Ji Dong1,2, Shuai-Bing Liu3, Jony Md Rasheduzzaman4, Chen-Rong Huang5,6, Li-Yan Miao7,8. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. 2. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. 3. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. 4. Pharmacogenomics Research Center, Inje University, Busan, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. chrishuangcr@163.com. 6. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. chrishuangcr@163.com. 7. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. miaolysuzhou@163.com. 8. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. miaolysuzhou@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Venetoclax (VEN), an anti-tumor drug that is a substrate of cytochrome P450 3A enzyme (CYP3A4), is used to treat leukemia. Voriconazole (VCZ) is an antifungal medication that inhibits CYP3A4. The goal of this study is to predict the effect of VCZ on VEN exposure. METHOD: Two physiological based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) models were developed for VCZ and VEN using the bottom-up and top-down method. VCZ model was also developed to describe the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on its pharmacokinetics (PK). The reversible inhibition constant (Ki) of VCZ for CYP3A4 was calibrated using drug-drug interaction (DDI) data of midazolam and VCZ. The clinical verified VCZ and VEN model were used to predict the DDI of VCZ and VEN at clinical dosing scenario. RESULT: VCZ model predicted VCZ exposure in the subjects of different CYP2C19 genotype and DDI related fold changes of sensitive CYP3A substrate with acceptable prediction error. VEN model can capture PK of VEN with acceptable prediction error. The DDI PBPK model predicted that VCZ increased the exposure of VEN by 4.5-9.6 fold. The increase in VEN exposure by VCZ was influenced by subject's CYP2C19 genotype. According to the therapeutic window, VEN dose should be reduced to 100 mg when co-administered with VCZ. CONCLUSION: The PBPK model developed here could support individual dose adjustment of VEN and DDI risk assessment. Predictions using the robust PBPK model confirmed that the 100 mg dose adjustment is still applicable in the presence of VCZ with high inter-individual viability.
PURPOSE: Venetoclax (VEN), an anti-tumor drug that is a substrate of cytochrome P450 3A enzyme (CYP3A4), is used to treat leukemia. Voriconazole (VCZ) is an antifungal medication that inhibits CYP3A4. The goal of this study is to predict the effect of VCZ on VEN exposure. METHOD: Two physiological based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) models were developed for VCZ and VEN using the bottom-up and top-down method. VCZ model was also developed to describe the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on its pharmacokinetics (PK). The reversible inhibition constant (Ki) of VCZ for CYP3A4 was calibrated using drug-drug interaction (DDI) data of midazolam and VCZ. The clinical verified VCZ and VEN model were used to predict the DDI of VCZ and VEN at clinical dosing scenario. RESULT: VCZ model predicted VCZ exposure in the subjects of different CYP2C19 genotype and DDI related fold changes of sensitive CYP3A substrate with acceptable prediction error. VEN model can capture PK of VEN with acceptable prediction error. The DDI PBPK model predicted that VCZ increased the exposure of VEN by 4.5-9.6 fold. The increase in VEN exposure by VCZ was influenced by subject's CYP2C19 genotype. According to the therapeutic window, VEN dose should be reduced to 100 mg when co-administered with VCZ. CONCLUSION: The PBPK model developed here could support individual dose adjustment of VEN and DDI risk assessment. Predictions using the robust PBPK model confirmed that the 100 mg dose adjustment is still applicable in the presence of VCZ with high inter-individual viability.
Authors: Suresh K Agarwal; Ahmed Hamed Salem; Alexey V Danilov; Beibei Hu; Soham Puvvada; Martin Gutierrez; David Chien; Lionel D Lewis; Shekman L Wong Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Souzan B Yanni; Pieter P Annaert; Patrick Augustijns; Arlene Bridges; Yan Gao; Daniel K Benjamin; Dhiren R Thakker Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2008-03-24 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Corinna Hahn-Ast; Axel Glasmacher; Sara Mückter; Andrea Schmitz; Anja Kraemer; Günter Marklein; Peter Brossart; Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Caitlin R Rausch; Courtney D DiNardo; Abhishek Maiti; Nadya J Jammal; Tapan M Kadia; Kayleigh R Marx; Gautam Borthakur; J Michael Savoy; Naveen Pemmaraju; Adam J DiPippo; Naval G Daver; Serena M Chew; Koji Sasaki; Ghayas C Issa; Nicholas J Short; Koichi Takahashi; Maro N Ohanian; Jing Ning; Lianchun Xiao; Yesid Alvarado; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Farhad Ravandi; Hagop M Kantarjian; Marina Y Konopleva Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 6.921