Literature DB >> 35722658

Comparison of biological responses between submerged, pseudo-air-liquid interface, and air-liquid interface exposure of A549 and differentiated THP-1 co-cultures to combustion-derived particles.

Kamaljeet Kaur1, Raziye Mohammadpour2,3, Anne Sturrock4, Hamidreza Ghandehari2,3,5, Christopher Reilly2,6, Robert Paine4, Kerry E Kelly1,2.   

Abstract

Air liquid interface (ALI) exposure systems are gaining interest, and studies suggest enhanced response of lung cells exposed to particles at ALI as compared to submerged exposure, although the results have been somewhat inconsistent. Previous studies have used monocultures and measured particle deposition using assumptions including consistent particle deposition, particle density, and shape. This study exposed co-cultures of A549 and differentiated THP-1 cells to flame-generated particles using three exposure methods: ALI, pseudo-ALI, and submerged. The dose at ALI was measured directly, reducing the need for assumptions about particle properties and deposition. For all exposure methods an enhanced pro-inflammatory response (TNFα) and Cytochrome P450 (CYP1A1) gene expression, compared to their corresponding negative controls, was observed. ALI exposure induced a significantly greater TNFα response compared to submerged exposure. The submerged exposures exhibited greater induction of CYP1A1 than other exposure methods, although not statistically significant. Some of the factors behind the observed difference in responses for the three exposure methods include differences in physicochemical properties of particles in suspending media, delivered dose, and potential contribution of gas-phase species to cellular response in ALI exposure. However, given the difficulty and expense of ALI exposures, submerged exposure may still provide relevant information for particulate exposures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP1A1 gene expression; Cell uptake; electrostatic deposition; exposure method; mass dose; pro-inflammatory marker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35722658      PMCID: PMC9354920          DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2022.2083429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng        ISSN: 1093-4529


  41 in total

1.  Expression of adhesion molecules, monocyte interactions and oxidative stress in human endothelial cells exposed to wood smoke and diesel exhaust particulate matter.

Authors:  Lykke Forchhammer; Steffen Loft; Martin Roursgaard; Yi Cao; Ingunn Skogstad Riddervold; Torben Sigsgaard; Peter Møller
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  Time course of bronchial cell inflammation following exposure to diesel particulate matter using a modified EAVES.

Authors:  Brie Hawley; Dave McKenna; Anthony Marchese; John Volckens
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM1 and PM2.5 in Tianjin, China: Impacts of biomass burning and primary biogenic sources.

Authors:  Jahan Zeb Khan; Long Sun; Yingze Tian; Guoliang Shi; Yinchang Feng
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.565

4.  The pro-inflammatory effects of low-toxicity low-solubility particles, nanoparticles and fine particles, on epithelial cells in vitro: the role of surface area.

Authors:  Claire Monteiller; Lang Tran; William MacNee; Steve Faux; Alan Jones; Brian Miller; Ken Donaldson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  In vitro exposures in diesel exhaust atmospheres: resuspension of PM from filters versus direct deposition of PM from air.

Authors:  Kim M Lichtveld; Seth M Ebersviller; Kenneth G Sexton; William Vizuete; Ilona Jaspers; Harvey E Jeffries
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  The Gillings Sampler--an electrostatic air sampler as an alternative method for aerosol in vitro exposure studies.

Authors:  Jose Zavala; Kim Lichtveld; Seth Ebersviller; Johnny L Carson; Glenn W Walters; Ilona Jaspers; Harvey E Jeffries; Kenneth G Sexton; William Vizuete
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.192

7.  Cellular response to diesel exhaust particles strongly depends on the exposure method.

Authors:  Amara L Holder; Donald Lucas; Regine Goth-Goldstein; Catherine P Koshland
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Protective effects of pulmonary epithelial lining fluid on oxidative stress and DNA single-strand breaks caused by ultrafine carbon black, ferrous sulphate and organic extract of diesel exhaust particles.

Authors:  Hsiao-Chi Chuang; Yi-Ling Cheng; Yu-Chen Lei; Hui-Hsien Chang; Tsun-Jen Cheng
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  The identification of markers of macrophage differentiation in PMA-stimulated THP-1 cells and monocyte-derived macrophages.

Authors:  Marc Daigneault; Julie A Preston; Helen M Marriott; Moira K B Whyte; David H Dockrell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Combined exposure of diesel exhaust particles and respirable Soufrière Hills volcanic ash causes a (pro-)inflammatory response in an in vitro multicellular epithelial tissue barrier model.

Authors:  Ines Tomašek; Claire J Horwell; David E Damby; Hana Barošová; Christoph Geers; Alke Petri-Fink; Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser; Martin J D Clift
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 9.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.