| Literature DB >> 35722321 |
Zafran Khan1,2,3,4, Daniya Ualiyeva2,5,6, Obed Boadi Amissah1,2, Sanjeep Sapkota1,2,3,4, H M Adnan Hameed1,2,3,4, Tianyu Zhang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB), an infectious disease, has been a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for decades. The causative agent of TB is the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) which can infects various parts of the body, mainly the lungs in pulmonary TB cases. Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the only approved vaccine for TB, but its efficiency to combat pulmonary TB is limited. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB and extensive drug-resistant (XDR) TB requires the evolution of more potent vaccines. Therefore, this research aims to generate a universal TB subunit vaccine using advanced immunoinformatics techniques. In generating a novel multiepitope subunit vaccine, we selected the conserved and experimentally confirmed antigens Rv0058, Rv0101, and Rv3343. After a rigorous evaluation, the top candidates from predicted Helper T-lymphocytes (HTL), Cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL), and B-cell epitopes were considered potential vaccine candidates. Immunogenicity was enhanced by the addition of an adjuvant to the ultimate construct of the vaccine. B-cell epitopes predictions guaranteed the eventual induction of a humoral response. Thereafter, dynamics simulations and molecular docking validated the vaccine-receptor complex's stability and high affinity for the immune receptor TLR-3. Also, immune simulations revealed the significantly elevated levels of immunoglobulins such as IgM, cytokines such as interleukin-2, helper T (Th) cells, and cytotoxic T-cell populations. These results agreed with the actual inflammatory response and showed rapid antigen clearance after manifold exposure. Finally, the E. coli K12 strain was confirmed via in-silico cloning for quality expression. Nevertheless, in vivo experiments should be performed to validate the safety of the proposed vaccine and its inherent ability to prevent TB infection.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; drug resistance; immunoinformatics; therapeutic vaccine; tuberculosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35722321 PMCID: PMC9201507 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.866873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Figure 1Illustration of study workflow.
Selected CTL epitopes that met all of the criteria for antigenicity, non-allergenicity, and non-toxicity, and the ability to bind efficiently to MHC-I A1-supertype alleles.
| Protein | Peptide sequence | MHC binding affinity | Rescale binding affinity | C-terminal cleavage affinity | Transport efficiency | Prediction score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rv0058 | LSDMRSGRM | 0.2786 | 1.1827 | 0.5806 | 0.2740 | 1.2835 |
| PTNGQGRVY | 0.2027 | 0.8608 | 0.7749 | 2.1900 | 1.0866 | |
| Rv0101 | LTADLSAAY | 0.7063 | 2.9987 | 0.9596 | 2.7790 | 3.2816 |
| VSAPTIINY | 0.5144 | 2.1839 | 0.9199 | 3.0210 | 2.4730 | |
| Rv3343 | FSIPVTFSY | 0.4237 | 1.7988 | 0.9743 | 2.9090 | 2.0904 |
| VSESIPLNF | 0.2736 | 1.1617 | 0.8822 | 2.5030 | 1.4192 | |
| YSTPALTLF | 0.2062 | 0.8754 | 0.8222 | 2.5730 | 1.1274 |
HTL epitopes that met all of the criteria for antigenicity, nonallergenicity, and nontoxicity, as well as the ability to induce an IFN-γ immune response.
| Protein | Allele | Start | End | Peptide sequence | Percentile rank | Method | IFN-γ result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rv0058 | HLA-DRB5*01:01 | 264 | 278 | VMRLLSAEAKIKLSD | 0.43 | SVM | Positive |
| HLA-DRB5*01:01 | 31 | 45 | GRKEVFRLRLASGRE | 0.66 | SVM | Positive | |
| HLA-DRB3*01:01 | 45 | 59 | TRILRADTGAEVAFG | 1.4 | SVM | Positive | |
| Rv0101 | HLA-DRB1*03:01 | 823 | 837 | DQRGASLVVDWPASV | 1.20 | SVM | Positive |
| HLA-DRB3*01:01 | 60 | 74 | AALFVLDSWLRPVPA | 2.20 | SVM | Positive | |
| HLA-DRB4*01:01 | 460 | 474 | TRIRLVLVSLGVSSF | 2.70 | SVM | Positive | |
| Rv3343 | HLA-DRB5*01:01 | 368 | 382 | LGLTVRYLTPHSKWS | 0.08 | SVM | Positive |
| HLA-DRB1*07:01 | 548 | 562 | HSDVMYRSVLALLML | 1.40 | SVM | Positive |
The lowest the percentile rank the higher binding affinity toward the MHC-II. Individual epitope percentile score reflects its ability of binding to MHC-II.
Linear B cell epitopes with a binding score of greater than 0.9 chosen for the final vaccine.
| Protein | Peptide sequence | Start position | Predicted score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rv0058 | MMDIQLHEPTMWKHSP | 739 | 0.90 |
| Rv0101 | CAAISAPLRPGSGMPP | 1777 | 0.98 |
| Rv3343 | RGDYQGLLGFSSGANV | 423 | 0.94 |
Figure 2Schematically presentation of final MSV. An EAAAK linker (yellow) was used to connect the 309-amino-acid long peptide sequence with adjuvant (grey) at both the N and C terminals to the multiepitope sequence.GPGPG linkers (blue) are used to connect B cell and HTL epitopes, while AAY linkers (red) are used to connect CTL epitopes.
Figure 3Predicted vaccine construct’s solubility and secondary structure. (A) Solubility analysis of vaccine constructs with a score of 0.557 after expression, by using ProtSol. (B) Secondary structure prediction of vaccine constructs with (20.0%) alpha-helices, (21.0%) beta-strands, and (58.0%) coils, by using the PSIPRED server.
Figure 43D modeling, refinement, and validation of proteins. (A) Following homology modeling, the I-TASSER server produced a 3D model of a MSV. (B) Refinement: superimposition of a refined 3D structure (colored) on a “crude model” (gray) by the GalaxyRefne server. (C) Validation: Ramachandran plot analysis of protein residues, showing 85.9% in favored, 8.9% in allowed, and 5.2% in disallowed regions; (D) ProSA-web, with a Z score of 1.39.
Figure 5A 3D representation of the designed MSV conformational or discontinuous B cell epitopes. (A–G) The conformational or discontinuous B cell epitopes are represented by yellow surfaces, while grey sticks represent the bulk of the polyprotein.
Conformational B cell epitopes residues of the designed MSV, predicted by ElliPro.
| No. | Residues | No. of residues | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A:E125, A:V126, A:F127, A:R128 | 4 | 0.918 |
| 2 | A:L129, A:R130, A:L131, A:A132, A:S133, A:G134 | 6 | 0.864 |
| 3 | A:L9, A:G10, A:E11, A:A12, A:A13, A:A14, A:K15, A:L16, A:S17, A:D18, A:M19, A:R20, A:S21, A:G22, A:R23, A:M24, A:A25, A:A26, A:Y27, A:P28, A:G31, A:Q32, A:G33, A:R34, A:V35, A:R164, A:G165, A:G301, A:P302 | 29 | 0.701 |
| 4 | A:L40, A:D43, A:A46, A:A47, A:Y48, A:A49, A:A50, A:Y51, A:V52, A:S53, A:A54, A:P55, A:T56, A:I57, A:I58, A:N59, A:Y60, A:A61, A:A62, A:Y63, A:F64, A:S65, A:I66, A:P67, A:V68, A:T69, A:G212, A:V213, A:S214, A:S215, A:F216, A:G217, A:P218, A:G219, A:P220, A:G221, A:L222, A:G223, A:L224, A:T225, A:V226, A:R227, A:Y228, A:L229, A:T230, A:P231, A:H232, A:W235, A:S236, A:G237, A:P238, A:G239, A:P240, A:G241, A:H242, A:D244, A:R248, A:M255, A:L256, A:G257, A:P258, A:G259, A:P260, A:M262 | 64 | 0.685 |
| 5 | A:N318, A:A321, A:A322, A:A323, A:K324, A:V325, A:P326, A:S327, A:L328, A:P329, A:L330, A:V331, A:P332, A:L333, A:G334 | 15 | 0.665 |
| 6 | A:S79, A:I80, A:P81, A:L82, A:N83, A:A85, A:A86, A:Y88, A:S89, A:T90, A:P91, A:A92, A:L93, A:T94, A:L95, A:F96, A:G97, A:R135, A:E136, A:G137, A:P138, A:I144, A:L145, A:R146, A:A147, A:D148, A:T149, A:G150, A:A151, A:E152, A:V153, A:A154, A:F155, A:S167, A:L168, A:V169, A:V170, A:D171, A:W172, A:P173, A:A174, A:S175, A:V176, A:G177, A:P178, A:G179, A:P180, A:G181, A:A182, A:A183, A:L184 | 51 | 0.657 |
| 7 | A:S115, A:D116, A:G117, A:P118, A:G119, A:P120, A:G121, A:G122, A:R123, A:K124, A:P277, A:G278, A:P279, A:G280, A:P281, A:G282, A:C283, A:A284, A:A285, A:I286, A:S287, A:A288, A:L310 | 23 | 0.628 |
Figure 6Interaction of the ligand protein (MSV) and the receptor protein in discontinuous B cell epitopes (TLR-3). (A) In the MSV, the individual predicted score of discontinuous B cell epitopes. (B,C) The ligand protein is highlighted in green, while the receptor protein is highlighted in blue.
Figure 7Results of normal mode analysis of a vaccine construct docked with TLR-3. (A) NMA mobility, (B) deformability, (C) eigenvalues, (D) variance (individual variances shown in red color and green color indicates cumulative variances), (E) Bfactor, (F) co-variance map (correlated (red), uncorrelated (white) or anti-correlated (blue) motions), and (G) elastic network (darker gray regions indicate stiffer regions).
Figure 8The sequence of the vaccine was optimized and inserted into E.coli vector pET-21(+) (57), between AhdI (3984) and StyI (57). The white color represents the inserted DNA sequence.
Figure 9An in silico immune simulation with the construct is presented by C-ImmSim. (A) Immunoglobulin production in response to antigen injections (black vertical lines); colored peaks indicate specific subclasses. (B) After three injections, the evolution of B-cell populations.
Figure 10An in silico immune simulation with the construct is presented by C-ImmSim. After the injections, (A) T-helper cell populations per state evolved, and (B) T-cytotoxic cell populations per state evolved. The resting state describes cells that have not been exposed to the antigen, whereas the anergic state describes T-cell tolerance to the antigen as a result of repeated exposures. (C) The cytokine levels after injections are shown in the main plot. The Simpson index, D, is shown by the dotted line in the insert plot of IL-2 levels. D is a diversity metric. The emergence of different epitope-specific dominant T-cell clones over time is indicated by an increase in D. The lower the D value, the less diverse the population.