| Literature DB >> 35729238 |
Huaming Du1,2, Xinwei Lu3.
Abstract
Spatial distributions and sources of some commonly concerned heavy metal(loid)s (HMs, As, Ba, Cr, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, Mn, Zn, and V) in topsoil of Mianyang city, a typical medium-sized emerging industrial city in Southwest China, were determined to explore the influences of anthropogenic activities on the urban environment. The contents of the 10 HMs in 101 topsoil samples were analyzed using an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer, and their sources were analyzed by positive matrix factorization and statistical analysis. The spatial distributions of the HMs and the source contributions were mapped using GIS technology. The results showed that the mean contents of Ba, Cr, Cu, and Zn in the topsoil were significantly higher than their background values. Industrial activities resulted in high contents of Ba, Zn, Cu, and Cr. As, Co, Ni, and V that primarily came from natural sources; Pb, Cr, Cu, and Zn were chiefly derived from a mixed source of industry and traffic; and Ba and Mn primarily originated from industrial sources. Natural sources, mixed sources, and industrial sources contributed 32.6%, 34.4%, and 33.0% of the total HM contents, respectively. Industrial sources and mixed sources of industry and traffic were the main anthropogenic sources of HMs in the urban topsoil and should be the focus of pollution control.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35729238 PMCID: PMC9213469 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14695-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Research region and sampling locations in Miangyang, China [the figure was generated by Huaming Du using the ArcGIS 10.3 (https://developers.arcgis.com/)].
Contents of HMs and background values in topsoil of Sichuan (mg kg−1).
| Element | As | Ba | Co | Cr | Cu | Mn | Ni | Pb | Zn | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 11.2 | 586.8 | 20.2 | 124.7 | 37.8 | 661.5 | 34.9 | 28.4 | 102.2 | 96.6 |
| Minimum | 3.0 | 2926.0 | 7.4 | 72.0 | 16.7 | 71.6 | 16.7 | 16.6 | 40.0 | 42.8 |
| Maximum | 30.0 | 873.4 | 93.9 | 252.0 | 369.9 | 1356.9 | 49.6 | 60.0 | 320.2 | 155.5 |
| Median | 10.1 | 572.5 | 17.1 | 119.3 | 33.2 | 663.3 | 35.4 | 27.0 | 87.4 | 97.4 |
| Standard deviation | 4.2 | 110.9 | 12.5 | 28.9 | 34.6 | 168.6 | 5.7 | 7.1 | 39.0 | 15.8 |
| Coefficient of variation (%) | 37.6 | 18.9 | 62.0 | 23.2 | 91.6 | 25.5 | 16.2 | 24.9 | 38.2 | 16.4 |
| Kurtosis | 4.5 | − 0.1 | 23.3 | 3.1 | 85.1 | 5.1 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 15.5 | 2.9 |
| Skewness | 1.7 | 0.1 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 8.9 | 0.8 | − 0.8 | 1.9 | 3.4 | − 0.2 |
| Reference value[ | 10.4 | 474.0 | 17.6 | 79.0 | 31.1 | 657.0 | 32.6 | 30.9 | 86.5 | 96.0 |
Comparative analysis of HM contents (mg kg−1) in the topsoil of diverse cities. NA means not available.
| City | As | Ba | Co | Cr | Cu | Mn | Ni | Pb | Zn | V | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karamay | 20.65 | NA | NA | 117.86 | 64.22 | NA | 42.7 | 32.56 | 123.32 | NA | Wang et al.[ |
| Yinchuan | NA | NA | 37.2 | 109.1 | 16.8 | NA | 25.3 | 25.0 | 26.0 | 59.9 | Zhang et al.[ |
| Rawalpindi | NA | NA | 33.4 | 295.3 | 335.7 | 633.7 | 235.7 | 1572.4 | 542.5 | NA | Shehzad et al.[ |
| Klang | NA | NA | 1.20 | 15.58 | 29.35 | NA | NA | 52.73 | 275.75 | NA | Yuswir et al.[ |
| Beni Mellal | 3.9 | NA | NA | 64.4 | 46.8 | 1097.9 | 20.2 | 95.1 | 228.6 | NA | Odewande and Abimbola[ |
| Ancona | NA | NA | 18.1 | 45.6 | 63.9 | NA | 50.9 | 97.4 | 199.1 | NA | Serrani et al.[ |
| Changchun | 12.5 | NA | NA | 66.0 | 29.4 | 880.0 | NA | 35.4 | 90.0 | NA | Yang et al.[ |
| Guiyang | 16.8 | NA | NA | NA | 66.1 | NA | 38.9 | 79.5 | 243.0 | NA | Li et al.[ |
| Yan’an | NA | NA | NA | 66.22 | 23.65 | NA | 37.56 | 20.18 | 71.20 | NA | Hu et al.[ |
| Xi’an | NA | NA | 19.3 | 81.1 | 54.3 | 671.5 | 34.5 | 59.7 | 186.2 | 85.2 | Chen et al.[ |
| Beijing | NA | NA | NA | 61.0 | 31.7 | NA | 24.0 | 23.3 | 92.9 | NA | Wang et al.[ |
| Nanjing | 9.94 | NA | NA | 74.54 | 37.25 | NA | 31.89 | 32.52 | 109.15 | NA | Wang et al.[ |
| Mianyang | 11.2 | 586.8 | 20.2 | 124.7 | 37.8 | 661.5 | 34.9 | 28.4 | 102.2 | 96.6 | This work |
Figure 2Spatial distribution of HM contents in the topsoil of Mianyang [the figure was generated by Huaming Du using the ArcGIS 10.3 (https://developers.arcgis.com/)].
Spearman correlation matrix of HMs in the urban topsoil of Mianyang. **Correlation is significant at P < 0.01 (2-tailed). *Correlation is significant at P < 0.05 (2-tailed).
| As | Ba | Co | Cr | Cu | Mn | Ni | Pb | Zn | V | Al | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | 1 | ||||||||||
| Ba | − 0.261** | 1 | |||||||||
| Co | 0.490** | − 0.124 | 1 | ||||||||
| Cr | − 0.235* | 0.249* | − 0.315** | 1 | |||||||
| Cu | 0.076 | 0.531** | 0.08 | 0.378** | 1 | ||||||
| Mn | 0.111 | 0.457** | 0.13 | − 0.14 | 0.275** | 1 | |||||
| Ni | 0.467** | 0.304** | 0.346** | − 0.154 | 0.404** | 0.231* | 1 | ||||
| Pb | 0.512** | − 0.023 | 0.356** | 0.171 | 0.460** | 0.182 | 0.198* | 1 | |||
| Zn | − 0.172 | 0.663** | − 0.041 | 0.378** | 0.754** | 0.194 | 0.306** | 0.323** | 1 | ||
| V | 0.538** | 0.303** | 0.371** | − 0.144 | 0.349** | 0.165 | 0.871** | 0.241* | 0.229* | 1 | |
| Al | 0.331** | 0.126 | 0.267** | − 0.088 | 0.163 | 0.087 | 0.473** | 0.105 | 0.07 | 0.501** | 1 |
| Fe | 0.323** | 0.081 | 0.296** | − 0.14 | 0.144 | 0.061 | 0.486** | 0.03 | 0.063 | 0.485** | 0.923** |
Rotated component matrix for HM data in the topsoil of Mianyang.
| Element | Principal Component | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| As | 0.100 | − 0.419 | |
| Ba | 0.049 | 0.316 | |
| Co | − 0.144 | 0.027 | |
| Cr | − 0.448 | − 0.106 | |
| Cu | 0.130 | 0.180 | |
| Mn | 0.022 | − 0.012 | |
| Ni | 0.261 | 0.213 | |
| Pb | 0.402 | − 0.061 | |
| Zn | 0.104 | 0.394 | |
| V | 0.251 | 0.107 | |
| Eigenvalue | 3.454 | 2.302 | 1.423 |
| % of variance | 27.69 | 25.34 | 18.75 |
| % of cumulative | 27.69 | 53.03 | 71.78 |
Significant values are in bold.
Figure 3Dendrogram of cluster analysis for 10 HMs.
Figure 4Source contribution rates of the three sources to HMs in the topsoil of Mianyang.
Figure 5Spatial distribution of the contribution rate of the three sources [the figure was generated by Huaming Du using the ArcGIS 10.3 (https://developers.arcgis.com/)].