Literature DB >> 35727144

Mechanistic Modeling of Central Nervous System Pharmacokinetics and Target Engagement of HER2 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Inform Treatment of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

Jing Li1, Jun Jiang1, Xun Bao1, Vineet Kumar2, Stephen C Alley2, Scott Peterson3, Anthony J Lee2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the central nervous system (CNS) pharmacokinetics and target engagement of lapatinib, neratinib, and tucatinib in patients with cancer, using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Drug-specific parameters for in vitro metabolism, binding to plasma proteins and brain tissues, transcellular passive permeability, and interactions with efflux transporters were determined. Whole-body PBPK models integrated with a 4-compartment permeability-limited brain model was developed and verified for predicting plasma and CNS pharmacokinetics. Target engagement ratio (TER), defined as the ratio of the average steady-state unbound drug brain concentration (Css,ave,br) to in vitro IC50 for HER2 inhibition, was used as a predictor of intracranial efficacy.
RESULTS: PBPK models predicted that following 1 cycle of standard dosing, tucatinib and lapatinib achieved similar Css,ave,br (14.5 vs. 16.8 nmol/L), while neratinib Css,ave,br (0.68 nmol/L) was 20-fold lower. Tucatinib and neratinib were equally potent for HER2 inhibition (IC50, 6.9 vs. 5.6 nmol/L), while lapatinib was less potent (IC50, 109 nmol/L). The model-predicted population mean TER in the human normal brain was 2.1 for tucatinib, but < 0.20 for lapatinib and neratinib.
CONCLUSIONS: The PBPK modeling suggests that tucatinib induces sufficient HER2 inhibition (TER > 2.0) in not only brain metastases with a disrupted blood-brain barrier (BBB), but also micrometastases where the BBB largely remains intact. These findings, in line with available clinical pharmacokinetics and efficacy data, support the therapeutic value of tucatinib for treatment of brain metastases and warrant further clinical investigation for the prevention of brain metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. ©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35727144      PMCID: PMC9357092          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  49 in total

1.  Kinetic considerations for the quantitative assessment of efflux activity and inhibition: implications for understanding and predicting the effects of efflux inhibition.

Authors:  J Cory Kalvass; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Sensors and regulators of intracellular pH.

Authors:  Joseph R Casey; Sergio Grinstein; John Orlowski
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Blood-brain barrier: an impediment to neuropharmaceuticals.

Authors:  J T Henderson; M Piquette-Miller
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Quantitative and Mechanistic Understanding of AZD1775 Penetration across Human Blood-Brain Barrier in Glioblastoma Patients Using an IVIVE-PBPK Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Jing Li; Jianmei Wu; Xun Bao; Norissa Honea; Youming Xie; Seongho Kim; Alex Sparreboom; Nader Sanai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Cabazitaxel Plus Lapatinib as Therapy for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer With Intracranial Metastases: Results of a Dose-finding Study.

Authors:  Denise A Yardley; Lowell L Hart; Patrick J Ward; Gail L Wright; Mythili Shastry; Lindsey Finney; Laura M DeBusk; John D Hainsworth
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Overcoming the blood-brain tumor barrier for effective glioblastoma treatment.

Authors:  O van Tellingen; B Yetkin-Arik; M C de Gooijer; P Wesseling; T Wurdinger; H E de Vries
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 18.500

7.  Complex disease-, gene-, and drug-drug interactions: impacts of renal function, CYP2D6 phenotype, and OCT2 activity on veliparib pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Jing Li; Seongho Kim; Xianyi Sha; Richard Wiegand; Jianmei Wu; Patricia LoRusso
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Neratinib Plus Paclitaxel vs Trastuzumab Plus Paclitaxel in Previously Untreated Metastatic ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer: The NEfERT-T Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ahmad Awada; Ramon Colomer; Kenichi Inoue; Igor Bondarenko; Rajendra A Badwe; Georgia Demetriou; Soo-Chin Lee; Ajay O Mehta; Sung-Bae Kim; Thomas Bachelot; Chanchal Goswami; Suryanarayan Deo; Ron Bose; Alvin Wong; Feng Xu; Bin Yao; Richard Bryce; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 9.  Involvement of tumor acidification in brain cancer pathophysiology.

Authors:  Avinash Honasoge; Harald Sontheimer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Intracranial Efficacy and Survival With Tucatinib Plus Trastuzumab and Capecitabine for Previously Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases in the HER2CLIMB Trial.

Authors:  Nancy U Lin; Virginia Borges; Carey Anders; Rashmi K Murthy; Elisavet Paplomata; Erika Hamilton; Sara Hurvitz; Sherene Loi; Alicia Okines; Vandana Abramson; Philippe L Bedard; Mafalda Oliveira; Volkmar Mueller; Amelia Zelnak; Michael P DiGiovanna; Thomas Bachelot; A Jo Chien; Ruth O'Regan; Andrew Wardley; Alison Conlin; David Cameron; Lisa Carey; Giuseppe Curigliano; Karen Gelmon; Sibylle Loibl; JoAl Mayor; Suzanne McGoldrick; Xuebei An; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.