Literature DB >> 35729328

The role of preoperative prostatic shape in the recovery of urinary continence after robotic radical prostatectomy: a single cohort analysis.

V Iacovelli1, M Carilli2, M Sandri3, V Forte4, C Cipriani2, R Bertolo2, M Vittori2, F Petta2, F Maiorino2, M Signoretti2, M Antonucci2, A U Cavallo4, M Sperandio4, E Finazzi Agrò5, P Bove2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To explore the role of preoperative MRI prostate shape in urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
METHODS: Patients were stratified into four groups based on the mpMRI prostatic apex shape: Group A (prostatic apex overlapping the membranous urethra anteriorly and posteriorly), Group B and C (overlap of the prostatic apex of the anterior or posterior membranous urethra, respectively) and Group D (no overlap). Preoperative variables and intraoperative data were compared. Continence recovery was defined as no pad/day or 1 safety pad/day by an outpatient evaluation performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RARP.
RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent RARP were classified as belonging to Group A (n = 30), Group B (n = 16), Group C (n = 14), and Group D (n = 40). Group D showed a significantly more favorable urinary continence recovery after RARP respect to all the other shapes presenting any forms of overlapping (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1, p = 0.007). The estimated HR remained substantially unchanged after adjusting by age, body mass index, CCI, prostate volume, and bladder neck sparing (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2, p = 0.016). The continence recovery median time was 9 months for Group A + B + C (95% CI 5-11) and 4 months for Group D (95% CI 2-6) (p = 0.023).
CONCLUSION: Shape D showed a better continence recovery when compared to other shapes presenting any kind of overlapping of the prostatic apex over the membranous urethra.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35729328     DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00563-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  2 in total

Review 1.  How can we prevent postprostatectomy urinary incontinence by patient selection, and by preoperative, peroperative, and postoperative measures? International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society 2018.

Authors:  Marcio A Averbeck; Tom Marcelissen; Ralf Anding; Mohammad S Rahnama'i; Arun Sahai; Andrea Tubaro
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joel E Rosenberg; Jae Hung Jung; Zach Edgerton; Hunju Lee; Solam Lee; Caitlin J Bakker; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.