Literature DB >> 35722610

Is duodenal biopsy always necessary for the diagnosis of coeliac disease in adult patients with high anti-tissue transglutaminase (TTG) antibody titres?

Junaid Beig1, Kamran Rostami2, David T S Hayman3, Summer Hassan1, Stephen Gerred1, Ravinder Ogra1.   

Abstract

Objective: Avoiding duodenal biopsy in adults for coeliac disease (CD) diagnosis is controversial. Some retrospective and prospective studies have shown that CD can be reliably diagnosed in adults with serology rather than duodenal biopsies. This study aimed to check the accuracy of a cut-off value of ≥10 upper limit of normal of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody (anti-TTG IgA) titres for CD diagnosis in adult patients. Method: We retrospectively analysed adult patients (≥16 years) who underwent gastroscopy from 2013 to 2018 for positive coeliac serology. The relationship between titres and disease was determined by using linear models, whereas sensitivity and specificity were assessed by receiver operator curve.
Results: We analysed 144 newly anti-TTG antibody-positive adult patients with a median age of 48.5 years (IQR 32-62); among them, 86 (60%) patients had CD (Marsh III: n=68 and Marsh II and I: n=18) with a higher prevalence in females (n=59 (69%)) and Europeans (n=60 (70%)). Fifty (58%) patients with CD had colonoscopy and five (6%) had imaging; only six patients were diagnosed with additional conditions. An anti-TTG IgA titre cut-off value of 150 U/L was 100% specific for CD in our dataset, with 70% (95% CI: 60% to 88%) sensitivity for this patient group.
Conclusion: Coeliac serology using anti-TTG IgA with titres ≥10× normal value is an excellent predictor of CD, irrespective of age, gender and ethnicity. Duodenal biopsy may not be necessary in selected adult patients with CD, especially younger than 50 years of age without additional gastrointestinal red-flag signs and symptoms. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  celiac disease; small intestinal biopsy

Year:  2021        PMID: 35722610      PMCID: PMC9186042          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  44 in total

Review 1.  Advances in diagnosis and management of celiac disease.

Authors:  Ciarán P Kelly; Julio C Bai; Edwin Liu; Daniel A Leffler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Coeliac disease: further evidence that biopsy is not always necessary for diagnosis.

Authors:  Geoffrey K T Holmes; Julia M Forsyth; Sarah Knowles; Helen Seddon; Peter G Hill; Andrew S Austin
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.566

3.  Characteristics of adult celiac disease in the USA: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S N Stavropoulos; S G Panagi; S L Goldstein; D J Mcmahon; H Absan; A I Neugut
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Validation of Antibody-Based Strategies for Diagnosis of Pediatric Celiac Disease Without Biopsy.

Authors:  Johannes Wolf; David Petroff; Thomas Richter; Marcus K H Auth; Holm H Uhlig; Martin W Laass; Peter Lauenstein; Andreas Krahl; Norman Händel; Jan de Laffolie; Almuthe C Hauer; Thomas Kehler; Gunter Flemming; Frank Schmidt; Astor Rodrigues; Dirk Hasenclever; Thomas Mothes
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Combining antibody tests and taking into account antibody levels improves serologic diagnosis of celiac disease.

Authors:  Matthijs Oyaert; Pieter Vermeersch; Gert De Hertogh; Martin Hiele; Nathalie Vandeputte; Ilse Hoffman; Xavier Bossuyt
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Histologic follow-up of people with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet: slow and incomplete recovery.

Authors:  Peter J Wahab; Jos W R Meijer; Chris J J Mulder
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Serology-based criteria for adult coeliac disease have excellent accuracy across the range of pre-test probabilities.

Authors:  Valma Fuchs; Kalle Kurppa; Heini Huhtala; Kaija Laurila; Markku Mäki; Pekka Collin; Teea Salmi; Liisa Luostarinen; Päivi Saavalainen; Katri Kaukinen
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Antibodies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: a biopsy-controlled, international, multicentre study of 376 children with coeliac disease and 695 controls.

Authors:  Johannes Wolf; Dirk Hasenclever; David Petroff; Thomas Richter; Holm H Uhlig; Martin W Laaß; Almuthe Hauer; Martin Stern; Xavier Bossuyt; Jan de Laffolie; Gunter Flemming; Danilo Villalta; Wolfgang Schlumberger; Thomas Mothes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Subclinical celiac disease and gluten sensitivity.

Authors:  Mohammad Rostami Nejad; Sabine Hogg-Kollars; Sauid Ishaq; Kamran Rostami
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.