| Literature DB >> 35722593 |
Joel T Tetteh1,2, Anthony Pham2, Edward Peltier2, Justin M Hutchison2, Reza Barati Ghahfarokhi1,3.
Abstract
Surface complexation models (SCM), based mainly on the diffuse double layer (DDL) theory, have been used to predict zeta potential at the crude oil-brine-rock (COBR) interface with limited success. However, DDL is inherently limited in accurately predicting zeta potential by the assumptions that all the brine ions interact with the rock surface at the same plane and by the double layer collapse at higher brine ionic strength (>1M). In this work, a TLM-based SCM captured zeta potential trends at the calcite-brine interface with ionic strength up to 3 M. An extended DDL and TLM-based SCMs were used to predict the electrokinetic properties of a composite carbonate rock showing a different mineralogical composition. The extended TLM-based SCM captured the zeta potential prediction trends and magnitude, highlighting the contribution of the inorganic minerals and organic impurities on the composite carbonate surface. In contrast, the extended DDL-based SCM captured the zeta potential trends but failed to capture the magnitude of the measured zeta potential. Interestingly, the TLM-based SCM predicted a positive SP for the rock-brine interface, which could explain the oil-wet nature of composite carbonate rocks due to electrostatic adsorption of negatively charged carboxylic acids. Conversely, the DDL-based SCM predicted a negative SP, leading to an inaccurate interpretation of the electrokinetic properties at the rock-brine interface. Thus, the use of extended TLM-based SCM was required to accurately predict the zeta potential and account for the adsorption of carboxylic acids on the reservoir composite carbonate surface.Entities:
Keywords: Carbonate rocks; Electrokinetic interactions; Low salinity waterflooding; Surface complexation model; Triple layer model; Wettability alteration
Year: 2021 PMID: 35722593 PMCID: PMC9202652 DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fuel (Lond) ISSN: 0016-2361 Impact factor: 8.035