Delta transmission pairs in which both case-patients had received a booster vaccine were reported. CrI, credible interval; NA, not available No difference in mean empirical serial intervals was found for pairs where both case-patients were unvaccinated or only partially vaccinated (2.69 vs. 2.54 days; p = 0.931) (Figure 2, panels A, B). For transmission pairs in which both case-patients were vaccinated (without booster), the mean empirical serial interval for Omicron was significantly shorter than that for Delta (2.63 vs. 3.38 days; p = 0.004) (Figure 2, panels C, D). The mean empirical serial interval for Omicron was longer for pairs that received a booster vaccine than for pairs that were vaccinated with only 2 doses (3.34 vs. 2.63 days; p = 0.065) (Figure 2, panels C–E). The mean empirical serial interval was significantly longer for the Delta variant in transmission pairs in which both case-patients completed the vaccination cycle, compared with those where both case-patients were unvaccinated or only partially vaccinated (3.38 versus 2.54 days; p = 0.045) (Figure 2, panels B–D).
Figure 2

Empirical distribution of the serial intervals for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (A, C, E) and Delta (B, D) variants, for transmission pairs where both cases are unvaccinated (A, B), vaccinated (C, D), or vaccinated with a booster (E, no data for Delta variant), Belgium, for cases with onset date of infector during November 19–December 31, 2021.

Empirical distribution of the serial intervals for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (A, C, E) and Delta (B, D) variants, for transmission pairs where both cases are unvaccinated (A, B), vaccinated (C, D), or vaccinated with a booster (E, no data for Delta variant), Belgium, for cases with onset date of infector during November 19–December 31, 2021.

Conclusions

Our estimates of the empirical serial interval for Omicron are in line with those previously reported. Lee et al. () reported a mean serial interval of 2.8 days, and Kim et al. () estimated the mean serial interval to be 2.22 days (SD 1.62 days). Backer et al. () reported a mean serial interval of 3.5 and 3 days in 2 consecutive weeks for Omicron within-household pairs; in line with our findings, they found the interval to be shorter than that for Delta pairs. Shorter serial intervals suggest a possibly shorter generation time for the Omicron variant compared with Delta, pointing to faster transmission, which could explain the rapid growth that is observed for the Omicron variant. However, control measures and asymptomatic transmission may lead to different serial and generation interval distributions (). Future studies estimating the generation interval for both variants are needed to shed more light on this matter. The first limitation of our study is that self-reported symptom onset dates and contacts may be subject to recall bias. Likewise, the level of reporting contacts may differ for each person. We have used all reported transmission pairs, although some of them may have been wrongly assigned. We further assume that directionality of transmission was from index to contact, which may not be correct for each pair. However, because the same assumption was made for both variants, the comparison of serial intervals still holds, although serial interval lengths should be interpreted with caution. In addition, contacts were required to quarantine, which limited possible exposure from sources other than the reported index case-patient. We also do not explicitly account for right truncation (); this choice is assumed not to affect our estimates because symptomatic infectees probably were not missed, given that we used the data available on January 17, 2022, but limited the serial interval to no more than 15 days. However, because contacts are reconstructed until 2 days before symptom onset of the index case-patient, possible left truncation might lead to exclusion of some transmission pairs. Selection bias attributable to targeted genotype sequencing of suspected Omicron cases (such as previously infected cases or travelers) might also have occurred, whereas genotype sequencing resulting in confirmed Delta cases might have been performed on samples from a hospital setting because severe disease was an indication for sequencing during the study period. This analysis does not correct for age or for previous infection; reinfections might be overrepresented among the Omicron cases. Our results suggest that the empirical mean serial interval increases when both case-patients have a higher level of vaccine-induced immunity. However, possibly because of limited sample size, we did not observe this pattern for all possible combinations of vaccination status (Appendix Figure 3); more data are needed to properly assess the relationship between vaccination and serial interval. The empirical mean serial interval for unvaccinated and vaccinated (without booster) transmission pairs was similar for the Omicron variant. If vaccine-induced immunity and serial interval are positively correlated, this result might be explained by lower vaccine efficacy against Omicron for persons who have not yet received a booster vaccine. As the vaccination campaign progresses and more persons receive a booster vaccine, the reasons for and extent of Omicron’s dominance over Delta might need to be reassessed.

Appendix

Additional information about serial intervals for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants, Belgium, November 19–December 31, 2021.
  9 in total

1.  A note on generation times in epidemic models.

Authors:  Ake Svensson
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 2.144

2.  Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19.

Authors:  Xi He; Eric H Y Lau; Peng Wu; Xilong Deng; Jian Wang; Xinxin Hao; Yiu Chung Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Yujuan Guan; Xinghua Tan; Xiaoneng Mo; Yanqing Chen; Baolin Liao; Weilie Chen; Fengyu Hu; Qing Zhang; Mingqiu Zhong; Yanrong Wu; Lingzhai Zhao; Fuchun Zhang; Benjamin J Cowling; Fang Li; Gabriel M Leung
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Incubation Period and Other Epidemiological Characteristics of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infections with Right Truncation: A Statistical Analysis of Publicly Available Case Data.

Authors:  Natalie M Linton; Tetsuro Kobayashi; Yichi Yang; Katsuma Hayashi; Andrei R Akhmetzhanov; Sung-Mok Jung; Baoyin Yuan; Ryo Kinoshita; Hiroshi Nishiura
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  On realized serial and generation intervals given control measures: The COVID-19 pandemic case.

Authors:  Andrea Torneri; Pieter Libin; Gianpaolo Scalia Tomba; Christel Faes; James G Wood; Niel Hens
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Importation and Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) Variant of Concern in Korea, November 2021.

Authors:  Ji Joo Lee; Young June Choe; Hyeongseop Jeong; Moonsu Kim; Seonggon Kim; Hanna Yoo; Kunhee Park; Chanhee Kim; Sojin Choi; JiWoo Sim; Yoojin Park; In Sil Huh; Gasil Hong; Mi Young Kim; Jin Su Song; Jihee Lee; Eun-Jin Kim; Jee Eun Rhee; Il-Hwan Kim; Jin Gwack; Jungyeon Kim; Jin-Hwan Jeon; Wook-Gyo Lee; Suyeon Jeong; Jusim Kim; Byungsik Bae; Ja Eun Kim; Hyeonsoo Kim; Hye Young Lee; Sang-Eun Lee; Jong Mu Kim; Hanul Park; Mi Yu; Jihyun Choi; Jia Kim; Hyeryeon Lee; Eun-Jung Jang; Dosang Lim; Sangwon Lee; Young-Joon Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization.

Authors:  Sandile Cele; Laurelle Jackson; David S Khoury; Khadija Khan; Thandeka Moyo-Gwete; Houriiyah Tegally; James Emmanuel San; Deborah Cromer; Cathrine Scheepers; Daniel G Amoako; Farina Karim; Mallory Bernstein; Gila Lustig; Derseree Archary; Muneerah Smith; Yashica Ganga; Zesuliwe Jule; Kajal Reedoy; Shi-Hsia Hwa; Jennifer Giandhari; Jonathan M Blackburn; Bernadett I Gosnell; Salim S Abdool Karim; Willem Hanekom; Anne von Gottberg; Jinal N Bhiman; Richard J Lessells; Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Miles P Davenport; Tulio de Oliveira; Penny L Moore; Alex Sigal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Shorter serial intervals in SARS-CoV-2 cases with Omicron BA.1 variant compared with Delta variant, the Netherlands, 13 to 26 December 2021.

Authors:  Jantien A Backer; Dirk Eggink; Stijn P Andeweg; Irene K Veldhuijzen; Noortje van Maarseveen; Klaas Vermaas; Boris Vlaemynck; Raf Schepers; Susan van den Hof; Chantal Bem Reusken; Jacco Wallinga
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2022-02

8.  Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection associated with emergence of Omicron in South Africa.

Authors:  Juliet R C Pulliam; Cari van Schalkwyk; Nevashan Govender; Anne von Gottberg; Cheryl Cohen; Michelle J Groome; Jonathan Dushoff; Koleka Mlisana; Harry Moultrie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 63.714

9.  Estimation of Serial Interval and Reproduction Number to Quantify the Transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in South Korea.

Authors:  Dasom Kim; Sheikh Taslim Ali; Sungchan Kim; Jisoo Jo; Jun-Sik Lim; Sunmi Lee; Sukhyun Ryu
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.048

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  EpiLPS: A fast and flexible Bayesian tool for estimation of the time-varying reproduction number.

Authors:  Oswaldo Gressani; Jacco Wallinga; Christian L Althaus; Niel Hens; Christel Faes
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 2.  A comparative overview of SARS-CoV-2 and its variants of concern.

Authors:  Aqeel Ahmad; Mohammed Ali Mullah Fawaz; Arafeen Aisha
Journal:  Infez Med       Date:  2022-09-01

3.  A new approach to modeling pre-symptomatic incidence and transmission time of imported COVID-19 cases evolving with SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Authors:  Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Grace Hsiao-Hsuan Jen; Chen-Yang Hsu; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Chao-Chih Lai; Yen-Po Yeh; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants on a university campus.

Authors:  Ana A Weil; Kyle G Luiten; Amanda M Casto; Julia C Bennett; Jessica O'Hanlon; Peter D Han; Luis S Gamboa; Evan McDermot; Melissa Truong; Geoffrey S Gottlieb; Zack Acker; Caitlin R Wolf; Ariana Magedson; Eric J Chow; Natalie K Lo; Lincoln C Pothan; Devon McDonald; Tessa C Wright; Kathryn M McCaffrey; Marlin D Figgins; Janet A Englund; Michael Boeckh; Christina M Lockwood; Deborah A Nickerson; Jay Shendure; Trevor Bedford; James P Hughes; Lea M Starita; Helen Y Chu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 17.694

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.