Huajun Qin1,2,3, Rasmus B Holländer1, Lukáš Flajšman1, Sebastiaan van Dijken1. 1. NanoSpin, Department of Applied Physics, Aalto University School of Science, P. O. Box 15100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland. 2. School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China. 3. Wuhan Institute of Quantum Technology, Wuhan 430206, China.
Abstract
Long-distance transport and control of spin waves through nanochannels is essential for integrated magnonic technology. Current strategies relying on the patterning of single-layer nano-waveguides suffer from a decline of the spin-wave decay length upon downscaling or require large magnetic bias field. Here, we introduce a new waveguiding structure based on low-damping continuous yttrium iron garnet (YIG) films. Rather than patterning the YIG film, we define nanoscopic spin-wave transporting channels within YIG by dipolar coupling to ferromagnetic metal nanostripes. The hybrid material structure offers long-distance transport of spin waves with a decay length of ∼20 μm in 160 nm wide waveguides over a broad frequency range at small bias field. We further evidence that spin waves can be redirected easily by stray-field-induced bends in continuous YIG films. The combination of low-loss spin-wave guiding and straightforward nanofabrication highlights a new approach toward the implementation of magnonic integrated circuits for spin-wave computing.
Long-distance transport and control of spin waves through nanochannels is essential for integrated magnonic technology. Current strategies relying on the patterning of single-layer nano-waveguides suffer from a decline of the spin-wave decay length upon downscaling or require large magnetic bias field. Here, we introduce a new waveguiding structure based on low-damping continuous yttrium iron garnet (YIG) films. Rather than patterning the YIG film, we define nanoscopic spin-wave transporting channels within YIG by dipolar coupling to ferromagnetic metal nanostripes. The hybrid material structure offers long-distance transport of spin waves with a decay length of ∼20 μm in 160 nm wide waveguides over a broad frequency range at small bias field. We further evidence that spin waves can be redirected easily by stray-field-induced bends in continuous YIG films. The combination of low-loss spin-wave guiding and straightforward nanofabrication highlights a new approach toward the implementation of magnonic integrated circuits for spin-wave computing.
Entities:
Keywords:
magnonic waveguide; magnonics; spin-wave transport; yttrium iron garnet
Magnonics based on the transfer
of angular momentum in the form of spin waves provides a promising
technology for wave-based information processing[1−5] and neuromorphic computing.[6,7] Several
signal processing devices utilizing the interference or nonlinear
dynamics of spin waves have already been realized.[8−13] Moreover, because spin-wave propagation does not produce ohmic losses,
it can be more energy efficient than charge-carrier transport in complementary
metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuits. A key challenge in realizing
a viable spin-wave technology is the connection of multiple computational
units into integrated magnonic circuits, which requires a scalable
materials platform for low-loss spin-wave transport. To be competitive,
the transporting solution should enable spin-wave transmission through
nanoscopic channels and allow signal redirection, interference, and
manipulation.The decay length (ld) of propagating
spin waves in magnetic materials is proportional to the product of
the group velocity (vg) and the spin-wave
relaxation time (τ). Because τ is inversely proportional
to the Gilbert damping parameter (α) and the frequency (f), ld ∝ vg/αf. Ferromagnetic metals can
provide high group velocity, but their damping parameter is often
large, with the exception of specific 3d transition
metal alloys[14,15] and Heusler compounds.[16] Waveguides made of ferromagnetic metals have
been studied extensively,[17−22] and because they are patterned easily, various waveguiding structures
have been proposed.[23−25] Moreover, metallic waveguides allow for the use of
electric currents to guide[8] or excite[26,27] spin waves. Insulating yttrium iron garnet (YIG), on the other hand,
offers ultralow Gilbert damping. Patterning of YIG films into nanoscopic
waveguides and directional couplers has been demonstrated recently,[28−31] paving the way toward low-loss magnonic devices. However, the patterning
of nanoscale YIG structures remains challenging because its damping
parameter easily deteriorates by defect formation during ion milling.
Apart from extrinsic effects caused by nanopatterning, there are also
fundamental challenges in transporting spin waves along laterally
confined nanostructures. For waveguides wherein the magnetization
aligns along the transporting direction, the decay length drops quickly
below a width of 1 μm because of a declining group velocity,[28] while waveguides with transverse magnetization
require an ever-increasing magnetic bias field upon downscaling. For
technologically relevant waveguides with a width below 200 nm, the
spin-wave decay length is typically limited to 1–3 μm
for ferromagnetic metals and YIG.[28,32] The largest
decay length in ultranarrow waveguides is 8 μm, which was measured
recently on YIG in a narrow frequency range and at a large bias field
of 270 mT.[31] Magnetic domain walls, which
have been proposed as nanochannels for spin-wave guiding, also restrict
the propagation distance of spin waves to a few micrometers.[33−36]Here, we experimentally demonstrate a new low-loss magnonic
waveguiding
structure. In our approach, spin waves propagate in a continuous YIG
film along nanoscopic channels that are defined by dipolar coupling
to a ferromagnetic metal nanostripe patterned on top. By taking advantage
of ultralow damping in YIG and avoiding any nanopatterning of this
oxide material, we demonstrate a spin-wave decay length of ∼20
μm in 160–400 nm wide waveguiding structures at a modest
bias field of 25 mT. Additionally, our hybrid materials platform enables
low-loss spin-wave transport through curved nanowaveguides.Figure a illustrates
the hybrid waveguiding structure and the experimental configuration
for the imaging of spin-wave transport. The waveguide consists of
a continuous YIG film with a CoFeB nanostripe patterned on top. To
restrict the interaction between YIG and CoFeB solely to dipolar coupling
fields, we use a 6 nm thick TaO spacer
to separate the two magnetic materials. The interlayer coupling strength
is controlled by an external magnetic field, which is applied along
the y axis, perpendicular to the CoFeB nanostripe
(Figure b). In this
configuration, a field of ∼1 mT saturates the magnetization
of the YIG film perpendicular to the waveguide, thus establishing
spin-wave transport in the Damon–Eshbach geometry. Moreover,
coherent rotation of the CoFeB magnetization away from the stripe
axis in an external field tunes the spin-wave properties through a
controlled variation of the dipolar coupling strength. In our experiments,
the YIG film is 66 nm thick and its Gilbert damping parameter is 5
× 10–4 (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information (SI)). The thickness of the CoFeB
nanostripe is 24 nm, and we vary the stripe width from 400 nm down
to 160 nm. Spin waves are excited by a 1 μm wide microwave antenna,
and their propagation is imaged using super-Nyquist sampling magneto-optical
Kerr effect (SNS-MOKE) microscopy (see Methods in the SI).
Figure 1
Long-distance spin-wave transport in magnonic nano-waveguides.
(a) Schematic of the experiment. The waveguide consists of a continuous
YIG film with a CoFeB nanostripe patterned on top. Dipolar coupling
between the two magnetic materials induces a one-dimensional nanochannel
with reduced effective magnetic field in the YIG film, along which
spin waves propagate with low damping below the FMR frequency of the
uncovered YIG film. Propagating spin waves are excited by a microwave
antenna and imaged by SNS-MOKE microscopy. An external magnetic field
(Hext) is applied perpendicular to the
waveguide. (b) Scanning electron microscopy image of a waveguiding
structure. The red arrow indicates the magnetization angle, φM, in the CoFeB nanostripe with respect to the x axis. (c and d) SNS-MOKE microscopy maps and line profiles of propagating
spin waves in a 260 nm wide waveguide at 1.84 and 2.88 GHz. The external
magnetic field is −25 mT. The dashed lines indicate the CoFeB
stripe. The orange lines depict fits to the experimental data. (e)
Wave-vector dependence of the spin-wave decay length in hybrid waveguides
of different width and in the uncovered YIG film. The bias field is
−25 mT.
Long-distance spin-wave transport in magnonic nano-waveguides.
(a) Schematic of the experiment. The waveguide consists of a continuous
YIG film with a CoFeB nanostripe patterned on top. Dipolar coupling
between the two magnetic materials induces a one-dimensional nanochannel
with reduced effective magnetic field in the YIG film, along which
spin waves propagate with low damping below the FMR frequency of the
uncovered YIG film. Propagating spin waves are excited by a microwave
antenna and imaged by SNS-MOKE microscopy. An external magnetic field
(Hext) is applied perpendicular to the
waveguide. (b) Scanning electron microscopy image of a waveguiding
structure. The red arrow indicates the magnetization angle, φM, in the CoFeB nanostripe with respect to the x axis. (c and d) SNS-MOKE microscopy maps and line profiles of propagating
spin waves in a 260 nm wide waveguide at 1.84 and 2.88 GHz. The external
magnetic field is −25 mT. The dashed lines indicate the CoFeB
stripe. The orange lines depict fits to the experimental data. (e)
Wave-vector dependence of the spin-wave decay length in hybrid waveguides
of different width and in the uncovered YIG film. The bias field is
−25 mT.An example of spin-wave transport
along a 260 nm wide waveguiding
structure is shown in Figure c. At an excitation frequency of 1.84 GHz and −25 mT
magnetic field, spin waves only propagate along a narrow channel that
is defined by the CoFeB nanostripe. Localization of spin-wave transport
in the YIG film breaks down at higher frequency (Figure d), where spin waves are excited
across the entire length of the microwave antenna. When guided along
a narrow channel, spin waves propagate over a long distance that is
only reduced by a factor of 1–2.5 compared to nonlocalized
transport in the uncovered YIG film (Figure e, the variation of ld with frequency is depicted in Figure S2 of the SI). Fitting the spin-wave amplitude in the waveguide
to C exp(− |x|/ld) sin(2πx/λ
+ ϕ), we extract spin-wave decay length ld ≈ 20 μm, which is larger than the decay lengths
measured on patterned single-layer nanoscopic waveguides.[28,31,32] Moreover, we find that the propagation
of spin waves does not vary strongly with wave vector, frequency,
or channel width, as similar transport characteristics are measured
on 400 nm wide and 160 nm wide waveguides (see Figure e; SNS-MOKE microscopy measurements underlying
the data are shown in Figures S3 and S4 of the SI). The nearly constant spin-wave decay length in the waveguide
is explained by the linear dispersion of spin waves in the CoFeB/YIG
bilayer for this range of wave vectors, as we will discuss next.To analyze spin-wave transport in the waveguides, we derive the
dispersion relation from SNS-MOKE measurements. Figure a shows the experimental data together with
results from micromagnetic simulations and theoretical calculations
(see Methods in the SI) for −25
mT external magnetic field. Because dynamic dipolar coupling between
the YIG film and CoFeB stripe depends on the chirality of propagating
spin waves,[13,37−40] transport along the waveguide
is nonreciprocal. Localization of spin-wave transmission is enabled
by a frequency downshift of the dispersion relation in the CoFeB/YIG
bilayer region compared to that of the uncovered YIG film due to a
local lowering of the effective magnetic field. Profiles of the effective
field in the YIG film and CoFeB stripe are depicted in Figure b. For an external field of
−25 mT, the magnetization in the CoFeB stripe is rotated by
φM = 14° with respect to the x axis (Figure c).
The stray field that this rotation produces reduces the effective
field at the center of the waveguiding channel in the YIG film to
just 3 mT. Spin waves propagate exclusively along this magnetically
induced nanochannel up to the FMR frequency of the uncovered YIG film
(2.25 GHz in Figure a). While any ferromagnetic stripe on top of YIG would downshift
the spin-wave dispersion relation, the effect is particularly strong
when its saturation magnetization is large. To ensure waveguiding
over a broad frequency range, we selected CoFeB in our experiments.
Figure 2
Spin-wave
dispersion and confinement. (a) Measured (empty symbols),
calculated (lines), and simulated (solid squares) spin-wave dispersion
relations for a 66 nm thick bare YIG film and a 260 nm wide waveguide.
The spin-wave group velocity shown in the inset is derived from the
experimental data. (b and c) Simulated effective field and magnetization
angle in the YIG film and a 260 nm wide CoFeB stripe. The magnetization
angle is defined with respect to the x axis. The
vertical dashed lines indicate the position of the CoFeB nanostripe.
(d–f) Measured and simulated spin-wave maps for a 260 nm wide
waveguide at 1.84 GHz. The micromagnetic simulations in panels e and
f depict the spin-wave mode in YIG and CoFeB, respectively. All data
are obtained for a magnetic field of −25 mT. Similar data sets
for 160 nm wide and 400 nm wide waveguiding structures are shown in Figures S7 and S8 of the SI.
Spin-wave
dispersion and confinement. (a) Measured (empty symbols),
calculated (lines), and simulated (solid squares) spin-wave dispersion
relations for a 66 nm thick bare YIG film and a 260 nm wide waveguide.
The spin-wave group velocity shown in the inset is derived from the
experimental data. (b and c) Simulated effective field and magnetization
angle in the YIG film and a 260 nm wide CoFeB stripe. The magnetization
angle is defined with respect to the x axis. The
vertical dashed lines indicate the position of the CoFeB nanostripe.
(d–f) Measured and simulated spin-wave maps for a 260 nm wide
waveguide at 1.84 GHz. The micromagnetic simulations in panels e and
f depict the spin-wave mode in YIG and CoFeB, respectively. All data
are obtained for a magnetic field of −25 mT. Similar data sets
for 160 nm wide and 400 nm wide waveguiding structures are shown in Figures S7 and S8 of the SI.The spin-wave group velocity in the CoFeB/YIG waveguide is approximately
constant in the measurement range, which contrasts with the group
velocity in the uncovered YIG film (inset in Figure a). Considering ld ∝ vg/αf, the following picture emerges; the group velocity of the CoFeB/YIG
waveguiding structure is smaller than that of the uncovered YIG film
at small wave vector. Together with stronger damping in CoFeB/YIG,
this causes spin waves with k = 1 rad/μm to
decay ∼2.5 times faster in the nanoscopic waveguide (Figure e). From the experimental
data (decay length, group velocity, and frequency), we estimate αWG ≈ 2.5αYIG. With increasing wave
vector, the group velocitity in YIG drops while that of the CoFeB/YIG
waveguide remains approximately constant. The group velocity of the
waveguide thus compensates for its stronger damping, resulting in
similar spin-wave decay lengths at k = 5 rad/μm
(Figure e). This comparison
illustrates that the propagation of spin waves along the hybrid waveguide
can be optimized through engineering of the bilayer dispersion relation.
Interestingly, micromagnetic simulations indicate that the decay length
in the waveguiding structure does not depend on the damping parameter
of the ferromagnetic nanostripe (Figure S5 in the SI). In contrast, variation of the YIG damping parameter
sensitively tunes the spin-wave propagation distance along the magnetically
induced nanochannel (Figure S6 in the SI).
These results demonstrate that long-distance transport of confined
spin waves is determined fully by the low-damping parameter of the
continuous YIG film and that the material of the ferromagnetic nanostripe
can be chosen freely.Panels d–f of Figure show the measured spin-wave
profile at 1.84 GHz and corresponding
layer-resolved simulations for the YIG film and 260 nm wide CoFeB
nanostripe. Similar data sets for 160 nm wide and 400 nm wide waveguiding
structures are summarized in Figures S7 and S8 of the SI. The data confirm nonreciprocal spin-wave transport as
the wavelength is much shorter for −x than
+x. The short-wavelength mode is not seen in the
experiments because of the limited excitation range of the microwave
antenna and the imaging resolution of SNS-MOKE microscopy. The propagating
spin waves in YIG and CoFeB are out-of-phase, and the wave vector
along the y axis is quantized in both layers. From
the simulations, we conclude that spin-wave transport in the continuous
YIG film is highly localized. While the wave profile along the y axis in YIG is a bit broader than the width of the CoFeB
nanostripe, the broadening is limited to about 15%.The dispersion
of spin waves in the hybrid waveguiding structure
varies with the strength of interlayer dipolar coupling, which depends
sensitively on the direction of magnetization in the CoFeB nanostripe.
Consequently, various spin-wave properties change when the external
magnetic field increases. To quantify this effect, we measured the
spin-wave dispersion (Figure a) and extracted the group velocity (Figure b) at different magnetic fields. The dispersion
curve of the CoFeB/YIG waveguide and the uncovered YIG film at −75
mT are compared in Figure c. The data demonstrate that an increase of the external field
enhances the frequency of spin waves in the waveguide, but that their
group velocity remains approximately constant. The field-induced shift
of the spin-wave dispersion relation is smaller for the waveguiding
structure than for the YIG film. This difference is explained by coherent
magnetization rotation in CoFeB, which enlarges the demagnetization
field in CoFeB and the stray field in YIG, thereby partially compensating
for the increasing external field (Figure d,e). The growing frequency gap between the
two dispersion curves at large external field facilitates localization
of short-wavelength spin waves up to high frequency (Figure f). For instance, localized
spin waves with wavelengths down to 130 nm do propagate along the
CoFeB/YIG waveguiding structure at −75 mT. Another notable
field effect is the growing asymmetry of the spin-wave dispersion
relation (see Figures a and 3c). The frequency nonreciprocity of
the waveguiding structure increases with external magnetic field,
as illustrated in Figure g for a wave vector of 7 rad/μm.
Figure 3
Magnetic field tuning
of spin-wave properties. (a) Measured spin-wave
dispersion relations for a 260 nm wide waveguide at different external
magnetic fields. (b) Spin-wave group velocity derived from panel a.
(c) Measured (empty symbols), calculated (lines), and simulated (solid
squares) spin-wave dispersion relations for a 66 nm thick bare YIG
film and a 260 nm wide waveguide at −75 mT magnetic field.
(d and e) Magnetic field dependence of the effective field and magnetization
angle in the YIG film underneath the CoFeB stripe and in the CoFeB
stripe. (f) Wavelength of spin waves propagating along a 260 nm wide
waveguide at −25 and −75 mT. Arrows mark the FMR frequencies
of the uncovered YIG film, i.e., the frequency above which spin-wave
transport is no longer localized. (g) Frequency nonreciprocity of
spin waves with |k| = 7 rad/μm as a function
of external magnetic field.
Magnetic field tuning
of spin-wave properties. (a) Measured spin-wave
dispersion relations for a 260 nm wide waveguide at different external
magnetic fields. (b) Spin-wave group velocity derived from panel a.
(c) Measured (empty symbols), calculated (lines), and simulated (solid
squares) spin-wave dispersion relations for a 66 nm thick bare YIG
film and a 260 nm wide waveguide at −75 mT magnetic field.
(d and e) Magnetic field dependence of the effective field and magnetization
angle in the YIG film underneath the CoFeB stripe and in the CoFeB
stripe. (f) Wavelength of spin waves propagating along a 260 nm wide
waveguide at −25 and −75 mT. Arrows mark the FMR frequencies
of the uncovered YIG film, i.e., the frequency above which spin-wave
transport is no longer localized. (g) Frequency nonreciprocity of
spin waves with |k| = 7 rad/μm as a function
of external magnetic field.Magnonic circuits require low-loss transmission of spin waves in
curved waveguides. Our bilayer structure allows the redirection of
spin-wave transport in a continuous YIG film. As an example, we image
the propagation of spin waves through waveguiding structures wherein
260 nm wide and 160 nm wide CoFeB nanostripes bend by 17° (Figure ). In the tilted
part of the waveguides, the wavelength of spin waves converts either
up or down, depending on the direction of the bend, because of changes
in the effective magnetic field (Figure S9 in the SI). Transport through the curve, however, hardly affects
the transmission loss, as illustrated by the signal intensity measured
on waveguiding structures with and without bend (blue data points
in Figure g). Curved
waveguides are an important building block of spin-wave interference
devices.[1−5] In Figure c,f, we
image wave transport in narrow Y-shaped waveguides. In this configuration,
constructive interference would enhance the spin-wave intensity after
the two legs combine into one. We, however, measure a smaller spin-wave
intensity in Y-shaped structures than in single waveguides with a
bend (compare orange and blue data points in Figure g), signifying nonconstructive spin-wave
interference. This effect is explained by slightly different effective
magnetic fields in the two bends of the Y-shaped waveguide (Figure S9 in the SI). Tuning of the spin-wave
interference condition is possible through a variation of the field
strength or orientation, or through an optimization of the bend angles.
Figure 4
Spin-wave
transport in curved nanowaveguides. (a–f) Comparison
of spin-wave transport along straight, curved, and Y-shaped waveguides
with a width of (a–c) 260 nm and (d–f) 160 nm. The angle
of the curve is 17°, and the external magnetic field is −25
mT. (g) Ratio of the spin-wave amplitude after 9 μm transport
along straight and curved waveguides (blue symbols). The orange data
show the same ratio for Y-shaped waveguides.
Spin-wave
transport in curved nanowaveguides. (a–f) Comparison
of spin-wave transport along straight, curved, and Y-shaped waveguides
with a width of (a–c) 260 nm and (d–f) 160 nm. The angle
of the curve is 17°, and the external magnetic field is −25
mT. (g) Ratio of the spin-wave amplitude after 9 μm transport
along straight and curved waveguides (blue symbols). The orange data
show the same ratio for Y-shaped waveguides.Nanoscopic magnonic waveguides combining low-loss transport and
straightforward nanofabrication are of great importance for the realization
of spin-wave logic gates and unconventional magnonic computing devices.[41] Fast nondissipative logic operations require
the use of short-wavelength spin waves with high group velocity, magnonic
nanostructures, and low-loss spin-wave transport. Bilayer waveguides
made of a low-damping continuous YIG film and ferromagnetic metal
nanostripes, as introduced here, offer many attractive properties.
First, by avoiding patterning of the YIG film, spin-wave scattering
on milling-induced defects is avoided. Second, the magnetization of
the YIG film saturates perpendicular to the waveguiding structure
in an ∼1 mT field. Because a small rotation of the CoFeB magnetization
away from the nanostripe axis already localizes the transport of spin
waves in the YIG film, only a modest bias field is needed. Third,
the spin-wave decay length of the hybrid waveguiding structure is
large compared to fully patterned nanoscopic waveguides. While dipolar
coupling between CoFeB and YIG enhances the effective damping, this
effect is compensated for, in part, by a different dependence of the
group velocity on the wave vector. Our experiments demonstrate that
the spin-wave decay length in a 160 nm waveguide is identical to the
decay length of the low-damping continuous YIG film at k = 5 rad/μm (Figure e), which is an unprecedented result. Moreover, we find that
the propagation distance of spin waves does depend on the damping
parameter of the continuous YIG film, but not on the damping in the
ferromagnetic nanostripe. Fourth, the hybrid waveguiding structure
offers tunable frequency nonreciprocity, which could be used to isolate
circuit components. Fifth, spin waves are transported efficiently
through bends in the bilayer waveguide.Besides these promising
features, the hybrid waveguiding structure
has two limitations: The spin-wave signal in the continuous YIG film
is not fully confined to the width of the CoFeB nanostripe and localized
spin-wave transport breaks down at the FMR frequency of the uncovered
YIG film. Using experimental parameters in micromagnetic simulations,
we estimate that the spin-wave signal in YIG is confined to about
400, 300, and 300 nm for the 400, 260, and 160 nm wide waveguides
(Figure e and Figures S7 and S8 in the SI). We note, however,
that these results are obtained for a 66 nm thick YIG film and a 24
nm thick CoFeB nanostripe. The confinement of spin waves improves
considerably in thinner YIG films. For instance, micromagnetic simulations
on a 160 nm wide waveguide comprising a 20 nm thick YIG film and a
15 nm thick CoFeB nanostripe indicate full confinement of propagating
spin waves to a 160 nm wide channel in YIG (Figure S10 in the SI).Spin-wave transport is only localized
in YIG between the FMR frequencies
of the bilayer structure and the uncovered YIG film. This restricts
the wavelength of propagating spin waves. Yet, short wavelengths can
still be attained. Our waveguiding structure supports the transport
of confined spin waves with wavelengths down to 330 nm at a magnetic
bias field of −25 mT and wavelengths down to 130 nm at −75
mT (Figure f), which
is well into the dipolar exchange coupling regime. Waves with shorter
wavelengths can be confined by increasing the magnetic field further
or by modifying the bilayer dispersion curve through structural or
material changes.Finally, we note that hybrid low-loss waveguiding
structures could
also be realized by considering other magnetic coupling mechanisms.
For the 66 nm thick YIG film in our experiments, dipolar coupling
is most effective. Direct exchange at the CoFeB/YIG interface of structures
without spacer, for instance, would only have a minor effect on the
confinement of propagating spin waves (see Figure S11 in the SI). For thinner films, antiferromagnetic coupling
effects that lower the effective field in YIG, such as RKKY coupling,
may become attractive.In summary, we demonstrated a low-loss
hybrid materials platform
for long-distance transport of spin waves along nanoscopic channels.
Combining continuous YIG films with patterned ferromagnetic metal
nanostripes offers straightforward fabrication and great flexibility
in the design of desirable spin-wave properties, including long decay
lengths, nonreciprocity, and efficient guiding through bends. Our
work provides a new strategy for the implementation of low-loss magnonic
devices and integrated circuits without YIG nanopatterning.
Authors: Volker Sluka; Tobias Schneider; Rodolfo A Gallardo; Attila Kákay; Markus Weigand; Tobias Warnatz; Roland Mattheis; Alejandro Roldán-Molina; Pedro Landeros; Vasil Tiberkevich; Andrei Slavin; Gisela Schütz; Artur Erbe; Alina Deac; Jürgen Lindner; Jörg Raabe; Jürgen Fassbender; Sebastian Wintz Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Giacomo Talmelli; Thibaut Devolder; Nick Träger; Johannes Förster; Sebastian Wintz; Markus Weigand; Hermann Stoll; Marc Heyns; Gisela Schütz; Iuliana P Radu; Joachim Gräfe; Florin Ciubotaru; Christoph Adelmann Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: S Urazhdin; V E Demidov; H Ulrichs; T Kendziorczyk; T Kuhn; J Leuthold; G Wilde; S O Demokritov Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2014-05-11 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: K Vogt; F Y Fradin; J E Pearson; T Sebastian; S D Bader; B Hillebrands; A Hoffmann; H Schultheiss Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: A V Sadovnikov; A A Grachev; S E Sheshukova; Yu P Sharaevskii; A A Serdobintsev; D M Mitin; S A Nikitov Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Luis Flacke; Lukas Liensberger; Matthias Althammer; Hans Huebl; Stephan Geprägs; Katrin Schultheiss; Aleksandr Buzdakov; Tobias Hula; Helmut Schultheiss; Eric R J Edwards; Hans T Nembach; Justin M Shaw; Rudolf Gross; Mathias Weiler Journal: Appl Phys Lett Date: 2019 Impact factor: 3.791