We report the synthesis, crystal structure, thermal response, and electrochemical behavior of the Prussian blue analogue (PBA) K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]. From a structural perspective, this is the most complex PBA yet characterized: its triclinic crystal structure results from an interplay of cooperative Jahn-Teller order, octahedral tilts, and a collective "slide" distortion involving K-ion displacements. These different distortions give rise to two crystallographically distinct K-ion channels with different mobilities. Variable-temperature X-ray powder diffraction measurements show that K-ion slides are the lowest-energy distortion mechanism at play, as they are the only distortion to be switched off with increasing temperature. Electrochemically, the material operates as a K-ion cathode with a high operating voltage and an improved initial capacity relative to higher-vacancy PBA alternatives. On charging, K+ ions are selectively removed from a single K-ion channel type, and the slide distortions are again switched on and off accordingly. We discuss the functional importance of various aspects of structural complexity in this system, placing our discussion in the context of other related PBAs.
We report the synthesis, crystal structure, thermal response, and electrochemical behavior of the Prussian blue analogue (PBA) K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]. From a structural perspective, this is the most complex PBA yet characterized: its triclinic crystal structure results from an interplay of cooperative Jahn-Teller order, octahedral tilts, and a collective "slide" distortion involving K-ion displacements. These different distortions give rise to two crystallographically distinct K-ion channels with different mobilities. Variable-temperature X-ray powder diffraction measurements show that K-ion slides are the lowest-energy distortion mechanism at play, as they are the only distortion to be switched off with increasing temperature. Electrochemically, the material operates as a K-ion cathode with a high operating voltage and an improved initial capacity relative to higher-vacancy PBA alternatives. On charging, K+ ions are selectively removed from a single K-ion channel type, and the slide distortions are again switched on and off accordingly. We discuss the functional importance of various aspects of structural complexity in this system, placing our discussion in the context of other related PBAs.
Many of the most important
and interesting ceramic perovskites
are systems in which there is strong interplay among different types
of symmetry-lowering distortions.[1−5] The manganites are arguably the most famous case, for which orbital,
magnetic, lattice, and charge degrees of freedom interact;[6] this interaction is the key to anomalous physical
properties such as colossal magnetoresistance, for example.[7,8] The concept of hybrid improper ferroelectricity is closely related,
whereby carefully chosen structural distortions, each of which preserves
inversion symmetry, can nonetheless collectively break inversion symmetry
and so drive a bulk ferroelectric response.[9] We[10] and others[11,12] have a particular interest in the extension of these same ideas
to molecular perovskites—systems in which at least one of the
A, B, or X components of the perovskite ABX3 structure
type is molecular, rather than atomic.[13]One key family of molecular perovskites is that of the Prussian
blue analogues (PBAs)[14−17]—famous and long-studied systems that are of particular currency
in the context of K-ion battery materials (Figure a).[18,19] They are inexpensive
to make, employ earth-abundant elements, are accessible through solution-phase
synthesis, and benefit from both high operating voltages and favorable
charge rates.[20] It is often considered
a key design feature of PBA battery materials that their cubic structure
type is relatively unaffected by charge/discharge cycles,[19] especially in contrast to the substantial anisotropic
swelling observed in, e.g., layered cathode materials.[21] However, it is becoming increasingly clear that
PBAs, in fact, harbor a large number of different types of structural
distortions.[22,23] Yet, the implications of these
distortions for material function are not fully understood; in particular,
do they help or do they hinder?
Figure 1
Idealized PBA structure and some common
distortions. (a) The structure
of low-vacancy PBAs (formula AP[R(CN)6]) is closely related to that of the double perovskites. P
(blue) and R (dark-red) transition metals alternate on a cubic lattice
and are connected via P–NC–R links. The A-site cations
(green) are situated within the framework cavities. (b) In K-rich
PBAs, neighboring layers of K+ ions slide in opposite directions
along a common ⟨110⟩ axis in order to maximize Coulombic
interactions with the anionic framework. (c) Jahn–Teller active
P-site cations (e.g., Cu2+) can drive cooperative Jahn–Teller
order, in which the tetragonal distortion of Cu2+ coordination
environments aligns along a single common ⟨100⟩ axis.
Idealized PBA structure and some common
distortions. (a) The structure
of low-vacancy PBAs (formula AP[R(CN)6]) is closely related to that of the double perovskites. P
(blue) and R (dark-red) transition metals alternate on a cubic lattice
and are connected via P–NC–R links. The A-site cations
(green) are situated within the framework cavities. (b) In K-rich
PBAs, neighboring layers of K+ ions slide in opposite directions
along a common ⟨110⟩ axis in order to maximize Coulombic
interactions with the anionic framework. (c) Jahn–Teller active
P-site cations (e.g., Cu2+) can drive cooperative Jahn–Teller
order, in which the tetragonal distortion of Cu2+ coordination
environments aligns along a single common ⟨100⟩ axis.It was in this context that we sought to prepare
and to study the
PBA material K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]: our motivation was
the prospect of intentionally introducing a large degree of structural
complexity in a material that ought to be electrochemically active.
In this way, we might assess the interplay of structural distortions
and material function.We rationalize our choice of composition
in the following way.
PBAs with high K-ion concentrations on the A-site undergo a “slide”
distortion that maximizes Coulombic interactions with the cyanide
framework and reduces the cubic PBA symmetry to monoclinic;[22,24] this distortion occurs in K2Mn[Fe(CN)6] and
K2Fe[Fe(CN)6], for example, and is analogous
to the A-site antipolar distortions of conventional perovskites (Figure b).[25,26] Our second ingredient is the use of Cu2+, which introduces
a Jahn–Teller instability that ordinarily drives cooperative
orbital order and a very different lattice distortion—now tetragonal—as
in Cu[Pt(CN)6] (Figure c).[27,28] Finally, it is the accessibility
of Fe3+/2+ electrochemistry that informs our decision to
focus on a hexacyanoferrate salt.Anticipating our results,
we will come to show that K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] does
indeed adopt a particularly complex structure
(we understand it to be the most complex PBA yet characterized) and
at the same time possesses a variety of interesting electrochemical
properties. We explore the interplay of these two aspects by using
variable-temperature X-ray diffraction measurements, on the one hand,
to understand the hierarchy of distortion energy scales at play, and
then ex situ diffraction measurements during charge/discharge
cycles, on the other hand, to relate these distortions to the structural
mechanism of K-ion (de)insertion.
Methods
Synthesis
On the basis of the exploration of synthesis
parameters reported in ref (25), we synthesized polycrystalline samples of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] via a citrate-assisted precipitation in aqueous
media. CuNO3·3H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, 1 mmol)
was dissolved in an aqueous solution of potassium citrate (Sigma-Aldrich,
1 M, 20 mL). This solution was added dropwise to a stoichiometric
aqueous solution of K4Fe(CN)6 (Sigma-Aldrich,
20 mL) at 80 °C with stirring. The mixture was stirred for 2 h
and then allowed to age for a further 2 h. During this period, a deep-red
precipitate formed. This precipitate was isolated by centrifugation
and washed with a 50:50 water/ethanol mixture in order to prevent
the solid dispersing. The solid was dried in air at 70 °C.
Materials Characterization
Elemental composition was
determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)
(Shimadzu ICPMS-2030), and water content was estimated using thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA) (NETZSCH STA 449 F3 Jupiter) under Ar at a heating
rate of 5 °C min–1. Scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) was carried out on a Zeiss Merlin microscope. Synchrotron X-ray
diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed on I11 beamline of the
Diamond Light Source operating with an X-ray wavelength of 0.826872
Å. The position-sensitive detector was used to collect diffraction
patterns over the temperature range 30–450 °C with a hot-air
blower. Ex situ X-ray powder diffraction measurements
of the electrode materials were performed using a Rigaku Smartlab
diffractometer (Cu Kα). All Rietveld and Pawley refinements
were carried out using the TOPAS-Academic software.[29]
Electrochemical Characterization
Electrodes were prepared
by mixing 70 wt % active material, 20 wt % carbon black (Super P),
and 10 wt % poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) in a mortar and pestle
with 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) to form a slurry. The slurry was
pasted on carbon cloth (Fuel Cell Store ELAT hydrophilic carbon cloth)
with a mass loading of around 10 mg cm–2, dried
in air, and then dried overnight at 80 °C under vacuum. Electrochemical
measurements were performed in flooded three-electrode cells sealed
under Ar atmosphere in an aqueous solution of K2SO4 (0.5 M) acidified to pH 1.8 with H2SO4. A Hg/Hg2SO4 reference in saturated K2SO4 and a Pt counter electrode were used.
Computational
Methods
Density-functional theory (DFT)
calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation
Package (VASP).[30,31] Candidate structures were relaxed
using the HSE06 functional.[32,33] All calculations were
Γ-point only with a planewave kinetic-energy cutoff of 520 eV.
Electronic and ionic convergence criteria were 10–5 eV and 0.05 eV Å–1, respectively.
Results
and Discussion
Preparation and Characterization of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]
The chemical composition of
our K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] sample, prepared as described
above, was determined using
ICP-MS measurements. ICP provides a robust measure of both Fe and
Cu content, but is notoriously unreliable in determining potassium
content,[34] which must be deduced by consideration
of charge balance. We found the Fe/Cu ratio to be 0.979(8). The degree
of hydration was estimated to be 0.11 on the basis of the mass loss
observed in TGA measurements, although some of this will be surface-absorbed
water. Collectively these measurements implied a composition of K1.96Cu[Fe(CN)6]0.98·0.11H2O; we use the simplified approximate formula K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] hereafter.The ambient-temperature synchrotron X-ray
diffraction pattern of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] is shown
in Figure a. The diffraction
profile is surprisingly different to that of the monoclinic PBAs,
such as K2Mn[Fe(CN)6];[25] in particular, the very strongest low-angle reflections show further
peak splitting than allowed even in the already-low-symmetry monoclinic
structure type (see inset to Figure a). Using the distortion mode refinement approach implemented
within TOPAS,[29] we obtained a structure
solution in the triclinic space-group P1̅ with
an excellent fit-to-data (Rwp = 1.95%).
We came to rationalize this particularly low-symmetry structure in
terms of competing distortion modes. Details of the structural model
are given in Table , and the structure itself is illustrated in Figure b; our refinement protocol is discussed in
more detail in the Supporting Information (SI).
Figure 2
(a) Rietveld fit to the room-temperature synchrotron X-ray powder
diffraction pattern of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] with data
(black), fit (red), difference function (blue), and calculated reflection
positions (dark-red tick marks). The inset shows a representative
low-angle region of the pattern in which the triclinic splitting is
very obvious—here between the 110 and 11̅0 reflections.
(b) Representation of the final structural model determined from our
refinements. K atoms are shown in green, Cu in dark blue, Fe in dark
red, C in gray, and N in light blue. Note the presence of large-scale
K-ion off-centering. The Cu–N bond lengths partition into “short”
and “long” bonds, shown here as light and dark blue
cylinders, respectively. The arrangement of the different Cu–N
bonds reflects collective Jahn–Teller order, with Cu2+ octahedra elongated along a direction close to [110].
Table 1
Crystallographic Parameters for the P1̅ Structure of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] at Ambient
Temperaturea
a/Å
7.0560(5)
b/Å
7.3401(6)
c/Å
9.8698(6)
α/°
89.8890(10)
β/°
89.9083(11)
γ/°
86.154(10)
V/Å3
510.025(2)
Z
2
In our Rietveld refinements we allowed
K occupancies to vary from unity, obtaining the values 0.946(13) and
0.986(13) for K1 and K2. The Beq values
for all non-K atoms were constrained to be the same in order to reduce
the number of independent variables.
(a) Rietveld fit to the room-temperature synchrotron X-ray powder
diffraction pattern of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] with data
(black), fit (red), difference function (blue), and calculated reflection
positions (dark-red tick marks). The inset shows a representative
low-angle region of the pattern in which the triclinic splitting is
very obvious—here between the 110 and 11̅0 reflections.
(b) Representation of the final structural model determined from our
refinements. K atoms are shown in green, Cu in dark blue, Fe in dark
red, C in gray, and N in light blue. Note the presence of large-scale
K-ion off-centering. The Cu–N bond lengths partition into “short”
and “long” bonds, shown here as light and dark blue
cylinders, respectively. The arrangement of the different Cu–N
bonds reflects collective Jahn–Teller order, with Cu2+ octahedra elongated along a direction close to [110].In our Rietveld refinements we allowed
K occupancies to vary from unity, obtaining the values 0.946(13) and
0.986(13) for K1 and K2. The Beq values
for all non-K atoms were constrained to be the same in order to reduce
the number of independent variables.Despite the low symmetry of this structure, our use
of high-resolution
synchrotron X-ray diffraction measurements has allowed us to obtain
sensible atomic coordinates. For example, we find that the octahedral
coordination geometry of the hexacyanoferrate groups is well preserved,
and that even the C and N positions are reasonable despite the poor
scattering contrast of these light elements in the presence of K,
Fe, and Cu. Importantly, the structural distortions we intended to
introduce by choosing the K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] composition
are evident in this structure solution. For example, the K atoms have
displaced from their high-symmetry positions by about 0.5 Å to
give precisely the same type of slide distortion seen in other K-rich
PBAs (albeit that the magnitude of distortion is particularly large
here). Likewise, of the six distinct Cu–N bond lengths, two
are significantly longer than the other four (2.36 Å vs 2.02
Å), as expected for a Jahn–Teller-distorted octahedral
Cu2+ coordination environment.[1,28] Cooperative
tilting of the transition-metal coordination polyhedra is also observed;
the particular tilt system is given by the Glazer notation[35]a0a0c+ and is the simplest tilt
distortion compatible with the K-ion slides we have observed.[22,36] An important feature of this structure is the existence of two symmetry-inequivalent
K+ sites, a point that is discussed later in this paper.
Further details of key bond lengths and coordination environments
are given in the SI.
Distortion-Mode
Analysis
In general, one ought to be
skeptical of low-symmetry structure solutions, so it is natural to
question if there a logical reason why the crystal structure of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] is triclinic.We argue first
by comparing against the known structure of K2Mn[Fe(CN)6], which has the monoclinic P21/n space-group symmetry common to many K-rich PBAs.[25] Formally, this monoclinic structure type is
related to the idealized cubic PBA parent structure (Fm3̅m symmetry) by the combined activation of
the slide distortion shown in Figure b and a cooperative a0a0c+ octahedral tilt
of the framework structure that always seems to accompany it.[22,23] The former deformation transforms as the X5+ irreducible representation (irrep; note
that we are using labels relative to the double-perovskite Fm3̅m parent with B-site ions located
at the cell origin) and the latter as X3+; it is the interplay of these two distortion
modes that reduces the PBA symmetry to P21/n.[22] Replacing Mn2+ by the Jahn–Teller-active Cu2+ understandably
leads to an additional distortion of the type illustrated in Figure c, which transforms
as Γ3+. We find by using the ISOTROPY software[37,38] that this additional distortion reduces the crystal symmetry from P21/n to P1̅,
with the same cell orientation as observed in our Rietveld refinement.
Consequently, adding collective Jahn–Teller order to the monoclinic
K2Mn[Fe(CN)6] structure type necessarily implies
triclinic symmetry.A related argument can be made by considering
the structure of
RbCu[Co(CN)6].[39] This system
has orthorhombic Cccm space-group symmetry, which
is understood as arising from the interplay of the collective Jahn–Teller
order of Cu2+ ions (again, Γ3+) with either the a0a0c+ tilt distortion (X3+) or “rodlike” Rb cation order
(X4+). The group
theory result is that any two of these three distortion types necessarily
gives the third, so there is no way of telling from symmetry arguments
alone which two of these three are physically responsible for symmetry
lowering. Whatever the case, there is no off-centering of the Rb+ ions in this orthorhombic structure. Replacing Rb+ by the smaller K+ and doubling the A-site cation content
introduces the X5+ slide distortion; again, ISOTROPY analysis indicates that this additional
distortion lowers the crystal symmetry to P1̅,
as observed experimentally.We illustrate these various symmetry
relationships in Figure , where we draw on
the established visual language used to relate progressively complex
tilt distortions in conventional perovskites.[36,40,41] The key point is that one can consider the
low-symmetry P1̅ structure we observe as the
inevitable consequence of introducing either cooperative Jahn–Teller
order into the monoclinic K-rich PBA structure type or K-ion-driven
slides into the orthorhombic Jahn–Teller-ordered structure.
Figure 3
Symmetry
relationships in distorted PBAs. The four key distortion
types relevant to our study are (top, left to right) cooperative Jahn–Teller
order, “rodlike” A-site cation order, a0a0c+ octahedral tilts, and K-ion slides. Starting from the aristotypic
double-perovskite, the symmetry map at the bottom of the figure represents
the space-group symmetry that results from successive activation of
each distortion type. Note that any two of the Γ3+, X4+, and X3+ distortions necessarily
activates the third. Combinations with known PBA exemplars are highlighted
in gray. The path between P1̅ and Cccm structure types, which is key to the thermal and electrochemical
response of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6], is highlighted in
green as it corresponds to activation or deactivation of the K-ion
slide distortion. We have used the space-group labels P21/c and P21/n for two of the distorted structure types to convey
the point that the resulting structures are inequivalent: while either
might be transformed to the other space-group setting, the unique
axis is different in the two cases.
Symmetry
relationships in distorted PBAs. The four key distortion
types relevant to our study are (top, left to right) cooperative Jahn–Teller
order, “rodlike” A-site cation order, a0a0c+ octahedral tilts, and K-ion slides. Starting from the aristotypic
double-perovskite, the symmetry map at the bottom of the figure represents
the space-group symmetry that results from successive activation of
each distortion type. Note that any two of the Γ3+, X4+, and X3+ distortions necessarily
activates the third. Combinations with known PBA exemplars are highlighted
in gray. The path between P1̅ and Cccm structure types, which is key to the thermal and electrochemical
response of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6], is highlighted in
green as it corresponds to activation or deactivation of the K-ion
slide distortion. We have used the space-group labels P21/c and P21/n for two of the distorted structure types to convey
the point that the resulting structures are inequivalent: while either
might be transformed to the other space-group setting, the unique
axis is different in the two cases.Just as the Cccm structure of RbCu[Co(CN)6] contains two crystallographically distinct A-site environments—in
that case, one empty and the other occupied by Rb[39]—so is it the case that there are two
distinct K
environments in our new P1̅ structure of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] (as noted above). The authors of ref (42) argued on the basis of
Madelung constants that the resulting “rodlike” Rb order
has a physical basis, but our instinct is that there is no strong
chemical driving force for this distinction in a system such as K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] where all A sites are occupied. Instead
the existence of two K-ion sites is a consequence of symmetry-breaking
by other structural distortions with more obvious physical origins.
Density Functional Theory Calculations
We used density
functional theory (DFT) calculations as a further check on the validity
of our structural model for K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]. Starting
from the lattice parameters and atomic coordinates determined in our
Rietveld refinement, the crystal structure was fully relaxed using
the HSE06 functional to account for strong electronic correlation.[43] The relaxed unit cell dimensions are listed
in Table and differ
by less than 1% from our experimental values. Individual atomic coordinates
also showed relatively small deviations. The Fe and Cu atom positions
do not vary, the K atoms shifted with a root-mean-squared (r.m.s.)
displacement of 0.09 Å, and the C and N atoms showed the largest
shifts with r.m.s. displacements of 0.18 and 0.20 Å, respectively.
Given the difficulty of refining C and N positions in the presence
of electron-rich elements from powder X-ray diffraction data, we consider
this difference entirely reasonable. Importantly, all of the distortion
modes identified above—K-ion slides, collective Jahn–Teller
order, and octahedral tilts—were evident also in this relaxed
DFT structure. For completeness, the DFT atomic coordinates are given
in the SI.
Table 2
DFT (0
K) Unit Cell Parameters for
K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] and the Corresponding Differences
Relative to Our Experimental Values Measured at 295 K
parameter
DFT
experiment
difference
(%)
a/Å
7.092
7.0560(5)
0.51
b/Å
7.335
7.3401(6)
0.07
c/Å
9.842
9.8698(6)
0.28
α/°
89.713
89.8890(10)
0.20
β/°
89.990
89.9083(11)
0.01
γ/°
85.520
86.154(10)
0.74
High-Temperature Behavior
In order to determine the
hierarchy of distortion energy scales in K2Cu[Fe(CN)6], we sought to characterize its behavior on heating. After
all, the thermal response of a material is dominated by the activation
of the lowest-energy deformations.[44] We
first used TGA to understand the compositional stability of the system;
our results are shown in Figure . Three regimes are evident. First, heating to ∼250
°C sees the loss of a small amount of surface and structural
water, as is common for PBAs in general.[45] A more substantive mass loss event occurs around 250–335
°C, resulting in a solid that eventually decomposes above 425
°C.
Figure 4
Variable-temperature structural response of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]. The temperature dependence of the relative mass loss Δm measured using TGA, a representative section of
the X-ray powder diffraction pattern, and the phase fractions ϕ
obtained using constrained Rietveld refinements to the X-ray data
are displayed left to right. Here, dark red corresponds to the ambient
K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] phase, green to the transient
decomposition product KCu(CN)2, and dark blue to K2Fe[Fe(CN)6]. The three horizontal lines drawn on
the diffractogram correspond to the data sets shown in Figure .
Variable-temperature structural response of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]. The temperature dependence of the relative mass loss Δm measured using TGA, a representative section of
the X-ray powder diffraction pattern, and the phase fractions ϕ
obtained using constrained Rietveld refinements to the X-ray data
are displayed left to right. Here, dark red corresponds to the ambient
K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] phase, green to the transient
decomposition product KCu(CN)2, and dark blue to K2Fe[Fe(CN)6]. The three horizontal lines drawn on
the diffractogram correspond to the data sets shown in Figure .
Figure 5
Constrained Rietveld fits to the X-ray powder diffraction patterns
measured for our K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] sample heated
to 420 °C (top), 307 °C (middle), and 246 °C (bottom).
The first of these corresponds to K2Fe[Fe(CN)6] at the point that its monoclinic distortion effectively vanishes,
the second corresponds to the temperature at which all three crystalline
phases are present, and the third corresponds to the first point at
which the structure of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] is better
described by Cccm than P1̅
space-group symmetry. The few weak peaks remaining that are forbidden
in Cccm are indicated by filled squares.
Our variable-temperature synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction measurements
focus on the temperature range 30–450 °C and are
consistent with the TGA findings (Figure ). The ambient P1̅
phase persists from room temperature until ∼250 °C.
Within this regime a number of peaks coalesce and others disappear,
suggesting a continuous ascent in symmetry (see, for example, the
pair of peaks marked with an asterisk in Figure ). On heating above 250 °C, the ambient
phase is progressively lost, and two new phases grow in. One appears
then disappears, and the other remains the dominant phase through
the highest temperatures explored in our measurements. The diffraction
pattern of this persistent phase appears close to that of a conventional
cubic PBA for the highest temperatures probed in our measurements.Focusing first on the thermal behavior of the ambient P1̅ phase, we carried out a series of sequential distortion-mode
Rietveld refinements for the diffraction patterns measured at each
temperature over the range 30–350 °C. We found the very
strongest variation in distortion-mode amplitudes for those distortions
related to the K-ion slide distortion (see SI). In fact, by 250 °C, the lattice strain associated with this
distortion (Γ5+ irrep) has essentially vanished such that the diffraction
pattern of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] at this temperature
is actually better described in the orthorhombic space-group Cccm than in P1̅. We show a fit to
the data using this higher-symmetry space group in Figure . The microscopic picture that emerges is that K-ion displacements
are most easily activated on heating, such that temperature switches
off the slide distortion and its symmetry-lowering effect—all
that remains are the distortions found in related systems with larger
A-site cations (e.g., RbCu[Co(CN)6]).[39]Constrained Rietveld fits to the X-ray powder diffraction patterns
measured for our K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] sample heated
to 420 °C (top), 307 °C (middle), and 246 °C (bottom).
The first of these corresponds to K2Fe[Fe(CN)6] at the point that its monoclinic distortion effectively vanishes,
the second corresponds to the temperature at which all three crystalline
phases are present, and the third corresponds to the first point at
which the structure of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] is better
described by Cccm than P1̅
space-group symmetry. The few weak peaks remaining that are forbidden
in Cccm are indicated by filled squares.While the focus of our study is on the ambient P1̅ phase, we were nevertheless interested to understand in
general terms the decomposition process. In this spirit, we were able
to match the diffraction profile of the high-temperature transient
phase to that of potassium dicyanocuprate(I), KCu(CN)2.[46] The cyanide ion is well known to reduce copper(II)
to copper(I),[47,48] so the emergence of this phase
implies the breaking of Fe–CN bonds at this elevated temperature.
KCu(CN)2 is understood to melt at around 290 °C, which
is presumably why the diffraction pattern of this phase disappears
on further heating. One possible decomposition pathway for K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] is the reactionThe mass loss observed in
our TGA measurements
is broadly consistent with that expected for cyanogen evolution (see SI). Moreover, we find the second, persistent,
high-temperature phase to be well modeled by the P21/n structure of K2Fe[Fe(CN)6];[26] the monoclinic distortion
in this phase decreases with increasing temperature such that it has
essentially vanished by 425 °C, and the structure is almost cubic.
Key corresponding Rietveld fits are shown in Figure , and the associated phase fractions are
given in panel (a) of the same figure.Our variable-temperature
X-ray diffraction results show that K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] responds to heating by first unwinding
the K-ion slide distortion and then, we propose, by exsolving Cu2+, which is reduced by free cyanide to give KCu(CN)2 as a transient solid phase and the thermally robust PBA K2Fe[Fe(CN)6]. Of course, it is possible that some Cu remains
in this final PBA—our X-ray measurements would be insensitive
to Cu/Fe compositions—but the space-group symmetry rules out
any cooperative Jahn–Teller distortion. Other decomposition
mechanisms may be equally consistent with our data, and a definitive
investigation is beyond the scope of this study. As a final point,
we note that not only are the K-ion slides the key thermally activated
distortion in this material, but also that the observed transition
to Cccm implies it is probably right to think of
them as a fundamental distortion in their own right and not simply
a byproduct of other distortions, such as tilts.[23]
Electrochemistry
We turn now to
the electrochemistry
of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6], with a particular emphasis
on understanding its structural response to K-ion (de)insertion. For
our electrochemical measurements, we used an aqueous cell setup designed
to perform well at high operating potentials; the linear sweep voltammetry
(LSV) shows good stability of the electrolyte in the upper potential
limit of 1.265 V versus the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) (see SI). Our results, obtained using a cycling rate
of C/6, are shown in Figure a. The material cycles at a high voltage of 0.949 V versus
SHE at the midcomposition on charging, with a capacity of 73.8 mA h g–1 on the first charge. This capacity is very close
to the theoretical value for a vacancy-free and anhydrous K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] composition (75.8 mA h g–1), which is further evidence of the low-vacancy/high-potassium content
of our sample. Not all capacity is recovered on subsequent discharge.
Figure 6
Electrochemical
characterization of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]. (a) The galvanostatic
cycle measured at a cycling rate
of C/6 shows a maximum specific capacity of 73.8 mA h g–1 centered on 0.949 V. The flat profile is characteristic of a two-phase
mechanism. (b) The corresponding differential capacity function.
Electrochemical
characterization of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]. (a) The galvanostatic
cycle measured at a cycling rate
of C/6 shows a maximum specific capacity of 73.8 mA h g–1 centered on 0.949 V. The flat profile is characteristic of a two-phase
mechanism. (b) The corresponding differential capacity function.The profile of the galvanostatic cycle is characteristic
of a biphasic
reaction: there is a plateau in the potential measured that corresponds
to a sharp peak in the differential capacity function (Figure b). A two-phase mechanism is
also supported by the potentiostatic intermittent titration technique
(PITT), which shows the characteristic bell-shaped I–t curve that arises from a delayed response
of the current following each step in voltage (see SI).There is an interesting comparison to be drawn
between the behavior
we observe for K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] and that of the
closely related and well-established cathode material K0.71Cu[Fe(CN)6]0.72.[18] With its large fraction of hexacyanoferrate vacancies, there is
no long-range cooperative Jahn–Teller order in the latter;
instead, its crystal structure (which is very disordered) has cubic
average symmetry. Cubic symmetry is maintained on K-ion insertion/deinsertion—the
presence of vacancies in that phase frustrating long-range order of
any local distortions.[22,49] This is why K0.71Cu[Fe(CN)6]0.72 cycles via a single-phase (solid-solution)
mechanism. By contrast, we expect that the K-ion slide distortion
in the vacancy-free K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] will be switched
off at a critical potassium content because K+ ions are
removed during charge.[22,25] On the basis of the symmetry
relationships shown in Figure , one anticipates a transition to the Cccm structure type at such a point, which would explain the two-phase
mechanism we observe here.We tested this hypothesis by carrying
out a series of ex
situ powder X-ray diffraction measurements on K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] samples taken at five key points in the first
charge/discharge cycle. Our results, which we proceed to explain,
are shown in Figure . The first measurement was taken prior to charging and is entirely
consistent with the P1̅ structure type determined
in our higher-resolution synchrotron X-ray study discussed above.
Halfway through the first charge, a particularly complex diffraction
pattern is observed that then simplifies considerably at the point
of full charge. That third measurement, which on the basis of our
electrochemical results corresponds to the approximate composition
of KCu[Fe(CN)6], can indeed be accounted for by a single
phase with Cccm symmetry. The complex intermediate
diffraction pattern at half-charge can then be fitted using a two-phase P1̅ /Cccm model, with intensities
taken from the pristine and fully charged patterns. Our measurements
taken on discharge are similar in their implications. The final diffraction
pattern is again characteristic of the K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] P1̅ structure type, albeit with significantly
broadened reflections, and the pattern taken at the half-discharge
point can again be fitted using a two-phase model. Full details of
our fitting procedure and results of the various refinements are given
in the SI.
Figure 7
Ex situ X-ray powder
diffraction measurements
for K2–Cu[Fe(CN)6]
samples taken from different key points in the first charge/discharge
cycle. Data are shown as black points, fits are shown as red lines,
and the difference (data – fit) is shown as blue lines. Tick
marks show the allowed reflection positions for both P1̅ (dark red) and Cccm (gold) phases. The
reflections marked with an asterisk are sensitive to the X5+ cation order.
Ex situ X-ray powder
diffraction measurements
for K2–Cu[Fe(CN)6]
samples taken from different key points in the first charge/discharge
cycle. Data are shown as black points, fits are shown as red lines,
and the difference (data – fit) is shown as blue lines. Tick
marks show the allowed reflection positions for both P1̅ (dark red) and Cccm (gold) phases. The
reflections marked with an asterisk are sensitive to the X5+ cation order.Just as K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] responds
to thermal
activation by switching off the K-ion slides and ascending from P1̅ to Cccm symmetry, so too does
electrochemical K-ion extraction have the same effect.A peculiarity
of both P1̅ and Cccm structures
to which we have already alluded is that they contain
two crystallographically distinct K-ion sites. This reflects the X4+ cation order we
know to be present. In the case of the Cccm KCu[Fe(CN)6] (fully charged) phase, there is clear evidence for K+/vacancy order: the emergence of diffraction intensity near Q = 0.85 Å–1 is characteristic. A
structural model with equal K-ion occupancies on the two crystallographically
distinct sites gives no appreciable intensity at this position; after
all, this is why there is no intensity here for the fully potassiated
phase. Hence, there is selective extraction of K+ ions
from just one subset of the K-ion channels in K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]. Unfortunately, our data are not of sufficiently high quality
to allow robust Rietveld refinement of the corresponding occupancies.DFT calculations also reflect this preference for cooperative K-ion
extraction. Starting with the relaxed P1̅ structure
described above, we removed in turn all possible combinations of two
of the four potassium ions in its unit cell and then rerelaxed the
corresponding structures. The two configurations with rodlike (X4+) K-ion/vacancy
order relaxed to lower energies (∼6 meV/atom) than other combinations.
Interestingly, in the resulting KCu[Fe(CN)6] structures
there persisted some off-centering of the K+ ions, which
reduced the symmetry from Cccm to P1̅. This suggests that the Cccm structure
type we observe may be unstable with respect to a slide distortion
at 0 K; presumably, it is simply that the critical temperature at
which the distortion occurs is below room temperature. This is the
same instability that we have observed (in reverse) when heating the
fully potassiated phase, for which the critical temperature is understandably
much higher.As a final point, we note that the increased peak
broadening observed
on discharge is probably due to a combination of particle size reduction
and also domain formation during symmetry lowering. We comment also
that it is not our intention here to investigate fully the cycling
capacity of K2Cu[Fe(CN)6], nor the effect of
different electrolytes, nor the potential differences between in situ and ex situ observations;[50] we expect to follow up on these aspects in a
future study. We note simply that the initial capacity observed (73.8
mA h g–1) certainly compares favorably against that
of the better known K0.71Cu[Fe(CN)6]0.72 phase (59.1 mA h g–1).[18]
Conclusion
In summary, we have prepared
and characterized the new PBA material
K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]. Its complex triclinic structure
arises from the interplay of K-ion slides, octahedral tilts, cooperative
Jahn–Teller order, and rodlike K-ion occupational order. Of
these various distortions, the K-ion slides are what dominate the
structural response of the material. We see this both in terms of
the behavior at high temperatures and the structural changes that
take place during electrochemical cycling. As esoteric as the various
symmetry considerations associated with combining distortions might
seem, one very physical consequence is that K-ion extraction proceeds
via a two-phase mechanism to give a charged phase with rodlike K-ion
order. This implies a specific migration pathway. A schematic representation
of these various transformations is given in Figure .
Figure 8
Schematic representation of the structural transformations
in K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] that take place as a function
of temperature
and electrochemical cycling. On heating, increased K-ion displacements
(shown here as blurred green spheres) result in “melting”
of the K-ion slide distortion and the ascent in symmetry from P1̅ to Cccm. Likewise, electrochemical
extraction of K+ from the ambient P1̅
phase gives KCu[Fe(CN)6] with rodlike A-site vacancy order
that again disrupts the slide distortion. Subsequent reinsertion of
K+ reactivates the K-ion slides, albeit in domains of smaller
coherence length than in the pristine sample. Dark-red-colored and
gold-colored frames denote the 2+/3+ charge state of Fe.
Schematic representation of the structural transformations
in K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] that take place as a function
of temperature
and electrochemical cycling. On heating, increased K-ion displacements
(shown here as blurred green spheres) result in “melting”
of the K-ion slide distortion and the ascent in symmetry from P1̅ to Cccm. Likewise, electrochemical
extraction of K+ from the ambient P1̅
phase gives KCu[Fe(CN)6] with rodlike A-site vacancy order
that again disrupts the slide distortion. Subsequent reinsertion of
K+ reactivates the K-ion slides, albeit in domains of smaller
coherence length than in the pristine sample. Dark-red-colored and
gold-colored frames denote the 2+/3+ charge state of Fe.At face value, the structural transformations taking place
during
K-ion (de)insertion in K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] perhaps
seem very much more complicated than the solid-solution cubic-phase
behavior of other PBAs. Of course, it is only because the various
distortions are ordered in our new material that we can see what is
actually going on. There can be no doubt that disordered phases such
as K0.71Cu[Fe(CN)6]0.72 exhibit the
very same types of distortions we discuss here—it is simply
that these distortions are correlated only over comparatively smaller
distances. Nevertheless the symmetry arguments we apply to our ordered
phase will still affect the local behavior of these disordered materials.
We now know there must be strong coupling between, e.g., local Jahn–Teller
order and the orientation of vacant A-site channels in K0.71Cu[Fe(CN)6]0.72, even if there is no obvious
signature of this in the average crystal structure. Our identification
of the key symmetry-lowering mechanisms at play also simplifies the
use of pair distribution function measurements to characterize the
local structure and its evolution in these important and useful cathode
materials.[51,52]As a final point, we comment
that the A-site slide degree of freedom—revealed
here as the key distortion mode in K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]—may turn out to be an effective ingredient in designing
ferroelectric PBAs. In conventional perovskites, antipolar A-site
distortions of the same type are induced by the common Pnma tilt distortion (e.g., as in SrSnO3). It was shown in
ref (53) that the right
kind of A-site compositional order in any such system would necessarily
give rise to a polar phase. The polarization direction and tilt sense
are linked by a trilinear coupling term in the free energy expansion,
and hence the polarization might be reversed in an applied field by
inverting the sense of octahedral rotation. While the K2Cu[Fe(CN)6] structure type also contains an A-site cation
order, the two types of K+ ions are evenly distributed
within each sliding plane, which is why this structure is not polar.
Nevertheless, the large number of different possible tilt systems
and other degrees of freedom accessible to PBAs[22,23] (and hybrid perovskites, more generally[10,13]) might allow the clever design of other systems in which other kinds
of A-site cation orders couple with A-site slides to drive a hybrid
improper ferroelectric response.[54] We intend
to revisit this point in a future study of slide distortions in PBAs.
Authors: Nicole A Benedek; James M Rondinelli; Hania Djani; Philippe Ghosez; Philip Lightfoot Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Hao Liu; Fiona C Strobridge; Olaf J Borkiewicz; Kamila M Wiaderek; Karena W Chapman; Peter J Chupas; Clare P Grey Journal: Science Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Andrew L Goodwin; Mark Calleja; Michael J Conterio; Martin T Dove; John S O Evans; David A Keen; Lars Peters; Matthew G Tucker Journal: Science Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Dominic J W Allen; Nicholas C Bristowe; Andrew L Goodwin; Hamish H-M Yeung Journal: J Mater Chem C Mater Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 7.393