Literature DB >> 35729405

Primary closure of the midline abdominal wall defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: analysis of risk factors for failure and outcomes at 5 years follow-up.

Julio Gómez-Menchero1,2, Andrea Balla3, Ana Fernández Carazo4, Salvador Morales-Conde2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this prospective study is to report bulging and recurrence rates and to analyze the risk factors responsible for failure, after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) with primary closure of defect (PCD) using a running suture and intraperitoneal mesh placement, at 5-year follow-up. The secondary endpoint is to evaluate 30-day postoperative complications, seroma, and pain.
METHODS: PCD failure was defined as the presence of postoperative bulging and/or recurrence. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). After surgery, fifty-eight patients underwent clinical examination and computed tomography scan to diagnose bulging, recurrence, and seroma (classified according to the Morales-Conde classification).
RESULTS: At 60 months follow-up, recurrence was observed in five patients (8.6%), while bulging, not needing a surgical treatment, occurred in fifteen patients (25.9%). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the only risk factor responsible for both outcomes together, bulging and recurrences (p = 0.029), while other considered risk factors as gender, age, body mass index, diabetes, smoke habits, primary or incisional hernia and the ratio defect width/transverse abdominal axis did not achieve the statistically significance. Clinical seroma was diagnosed at one month in eight patients (13.8%). Seromas were observed at one year of follow-up. During the follow-up, pain reduction occurred.
CONCLUSION: LVHR has evolved toward more anatomical concepts, with the current trend being the abdominal wall anatomical reconstruction to improve its functionality, reducing seroma rates. Based on results obtained, PCD is a reliable technique with excellent recurrence rate at 5 years follow-up, even when the defect closure may generate tension at the midline. On the other hand, this tension could be related with high bulging rate at long-term, particular in case of patients with COPD.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulging; Intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus; Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR); Primary closure of defect (PCD); Recurrence

Year:  2022        PMID: 35729405     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09374-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  37 in total

1.  The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernias: preliminary results.

Authors:  E Chelala; F Gaede; V Douillez; M Dessily; J L Alle
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair without sutures--double crown technique: our experience after 140 cases with a mean follow-up of 40 months.

Authors:  Salvador Morales-Conde; Hisnar Cadet; Auxiliadora Cano; Manuel Bustos; Juan Martín; Salvador Morales-Mendez
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

3.  Seroma after laparoscopic repair of hernia with PTFE patch: is it really a complication?

Authors:  S Susmallian; G Gewurtz; T Ezri; I Charuzi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.

Authors:  R Bittner; K Bain; V K Bansal; F Berrevoet; J Bingener-Casey; D Chen; J Chen; P Chowbey; U A Dietz; A de Beaux; G Ferzli; R Fortelny; H Hoffmann; M Iskander; Z Ji; L N Jorgensen; R Khullar; P Kirchhoff; F Köckerling; J Kukleta; K LeBlanc; J Li; D Lomanto; F Mayer; V Meytes; M Misra; S Morales-Conde; H Niebuhr; D Radvinsky; B Ramshaw; D Ranev; W Reinpold; A Sharma; R Schrittwieser; B Stechemesser; B Sutedja; J Tang; J Warren; D Weyhe; A Wiegering; G Woeste; Q Yao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings.

Authors:  K A LeBlanc; W V Booth
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-02

Review 6.  Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?

Authors:  S Van Hoef; T Tollens
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Katsuhito Suwa; Tomoyoshi Okamoto; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure versus bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study.

Authors:  John Emil Wennergren; Erik P Askenasy; Jacob A Greenberg; Julie Holihan; Jerrod Keith; Mike K Liang; Robert G Martindale; Skylar Trott; Margaret Plymale; John Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Outcomes of bridging versus mesh augmentation in laparoscopic repair of small and medium midline ventral hernias.

Authors:  Kryspin Mitura; Marzena Skolimowska-Rzewuska; Karolina Garnysz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias.

Authors:  F E Muysoms; M Miserez; F Berrevoet; G Campanelli; G G Champault; E Chelala; U A Dietz; H H Eker; I El Nakadi; P Hauters; M Hidalgo Pascual; A Hoeferlin; U Klinge; A Montgomery; R K J Simmermacher; M P Simons; M Smietański; C Sommeling; T Tollens; T Vierendeels; A Kingsnorth
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.