Literature DB >> 35723700

Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning versus open reduction and internal fixation for Jakob type 3 lateral condyle fractures in children.

Yanhan Liu1, Weizhe Shi1, Hai Zhao2, Yiqiang Li1, Jingchun Li1, Fuxin Xun1, Federico Canavese3, Hongwen Xu4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The management of type 3 lateral condyle fractures (LCFs) remains controversial. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) in patients with type 3 LCFs and to assess the outcome of such injuries according to the type of treatment, CRPP, or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of prospectively enrolled children with type 3 LCF managed by CRPP or ORIF between 2018 and 2021. All patients were followed for at least 12 months. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of treatment, CRPP or ORIF. Demographic characteristics were recorded for all patients. Standard radiographs were used to identify, evaluate, and classify each fracture and to detect the presence of other concomitant bone lesions. The clinical outcome was assessed according to the Hardacre et al. criteria.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight children with type 3 LCF were included; 42 were treated by CRPP (53.8%) and 36 by ORIF (46.2%); the mean follow-up time was 17.7 months (range, 12.3-40.9). The baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups of patients. Overall, successful CRPP could be achieved in 39 out of 42 patients (92.9%). The mean surgical time was 63.4 and 84.5 min in patients treated by CRPP and ORIF, respectively (p = 0.01). Fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in patients managed by ORIF than in those treated by CRPP (12 versus 40 s, respectively; p < 0.001). Clinical outcome according to the Hardacre et al. criteria was excellent in 37 out of 39 (94.4%) and in 35 out of 36 patients (97.2%) treated by CRPP and ORIF, respectively (p = 0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: CRPP management of paediatric type 3 LCF has clinical and radiographic outcomes similar to ORIF; if satisfactory reduction cannot be achieved by CRPP, conversion to ORIF should be considered.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Displaced; Lateral condyle fracture; Open reduction; Percutaneous fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35723700     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05476-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.479


  18 in total

1.  Open Vs. Closed Reduction in Type 2 Lateral Condyle Fractures.

Authors:  Kirollos Gendi; Andrew Livermore; Jason Browne; Maxwell Machurick; Matthew A Halanski; Kenneth J Noonan
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

2.  Radiological, clinical and functional evaluation using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire of children with medial epicondyle fractures treated surgically.

Authors:  Federico Canavese; Lorenza Marengo; Alexandru Tiris; Mounira Mansour; Marie Rousset; Antoine Samba; Antonio Andreacchio; Alain Dimeglio
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Diagnosis, management and complications of distal humerus lateral condyle fractures in children.

Authors:  Daniel A Shaerf; Ivor S Vanhegan; Rupen Dattani
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-04-11

4.  Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Type II Lateral Condyle Humerus Fractures in Children Displaced >2 mm.

Authors:  Andrew T Pennock; Lissette Salgueiro; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Tracey P Bastrom; Peter O Newton; Burt Yaszay
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Comparison of Kirschner wires and AO cannulated screw internal fixation for displaced lateral humeral condyle fracture in children.

Authors:  Wen Chao Li; Rui Jiang Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning of Displaced Pediatric Lateral Condyle Fractures of the Humerus: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mauricio Silva; Shannon D Cooper
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2015 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Elbow fractures in children. An epidemiological analysis of 589 cases.

Authors:  L A Landin; L G Danielsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1986-08

8.  Closed reduction and internal fixation of displaced unstable lateral condylar fractures of the humerus in children.

Authors:  Kwang Soon Song; Chul Hyung Kang; Byung Woo Min; Ki Cheor Bae; Chul Hyun Cho; Ju Hyub Lee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Lateral humeral condylar fractures in children.

Authors:  D E Foster; J A Sullivan; R H Gross
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Operative treatment of lateral humeral condyle fractures in children.

Authors:  Johannes Wirmer; Christian Kruppa; Guido Fitze
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.