Literature DB >> 3572577

Incremental rigidity scheme for recovering structure from motion: position-based versus velocity-based formulations.

N M Grzywacz, E C Hildreth.   

Abstract

Perceptual studies suggest that the visual system may use a rigidity assumption in its recovery of three-dimensional structure from motion. Ullman [Perception 13, 255 (1984)] recently proposed a computational scheme that uses this assumption to recover the structure of rigid and nonrigid objects in motion. The scheme assumes the input to be discrete positions of elements in motion, under orthographic projection. We present formulations of Ullman's method that use velocity information and perspective projection in the recovery of structure. Theoretical and computer analyses show that the velocity-based formulations provide a rough estimate of structure quickly but are not robust over an extended time. The stable long-term recovery of structure requires disparate views of moving objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3572577     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.000503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  9 in total

1.  The spatial and temporal characteristics of perceiving 3-D structure from motion.

Authors:  D W Eby
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

2.  The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences.

Authors:  J T Todd; P Bressan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

3.  The perceptual buildup of three-dimensional structure from motion.

Authors:  E C Hildreth; N M Grzywacz; E H Adelson; V K Inada
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

4.  Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: minimum points and views.

Authors:  M L Braunstein; D D Hoffman; F E Pollick
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-03

5.  Discerning nonrigid 3D shapes from motion cues.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Modelling human motion perception. II. Beyond Fourier motion stimuli.

Authors:  J Zanker
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1994-05

7.  Rigid and non-rigid kinetic depth effect with rotating discrete helices.

Authors:  G Ganis; C Casco; S Roncato
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

8.  Learned Non-Rigid Object Motion is a View-Invariant Cue to Recognizing Novel Objects.

Authors:  Lewis L Chuang; Quoc C Vuong; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Expectations affect the perception of material properties.

Authors:  Lorilei M Alley; Alexandra C Schmid; Katja Doerschner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.