Literature DB >> 35725124

Obesity Prevalence Among U.S. Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Brandon J Restrepo1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, several studies collected small and relatively homogenous samples to track U.S. adult obesity rates and obesity-related risk factors. In this study, a much larger sample from a nationally representative survey was used to investigate changes in average BMI, obesity prevalence rates, and 4 obesity-related risk factors in the U.S. adult population during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: Using a large nationally representative sample of U.S. adults aged ≥20 years from the 2011-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, linear regression models estimated intra-pandemic changes in average BMI and obesity prevalence rates as well as 4 obesity-related risk factors.
RESULTS: Relative to the 2019 to prepandemic 2020 period, significantly higher average BMI (+0.6%, p<0.05, N=3,555,865) and obesity prevalence rates (+3%, p<0.05, N=3,555,865) were observed among U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Significantly higher rates of any exercise participation (+4.4%, p<0.01, N=3,607,272), average sleep hours in a 24-hour period (+1.5%, p<0.01, N=1,907,798), average alcoholic drink days in the past month (+2.7%, p<0.05, N=3,577,090), and lower rates of smoking at least some days (-4%, p<0.01, N=3,625,180) were also observed.
CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. adult obesity rates were higher and worsened the pre-existing epidemic of adult obesity in the U.S. Higher rates of alcohol consumption and lower smoking rates may have contributed to the higher rates of adult obesity in the U.S during the COVID-19 pandemic. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35725124      PMCID: PMC8977388          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   6.604


INTRODUCTION

In 2017–2018, obesity prevalence among U.S. adults was estimated to be 42.4%. As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic unfolded, weight gain in the adult population was reported by several studies, suggesting that intra-pandemic behavior changes caused a positive energy balance that exacerbated the adult obesity epidemic. An online survey conducted in April 2020–May 2020 indicated that weight gain was reported by almost 1 in 3 participants overall and by more than one-third of participants who had obesity. In February 2020–June 2020, analysis of repeated weight measures from adult participants of the Health eHeart Study revealed an average gain of 1.5 pounds per month after local and state shelter-in-place orders were implemented. Similarly, in an online survey of adults during May 2020–August 2020, the average weight gain reported across all participants amounted to 1.3 pounds, with 1 in 4 participants who had obesity reporting an average weight gain >3 times higher (4.4 pounds). Given the rapidity with which adults gained weight, it is likely that intra-pandemic changes in risky dietary or other health-related behaviors contributed to the rise in body weight during the pandemic. Indeed, studies using online survey data found that adult participants who reported that they gained weight during the pandemic also reported more frequent snacking and alcohol intake; increased eating in response to sight, smell, and stress; and decreased physical activity. Though prior studies provide insights into how obesity prevalence changed during the pandemic, it is unclear whether results from nonrepresentative samples generalize to the broader adult population. This study contributes to the literature by using nationally representative data on adults aged ≥20 years from the 2011–2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to analyze changes in average BMI and obesity prevalence rates during the pandemic. Several behaviors that can influence obesity risk—exercise, sleep duration, alcohol use, and smoking—are also examined to help explain observed changes in average BMI and obesity prevalence rates.

METHODS

The BRFSS collects data about U.S. residents from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and 3 U.S. territories regarding health-related risk behaviors and chronic health conditions. This study used only public-use deidentified BRFSS data. To estimate intra-pandemic changes in average BMI, obesity prevalence rates, and 4 obesity-related risk measures—participation in any physical activity in the past month, average sleep hours in a 24-hour period, number of days in the past month when any amount of alcohol was consumed, and cigarette smoking every day or on some days—among adults aged ≥20 years in the 2011–2020 BRFSS, the following linear regression model was estimated by ordinary least squares:where Y is either a body weight measure or an obesity-related risk factor for individual i at time t; X is a vector of individual characteristics—age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, marital status, and number of children—that account for changing demographic characteristics over time that could affect body weight or obesity risk as well as the survey respondent's location; ∑ Interview Year represents 8 indicator variables equal to 1 if the survey respondent was interviewed in a prepandemic year 2011, 2012, …, 2018 and 0 otherwise; COVID Pandemic is an indicator variable equal to 1 if the survey respondent was interviewed after the President of the U.S. declared the spread of the novel coronavirus a pandemic (March 13, 2020) and 0 otherwise; and ε is a random error term. All interview period coefficient estimates are estimated relative to the (omitted) 2019 to March 12, 2020 period. The primary dependent variable of interest, BMI, is derived from self-reported height and weight. As these measures are often misreported, they were adjusted for measurement error using a percentile-based approach with data from the 2011 to March 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The adjusted height and weight data were used to compute an adjusted BMI measure and an adjusted obesity indicator (BMI ≥30). Table 1 contains the summary statistics for the dependent and independent variables used in the analysis. For BMI/obesity, the analysis involved 3,555,865 respondents (3,311,457 before the pandemic and 244,408 during the pandemic). Consistent with BRFSS respondents overestimating height and underestimating weight, adjusted BMI and obesity are higher than unadjusted BMI and obesity (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary Statistics for the Overall Sample, 2011‒2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

VariablesMean or %SD
BMI (unadjusted)28.1396.315
Obese (unadjusted)30.8%
BMI (adjusted)29.0516.620
Obese (adjusted)36.7%
Any physical activity in past montha75.6%
Average hours of sleep in a 24-hour periodb6.9581.469
Number of days in the past month alcohol was consumedc5.0798.071
Currently, smoking some days or every dayd17.6%
Age in years48.09316.914
Sex
 Female49.5%
 Male50.5%
Racial/ethnic group
 Non-Hispanic White65.4%
 Non-Hispanic Black11.7%
 Hispanic15.3%
 Other7.7%
Educational attainment
 Never attended school or only kindergarten0.2%
 Grades 1 through 8 (elementary)3.8%
 Grades 9 to 11 (some high school)8.2%
 Grade 12 or GED (high school graduate)26.8%
 College 1 year to 3 years (some college)31.5%
 College 4 years or more (college graduate)29.5%
Household income, $
 <10,0005.8%
 10,000 to <15,0005.3%
 15,000 to <20,0007.5%
 20,000 to <25,0009.1%
 25,000 to <35,00010.5%
 35,000 to <50,00013.6%
 50,000 to <75,00015.3%
 >75,00033.0%
Marital status
 Married or a member of an unmarried couple58.1%
 Divorced11.6%
 Widowed6.6%
 Separated2.6%
 Never married21.1%
Number of children under 18 years of age in the household
 063.0%
 114.9%
 213.4%
 35.8%
 42.0%
 ≥51.0%
Time period
 Year 20119.9%
 Year 201210.2%
 Year 201310.1%
 Year 201410.0%
 Year 20159.7%
 Year 201610.1%
 Year 201710.2%
 Year 20189.8%
 Year 2019–March 12, 202011.7%
 March 13, 2020–March 18, 20218.2%

Note: These are summary statistics corresponding to the regression sample involving BMI/obesity as a dependent variable: the overall N=3,555,865, the prepandemic n=3,311,457, and intra-pandemic n=244,408. To produce nationally representative estimates, the appropriate BRFSS sampling weights, strata, and primary sampling units were applied in computing these summary statistics. Because of missing information on the other dependent variables used in the regression analyses summarized in Figure 1, the sample sizes are smaller and are as follows:

The overall N=3,607,272. The prepandemic n=3,349,482 and intra-pandemic n=257,790.

The overall N=1,907,798. The prepandemic n=1,652,408 and intra-pandemic n=255,390.

The overall N=3,577,090. The prepandemic n=3,328,705 and intra-pandemic n=248,385.

The overall N=3,625,180. The prepandemic n=3,374,039 and intra-pandemic n=251,141.

Summary Statistics for the Overall Sample, 2011‒2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Note: These are summary statistics corresponding to the regression sample involving BMI/obesity as a dependent variable: the overall N=3,555,865, the prepandemic n=3,311,457, and intra-pandemic n=244,408. To produce nationally representative estimates, the appropriate BRFSS sampling weights, strata, and primary sampling units were applied in computing these summary statistics. Because of missing information on the other dependent variables used in the regression analyses summarized in Figure 1, the sample sizes are smaller and are as follows:
Figure 1

Changes in average BMI, obesity prevalence rates, and obesity-related risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Note: Each marker shows the linear regression coefficient estimate—relative to the 2019 to March 12, 2020, period—associated with an indicator for the COVID-19 pandemic period from a separate linear regression model estimated by Ordinary Least Squares along with the corresponding 95% confidence band. To compute nationally representative estimates, the appropriate BRFSS sampling weights, strata, and primary sampling units were used in all regressions. Each coefficient estimate shown is statistically significant at the 5% level or better. Please see the notes in Table 1 for the sample sizes for the 6 separate regression models. For the continuous dependent variables, to obtain percentage changes, the formula 100 × exp (linear regression coefficient estimate) − 100 must be applied. To obtain percentage changes for the binary dependent variables, the linear regression coefficient estimate must be divided by the sample mean. Regressors included but not shown: age and its square, male dummy, race/ethnicity dummies, educational attainment dummies, annual household income dummies, marital status dummies, number of children under 18 years of age in the household dummies, indicators for survey years 2011, 2012, …, 2018, and indicators for the survey respondent's state of residence.

The overall N=3,607,272. The prepandemic n=3,349,482 and intra-pandemic n=257,790. The overall N=1,907,798. The prepandemic n=1,652,408 and intra-pandemic n=255,390. The overall N=3,577,090. The prepandemic n=3,328,705 and intra-pandemic n=248,385. The overall N=3,625,180. The prepandemic n=3,374,039 and intra-pandemic n=251,141. There was significant skewness in the continuous dependent variables (BMI, sleep hours, and alcoholic drink days); therefore, they were log-transformed in the regression analysis. The primary independent variable of interest (COVID Pandemic) is a binary variable, so in linear regressions involving logged continuous dependent variables, percentage changes relative to the 2019 to March 12, 2020 period were obtained by applying the formula 100 × exp (linear coefficient estimate)−100. In linear regressions involving binary dependent variables, coefficient estimates were divided by sample means to obtain percentage changes relative to the 2019 to March 12, 2020 period. All analyses were conducted using Stata, version 17. To account for the complex survey design of the BRFSS and produce nationally representative estimates, BRFSS sampling weights, strata, and primary sampling units were applied using Stata's estimation commands for survey data.

RESULTS

Figure 1 shows the linear regression coefficient estimates associated with the indicator for the COVID-19 pandemic period. The analysis reveals that, relative to the 2019 to March 12, 2020 period, average BMI was higher by 0.6% (p<0.05) and obesity prevalence rates were higher by 1.1 percentage points or 3% relative to the sample mean (p<0.05). Exercise participation rates were higher by 3.3 percentage points (or 4.4%) (p<0.01), average sleep hours were higher by 1.5% (p<0.01), average alcoholic drink days were higher by 2.7% (p<0.05), and smoking rates were lower by 0.7 percentage points (or 4%) (p<0.01). Changes in average BMI, obesity prevalence rates, and obesity-related risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Note: Each marker shows the linear regression coefficient estimate—relative to the 2019 to March 12, 2020, period—associated with an indicator for the COVID-19 pandemic period from a separate linear regression model estimated by Ordinary Least Squares along with the corresponding 95% confidence band. To compute nationally representative estimates, the appropriate BRFSS sampling weights, strata, and primary sampling units were used in all regressions. Each coefficient estimate shown is statistically significant at the 5% level or better. Please see the notes in Table 1 for the sample sizes for the 6 separate regression models. For the continuous dependent variables, to obtain percentage changes, the formula 100 × exp (linear regression coefficient estimate) − 100 must be applied. To obtain percentage changes for the binary dependent variables, the linear regression coefficient estimate must be divided by the sample mean. Regressors included but not shown: age and its square, male dummy, race/ethnicity dummies, educational attainment dummies, annual household income dummies, marital status dummies, number of children under 18 years of age in the household dummies, indicators for survey years 2011, 2012, …, 2018, and indicators for the survey respondent's state of residence.

DISCUSSION

Relative to the 2019 to March 12, 2020 period, significantly higher average BMI and obesity prevalence rates during the COVID-19 pandemic were observed among adults. Significant changes in several obesity-related risk indicators were also observed. Higher rates of alcohol consumption and lower smoking rates may have contributed to higher obesity prevalence rates. Indeed, higher alcohol intake has been shown to be a risk factor for obesity in some adults, particularly when it is not compensated for through reductions in intake of other calorie-dense foods and beverages. Quitting smoking has also been shown to lead to weight gain, both in the short and longer term. Higher exercise participation and average sleep duration can reduce obesity risk. However, given the observed higher obesity prevalence rates, higher exercise participation rates and average hours of sleep were not enough to offset behavior changes that increased obesity risk. Given that >40% of adults currently have obesity, which raises annual medical costs by approximately $3,632 (2020 dollars), continued surveillance of obesity prevalence rates and obesity-related risk factors can help to inform policy that is designed to mitigate the health and economic burdens of obesity. A major strength of this study is its ability to estimate intra-pandemic obesity prevalence rates and obesity-related risk factors using a large nationally representative survey. The BRFSS is, however, a cross-sectional data set. Future work exploiting longitudinal data to explore the dynamics of weight status among the same individuals during the pandemic would be useful. Another important limitation is that BRFSS respondents were not asked whether they had COVID-19, which may have affected obesity-related risk factors. Moreover, obesity is a complex disease, and there are many risky behaviors that could have contributed to the higher obesity prevalence rates documented here, including changes in dietary intake that are unmeasured in the BRFSS data. An important direction for future research is to examine whether adults shifted toward more calorie-dense eating patterns during the pandemic. These results may prove to be useful inputs in policymaking decisions regarding potential actions to combat the exacerbated adult obesity epidemic as the COVID-19 pandemic subsides.
  11 in total

1.  The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach.

Authors:  John Cawley; Chad Meyerhoefer
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Adjusting body mass for measurement error with invalid validation data.

Authors:  Charles Courtemanche; Joshua C Pinkston; Jay Stewart
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.184

3.  The effect of smoking on obesity: Evidence from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Charles Courtemanche; Rusty Tchernis; Benjamin Ukert
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  COVID-19 pandemic and stay-at-home mandates promote weight gain in US adults.

Authors:  Adam Seal; Andrew Schaffner; Suzanne Phelan; Hannah Brunner-Gaydos; Marilyn Tseng; Sarah Keadle; Julia Alber; Isabelle Kiteck; Todd Hagobian
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 9.298

5.  Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017-2018.

Authors:  Craig M Hales; Margaret D Carroll; Cheryl D Fryar; Cynthia L Ogden
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2020-02

Review 6.  Alcohol Consumption and Obesity: An Update.

Authors:  Gregory Traversy; Jean-Philippe Chaput
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-03

Review 7.  Economic Burden of Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Maximilian Tremmel; Ulf-G Gerdtham; Peter M Nilsson; Sanjib Saha
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Longitudinal Weight Gain and Related Risk Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Adults in the US.

Authors:  Surabhi Bhutani; Michelle R vanDellen; Jamie A Cooper
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Self-quarantine and weight gain related risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Zeigler Zachary; Forbes Brianna; Lopez Brianna; Pedersen Garrett; Welty Jade; Deyo Alyssa; Kerekes Mikayla
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  The Impact of COVID-19 Stay-At-Home Orders on Health Behaviors in Adults.

Authors:  Emily W Flanagan; Robbie A Beyl; S Nicole Fearnbach; Abby D Altazan; Corby K Martin; Leanne M Redman
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 9.298

View more
  6 in total

1.  Personalized Disease Prevention (PDP): study protocol for a cluster-randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Glen B Taksler; Phuc Le; Bo Hu; Jay Alberts; Allen J Flynn; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.728

2.  Work from home and daily time allocations: evidence from the coronavirus pandemic.

Authors:  Brandon J Restrepo; Eliana Zeballos
Journal:  Rev Econ Househ       Date:  2022-06-13

3.  Inpatient care cost, duration, and acute complications associated with BMI in children and adults hospitalized for COVID-19.

Authors:  Lyudmyla Kompaniyets; Alyson B Goodman; Jennifer L Wiltz; Sundar S Shrestha; Scott D Grosse; Tegan K Boehmer; Heidi M Blanck
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 9.298

4.  Nationwide changes in physical activity, nutrient intake, and obesity in South Korea during the COVID-19 pandemic era.

Authors:  Hong Jun Yang; Saengryeol Park; Tai-Young Yoon; Jae-Hong Ryoo; Sung Keun Park; Ju Young Jung; Ju-Hyung Lee; Chang-Mo Oh
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.055

5.  The Association between Altitude and Waist-Height Ratio in Peruvian Adults: A Cross-Sectional Data Analysis of a Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Akram Hernández-Vásquez; Diego Azañedo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Pilot Study on the Impact of a Home-Based Exercise Program on Inflammatory Cytokines and Quality of Life in Men with Prostate Cancer Under Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Crisann Moon; Amber M Gallegos; Bilal Sheikh; Pratap Kumar; Michael Liss; Darpan I Patel
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.