Literature DB >> 35732159

Cytopathological Findings in Bronchoalveolar Lavage from Patients with COVID-19.

Silvio Antonio Galeano Reyes1, Patricia Dhimes Tejeda1, Bárbara Steen2, Hansely Keret Arcos Orozco1, Paloma Ramos Pontón1.   

Abstract

Information on cellular analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in patients with COVID-19 is limited. Some studies have described an increase in lymphocyte percentage or exuberant plasmacytosis. Some reports addressed the importance of molecular testing on BAL samples to confirm COVID-19 pneumonia, in clinically highly suspected patients with consecutive negative nasopharyngeal swab results. In addition to atypical lymphocytes in the peripheral blood, morphologic findings of atypical lymphocytes in BAL were also reported in a few patients. The objective of this study was to describe the cytopathic characteristics identified, any data presented here are descriptives and intended to trigger further research. Three general aspects have been evaluated in each sample: reactive changes, virus-related pathological changes, and differential leukocyte count. Seventeen samples were collected. All samples were negative for malignancy, with an inflammatory background, predominantly lymphohistiocytic in 5 samples, histiocytic in 9, and 3 with predominantly neutrophilic. Hemosiderin-laden macrophages were observed in 12/17. Nonspecific reactive cell changes were identified in 4 samples, including bronchial, alveolar, and reserve cell hyperplasia. Virus-related pathological changes were observed in 14 samples, such as loss of nuclear chromatin pattern, lymphocytes with atypical nuclei, nuclear and cytoplasmic inclusions, multinucleations in bronchial cells and macrophages, or multinucleated giant cells. The identification of multinucleated giant cells could represent a cytopathic effect induced by the virus, at the same time the nuclear clearance of pneumocytes as a possible direct effect. BAL is a procedure aimed at obtaining cells from the respiratory tract that can provide valuable and rapid information. It is important to collect and describe as many cytopathological findings as possible, which can provide relevant information for future studies.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bronchoalveolar lavage; COVID-19; Cytopathological finding

Year:  2022        PMID: 35732159      PMCID: PMC9393766          DOI: 10.1159/000525339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   3.000


Introduction

The new coronavirus, called SARS-CoV-2, was isolated for the first time in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 [1]. Its outbreak and the rapid worldwide spread of COVID-19 along with its multiple consequences meant the study of such pathology represents a global and emerging need at a scientific level. Autopsies produced an organic overview of the COVID-19 landscape in the lungs. As a second step, pathologists are translating the histological information into mini-invasive samples such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), which might play a significant role in the multidisciplinary workup of SARS-CoV-2 infection [2, 3]. Performing BAL with the flexible bronchoscope is a simple, safe, well-tolerated technique that provides valuable clinical information in the study of various lung diseases. When this technique was first described in the late sixties, such a significant and growing development over the years was never expected from it. The application of BAL in the microbiological study became popular in the 1980s with the emergence of the AIDS epidemic and in the 1990s for the study of pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation [4]. The technique consists of instilling saline in 20–50 mL boluses up to the desired total volume through the internal channel of the bronchofiberscope, after fitting it into the chosen bronchus. After each instillation, it is aspirated with the same syringe, with adequate pressure, so as not to collapse the bronchial walls [5]. Among the indications for BAL, one of the most frequent is the diagnosis of virus infections. Unlike pneumonia due to fungi or bacteria, viral infections often induce specific cytopathic changes that allow the pathologist to make a firm diagnosis of the causative agent. This is particularly important since other methods may not be available, less profitable, or not as accurate. Cytopathic findings can be nonspecific or specific for viral infection [6]. Among the nonspecific, exudation of inflammatory cells and necrotic debris can be seen in early stages of influenza or parainfluenza infections. Degenerative changes can be identified as remnants of fragmented hair cells of the bronchial columnar epithelium, with cytoplasmic swelling and nuclear pyknosis. This phenomenon was described for the first time in adenovirus infections. In addition, hyperplasia of bronchial and alveolar cells can be observed, arranged in clusters, with swollen hyperchromatic nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Specific changes for certain viruses have been described and well recognized, such as intranuclear inclusion bodies, loss of the nuclear chromatin pattern, multinucleations, or cytoplasmic inclusions. These changes can be seen mainly in infections by herpes virus, varicella zoster, cytomegalovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, or adenovirus. Studies based on findings presented in BAL patients with various pulmonary pathologies have been increasing in recent years due to their cost-effectiveness and the wide sampling source they represent. BAL has become a useful bronchoscopic medium for sampling the cells of the respiratory tract, soluble products, and pathogens that line the alveolar spaces [7]. All this, in numerous pathologies, including the current COVID-19 disease. Information on cellular analysis of BAL and its clinical significance in patients with COVID-19 is limited. Two earlier single case reports have described an increase in lymphocyte percentage or exuberant plasmacytosis in BAL fluid in patients with severe COVID-19 [2, 8]. A study of 20 patients reported BAL lymphocytosis with plasmacytosis [9]. Some reports addressed the importance of molecular testing on BAL samples to confirm COVID-19 pneumonia in clinically highly suspected patients with consecutive negative nasopharyngeal swab results [10, 11, 12]. Others described increased lymphocyte percentage or exuberant plasmacytosis in BAL fluid in 2 patients [8, 9]. In addition to atypical lymphocytes in the peripheral blood, morphologic findings of atypical lymphocytes in BAL fluid were also reported in a few patients [13, 14, 15]. The objective of this study was to describe the cytopathic characteristics identified in BAL samples from these patients. Any data presented here are descriptives and intended to trigger further research. In any case, previous reports suggest that BAL may be a proper specimen for in-depth diagnostics [16] and also the cytopathological observations may be confirmative factors for COVID-19 and could lead to SARS-CoV-2 testing if not previously initiated.

Materials and Methods

This is a descriptive study, in which samples of BAL from patients affected by COVID-19 were studied. The samples that were sent by the Department of Pneumology of the Fundación Alcorcón University Hospital (Madrid-Spain), to the Department of Pathology of the same center, from May 2020 to May 2021, were included. A BAL was present when meeting the Chamberlain criteria: degree of degeneration less than 20% in samples from cytocentrifuge, the liquid obtained had to be a minimum of 3 cc, observing a monolayer distribution of cells in the smear, and not having excessive blood contamination. Broken or incorrectly mounted sheets and material with external contaminants were excluded. Personally identifiable information and demographic aspects obtained from the electronic record of medical records were collected. The procedure notes were also reviewed to assess the endoscopic description. Each sample was cytocentrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 10 min (Cytospin III, Shandon Instruments, Sewickley) and processed with Papanicolaou staining after fixation in 96% alcohol. The cytological characteristics were reviewed and the relevant findings were evaluated by two pathologists, in different fields of low and high power under the light microscope, until the complete review of the sample and subsequent cell count in a high-power field (×400). Three general aspects have been evaluated in each sample: reactive changes, virus-related pathological changes, and differential leukocyte count. As a reactive change, we looked at hyperplasia of bronchial and alveolar cells, metaplasia, degeneration, repair, or inflammation. We also looked for virus-related pathological changes, such as intranuclear inclusion bodies, loss of the nuclear chromatin pattern, multinucleations, and cytoplasmic inclusions. Later, the differential leukocyte count for neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, and histiocytes was determined. Data analysis was performed with Excel version 16.16.27. Qualitative variables were analyzed with absolute and relative frequencies, and quantitative variables with measures of central tendency and dispersion. This study was approved by the committee and the informed consent was obtained from participants of this study.

Results

Sixteen patients who fit the study parameters were identified, of which a total of 17 BAL cytology samples were collected. The patients were between 31 and 80 years of age, with a mean of 62.8 ± 14.2, with 10 being female (62.5%) and 6 male (37.5%). Four patients (25%) had a known diagnosis of malignancy (3 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 2 with breast carcinoma). Only one case had a fatal outcome. Table 1 shows the demographic criteria, antecedents, symptoms, and clinical resolution of the cases studied.
Table 1

Epidemiological characteristics, clinical history, and clinical outcome of the cases studied

PatientAge, yearsSexClinical historyPresenting illness/symptomsClinical outcome
160FRheumatoid arthritis, GERD, hiatal herniaCough, expectoration, dyspnea, and feverDied
256FT2D, GERD, obese class 2, gonarthrosisCough, myalgia, and pleuritic chest painAlive
368MCKD, hypercholesterolemia, OSAHSCough, dyspnea, and feverAlive
479FHTDyspnea and feverAlive
572FSCH, Crohn's diseaseDyspnea and feverAlive
631MTrisomy 21, interventricular communication, obese, OSAHSDyspnea and orthopneaAlive
747FNHL, SLECough, expectoration, and feverAlive
862MIsoniazid-resistant tuberculosisHeadache and pleuritic chest painAlive
970FBreast cancer, SCHCough, dyspnea, and astheniaAlive
1056M Pemphigus vulgaris Dyspnea, cough, and feverAlive
1179MHT, T2D, dyslipidemiaCough and dyspneaAlive
1275FNHL, dyslipidemiaSickness, fever, cough, and dyspneaAlive
1380MBPHCough, expectoration, and dyspneaAlive
1480FHT, T2D, dyslipidemia, breast cancer, NHLCough and dyspneaAlive
1554FIntermittent asthmaDyspnea, asthenia, and pleuritic chest painAlive
1652FNo significant past medical historyDyspnea, fever, and pleuritic chest painAlive

M, male; F, female; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; T2D, type 2 diabetes; CKD, chronic kidney disease; OSAHS, obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome; HT, hypertension; SCH, subclinical hypothyroidism; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia.

On cytological analysis, all 17 samples were negative for malignancy, with an inflammatory background, predominantly lymphohistiocytic in 5 samples (shown in Fig. 1), histiocytic in 9 (shown in Fig. 2), and 3 with predominantly neutrophilic (shown in Fig. 3). Hemosiderin-laden macrophages were observed in 12/17 samples (shown in Fig. 4).
Fig. 1

Inflammatory background with a predominance of lymphocytes and histiocytes.

Fig. 2

Predominantly histiocytic inflammatory background.

Fig. 3

Inflammatory background with acute inflammation.

Fig. 4

Hemosiderin-laden macrophages.

Nonspecific reactive cell changes were identified in 4 samples, including bronchial, alveolar, and reserve cell hyperplasia (shown in Fig. 5). Virus-related pathological changes were observed in 14 samples, such as loss of nuclear chromatin pattern (shown in Fig. 6), lymphocytes with atypical nuclei, nuclear and cytoplasmic inclusions (shown in Fig. 7, 8), multinucleations in bronchial cells and macrophages, or multinucleated giant cells (shown in Fig. 9, 10). All these findings are summarized in Table 2.
Fig. 5

Reserve cell hyperplasia.

Fig. 6

Loss of nuclear chromatin pattern.

Fig. 7

Nuclear inclusions.

Fig. 8

Cytoplasmic inclusions.

Fig. 9

Presence of multinucleated alveolar macrophages.

Fig. 10

Multinucleated giant cells.

Table 2

Cytopathological findings and differential count, determined in studied samples of BAL

PatientSampleNonspecific reactive changesVirus-specific cytopathic findingsBackgroundFindings suggestive of bleeding or thrombiDifferential leukocyte count/100 cells
11AbsentLoss of nuclear chromatin pattern, nuclear and cytoplasmic inclusions, multinucleations in bronchial cells and macrophages, multinucleated giant cellsInflammatory, predominantly histiocyticHemosiderin-laden macrophages10% neutrophils, 5% lymphocytes0% eosinophils, 85% histiocytes

22Bronchial, alveolar, and reserve cell hyperplasiaMultinucleations in macrophages, lymphocytes with atypical nucleiInflammatory, lymphohistiocyticAbsent10% neutrophils, 30% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 60% histiocytes

33AbsentMultinucleations in bronchial cells and macrophages, multinucleated giant cellsInflammatory and necroticAbsent50% neutrophils, 8% lymphocytes, 2% eosinophils 40% histiocytes

44AbsentAbsentInflammatory, predominantly histiocyticAbsent2% neutrophils, 3% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 95% histiocytes

55AbsentLoss of nuclear chromatin pattern, macrophages multinucleated, atypical lymphocytes, multinucleated giant cellsInflammatory, predominantly histiocyticHemosiderin-laden macrophages10% neutrophils, 5% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 85% histiocytes

66Bronchial cell hyperplasiaMacrophages multinucleated and nuclear inclusions, multinucleated giant cellsInflammatory, predominantly histiocyticAbsent5% neutrophils, 4% lymphocytes, 1% eosinophils 90% histiocytes

77AAbsentAbsentInflammatory, predominantly histiocyticHemosiderin-laden macrophages5% neutrophils, 10% lymphocytes, 5% eosinophils 80% histiocytes

7BAbsentAbsentInflammatory, lymphohistiocytic and necroticHemosiderin-laden macrophages and squamous metaplasia2% neutrophils, 20% lymphocytes 8% eosinophils 70% histiocytes

88AbsentMacrophages multinucleated, multinucleated giant cellsInflammatory, predominantly histiocyticHemosiderin-laden macrophages3% neutrophils, 7% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 90% histiocytes

99Bronchial, alveolar, and reserve cell hyperplasiaVacuolar inclusion bodies, macrophage cytoplasmic, multinucleated giant cellsInflammatory, lymphohistiocyticHemosiderin-laden macrophages15% neutrophils, 15% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 70% histiocytes

1010AbsentMultinucleations in macrophagesInflammatory, lymphohistiocyticHemosiderin-laden macrophages25% neutrophils, 30% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 45% histiocytes

1111AbsentMacrophages multinucleated, multinucleated giant cellsInflammatory, predominantly histiocyticHemosiderin-laden macrophages3% neutrophils, 4% lymphocytes, 3% eosinophils 90% histiocytes

1212AbsentMultinucleations in macrophages and lymphocytes with atypical nucleiInflammatory, predominantly histiocyticHemosiderin-laden macrophages10% neutrophils, 5% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 85% histiocytes

1313AbsentIntranuclear and cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in macrophagesInflammatory, predominantly neutrophilicAbsent89% neutrophils, 1% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 10% histiocytes

1414AbsentLoss of nuclear chromatin pattern, multinucleations in bronchial cells and macrophagesInflammatory, lymphohistiocytic and necroticHemosiderin-laden macrophages5% neutrophils, 31% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 64% histiocytes

1515AbsentLoss of nuclear chromatin pattern, multinucleations in bronchial cells and macrophages, macrophage nuclear inclusionsInflammatory and necroticHemosiderin-laden macrophages50% neutrophils, 5% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 45% histiocytes

1616Bronchial and alveolar cell hyperplasiaLoss of nuclear chromatin pattern, multinucleations in bronchial cells and atypical lymphocytes, macrophage cytoplasmic and nuclear inclusions, multinucleated giant cellsInflammatory, predominantly histiocyticHemosiderin-laden macrophages2% neutrophils, 4% lymphocytes, 0% eosinophils 96% histiocytes

Discussion

The BAL is a useful and safe procedure for the sampling of cellular elements of the lung. As a diagnostic tool, it can be used accurately in various infections, and culture and antibiogram material can also be obtained. This can be very useful in the diagnosis of infections with a sensitivity of 98% and is similar to the bronchial biopsy in sensitivity and specificity [17, 18, 19]. The respiratory tract epithelium responds to injury with reactive changes including hyperplasia, metaplasia, degeneration, repair, or inflammation. Although these are often nonspecific changes, others have characteristic cytological features that point to a specific etiology. Furthermore, the epithelium in the distal regions, which comprise the alveoli and smaller branches of the bronchial tree, reacts differently from the epithelium that lines the main bronchi. Sampling these distal areas through the BAL represents a great advantage of this diagnostic method. Viral pneumonias are frequently associated with prominent hyperplasia of the bronchial and alveolar epithelium, as we have been able to verify in 4 cases studied, in addition to reserve cell hyperplasia. The presence of necrotic remains is a frequent finding, especially in those infections caused by influenza and parainfluenza viruses [20], an aspect also identified in four cases in this study. Lung injury due to COVID-19 has been described in 263 cases from 28 studies [21]. Findings in biopsy samples included squamous metaplasia [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28], reactive hyperplasia of pneumocytes [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37], multinucleated giant cells [24, 26, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40], and alveolar hemorrhage with detection of abundant hemosiderin-laden macrophages [23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 35]. Inflammation was also described acute and chronic alveolar space [28]. All of these changes were isolated or associated with diffuse alveolar damage. These changes are positively correlated with the cytopathological findings identified in the BAL samples analyzed in our study. The integration of the morphological study together with the predominant cell count in the samples can lead to a final pathobiological understanding of the infection. Based on the published literature, BAL samples from healthy individuals contain mainly macrophages (80–90%), few lymphocytes (5–15%), neutrophils (3%), and eosinophils (<1%) [41, 42]. The ratio observed in patients with COVID-19 between neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages is similar to that of other interstitial lung diseases, in which pronounced neutrophilia in BAL samples is generally associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute interstitial pneumonia [43, 44]. In 12/17 of the samples that we studied, a neutrophil count greater than 3% was observed, in the absence of infection or bacterial colonization. Previous studies have also described subsets of patients with increased neutrophils in the absence of concurrent or overlapping bacterial pulmonary infections [28]. However, an increased neutrophil count should prompt the evaluation of a likely concomitant infection. The role of neutrophils in disease progression is evidenced by the maintenance of the host's innate immune defense by these cellular elements, which can initiate and propagate inflammation and thrombosis [45, 46]. Another striking finding was the frequent detection of multinucleated giant cells, whose histological counterpart has recently been well described, in approximately 50% of autopsy studies, which are frequently associated with the late proliferative or fibrotic stage of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) [25, 29]. Some authors have even proposed that the identification of these cells could represent a cytopathic effect induced by the virus, describing at the same time the nuclear clearance of pneumocytes as a possible direct effect, calling these covocytes [47, 48]. These viral cytopathic changes were observed in pneumocytes and even viral inclusions were reported [27, 35, 40, 49, 50, 51, 52]. Immunohistochemistry has shown positivity against the 2019-nCoV antigen in the alveolar epithelium, desquamated pneumocytes, and macrophages [30] and RNA particles have also been seen in the cytoplasm of numerous multinucleated giant cells [28]. Similarly, in situ hybridization, viral RNA was identified in the tracheal epithelium [28] and some studies have shown SARS-CoV-2 virions by transmission electron microscopy within alveolar macrophage phagosomes [52]. These previous findings also correlate with the cytopathic changes identified by our study in bronchial cells and mainly in macrophages. The airway epithelium contains a specialized subset of macrophages known as alveolar macrophages, which are a specific type of tissue-resident macrophages that originate in the yolk sac during early embryogenesis. These cells have the capacity to self-heal [53, 54]. However, it has also been shown that bone marrow-derived monocytes are recruited into the lung to repopulate this organ after specific conditions of infection [55]. These macrophages are likely to be an important determinant of early responses to respiratory virus infections due to their abundance and their physical location in the lung. Therefore, they would probably be the first type of immune cells faced by respiratory viruses [56]. In line with this, they are considered the main producers of interferons during infection by respiratory viruses, such as influenza virus [55, 56, 57, 58, 59] and respiratory syncytial virus [59]. In addition, it is considered that the SARS-CoV-2-induced macrophage activation syndrome could be lethal and it is very likely that the heterogeneity of macrophages is involved in determining the severity, so that the variable responses and diverse changes detected in these cellular components could even be important in determining the prognosis of these patients. Similarly, future lines of research could be based on the comparison of such cellular changes according to severity parameters such as age or various baseline conditions [60]. In this cytopathological scenario, the lymphocytes could show cytological abnormalities as well, as observed in peripheral blood [13]. These atypical morphological aspects generally range from plasmacytoid morphology with eccentric nuclei and intracytoplasmic halos [2], to large nuclei and evident nucleoli reminiscent of immunoblasts. In four samples analyzed in our study, small/intermediate sized lymphocytes with convoluted/cerebriform nuclei were observed, with an increased nucleus/cytoplasm ratio. Morphologic findings of atypical lymphocytes in BAL fluid were also reported [13, 14, 15]. The presence of atypical lymphocytes probably reflects the active response of T cells to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and it should be noted that a study in peripheral blood samples showed that the presence of atypical lymphocytes showed a positive correlation with a better prognosis [61]. In conclusion, BAL is a procedure aimed at obtaining cells from the respiratory tract that can provide valuable and rapid information on the status of infections and interstitial lung diseases. This study has limitations since the observations were made on a sample of limited size, given the high risk of contagion of health workers and laboratory personnel in the collection period corresponding to the first wave. However, it is important to collect and describe as many cytopathological findings as possible, which can provide relevant information for future studies related to the different clinical courses, to finally verify how these pieces fit into the puzzle that represents the study of COVID-19 disease.

Statement of Ethics

This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Committee of University Hospital Fundación Alcorcón. The written informed consent was obtained from participants of this study.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Sources

The material resources used in this study come from the University Hospital Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

Author Contributions

Silvio Antonio Galeano Reyes and Patricia Dhimes Tejeda: cytological and statistical analysis and writing of the article. Bárbara Steen: performing the bronchoalveolar lavage technique. Hansely Keret Arcos Orozco and Paloma Ramos Pontón: statistical analysis and writing of the article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
  56 in total

Review 1.  Acute interstitial pneumonia.

Authors:  D Bouros; A C Nicholson; V Polychronopoulos; R M du Bois
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 16.671

2.  An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: the clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cellular analysis in interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Keith C Meyer; Ganesh Raghu; Robert P Baughman; Kevin K Brown; Ulrich Costabel; Roland M du Bois; Marjolein Drent; Patricia L Haslam; Dong Soon Kim; Sonoko Nagai; Paola Rottoli; Cesare Saltini; Moisés Selman; Charlie Strange; Brent Wood
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  False Negative Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Infection - Challenges and Implications.

Authors:  Steven Woloshin; Neeraj Patel; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Evidence for systematic autopsies in COVID-19 positive deceased: Case report of the first German investigated COVID-19 death.

Authors:  A Fitzek; J Sperhake; C Edler; A S Schröder; A Heinemann; F Heinrich; A Ron; H Mushumba; M Lütgehetmann; K Püschel
Journal:  Rechtsmedizin (Berl)       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 0.517

5.  Tissue-resident macrophages self-maintain locally throughout adult life with minimal contribution from circulating monocytes.

Authors:  Daigo Hashimoto; Andrew Chow; Clara Noizat; Pearline Teo; Mary Beth Beasley; Marylene Leboeuf; Christian D Becker; Peter See; Jeremy Price; Daniel Lucas; Melanie Greter; Arthur Mortha; Scott W Boyer; E Camilla Forsberg; Masato Tanaka; Nico van Rooijen; Adolfo García-Sastre; E Richard Stanley; Florent Ginhoux; Paul S Frenette; Miriam Merad
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 6.  Bronchoalveolar lavage as a diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Keith C Meyer
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.119

7.  Alveolar macrophage-derived type I interferons orchestrate innate immunity to RSV through recruitment of antiviral monocytes.

Authors:  Michelle Goritzka; Spyridon Makris; Fahima Kausar; Lydia R Durant; Catherine Pereira; Yutaro Kumagai; Fiona J Culley; Matthias Mack; Shizuo Akira; Cecilia Johansson
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Pathological study of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) through postmortem core biopsies.

Authors:  Sufang Tian; Yong Xiong; Huan Liu; Li Niu; Jianchun Guo; Meiyan Liao; Shu-Yuan Xiao
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Exuberant Plasmocytosis in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimen of the First Patient Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for SARS-CoV-2 in Europe.

Authors:  Marco Giani; Davide Seminati; Alberto Lucchini; Giuseppe Foti; Fabio Pagni
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Atypical lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with COVID-19 ARDS.

Authors:  Ronan M G Berg; Andreas Ronit; Sara B Rørvig; Ronni R Plovsing
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.