Literature DB >> 35729053

De novo emergence of the mutation E484K in a SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage variant.

Mikel Urrutikoetxea-Gutierrez1, Estibaliz Ugalde Zarraga2, Mikel Gallego Rodrigo3, Jose Luis Díaz de Tuesta Del Arco2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35729053      PMCID: PMC9174144          DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed)        ISSN: 2529-993X


× No keyword cloud information.
Since its first description in December 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern VOC-202112/01 (also known as lineage B.1.1.7, 20I/501Y.V1 or, recently, according to the WHO, simply alpha) has been spreading all over the world. In our geographical area, it became predominant from the beginning of March 2021, accounting for more than 90% of new infections in June 2021. This is mainly due to the mutations that this variant accumulates in the gene that encodes the spike (S gene), especially in the receptor-binding domain (RBD). These mutations, especially the N501Y mutation that it shares with the beta (B.1.351 or 20H/501Y.V2) and gamma (P.1 20J/501Y.V3) variants of concern, among others, are related to an increased binding affinity of the spike with angiotensin-converting enzyme II and an increase in transmissibility. These last two variants also share the E484K mutation, also in the RBD, which could be related to a certain degree of escape from the action of the vaccines. Therefore, when the first sequences of the B.1.1.7 lineage with the E484K mutation emerged, the British authorities declared them variants of concern VOC-202102/02. However, the cluster in which these variants were framed does not seem to have been as successful and represents only 0.225% of the sequences of the B.1.1.7 lineage included in the GISAID (Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data). In accordance with our centre’s variant screening protocol, all SARS-CoV-2 positive samples with Ct <32 are tested using the Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Variants I Assay kit (Seegene, Korea), which simultaneously detects H69/V70, E484K and N501Y mutations. At the end of April, we identified a sample which was positive for all three targets studied. In addition to the sample from the patient who had all three mutations, samples from the other three positive cases from the family cluster of which the patient had been a close contact were sequenced, presenting a profile compatible with the B.1.1.7 lineage but without the E484K mutation. For the sequencing of the viral genome, the Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 Research Panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used. Libraries were prepared following the manufacturer’s instructions and loaded onto a 540 chip and the Ion GeneStudio™ S5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) platform. The genome was assembled using the IRMA plugin and its consistency was checked using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) program. The Nextstrain webApp was also used for both clade assignment and visualisation of mutations. The sequences obtained by next-generation sequencing confirmed the results of the PCR variant screening techniques. The test sample presented the G23012A mutation that conditions the amino acid change in the E484K S gene. None of the other three samples had that mutation in the assembly, and the A readings at position 23012 accounted for less than 1% of the readings in each of the samples. Except for the G23012A mutation, the four strains of the family cluster were identical and had both the characteristic mutations of the B.1.1.7 lineage and some of their own (see Table 1 ).
Table 1

Coverage of the mutations present in the family cluster.

Test sampleRelative 1Relative 2Relative 3
C241T2935735648923110
C913T54991053376345110
C3037T68991081787528597
C3267T1870699744893645
C4464T73181396289505797
A5041G3407698045432567
C5388A4309844853093474
G5763A767312951998310079
C5986T207434581213449
T6954C282272023136933
11288-1129769111110783457157
C11668T5339707839732795
C12439T69031134976226920
C14407T4004620934892521
C14408T4006623034962525
C14676T5486891161154265
T15096C3185526734623199
C15279T1811665540962838
T16176C60501172181179837
C18647T2354650140853055
21766-217725587626158075072
21994-219977153798565695075
G23012A8771
A23063T2137542243001691
C23271A4375748560715999
A23403G13281160041338713398
C23604A9736129851175414791
C23709T77351103795947600
T24506G14234171571558113242
G24914C939814695117727804
C27972T25717288123928327683
G28048T25829288353926727589
A28095T1221816000197636728
A28111G1219215990197276687
28274951711135184338315
G28280C1062412112197908916
A28281T1068612175198658933
T28282A1068912181198758936
C28320T1085312294200719036
G28881A683110521126615721
8882A684010531126735728
G28883C684110531126735728
C28977T671510284123365378
Coverage of the mutations present in the family cluster. Despite belonging to the B.1.1.7 lineage and also exhibiting the E484K mutation, the sequence of our sample did not share the rest of the characteristic mutations of VOC-202102/02. The appearance of this mutation was therefore probably independent to those found in February 2021 in the United Kingdom, similar to other synchronous appearances of this mutation. In this case, the epidemiological chain of transmission is quite clear, since the infection of the patient with the E484K mutation appeared later: one week after the rest, and when the patient had been in isolation for six days for being a close contact of a confirmed case, so this mutation probably emerged de novo, either in the patient himself or in any of the other three members of the cluster after taking their respective samples. Fortunately, the patient had no subsequent close contacts and no new variants belonging to the B.1.1.7 lineage with the E484K mutation have been observed in the daily screenings carried out in our health organisation.
  6 in total

1.  Integrative genomics viewer.

Authors:  James T Robinson; Helga Thorvaldsdóttir; Wendy Winckler; Mitchell Guttman; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Viral deep sequencing needs an adaptive approach: IRMA, the iterative refinement meta-assembler.

Authors:  Samuel S Shepard; Sarah Meno; Justin Bahl; Malania M Wilson; John Barnes; Elizabeth Neuhaus
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution.

Authors:  James Hadfield; Colin Megill; Sidney M Bell; John Huddleston; Barney Potter; Charlton Callender; Pavel Sagulenko; Trevor Bedford; Richard A Neher
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.931

4.  Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity.

Authors:  Wilfredo F Garcia-Beltran; Evan C Lam; Kerri St Denis; Adam D Nitido; Zeidy H Garcia; Blake M Hauser; Jared Feldman; Maia N Pavlovic; David J Gregory; Mark C Poznansky; Alex Sigal; Aaron G Schmidt; A John Iafrate; Vivek Naranbhai; Alejandro B Balazs
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England.

Authors:  Sam Abbott; Rosanna C Barnard; Christopher I Jarvis; Adam J Kucharski; James D Munday; Carl A B Pearson; Timothy W Russell; Damien C Tully; Alex D Washburne; Tom Wenseleers; Nicholas G Davies; Amy Gimma; William Waites; Kerry L M Wong; Kevin van Zandvoort; Justin D Silverman; Karla Diaz-Ordaz; Ruth Keogh; Rosalind M Eggo; Sebastian Funk; Mark Jit; Katherine E Atkins; W John Edmunds
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 63.714

6.  Evaluation of the Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 Research Panel by Massive Parallel Sequencing.

Authors:  Federica Alessandrini; Sara Caucci; Valerio Onofri; Filomena Melchionda; Adriano Tagliabracci; Patrizia Bagnarelli; Laura Di Sante; Chiara Turchi; Stefano Menzo
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.