Literature DB >> 35731295

Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic methods in stapedotomy: a retrospective analysis.

Turgut Celik1, Omer Erdur2, Osman Gul3, Cigdem Firat Koca4, Bahar Colpan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of the present study was to compare the audiologic results, complications, and advantages/disadvantages of endoscopic and microscopic stapedotomy.
METHODS: Patients who experienced stapedotomy surgery in the Ear Nose Throat Clinic (ENT) of Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine between September 2011 and January 2018 were included in the study. The data of all patients were analyzed and divided into two groups. Those who underwent endoscopic stapedotomy were included in group I, and patients who underwent microscopic stapedotomy formed group II. Surgical findings, complications, and operation times were compared for the two groups. Air and bone conduction thresholds were evaluated at the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz pre- and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months, and the mean (± SD) air-bone gap value was recorded.
RESULTS: While the mean pre- and postoperative air-bone gaps were 34.38 ± 7.47 dB (23-53 dB) and 9.69 ± 4.43 dB (0-19 dB), respectively, in group I, 34.32 ± 7.57 dB (23-6 dB) and 9.62 ± 4.25 dB (2-23 dB) were the respective means calculated in group II (p < 0.05). When the mean postoperative air-bone gap was compared, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.774). The mean operative times for groups I and II were 57.22 ± 4.37 min and 63.70 ± 7.34 min, respectively (p < 0.001). The requirement for chorda tympani nerve manipulation and scutum curettage was significantly less in group I compared to group II (p = 0.003). Postoperative dysgeusia and postoperative pain were found to be higher in group II than group I, but they were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic stapedotomy displayed similar audiological results, shorter operation times, and similar complication rates, as well as being a less invasive surgery, compared to the microscopic approach.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic; Microscopic; Stapedotomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35731295     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07507-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  2 in total

1.  Endoscopic Anatomy of the Chorda Tympani: Systematic Dissection, Novel Anatomic Classification, and Surgical Implications.

Authors:  Giulia Molinari; Abraam Yacoub; Matteo Alicandri-Ciufelli; Daniele Monzani; Livio Presutti; Marco Caversaccio; Lukas Anschuetz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Stapedotomy versus stapedectomy.

Authors:  U Fisch
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1982-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.