Literature DB >> 35726284

Management of Transplant Renal Artery Pseudoaneurysm and Literature Review.

Luke Anders1, Rachel Stephens2, Melissa Laub2, Rushay Amarath-Madav1, Ahmad Mirza3, Muhammad Irfan Saeed3.   

Abstract

Renal transplantation is the ultimate treatment for end-stage renal disease patients. However, vascular complications can impact renal allograft outcomes. Extrarenal pseudoaneurysms (EPSA) are a rare complication occurring in 1% of transplant recipients. We report a case series of extrarenal pseudoaneurysm after kidney transplant with different clinical presentations and management strategies. Given the rarity of EPSA, literature describing this complication is limited to single case reports or small retrospective case series. We also provide an up-to-date review of 76 articles on mycotic, bacterial, and idiopathic EPSAs. Allograft removal is considered standard treatment, but new endovascular alternatives may allow allograft salvage. EPSA should be managed with a multidisciplinary approach. Surveillance with renal ultrasound is recommended in patients considered high risk.
Copyright © 2022 Luke Anders et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35726284      PMCID: PMC9206571          DOI: 10.1155/2022/6232586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Transplant        ISSN: 2090-6951


1. Introduction

Vascular complications, which have an incidence rate of 6-30% after a kidney transplant, can impact allograft and patient outcomes [1]. Vascular complications include renal artery stenosis, arterial/venous thrombosis, arteriovenous fistulas, and renal artery pseudoaneurysms [1]. Intrarenal pseudoaneurysms are most commonly secondary to percutaneous kidney biopsy, infection, or technical error but usually resolve spontaneously with time, despite a 5% occurrence rate [2]. Extrarenal pseudoaneurysms (EPSAs) carry an incidence rate of 1% and cause irreversible arterial destruction of the vessel wall; causes can include infectious and noninfectious etiologies [1, 3, 4]. Despite their rarity, EPSAs are a serious complication, which profoundly impact both graft and patient survival. Though small EPSAs can be closely observed, large or infected EPSAs are a clinical emergency. Rupture of the EPSA creates life-threatening bleeding, so allograft nephrectomy, either prophylactically or emergently, is the recommended treatment of choice [5-7]. Evidence-based care of this complication is limited to single case reports or small retrospective series. Here, we report three cases of infectious EPSA after kidney transplantation, including their wide-ranging clinical presentations, treatments, and outcomes (Table 1). Additionally, we present an up-to-date review of the literature to provide the reader with a multitude of examples of how this anomaly may present in practice (Table 2).
Table 1

Summary of our three cases, including clinical presentations, treatments, and outcomes.

AgeTime since transplantOrganisms cultured in urine posttransplantOrganisms cultured in blood posttransplantDiagnosis on imagingOutcome
Recipient 1682.5 weeks Pseudomonas aeruginosa (on admission) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (on admission)CTA: hematoma with active bleed from IPA of donor renal arteryNephrectomy
Recipient 26927 weeks Enterococcus faecalis (on admission) Bacteroides (week 4)Enterococcus faecalis (on admission)Noncontrast CT: 8 × 8 cm mass highly suspicious for blood components, seen in the same area of the pseudoaneurysm seen in his initial ultrasoundEndovascular exclusion via covered stent
Recipient 3646 weeksVancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Candida tropicalis (week 1)Pseudomonas aeruginosa(week 5)Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (week 6)N/AAngiography: large and small pseudoaneurysms arising from the proximal and midtransplant renal artery, respectivelyLarge PA: coil embolization +6 × 16 mm covered stentSmall PA: 6 × 16 mm covered stent
Table 2

Review of literature on extrarenal pseudoaneurysms in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases (1978–September 1, 2021). Tx: transplantectomy; SR: surgical repair; EVS: endovascular stenting; EVC: endovascular coiling; OBS: observation.

AuthorYear N InfectionInterval after transplantInterventionOutcome
Bacterial pseudoaneurysms in literature review
Nelson198411/P. aeruginosa11 days1/Tx1/graft loss
Kumar200211/P. aeruginosa9 days1/Tx1/graft loss
Saidi200422/P. aeruginosa 2/Tx2/graft loss
Eng200641/MRSA, C. difficile1/MRSA1/S. marcescens1/C. albicans 4/Tx4/graft loss2/death
Fujikata200611/MRSA1.3 months1/OBS1/graft preserved
Nguan200611/S. aureus 1/Tx1/graft loss
Poels and Riley200711/P. aeruginosa1.7 months1/EVS + thrombin1/graft preserved
Orlando200922/P. aeruginosa11-21 days2/Tx2/death
Berglund201111/P. aeruginosa46 days1/SR1/graft preserved
Buimer201211/E. coli14 months1/SR1/graft preserved
Kaabak201311/P. aeruginosa10 days1/SR1/graft preserved
Chandak201411/P. aeruginosa10 days1/SR1/graft preserved
Che201411/E. coli4 months1/EVS1/graft preserved
Patil201511/E. coli21 days1/EVS1/graft preserved
Berger201722/P. aeruginosa3-15 days1/Tx1/EVS1/graft loss1/graft preserved
Chung201711/P. aeruginosa1 month1/Tx1/graft loss
Mycotic pseudoaneurysms in literature review
Potti199811/C. albicans 1/Tx1/graft loss
Battaglia200022/C. albicans17 days-3 months2/Tx2/graft loss
Calvino200322/C. albicans 2/Tx2/graft loss
Garrido200322/A. flavus1.5-4 months2/Tx1/death1/graft loss
Peel200311/C. albicans1 month1/SR + EVC1/graft preserved
Laouad200544/C. albicans9 days-3 months4/Tx3/graft loss1/death
Zavos200532/C. albicans 2/Tx2/graft loss
Henderson200711/C. albicans4 months1/Tx1/graft loss
Liu200911/A. flavus12 months1/Tx1/graft loss
Osman200911/C. albicans1.2 months1/EVS + Tx1/graft loss
Taksin200911/C. albicans3 weeks1/Tx1/graft loss
Wang200934/A. flavus10 days-1.5 months4/Tx4/graft loss
Akhtar201111/C. albicans 1/Tx1/graft loss
Lee201111/C. albicans2 months1/Tx1/graft loss
Minz201122/A. flavus1-5 months2/Tx1/death1/graft loss
Polat201111/C. albicans 1/Tx1/graft loss
Kountidou201211/C. albicans3 months1/SR1/graft preserved
Ram Reddy201222/A. flavus3-20 weeks2/Tx2/graft loss
Debska-Slizien201522/C. albicans10-30 days2/Tx2/death after OP
Madhav201511/C. albicans25 days1/SR1/graft preserved
Zhao201622/C. albicans14-21 days2/EVS + Tx2/graft loss
Lazarus201611/C. albicans47 days1/Tx1/graft loss
Lin201722/C. albicans14-32 days1/Tx1/SR1/graft loss1/graft preserved
Ministro201722/C. albicans60-150 days2/SR2/graft preserved
Mixed pseudoaneurysms in literature review
Kyriakides197684/E. coli2/C. albicans2/P. aeruginosa1.5-6 months8/Tx1/SR2/death6/graft loss
Koo199931/MRSA2/none2-3 months1/EVC1/Tx1/OBS1/graft loss2/graft preserved
Bracale2009121/E. coli2/C. albicans9/none13 days-49 months8/Tx3/EVS + Tx1/SR + replantation8/graft loss3/death after OP1/graft preserved
Bozkurt201021/C. albicans1/E. faecalis11-18 days2/Tx2/graft loss
Leonardou201242/P. aeruginosa1/K pneumonia1/C. albicans3-15 months4/EVS + Tx4 graft loss
Santangelo201362/C. albicans4/none1.5-10 months1/SR + replantation4/Tx1/EVS + Tx1/graft preserved5/graft loss
Patrono201532/C. albicans1/P. aeruginosa12-25 days2/Tx1/SR2/graft loss1/graft preserved
Fananapazir201642/P. aeruginosa2/none2-12 weeks3/Tx1/EVC3/graft loss1/graft preserved
Liu201852/A. baumannii2/C. albicans1/S. epidermidis9-21 days5/SR5/graft preserved
Idiopathic pseudoaneurysms in literature review
Renigers and Spigos197811/none28 days1/Tx1/graft loss
Benoit198811/none6 months1/Tx1/graft loss
Koo199933/none2-4 months1/Tx2/observation1/graft loss2/graft preserved
Reus200211/none2 months1/thrombin1/graft loss
Taghavi200511/none72 months1/SR1/graft preserved
Zavos200522/none5 months2/EVS2/graft loss
Asztalos200611/none6 months1/SR1/graft preserved
Fujita200611/none5 months1/EVS1/graft preserved
Siu200611/none3 months1/EVS + thrombin1/graft preserved
Fornaro200711/none15 months1/thrombin1/graft preserved
Gravante200811/none6 months1/SR1/graft preserved
Orlic200811/none2.5 months1/Tx1/graft loss
Sharron200911/none3 months1/SR + thrombin1/graft preserved
Al-Wahaibi201011/none4 months1/SR1/graft preserved
Akgul201111/none14 years1/EVC1/graft preserved
Favelier201211/none36 months1/EVC and stent1/graft preserved
Smeds201311/none72 months1/EVS1/graft preserved
Tshomba201511/none9 months1/EVS1/graft preserved
Ardita201511/none20 days1/SR1/graft preserved
Farooqui201611/none2 months1/SR1/graft preserved
Turunc201711/none1 month1/EVS1/graft preserved
Marie201811/none5 months1/EVC1/graft preserved
Sharma201822/none14-24 months1/SR1/EVS2/graft preserved
Ugurlucan201811/none3 months1/EVC1/graft preserved
Haijie202066/none6/EVS3/graft loss3/graft preserved
Vijayvergiya202111/none1/EVC and stent1/graft preserved
Xu202111/none6 months1/observation1/graft preserved

2. Case Presentation

Case 1 (Figure 1)

The patient was a 68-year-old male with end stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to Wegener's granulomatosis who received his second deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) in November 2019. His postoperative course was significant for delayed graft function secondary to acute tubular necrosis (ATN). On postoperative day (POD) 19, he presented to clinic with complaints of fatigue, chills, and rigors. He was diagnosed with urosepsis. Both blood and urine cultures on admission grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Patient was started on broad spectrum antibiotics which included clindamycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, then cefepime and tobramycin at various points. A noncontrast computer tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen pelvis on admission was negative for any peri-nephric fluid collection. Overnight, he acutely decompensated and coded. Advanced cardiac life support protocol was initiated with return of spontaneous circulation after 20 minutes. Repeat CT angiogram (CTA) of the abdomen/pelvis was notable for a large retroperitoneal hematoma with active bleed from EPSA of the donor renal artery. Interventional radiology (IR) was consulted for placement of a covered stent. This intervention was unsuccessful, and ultimately, the patient was taken to the operating room and underwent transplant nephrectomy and saphenous vein patch angioplasty of the external iliac artery. The donor renal artery was completely avulsed from the recipient artery at the anastomosis site. The patient remained in the intensive care unit (ICU) postoperatively secondary to septic shock and multiorgan failure. On POD 39, he died of septic shock secondary to ischemic bowel and bowel perforation. Interestingly, the liver recipient from the same cadaveric donor, who was transplanted at another institution, also died suddenly at home.

Case 2 (Figure 2)

The patient is a 63-year-old male with ESRD secondary to diabetes and hypertension who received a DDKT in January 2020. The patient's immediate postop course was complicated by wound infection and dehiscence requiring multiple wash outs and biological mesh repair. Almost six months posttransplant, he was presented to a routine clinic follow-up with 1 week history of right flank pain, elevated blood pressure, hematuria, and a leaking sinus at his Gibson incision. Labs were significant for anemia and acute kidney injury with serum creatinine of 7 mg/dL from a baseline of 2 mg/dL. Ultrasound showed a juxta-anastomotic pseudoaneurysm measuring 5 × 5 cm confirmed on CT with concern for a contained anastomotic leak. The patient was admitted to ICU and started on broad spectrum antimicrobials empirically, which included metronidazole, vancomycin, and micafungin. Blood and urine cultures from admission grew Enterococcus faecalis. Vascular surgery performed an angiogram that showed an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm, but it was deemed unsafe to coil due to a wide neck. After detailed discussion with the patient, we decided to proceed with a Gore excluder cover stent placement in the external iliac artery with loss of the transplanted kidney because of the expanding pseudoaneurysm. Surgical repair option was discussed but considered too high risk for this patient and still carried a significant chance of graft loss. After stent deployment, CTA confirmed an excluded pseudoaneurysm with no evidence of leak. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms showed no vegetation or evidence of endocarditis. Repeat blood and urine cultures on hospital days 3 and 5 were negative, and his antibiotic regimen was changed to ampicillin monotherapy. The patient was restarted on hemodialysis and discharged to an inpatient rehab facility to finish a six-week antibiotic course. The patient is still alive and awaits a second kidney transplant.

Case 3 (Figure 3)

The patient is a 69-year-old female who received a DDKT in May 2021 and presented to clinic in July 2021 complaining of dysuria and pain at her Gibson incision. Her urine culture showed >100,000 CFU/mL vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE). Labs were significant for a drop in hemoglobin to 8.7 g/dL from 11.2 g/dL. She had experienced four prior urinary tract infections (UTIs) since transplant with unclear etiology; previously urine cultures demonstrated Candida tropicalis, VRE, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa organisms, which were appropriately treated with active antimicrobials. Notably, she never had positive blood cultures at any point in her course. At this clinic visit, she was readmitted for treatment of the current VRE infection with daptomycin per infectious disease recommendations, given history of recurrent UTIs. CT abdomen/pelvis on admission demonstrated a subcutaneous hematoma measuring 4 × 4 × 15 cm along her Gibson incision. Ultrasound of the transplanted kidney showed elevated peak velocities concerning for renal artery stenosis but gave no mention of pseudoaneurysm. A repeat transplant kidney ultrasound the next day showed a new onset 3 × 3 cm EPSA arising from the proximal transplant renal artery. Angiogram demonstrated a large and small EPSA arising from the proximal and midtransplant renal artery, respectively. There was no anastomotic EPSA. The distal transplant renal artery was severely stenosed but patent. Due to nonavailability of customized cover stent, the procedure was performed in two stages. Initially, the IR team coil embolized the larger EPSA, and she returned to IR the following day for placement of two 6 mm × 20 mm covered stents with angioplasty of the distal transplant renal artery. Repeat inpatient blood cultures were negative. She was discharged home on a four-week course of linezolid and fluconazole to cover the VRE and previous Candida tropicalis. The patient is doing well, and her repeat urine and blood cultures have remained negative of antimicrobials.

3. Discussion

EPSA is a rare (1% incidence rate) but devastating complication of kidney transplantation. EPSA can occur at or adjacent to the surgical anastomosis, usually secondary to a mycotic or bacterial infection. Previous literature reviews place the incidence of allograft loss at 56%, concurrence with an infective pathogen at 62%, and mortality at 14% [8]. In multiple retrospective series, C. albicans was the leading pathogen in cases with infection [8-10]. The mechanism by which mycotic and bacterial pseudoaneurysms develop is well-described in the literature, involving an inflammatory process that invades and compromises the wall of the artery [11]. Patients with kidney transplants often have multiple risk factors for opportunistic infections, including immunosuppression, end-stage renal failure, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia [12-14]. Additionally, prolonged ICU stays (>7 days) and extended operative times are associated with increased incidence [15]. Intuitively, age should be a risk factor for all operative complications, but this association is not reflected in the data [16]. Procurement of organs, transportation, back-table preparation, and transplantation involve countless opportunities for inadvertent contamination; the likelihood of transplant contamination is estimated at 40% [12]. This prevalence highlights the importance of obtaining donor cultures from multiple sites, careful handling of the allograft, and strict sterile technique at all times. Organ procurement organizations (OPO) work extensively with the donor centers to ensure minimal infection risk, frequently involving infectious disease colleagues to confirm thorough treatment and prophylaxis. While we extensively scan donors, preservation fluid, and recipient blood cultures, some smoldering infections can be masked or subdued by extended courses of antibiotics, making detection of some pathogens difficult [14]. The clinical presentation of EPSAs varies considerably, evident both within our own cases and the literature. Patients can be totally asymptomatic (Case 3) or acutely decompensating from aneurysmal rupture (Case 1). Time to diagnosis varied both within our own case series as well as cases in literature, ranging from a few days to many years after the initial transplant. Other symptoms include pulsatile masses, abdominal tenderness, lower limb ischemia, allograft dysfunction, anemia, or signs of infection [4, 15, 17]. Doppler ultrasonography is the first imaging tool used, ideally showing the pathognomonic “Yin Yang” sign indicating turbulent mixing of blood as exhibited in Figures 2(b) and 3(b). CT or magnetic resonance (MR) angiography can confirm the pathology as well as evaluate its impact on surrounding structures such as the ureter or iliac vessels [18]. Conventional angiography elucidates the exact location and occasionally allows for simultaneous percutaneous treatment.
Figure 2

Case 2 imaging, whose blood and urine cultures on admission grew Enterococcus faecalis. (a) Ultrasound from initial transplant hospitalization demonstrating normal RLQ transplant kidney with patent renal artery and vein without pseudoaneurysm. (b) Ultrasound on admission demonstrating pseudoaneurysm at the anastomosis measuring 5 cm × 4 cm × 6 cm. (c) Noncontrast CT demonstrating 8 cm × 8 cm hematoma in the same area of the pseudoaneurysm seen on ultrasound approximately 4 hours earlier. (d) Arteriogram demonstrating 5 cm × 5 cm juxta-anastomotic pseudoaneurysm; it was deemed unsafe to coil given its wide neck. (e) Arteriogram on the following day after placement of a 16 mm × 14.5 mm × 10 cm Gore excluder endograft. (f) CT angiogram demonstrating endograft placement completely excluding the anastomotic pseudoaneurysm.

Figure 3

Case 3 imaging, whose urine cultures on admission grew vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. She had 4 UTIs since her transplant with unclear etiology; previous UTIs included VRE, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida tropicalis. (a) Ultrasound 1 month prior to admission demonstrating normal RLQ transplant kidney with patent renal artery and vein without pseudoaneurysm. (b) Ultrasound on admission demonstrating 3 cm × 3 cm pseudoaneurysm arising from the renal transplant artery. (c) Arteriogram on the following day demonstrating a large and small pseudoaneurysm arising from the proximal and midtransplant artery, respectively. Severe stenosis also seen at the distal transplant artery. (d) Arteriogram demonstrating exclusion of both pseudoaneurysms as well as angioplasty of the distal transplant artery.

All three of our cases presented with an associated infection. In Case 1, Pseudomonas aeruginosa grew in urine and blood cultures; per literature review, this is the most frequent bacteria associated with EPSA occurrence [8, 11]. Rapidly developing an EPSA in less than 3 weeks, Case 1 is a good reminder that all infections, especially pathogens historically linked to the formation of EPSAs such as Pseudomonas, should trigger aggressive, immediate treatment, and surveillance after antibiotic completion. Case 2 is notable as Enterococcus faecalis has only been associated with EPSA in one other case in the literature. Notably, Case 3 had multiple UTIs prior to discovering the EPSA, but no positive blood cultures. In this instance, it is possible that long-term treatment for her multiple UTIs masked a developing vascular insult, at which point the EPSA was incidentally noted. Indications for repair of an EPSA are controversial, but pseudoaneurysms with a diameter of >2.5 cm are almost uniformly at a high risk of rupture [1, 7, 15, 16, 19]. Additional intervention indications include symptom severity, rate of size enlargement, presence of infection, and renal artery hypertension [1, 15]. EPSAs smaller than 2 cm can usually be managed conservatively with serial imaging and resolve spontaneously in some cases [20]. Therapeutic options for large or high-risk EPSAs include allograft nephrectomy, conventional open repair (allograft removal, creation of new vascular anastomoses, and repair of previous site with patch angioplasty), endovascular stenting or coiling, and/or ultrasound-guided percutaneous thrombin injection [14, 21]. In both our own practice and literature review, transplant nephrectomy represented the gold standard for definitive treatment but is a tough decision. Endovascular intervention represents a promising future for repair that retains allograft function, but, as in Case 2, sometimes necessitates excluding the allograft to prevent rupture. In such scenarios, a transplant nephrectomy may be performed later based on the patient's clinical condition (development of allograft abscess, etc.). The authors, including Lin et al. and Cano-Velasco et al., have compiled past articles on this subject, and Cano-Velasco et al. proposed a treatment algorithm based on these reports [8, 16]. Management of EPSA requires a multidisciplinary approach. Patient and allograft salvage are the prime goal. Newer endovascular techniques open new options for salvaging the graft. Each case is different and needs thorough assessment and unique plan development based on the patient's needs.

4. Conclusion

EPSA of the transplant renal artery is a rare issue. Prevention, high degree of suspicion, and aggressive multidisciplinary management are needed to save the patient and renal allograft. Surveillance of patients with previous urinary or bloodstream infections is also recommended.
  20 in total

Review 1.  Arterial anastomosis disrupton in two kidney recipients of contaminated grafts from a donor with Gorham's syndrome.

Authors:  R F Saidi; C Fasola; M El-Ghoroury; H Oh
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Presentation and management of mycotic pseudoaneurysm after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  D Patrono; R Verhelst; A Buemi; T Darius; N Godefroid; M Mourad
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Evaluation of the Renal Arteries of 2,144 Living Kidney Donors Using Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison with Intraoperative Findings.

Authors:  Mehmet Sarier; Mehmet Callioglu; Yucel Yuksel; Enes Duman; Mestan Emek; Sibel Surmen Usta
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Infectious Disease Transmission in Solid Organ Transplantation: Donor Evaluation, Recipient Risk, and Outcomes of Transmission.

Authors:  Sarah L White; William Rawlinson; Peter Boan; Vicky Sheppeard; Germaine Wong; Karen Waller; Helen Opdam; John Kaldor; Michael Fink; Deborah Verran; Angela Webster; Kate Wyburn; Lindsay Grayson; Allan Glanville; Nick Cross; Ashley Irish; Toby Coates; Anthony Griffin; Greg Snell; Stephen I Alexander; Scott Campbell; Steven Chadban; Peter Macdonald; Paul Manley; Eva Mehakovic; Vidya Ramachandran; Alicia Mitchell; Michael Ison
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-12-20

5.  Endovascular repair as first-choice treatment of iliac pseudoaneurysms following renal transplantation.

Authors:  G Zavos; P Pappas; J D Kakisis; P Leonardou; E Manoli; J Bokos; A Kostakis
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Mycotic Pseudoaneurysm After Kidney Transplantation: Two Case Reports.

Authors:  A Ministro; T Ferreira; L Batista; A Santana; N Alves; J Guerra; J Fernandes E Fernandes
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  Mycotic pseudoaneurysm following a kidney transplant: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ignacio Osmán; Rafael Barrero; Eduardo León; Rafael Medina; Francisco Torrubia
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2008-05-11

8.  Fatal hemorrhage in two renal graft recipients with multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

Authors:  G Orlando; P Di Cocco; G Gravante; M D'Angelo; A Famulari; F Pisani
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Transplanted kidney, stenotic renal artery, and a giant pseudoaneurysm: How we tried to treat, Why we failed, and How we managed?

Authors:  Murat Uğurlucan; Yılmaz Önal; Didem Melis Öztaş; Ali Rıza Odabaş; Ufuk Alpagut
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 0.332

10.  Diagnosis and spontaneous healing of asymptomatic renal allograft extra-renal pseudo-aneurysm: A case report.

Authors:  Rui-Fang Xu; En-Hui He; Zhan-Xiong Yi; Li Li; Jun Lin; Lin-Xue Qian
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 1.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.