Literature DB >> 3573109

Spinal instability and the log-rolling maneuver.

R A McGuire, S Neville, B A Green, C Watts.   

Abstract

Immobilization of the spine is of prime concern during transportation of trauma patients to prevent neurologic compromise. In an attempt to study certain techniques of prehospital thoracolumbar spine immobilization, we radiographically evaluated the motion of the thoracolumbar spine in a volunteer with a stable spine, a cadaver with an unstable thoracolumbar spine, and a patient with a T12-L1 fracture dislocation. Both the backboard and the Scoop stretcher offered adequate stabilization for thoracolumbar spine instability. The logroll maneuver presented the greatest possibility for movement of the spine at the unstable thoracolumbar segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3573109     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198705000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation.

Authors:  M D Luscombe; J L Williams
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Motion is reduced in the unstable spine with the use of mechanical devices for bed transfers.

Authors:  Calvin T Hu; Christian P Dipaola; Bryan P Conrad; Marybeth Horodyski; Gianluca Del Rossi; Glenn R Rechtine
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Traumatic hyperextension-distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine: a technical note on surgical positioning.

Authors:  Andrew S Moon; Carly A Cignetti; Jonathan A Isbell; Chong Weng; Sakthivel Rajan Rajaram Manoharan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Motion in the unstable thoracolumbar spine when spine boarding a prone patient.

Authors:  Bryan P Conrad; Diana L Marchese; Glenn R Rechtine; Marybeth Horodyski
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  A comparison of head movement during back boarding by motorized spine-board and log-roll techniques.

Authors:  Erik E Swartz; Jennifer Nowak; Chandra Shirley; Laura C Decoster
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Motion in the unstable cervical spine when transferring a patient positioned prone to a spine board.

Authors:  Bryan P Conrad; Diana L Marchese; Glenn R Rechtine; Mark Prasarn; Gianluca Del Rossi; Marybeth H Horodyski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Pre-hospital care management of a potential spinal cord injured patient: a systematic review of the literature and evidence-based guidelines.

Authors:  Henry Ahn; Jeffrey Singh; Avery Nathens; Russell D MacDonald; Andrew Travers; John Tallon; Michael G Fehlings; Albert Yee
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  The 6-plus-person lift transfer technique compared with other methods of spine boarding.

Authors:  Gianluca Del Rossi; Marybeth H Horodyski; Bryan P Conrad; Christian P Di Paola; Matthew J Di Paola; Glenn R Rechtine
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  A Comparison of Spine-Board Transfer Techniques and the Effect of Training on Performance.

Authors:  Gianluca Del Rossi; MaryBeth Horodyski; Michael E. Powers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Retrospective review of image quality of CT in polytrauma patients: comparison of patients scanned using a scoop stretcher and without a scoop stretcher.

Authors:  Sachin Modi; Rakesh Gadvi; David Yeo; Sandro Galea-Soler
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.