OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of surgical approach with outcomes in patients with adrenocortical carcinomas smaller and larger than 6 cm in size. METHODS: We reviewed the national cancer database for patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) and open adrenalectomy (OA) from 2010 to 2017. To adjust for differences between patients undergoing MIA and OA, we performed propensity score matching within each size strata of ≤6 cm, 6.1 to 10 cm, and 10.1 to 20 cm. We fit generalized estmiating equations with a logit link function to assess for the association of surgical approach with positive surgical margins and a Cox proportional hazards model to assess for the association of surgical approach with overall survival. RESULTS: We identified 364 patients that underwent MIA (182) and OA (182) in the matched cohort. We noted 21% and 18% of patients undergoing MIA and OA had a positive surgical margin, respectively. We did not identify a significant association between surgical approach and positive surgical margins in the cohort as a whole or within each of strata. Furthermore, we did not appreciate a significant association between surgical approach and overall survival in the cohort as a whole or within each size strata. CONCLUSION: In the National Cancer Database, patients undergoing MIA had similar positive surgical margins and overall survival compared with OA for masses ≤6 cm, 6.1 to 10cm, and >10 cm in size. Patients undergoing MIA should be carefully selected with surgical oncologic integrity being the primary determinants of surgical approach.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of surgical approach with outcomes in patients with adrenocortical carcinomas smaller and larger than 6 cm in size. METHODS: We reviewed the national cancer database for patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) and open adrenalectomy (OA) from 2010 to 2017. To adjust for differences between patients undergoing MIA and OA, we performed propensity score matching within each size strata of ≤6 cm, 6.1 to 10 cm, and 10.1 to 20 cm. We fit generalized estmiating equations with a logit link function to assess for the association of surgical approach with positive surgical margins and a Cox proportional hazards model to assess for the association of surgical approach with overall survival. RESULTS: We identified 364 patients that underwent MIA (182) and OA (182) in the matched cohort. We noted 21% and 18% of patients undergoing MIA and OA had a positive surgical margin, respectively. We did not identify a significant association between surgical approach and positive surgical margins in the cohort as a whole or within each of strata. Furthermore, we did not appreciate a significant association between surgical approach and overall survival in the cohort as a whole or within each size strata. CONCLUSION: In the National Cancer Database, patients undergoing MIA had similar positive surgical margins and overall survival compared with OA for masses ≤6 cm, 6.1 to 10cm, and >10 cm in size. Patients undergoing MIA should be carefully selected with surgical oncologic integrity being the primary determinants of surgical approach.
Authors: Kelly T Huynh; David Y Lee; Briana J Lau; Devin C Flaherty; JiHey Lee; Melanie Goldfarb Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: David Brix; Bruno Allolio; Wiebke Fenske; Ayman Agha; Henning Dralle; Christian Jurowich; Peter Langer; Thomas Mussack; Christoph Nies; Hubertus Riedmiller; Martin Spahn; Dirk Weismann; Stefanie Hahner; Martin Fassnacht Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Christina W Lee; Ahmed I Salem; David F Schneider; Glen E Leverson; Thuy B Tran; George A Poultsides; Lauren M Postlewait; Shishir K Maithel; Tracy S Wang; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; John E Phay; Lawrence Shirley; Ryan C Fields; Linda X Jin; Timothy M Pawlik; Jason D Prescott; Jason K Sicklick; Shady Gad; Adam C Yopp; John C Mansour; Quan-Yang Duh; Natalie Seiser; Carmen C Solorzano; Colleen M Kiernan; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Edward A Levine; Sharon M Weber Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Karl Y Bilimoria; Wen T Shen; Dina Elaraj; David J Bentrem; David J Winchester; Electron Kebebew; Cord Sturgeon Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kevin B Ginsburg; Akhil A Chandra; Jared P Schober; Elizabeth A Handorf; Robert G Uzzo; Richard E Greenberg; David Yt Chen; Rosalia Viterbo; Marc C Smaldone; Alexander Kutikov; Mark A Hallman; Andres F Correa Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 3.498