Literature DB >> 35722598

Endoscopically placed venting gastrostomy can be a safe and effective palliative intervention in benign and malignant gastrointestinal obstruction.

Ross J Porter1,2, Alastair W McKinlay1, Emma L Metcalfe1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic gastrointestinal obstruction can precipitate a constellation of symptoms including nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension and pain that negatively impact on health-related quality of life. Decompression via venting gastrostomy can offer symptomatic relief but safety and efficacy data are sparse. This study characterises the diverse venting percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (vPEG) cohort at our tertiary referral centre and defines the safety and efficacy of this procedure.
Methods: Patients undergoing vPEG between May 2012 and June 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database and demographic, procedure-related and mortality data were extracted. Retrospective analysis of case notes provided data on patient symptoms. Last follow-up was May 2021.
Results: 27 patients (median age 63, range 18-90 years) underwent vPEG insertion. The majority of vPEGs were for patients with obstruction secondary to locally advanced or metastatic malignancy (n=21/27, 77.8%). Six procedures were performed for benign disease (n=6/27, 22.2%). No patients developed the recognised serious complications of bleeding, perforation or peritonitis from vPEG insertion. Symptoms of nausea (p=0.006), vomiting (p<0.001), abdominal distension (p<0.001) and abdominal pain (p=0.002) were improved following vPEG. Pain beyond the expected postprocedural discomfort was associated with a lower number of days survived postprocedure (p=0.026).
Conclusion: vPEG can be a safe and efficacious palliative intervention for benign and malignant chronic gastrointestinal obstruction. Severe postprocedural pain should be promptly investigated to exclude a potential complication. A defined clinical strategy for assessing and managing these patients would facilitate wider recognition of the benefits of vPEG and improve the safety profile in centres with more limited experience. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; endoscopic gastrostomy; endoscopic procedures; gastrointestinal cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 35722598      PMCID: PMC9186026          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  11 in total

1.  Clinical-practice recommendations for the management of bowel obstruction in patients with end-stage cancer.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; R Twycross; M Baines; F Bozzetti; S Capri; F De Conno; B Gemlo; T M Hunt; H B Krebs; S Mercadante; R Schaerer; P Wilkinson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Palliative performance scale (PPS): a new tool.

Authors:  F Anderson; G M Downing; J Hill; L Casorso; N Lerch
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.250

3.  Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 1: Definitions and indications. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

Authors:  Marianna Arvanitakis; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Edward J Despott; Asuncion Ballarin; Torsten Beyna; Kurt Boeykens; Peter Elbe; Ingrid Gisbertz; Alice Hoyois; Ofelia Mosteanu; David S Sanders; Peter T Schmidt; Stéphane M Schneider; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Safety and Efficacy of Venting Gastrostomy in Malignant Bowel Obstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sreeharshan Thampy; Pavan Najran; Damian Mullan; Hans-Ulrich Laasch
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 5.  Surgery for the resolution of symptoms in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Sarah E Cousins; Emma Tempest; David J Feuer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-04

6.  Percutaneous venting gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy for malignant bowel obstruction: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Rebecca Singh Curry; Elizabeth Evans; Anne-Marie Raftery; Julia Hiscock; Marlise Poolman
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.568

7.  Gastropexy can be as safe as conventional percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and biomarkers do not predict short-term or long-term outcomes: a 7-year follow-up audit.

Authors:  Ross J Porter; Alastair W McKinlay; Emma L Metcalfe
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-13

8.  Management of malignant bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Carla Ida Ripamonti; Alexandra M Easson; Hans Gerdes
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer patients: epidemiology, management, and factors influencing spontaneous resolution.

Authors:  Albert Tuca; Ernest Guell; Emilio Martinez-Losada; Nuria Codorniu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 10.  EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Umair Iqbal; Harshit S Khara; Yirui Hu; Vikas Kumar; Kashif Tufail; Bradley Confer; David L Diehl
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.