Literature DB >> 35725511

Psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.

A Vancappel1, J Aubouin-Bonnaventure2, W El-Hage3, E Fouquereau4, C Réveillère4.   

Abstract

Multiple psychological health problems related to the COVID-19 pandemic among both the general public and health-care workers have been identified in the scientific literature. However, most studies used quantitative methods with scales selected on the basis of the researchers' pre-established knowledge derived from the experience of other situations and which can therefore induce biases. The dual aim of the present study was to explore qualitatively the perceived psychological consequences of lockdown on members of the general public and the perceived psychological consequences of COVID-19 on health-care workers. We recruited 241 participants from the general public and 120 health-care workers. They consented online to participate and completed open-ended questions evaluating the consequence of the health crisis on their life as a couple, on their friendships, family life, work, studies, psychological health, stress, and vision of the future. Finally, participants were asked to add any further consequences that had not been mentioned. We used double coding to process the data. We identified five main themes among the participants from the general public: improved and maintained social relationships, deterioration of health, improved health, personal growth, and lack of direct social contact. We also identified five main issues among the health-care workers: psychological and emotional impact, adjusting, negative impact on work, worries, and uncertainty about the future. The results confirmed the existence of psychological health problems related to the COVID-19 pandemic. They also highlighted positive consequences. Health-care workers tended to perceive more negative consequences than the participants from the general public.
Copyright © 2022 L'Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19 pandemic; General public; Grand public; Health-care workers; Pandémie de COVID-19; Personnel soignant; Problèmes de santé psychologique; Psychological health problems; Qualitative study; Étude qualitative

Year:  2022        PMID: 35725511      PMCID: PMC9108086          DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2022.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Encephale        ISSN: 0013-7006            Impact factor:   2.787


Introduction

On 21st January 2020, the World Health Organization published its first report of the existence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To slow down the spread of the virus, many countries imposed lockdown measures. This was an unprecedented global situation, with many psychological consequences for individuals. Studies evaluating the psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic have been carried out in numerous countries. They have reported symptoms of depression [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], anxiety [1], [2], [3], stress [4], [5], post-traumatic stress [1], [3], [5], [6], poor sleep quality [3], [6], loneliness [7], adjustment difficulties [8] and substance abuse [9]. A review of 13 studies on the psychological consequences of COVID-19 confirmed the high prevalence of anxiety, anger, stress, post-traumatic symptoms and loneliness [10]. Because they are particularly exposed to COVID-19, some studies focused specifically on health-care workers. They identified symptoms of depression and anxiety [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], stress [12], [13], post-traumatic stress [17], [18], somatic symptoms and suicidal ideations [14], sleep disorders [15], [16] and burnout [19], [20]. A meta-analysis also confirmed some of these results, highlighting high levels of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress and burnout symptoms [21]. All the above-mentioned studies used quantitative methods. This is problematic due to the use of pre-existing measures developed for other issues such as depression or anxiety disorders. They may therefore have missed certain important aspects of the psychological consequences of the crisis. To address this limitation, qualitative studies have also been performed to evaluate the psychological consequences of the crisis among healthcare workers [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. Overall, these studies highlighted emotional difficulties such as anxiety, helplessness and deterioration of family life, but also some positive consequences such as developing coping strategies, gaining experience and ability to adapt. However, these studies mostly used semi-structured interviews, limiting the sample size and therefore generalization of the conclusions. Moreover, no studies have been performed on the overall consequences of the crisis among the general population. Studies have been performed with specific groups (e.g. infected patients [27], patients suffering from ADHD [28], patients suffering from diabetes [29], elderly people [30]) and themes (e.g. loneliness [31], post-lockdown perception [32], marital difficulties [33]), but there has been little exploration of the psychological impact of lockdown in the general public. The dual aim of the present study was thus to use open-ended questions to explore the global psychological consequences of lockdown in the general public and the psychological consequences of working with COVID-19 patients for health-care workers.

Method

Participants

We recruited two samples of participants through social networks, between 19 April and 11 May 2020. Participation required reading an information note online, ticking a box to consent to participate. The experiment and consent procedures were approved by the ethics committee of the University. We recruited 241 participants (197 women) from the general public. Their mean age was 37.49 ± 14.58, and mean number of hours of work per week was 31.74 ± 12.07. Marital status, education level, occupation, and where they lived during lockdown are presented in Table 1 .
Table 1

Descriptive data.

General public
Health-care workers
PercentagePercentage
Marital status
 In a partnership68.0580
Education level
 Below baccalaureate5.812.5
 Baccalaureate10.796.67
 1–3 years of higher education28.6345.83
 4–5 years of higher education45.2339.17
 More than 5 years of higher education9.545.83
In lockdown with
 Partner46.8937.5
 Family30.2941.97
 Alone19.0919.17
 Friends or flatmates3.731.67
Activity
 Employed68.8100
Middle manager51.55Nurse34.17
Salaried worker24.22Speech/language therapist19.17
Intermediary activity8.7Nursing assistant16.67
Artisan, shop-keeper or company head6.83Physiotherapist6.67
Other activity8.7Doctor5
Full-time telecommuting53.42Midwife4.17
Laid off32.3Other14.17
No telecommuting8.7
Part-time telecommuting5.59
 Student12.86
 Retired7.88
 Job-seeker7.47
 Other4.98
Descriptive data. We recruited 120 health-care workers (110 women). Their mean age was 40 ± 11.31 and mean hours of work per week was 32.9 ± 13.16. Marital status, education level, occupation, and where they lived during lockdown are presented in Table 1.

Measures

Participants first provided sociodemographic information and then answered 9 open-ended questions. Participants were asked to describe the consequences of lockdown (for the general population)/coronavirus (for the health-care workers) on their relationships and friendships, family life, work, studies, psychological health, stress, and their vision of the future. Finally, they were asked to add any other consequences.

Data analysis

This research was designed according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) criteria [34]. We used thematic analysis to process the data [35]. A first reading of the data was carried out to become familiar with the answers then these were re-read and coded. A new code was created for each extra item of information. The data were double-coded; the data of the general public were coded first by the second author and then by the first author. The order was reversed for the health-care worker data. Minor disagreements were resolved, and the codes were categorized in themes and sub-themes. Finally, the two authors independently coded the data again and minor disagreements were resolved.

Results

General public

We identified 23 themes for the general public (Table 2 ). The five main themes were: improved and maintained social relationships, health deterioration, improved health, personal growth, and lack of direct social contact. These themes were mentioned by more than half of the sample.
Table 2

Themes and sub-themes in the general public.

n%ThemeSub-themeNumber sub-themeSub-theme percentage
21180.84Improving and maintaining social relationshipsImproving and maintaining friendships16468.05
Improving and maintaining family relationships14158.51
Improving and maintaining relationship with partner9539.42
Improving and maintaining links with relatives52.07
Improving and maintaining relationships in general41.66
19775.48Health deteriorationStress12953.53
Depression8535.27
Mood variations3715.35
Negative states and mood9539.42
Loss of bearings52.07
Sleep problems3514.52
Aggravation of existing health problems104.15
Disturbed rhythm of life41.66
Other00.00
Fear related to COVID-197430.71
Fear related to the future7731.95
16061.30Improved healthPositive mood and good health10443.15
Continuation and increase of physical activity3213.28
Better quality of sleep52.07
Reduced symptoms of chronic disease10.41
Less exhaustion31.24
Less stress and better stress management8836.51
14354.79Personal growthOpportunity for learning3213.28
Opportunity for introspection6727.80
Opportunity to have time for self6426.56
Adjusting and resilience6627.39
13551.72Lack of direct social contactHaving to respect social distancing9137.76
Loneliness3313.69
Lack of affection6727.80
Themes and sub-themes in the general public. Theme 1: improved and maintained social relationships. Most of the participants (80.84%) mentioned repeatedly that lockdown was an opportunity to contact and have more discussion time with friends, family and partner: “In general, I would say relationships have been strengthened by exchanging messages more regularly”. They frequently mentioned the use of social media: “We communicate a lot through WhatsApp, videos, pre-dinner drinks, quiz with photos when we go for a walk, so it shouldn’t change anything. On the contrary, it strengthens our friendships. My husband and his friends played Belote [a card game] on line. The essential thing is to use your brains!” Many participants mentioned that it gave them an opportunity to call relatives and reconnect with those they had not heard from, which they do not normally have time to do because of work and other activities. Participants also reported more emotional support, closeness and shared activities with their loved ones. Overall, the free time provided by lockdown resulted in improved social interaction with an increase in the frequency and quality of contact. Theme 2: health deterioration. Participants (75.48%) frequently mentioned the negative impact on their health, in particular, psychological problems such as an increase in stress. They mentioned that stress was difficult to manage, especially at the start of lockdown: “The stress increased quickly and it gets more and more difficult to manage (worrying about employment and salary).” They cited a number of causes of stress (e.g., fear related to COVID-19, concern for relatives, fear related to the future): “I’m usually stressed. Lockdown made me more anxious for many reasons: financial worries, worrying about my family's health, my health, the mental health of my grandmother who's 76 years old and lives on her own”. Participants also mentioned more depression, negative moods, sadness, boredom, exhaustion, sleep problems and disturbed rhythm of life. Finally, some of the participants mentioned an aggravation of existing health problems. Some of them felt useless. Theme 3: improved health. Some participants (61.30%) described improved health. They mentioned less stress and better stress management: “Much less stressed. Being able to manage my time, being at home and able to have a break whenever I want or do things if and when I feel stressed.” “Less stressed, easy stress management due to having the time and possibility to relax.” They also mentioned positive feelings (e.g., serenity, hope, optimism), more physical activity and better quality of sleep (e.g., reduction of insomnia). Theme 4: personal growth. Some participants (54.79%) mentioned the possibility of personal growth. They said that free time had enabled them to have a better understanding of themselves and that they had changed their behavior to develop positive habits: “After a month, I learnt a lot about myself, I meditated, I took time to do things and to think about myself. I think it will make me stronger.” “I took time for myself, and learnt to sew. It was a break in our lives in the fast lane.” They had the opportunity for introspection, to have time for themselves, for learning, adjusting and resilience. They also questioned themselves (e.g., awareness of feeling dissatisfied with their work), thought about their personal and professional projects (e.g., learn a new job, learn new skills). Theme 5: lack of direct social contact. Finally, some participants (51.72%) described their frustration related to lack of direct social contact: “It's frustrating not to see each other.” They explained that they used social media to talk to others but that it is not the same as having direct contact: “We send messages or we call each other, but it's not the same.” They said that social distancing generated feelings of loneliness and a lack of affection. Some participants also reported that lockdown led to reduced sociability, withdrawal and even social phobia.

Health-care workers

We identified 25 themes for the health-care workers (Table 3 ). The five most highly rated themes were psychological and emotional impact, adjusting, negative impact on work, worries, and uncertainty about the future. These themes were mentioned by more than 60% of the sample.
Table 3

Themes and sub-themes for health care workers.

n%ThemesSub-themesNumber sub-themesPercentage sub-themes
10486.67Psychological and emotional impactAnger/frustration/irritability3831.67
Mood and depressive manifestations2420
Exhaustion2420
Disturbance of instinctual behavior2924.17
General negative psychological impact1411.67
Negative impact on stress7965.83
Addictions43.33
Guilt86.67
Post-traumatic stress symptoms1512.5
8167.5Adaptation
7865Negative impact on workDeterioration of quality of life at work5646.67
Poor work conditions2520.83
Decreased professional activity2016.67
7663.33WorriesWorrying about infection5949.17
Worrying about the consequences of the health crisis3932.5
7461.67Uncertainty about future
Themes and sub-themes for health care workers. Theme 1: psychological and emotional impact. Most of the health-care workers (86.67%) described an increase in emotional difficulties. They reported stress, exhaustion, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, sleeping and eating problems, addictive behavior and guilt: “At the beginning, I was really stressed. I live in Mulhouse, a city that is particularly affected by the pandemic. At night, I woke up crying and wondering if I should leave a note for the children if I’m hospitalized!” “Lots of nightmares… For the moment, I don’t pay attention to my mental state, I keep focusing on my work, but I’m afraid about the future…”. They also mentioned negative emotions (e.g., anger, frustration, irritability, sadness, apathy), a feeling of injustice and not understanding people who did not comply with the lockdown measures. Theme 2: adjustment. Some participants (67.5%) described how they had adjusted to the situation using different techniques to modify their professional or personal life, particularly social media: “We had to adjust, my husband has been laid off. Everybody had to adapt. He's very understanding and sympathetic about what I’m going through at work.” “I call my brothers and sisters (and their family) and my 66-year-old mother who's living on her own. I keep in regular touch with my 90-year-old grandparents by email or phone calls through the secretary at their nursing home. I send pictures and videos.” They also mentioned how they had adjusted to the occupational health protocol. Theme 3: negative impact on work. Some participants (65%) mentioned more difficulty at work, particularly material problems, increased workload, staff shortages, and a global deterioration of quality of life at work: “The work is more intense because there are staff shortages but there are still emergencies.” They expressed greater emotional difficulty: “Feeling of being imprisoned, of doing nothing except working. After a while it's exhausting. I see others who have time to do lots of things and it's a bit exasperating.” The participants reported that the deterioration in their working conditions led to greater difficulty balancing work and personal life and disconnecting from work, an increase in burnout and conflict at work, as well as reduced quality of care and communication with patients. Finally, participants also mentioned a lack of recognition at work. Theme 4: worries. Generally, participants (63.33%) worried more: about being infected, infecting a relative, infecting a patient: “I worry about infecting the patients I still see in rehab.” “I worry about my family… I don’t see my children.” They also worried more about the emotional well-being of relatives and patients, money, etc. Theme 5: uncertainty about the future. Some participants (61.67%) reported their concern about the future. They worried about how their job would be affected. It was difficult for them to imagine how things would work out: “The uncertainty about the future, about going back to work (when, how) makes me really anxious.” “Difficult to plan, difficult to accept that there might not be a real return to normality.” They also expressed worry about a second wave of COVID-19, their professional future, the consequences of the health crisis for the economy and the ecological future of the planet.

Discussion

The aim of this study was to assess the psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on samples of French people using a qualitative method. In line with previous studies [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [9], we observed symptoms of stress, depression, sleep problems and substance abuse (theme 2). As previously demonstrated [7], our participants also experienced loneliness (theme 5). Qualitative analysis suggests that loneliness is caused not just by lack of social contact, but also by lack of direct physical contact. Our participants also reported some positive consequences, particularly having more free time and the opportunity to strengthen their relationships through the use of communication technologies (e.g., social media, online games), to think of themselves and for personal growth (e.g., introspection, new activities, learning) (themes 1, 3 and 4). We have not found similar results in the international literature. The most frequent theme was being able to develop and maintain social relationships. This suggests that one way of coping with lockdown is to develop its positive aspects. Our results for health-care workers are in line with those of quantitative studies [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], indicating emotional difficulties such as depression, stress, post-traumatic stress symptoms, sleeping problems, and burnout (theme 1). Participants also reported emotional difficulties, highlighting worries and uncertainty about the future (themes 4 and 5). We also found anger and addictive behavior (theme 1), which have been less studied among health-care workers. The health-care workers in our sample reported a negative impact of COVID-19 on their work (theme 3), which may partly explain their emotional difficulties. They also demonstrated the ability to adjust to the situation by changing their behavior (theme 2).

Limitations and implications

This study has a few limitations. First, most of the participants were women. Secondly, our sample of health-care workers was not representative of health professionals as a whole; in particular, there were few doctors. Finally, data were gathered during the second stage of lockdown, and it is possible that participants would have answered differently during the first stage. It would be interesting in the future to further analyze and understand the consequences of the pandemic, particularly for health-care workers, as France is currently experiencing a significant shortage of these professionals. Indeed, as the COVID-19 pandemic is not over, identifying their experiences of this health crisis and the determinants of staying in the job is a crucial issue for the sustainability of the health services. It would thus be interesting to explore the effects of the health crisis on the professional and personal lives of a more representative sample of health-care personnel (e.g., more physicians). This would allow us to compare the effects of the health crisis on different categories of health-care workers and identify those who experience the most serious consequences and therefore need the most help to preserve their health. Identification of the most significant job resources to protect their psychological well-being is also an important area for future research. This study provides insight into the beneficial effects of the health crisis and lockdown (e.g., improved and maintained social relationships, personal growth). These results are innovative because they reveal the potential drivers of personal resilience to be explored for future crises [32]. A future study could focus on determining the conditions (e.g., personal, social, professional) under which these benefits can be optimized.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to emotional difficulties among both the general public and health-care workers, with a wide range of symptoms. There have also been positive consequences, such as improved social relationships, personal growth, and better health. Finally, the consequences tend to be more negative for health-care workers than for the general public. Special attention should be paid to their emotional difficulties.

Disclosure of interest

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any business or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest..
  34 in total

1.  Psychological impact of COVID-19 on a sample of Spanish health professionals.

Authors:  María Dosil Santamaría; Naiara Ozamiz-Etxebarria; Iratxe Redondo Rodríguez; Joana Jaureguizar Albondiga-Mayor; Maitane Picaza Gorrochategi
Journal:  Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed)       Date:  2021-05-21

2.  Stress, anxiety, and depression levels in the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak in a population sample in the northern Spain.

Authors:  Naiara Ozamiz-Etxebarria; Maria Dosil-Santamaria; Maitane Picaza-Gorrochategui; Nahia Idoiaga-Mondragon
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 1.632

3.  Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Jianyu Que; Le Shi; Jiahui Deng; Jiajia Liu; Li Zhang; Suying Wu; Yimiao Gong; Weizhen Huang; Kai Yuan; Wei Yan; Yankun Sun; Maosheng Ran; Yanping Bao; Lin Lu
Journal:  Gen Psychiatr       Date:  2020-06-14

4.  COVID-19 confessions: a qualitative exploration of healthcare workers experiences of working with COVID-19.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; S Noble; Stephen Johnston; David Jones; Rachael Hunter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Drinking to cope with the pandemic: The unique associations of COVID-19-related perceived threat and psychological distress to drinking behaviors in American men and women.

Authors:  Lindsey M Rodriguez; Dana M Litt; Sherry H Stewart
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Quarantine experience of close contacts of COVID-19 patients in China: A qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Dandan Chen; Feng Song; Leiwen Tang; Hui Zhang; Jing Shao; Ruolin Qiu; Xiyi Wang; Zhihong Ye
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.238

7.  A qualitative study on the psychological experience of caregivers of COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Niuniu Sun; Luoqun Wei; Suling Shi; Dandan Jiao; Runluo Song; Lili Ma; Hongwei Wang; Chao Wang; Zhaoguo Wang; Yanli You; Shuhua Liu; Hongyun Wang
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Prevalence, risk factors and clinical correlates of depression in quarantined population during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Min Peng; Beirong Mo; Yansong Liu; Mingming Xu; Xinran Song; Luyu Liu; Yeqing Fang; Tianyou Guo; Jinying Ye; Zhijian Yu; Qiwen Deng; Xiangyang Zhang
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.