| Literature DB >> 35722324 |
Abstract
Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium are cell wall-less bacteria with strongly reduced genome content and close phylogenetic relatedness. In humans, the only known natural host, the microorganisms colonize the respiratory or genitourinary mucosa and may cause a broad range of clinical presentations. Besides fundamental differences in their tissue specificity, transmission route, and ability to cause prevalence peaks, both species share similarities such as the occurrence of asymptomatic carriers, preferred populations for infection, and problems with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. To further understand the epidemiology of these practically challenging bacteria, typing of strains is necessary. Since the cultivation of both pathogens is difficult and not performed outside of specialized laboratories, molecular typing methods with adequate discriminatory power, stability, and reproducibility have been developed. These include the characterization of genes containing repetitive sequences, of variable genome regions without the presence of repetitive sequences, determination of single and multi-locus variable-number tandem repeats, and detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms in different genes, respectively. The current repertoire of procedures allows reliable differentiation of strains circulating in different populations and in different time periods as well as comparison of strains occurring subsequently in individual patients. In this review, the methods for typing M. pneumoniae and M. genitalium, including the results of their application in different studies, are summarized and current knowledge regarding the association of typing data with the clinical characteristics of infections is presented.Entities:
Keywords: MLST; Mycoplasma genitalium; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; SNP; epidemiology; molecular typing; tandem repeats
Year: 2022 PMID: 35722324 PMCID: PMC9203060 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.904494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Characteristics of frequently used molecular approaches for typing Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium (results of studies with >25 patients are included; if not presented in the study, HGDI’s are calculated according to the data).
| Species | Typing method | Number of known types | HGDI | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 15 | 0.42–0.68 | |
| MLVA | 24 | 0.58–0.68 | ||
| MLST | 46 | 0.66–0.78 |
| |
| SNP | 15 | 0.80–0.84 | ||
| n.d. | 0.60–0.88 | |||
| n.d. | 0.75–0.91 | |||
| n.d. | 0.88–0.90 | |||
|
|
| 246 | 0.82–0.99 | |
| VNTR MG_309 | 12 | 0.84–0.95 | ||
| n.d. | 0.95–0.99 |
p1, sequence differences in p1 gene (MPN141); MLVA, multilocus variable number of tandem-repeat analysis; MLST, multilocus sequence typing; SNP, determination of single polynucleotide polymorphisms; mgpB, sequence differences in mgpB gene (MG_191); VNTR MG_309, variable number of tandem repeat in gene MG_309; HGDI, discriminatory index (Hunter and Gaston, 1988); and n.d., not determined.
Figure 1Association of main p1 types 1 and 2 (including variants) with multi-locus variable-number (MLV; A; using data of Benitez et al., 2012; Brown et al., 2015; Dumke et al., 2015; Touati et al., 2015; Kogoj et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2019; Kenri et al., 2020; Xiao et al., 2020; Dumke and Rodriguez, 2021; Meyer Sauteur et al., 2021), MLS (B; data of Brown et al., 2015; Kenri et al., 2020; Meyer Sauteur et al., 2021; and Dumke and Rodriguez, 2021), and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) types (C; data of Touati et al., 2015; Kenri et al., 2020; Dumke and Rodriguez, 2021), respectively.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of time-dependent shift of Mycoplasma pneumoniae genotypes.
Results of Mycoplasma genitalium typing studies.
| Main aspect | Typing method | Patients/country | No. of patients or samples | Main result(s) of the study | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methology/epidemiology |
| Not specified + couples/worldwide | 267 | First description of |
|
|
| Women/Kenya | 9 | Intrastrain |
| |
| Methology/epidemiology | Not specified + couples/worldwide | 105 | Description of MG_309 typing; usefulness of |
| |
| Methology/epidemiology | Men + women with and without symptoms/France + Tunisia | 76 | Comparison of methods; |
| |
| Epidemiology |
| Women with previous STD and partners/United States | 80 | Evaluation of sequence variability between strains from partners and occurrence of reinfections |
|
| Resistance |
| Not specified/France | 136 | Evaluation of sequence variability, selection for mutation during treatment; and polyclonality of macrolide resistance |
|
| Epidemiology |
| Women in sexual health and family planning clinics/Guinea-Bissau | 30 | Diversity of circulating strains |
|
| Methology |
| 12 | Importance of typing for documentation of absence of cross-contamination |
| |
| Resistance/epidemiology | Men with and without urethritis/United Kingdom | 22 | Two major clusters of genotypes with macrolide resistance in both clusters |
| |
| Resistance/epidemiology | Men with NGU/Japan | 20 | Evaluation of genotype variability |
| |
| Resistance/epidemiology | MSM/Germany | 19 | Evaluation of genotype variability; comparison of first and follow-up samples |
| |
| Resistance/follow-up | Men (mainly MSM)/Germany | 163 | Evaluation of genotype variability; comparison of first and follow-up samples |
| |
| Resistance/epidemiology | Women in antenatal clinics/Solomon Islands | 41 | Two major clusters of genotypes, strain replacement after mass drug administration for trachoma elimination |
| |
| Resistance/follow-up | Patients with suspected STD/Spain | 79 | Differentiation of persistent and recurrent infections |
| |
| Resistance/epidemiology | Heterosexual couples/US | 33 | Concordance of strains in couples |
| |
| Resistance/epidemiology | Mainly MSM/Spain | 54 | Two major clusters of genotypes with correlation to sexual networks and to macrolide resistance |
| |
| Methology/epidemiology |
| Patients of a sexual health center/Australia | 52 | Establishment of a custom amplicon sequencing approach for |
|
| Resistance/epidemiology |
| Not specified/Australia | 89 | Genotype variability correlated with |
|
| Resistance/epidemiology |
| Men in STD clinics/France | 78 | Lower diversity of types among macrolide-resistant strains |
|
| Epidemiology | Men and women with and without symptoms/South Africa | 38 | Circulation of different genotypes without geographic clustering |
| |
| Resistance/follow-up | Mainly MSM/Germany | 54 | Evaluation of first and follow-up samples during a resistance-guided treatment regime; two major clusters of genotypes with correlation to MSM and macrolide resistance |
| |
| Resistance/epidemiology |
| Asymptomatic MSM/Australia | 94 | Resistance not restricted to specific genotypes |
|
STD, sexually transmitted disease; VNTR MG_309, variable number of tandem repeat in gene MG_309; NGU, non-gonococcal urethritis; and MSM, men who have sex with men.
Figure 3Regional distribution of mgpB types (A) and association between mgpB type and resistance (B) among strains in selected studies included mainly men who have sex with men (MSM; Dumke et al., 2016, 2020; Fernandez-Huerta et al., 2020b; Chua et al., 2021; Dumke and Spornraft-Ragaller, 2021; Guiraud et al., 2021). Strains with S83N change of ParC are not included. ST, mgpB type; MRM, macrolide resistance-associated mutation; and QRM, quinolone resistance-associated mutation.
Figure 4Use of different approaches for Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium typing. DI, discriminatory index.