Incorporation of guest additives within inorganic single crystals offers a unique strategy for creating nanocomposites with tailored properties. While anionic additives have been widely used to control the properties of crystals, their effective incorporation remains a key challenge. Here, we show that cationic additives are an excellent alternative for the synthesis of nanocomposites, where they are shown to deliver exceptional levels of incorporation of up to 70 wt % of positively charged amino acids, polymer particles, gold nanoparticles, and silver nanoclusters within inorganic single crystals. This high additive loading endows the nanocomposites with new functional properties, including plasmon coupling, bright fluorescence, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Cationic additives are also shown to outperform their acidic counterparts, where they are highly active in a wider range of crystal systems, owing to their outstanding colloidal stability in the crystallization media and strong affinity for the crystal surfaces. This work demonstrates that although often overlooked, cationic additives can make valuable crystallization additives to create composite materials with tailored composition-structure-property relationships. This versatile and straightforward approach advances the field of single-crystal composites and provides exciting prospects for the design and fabrication of new hybrid materials with tunable functional properties.
Incorporation of guest additives within inorganic single crystals offers a unique strategy for creating nanocomposites with tailored properties. While anionic additives have been widely used to control the properties of crystals, their effective incorporation remains a key challenge. Here, we show that cationic additives are an excellent alternative for the synthesis of nanocomposites, where they are shown to deliver exceptional levels of incorporation of up to 70 wt % of positively charged amino acids, polymer particles, gold nanoparticles, and silver nanoclusters within inorganic single crystals. This high additive loading endows the nanocomposites with new functional properties, including plasmon coupling, bright fluorescence, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Cationic additives are also shown to outperform their acidic counterparts, where they are highly active in a wider range of crystal systems, owing to their outstanding colloidal stability in the crystallization media and strong affinity for the crystal surfaces. This work demonstrates that although often overlooked, cationic additives can make valuable crystallization additives to create composite materials with tailored composition-structure-property relationships. This versatile and straightforward approach advances the field of single-crystal composites and provides exciting prospects for the design and fabrication of new hybrid materials with tunable functional properties.
Incorporation of additives
within single crystals holds enormous
potential for the design and fabrication of composite materials with
superior optical, electrical, mechanical, and catalytic properties.[1−7] The single-crystal matrix ensures that the additives are completely
isolated from the surrounding environment, and the hybrid crystals
possess structures that could not be replicated by simple mixing of
the individual components. Incorporation of amino acids in calcite
(CaCO3) enhances the hardness of the hybrid crystals,[2] while improved stability and increase in band
gap are achieved for organometal halide perovskites and ZnO crystals.[8−10] The occlusion of functional nanoparticles is particularly attractive,
as their properties can be predefined using well-established synthetic
methods. For example, the incorporation of metal oxide nanoparticles[11−13] in KH2PO4 and K2SO4 has
created single crystals for optoelectronic and photonic devices, while
calcite-containing polymer nano-objects[14] and magnetic nanoparticles[15] exhibit
enhanced physical properties. Incorporation of gold nanoparticles[3] in ZnO crystals delivered nanocomposites with
tunable band gaps and superior photocatalytic activity.Despite
these achievements, the occlusion of high concentrations
of additives in single crystals remains challenging.[16−18] Indeed, only a few weight percent of quantum dots, Au, and Fe3O4 nanoparticles were incorporated within calcite,[19,20] Cu2O,[21,22] and NaCl and borax[7] single crystals using gel-trapping, confinement-based,
and evaporation strategies, respectively. Nevertheless, it is possible
to achieve homogeneous incorporation using simple coprecipitation,[3,23−25] provided that an appropriate balance is achieved
between additive binding and the rate of crystal growth. The additives
must bind sufficiently strongly to the crystal surface such that they
are engulfed by the subsequent steps but not so strongly that they
inhibit crystal growth.[26−28]This strategy has been
elegantly demonstrated for CaCO3, where a broad range of
organic (e.g., polymer nanoparticles and
protein nanogels)[14,23,29,30] and inorganic (e.g., carbon dots, Au, and
Fe3O4) nanoparticles[4,15,24] have been incorporated within calcite single
crystals. Occlusion was achieved by functionalizing the nanoparticles
with anionic polyelectrolytes rich in carboxylate,[30−33] sulfate,[34] sulfonate,[35] or phosphate[36] functional groups such that they bind strongly
to the crystal surfaces. However, this could only be carried out at
low solution supersaturations and particle concentrations due to the
colloidal instability of these anionic particles in the presence of
calcium ions.[26] This, in turn, limits the
scalability and thus the practical applications of this approach.
Nanoparticles are therefore required that have a high affinity for
the crystal surface and that retain their colloidal stability at high
calcium ion concentrations.[24]Here,
we show that these challenges can be overcome by functionalizing
the particulate additives with cationic polyelectrolytes. Exceptional
levels of incorporation (up to 70 wt %) of latex particles, gold nanoparticles,
and silver nanoclusters are achieved within calcite and alternative
carbonate, sulfate, and oxide single crystals. Insight into the mechanism
of occlusion and the structure/composition relationships of the nanocomposites
is obtained from molecular dynamics simulations and synchrotron high-resolution
powder X-ray diffraction. We also demonstrate that such high nanoparticle
loadings lead to nanocomposites with new properties, including bright
fluorescence and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). While anionic
molecules have been the predominant choice of crystallization additive
for inorganic compounds, this work shows that cationic species can
outperform their anionic counterparts in some applications.
Results
Incorporation
of Small Basic Molecules in Calcite
Initial
experiments investigated the precipitation of calcium carbonate in
the presence of the basic amino acids l-arginine (Arg) and l-lysine (Lys). Precipitation was carried out using the ammonia
diffusion method (pH ≈9),[37] where
this yielded calcite under all of the conditions investigated ([Ca2+] = 10–20 mM and [amino acid] = 50–400 mM)
(Figures , S1, and S2). Arg had no effect on the crystal
morphologies, while Lys yielded rough crystals that were highly elongated
along their c-axes. This morphology change is indicative
of the preferential interaction of Lys with the acute over the obtuse
steps of calcite.[26,38] Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA)
of crystals grown at [Ca2+] = 20 mM and [amino acid] =
400 mM revealed that only ≈0.8 mol % of Arg incorporated in
calcite, while up to ≈4 mol % was recorded for Lys (Figures e and S3).
Figure 1
Optical micrographs of calcite precipitated
in the presence of
(a, b) [l-arginine] = 400 mM, (c, d) [l-lysine]
= 400 mM and (a, c) [Ca2+] = 10 mM and (b, d) [Ca2+] = 20 mM. Insets are the SEM images of the calcite crystals. (e)
Graph showing the relationship between occlusion and the concentration
of amino acid in solution.
Optical micrographs of calcite precipitated
in the presence of
(a, b) [l-arginine] = 400 mM, (c, d) [l-lysine]
= 400 mM and (a, c) [Ca2+] = 10 mM and (b, d) [Ca2+] = 20 mM. Insets are the SEM images of the calcite crystals. (e)
Graph showing the relationship between occlusion and the concentration
of amino acid in solution.Molecular simulations were performed to elucidate the contrasting
effects of Lys and Arg. The binding free energies for molecules representing
the Lys and Arg side chains were computed at the terrace, acute step,
and acute kink sites of calcite (Figure a). Both molecules were modeled in a protonated
state (pKa side chain of Lys = 10.6 and
Arg = 12), reflecting the pH of the experiments. The primary (−NH3) amine in the Lys side chain interacts strongly with the
carbonate anions at all adsorption sites; the adsorption free energy
increased roughly in proportion to the number of carbonate anions
available—one for a terrace, two for a step, and three for
a kink (Figure b).
The calcite surface is also expected to be negatively charged at the
experimental pH of ≈9,[37] which will
further promote the association of Lys with the calcite surface. In
contrast, the binding free energy of the Arg side chain was weaker
at all adsorption sites, especially the step and kink sites. The stereochemistry
and charge density of the single amine in the Lys side chain therefore
provides stronger binding to calcite than the three amines in the
Arg side chain, which is consistent with its enhanced occlusion and
morphological effects.
Figure 2
(a) Binding free energies for molecules representing the
sides
chains of l-lysine and l-arginine with the carbonate
anions at the calcite terrace, acute step, and acute kink adsorption
sites. (b) Snapshots from trajectories showing binding to the calcite
terrace, step, and kink sites. The white dashed lines indicate hydrogen
bonds. Calcium is shown in green for the lower terrace and pink for
the upper terrace. Carbon is shown in gray, oxygen in red, nitrogen
in cyan, and hydrogen in white. Water is excluded from all images
for clarity.
(a) Binding free energies for molecules representing the
sides
chains of l-lysine and l-arginine with the carbonate
anions at the calcite terrace, acute step, and acute kink adsorption
sites. (b) Snapshots from trajectories showing binding to the calcite
terrace, step, and kink sites. The white dashed lines indicate hydrogen
bonds. Calcium is shown in green for the lower terrace and pink for
the upper terrace. Carbon is shown in gray, oxygen in red, nitrogen
in cyan, and hydrogen in white. Water is excluded from all images
for clarity.
Incorporation of Cationic
Polymer Nanoparticles in Calcite
The incorporation of larger
cationic particulate additives was
then assessed. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) nanoparticles that
were surface-functionalized with branched poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI)
were synthesized.[39] Scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed that the dry
particles were highly monodisperse 150 nm spheres (Figure a,b) with a well-defined core/shell
structure and a ≈15 nm PEI coating (Figure b). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) of the
particles in water confirmed their uniformity (polydispersity index
(PDI) = 0.05) and a mean hydrodynamic diameter of 200 nm (Figure S4), while ζ-potential measurements
showed that they were positively charged at the pH = 9 used for CaCO3 precipitation (+45.7 mV).[40]
Figure 3
(a) SEM micrograph
of the cationic PMMA-PEI nanoparticles. (b)
TEM image showing that the nanoparticles are core–shell structures
with a 15 nm PEI corona. (c–l) SEM images and cross sections
through PMMA-PEI/calcite composites precipitated in the presence of
(c–h) 0.10 wt % and (i–l) 0.25 wt % PMMA-PEI nanoparticles
for (c, d) [Ca2+] = 1.5 mM, (e, f, i, j) [Ca2+] = 2.5 mM, and (g, h, k, l) [Ca2+] = 5 mM.
(a) SEM micrograph
of the cationic PMMA-PEI nanoparticles. (b)
TEM image showing that the nanoparticles are core–shell structures
with a 15 nm PEI corona. (c–l) SEM images and cross sections
through PMMA-PEI/calcite composites precipitated in the presence of
(c–h) 0.10 wt % and (i–l) 0.25 wt % PMMA-PEI nanoparticles
for (c, d) [Ca2+] = 1.5 mM, (e, f, i, j) [Ca2+] = 2.5 mM, and (g, h, k, l) [Ca2+] = 5 mM.Calcite crystals precipitated in the presence of the nanoparticles
were elongated along the c-axes and capped by {104}
faces (Figure ). Greater
morphological effects were achieved at higher nanoparticle concentrations
and supersaturations (Figure c–l) as the latter increases the step density, and
therefore the growth rate, of the {104} faces, reducing their expression
in the morphology. This morphological change is again indicative of
preferential binding of the particles to the acute over the obtuse
steps of calcite, as has been observed in in situ AFM studies of calcite growth in the presence of nanoparticles.
Binding is through the PEI chains on the surfaces of the particles,[2,24,41−43] where the specificity
is expected to be sensitive to the reaction conditions.[44] As indicated by the macroscopic roughening of
the crystal surfaces, these additives must induce the formation of
macro-steps and, ultimately, step-bunching, where there may be greater
specificity and stronger binding to the larger macro-steps.DLS analyses revealed that the cationic nanoparticles remained
highly stable in solutions containing calcium and carbonate ions at
concentrations as high as 50 mM (Figures S6 and S7). Such excellent colloidal stability in the mineralization
solution enables their effective binding and entrapment within calcite,
as shown by examining cross sections through the crystals, prepared
by focused ion beam (FIB) milling or fracturing. The particles were
uniformly incorporated (Figure c–j). TGA further confirmed high particle loadings
in the calcite crystals, where they comprise up to 33 wt % (57 vol
%) cationic nanoparticles (Figure S5).
Comparison with Low Charge and Anionic Polymer Nanoparticles
The incorporation of the cationic PMMA-PEI nanoparticles (Figure a–c) was then
compared with 200 nm low-charge and anionic nanoparticles. Nonfunctionalized
poly(styrene) nanoparticles failed to incorporate or alter the crystal
morphology (Figures d–f and S5), while carboxyl-functionalized
nanoparticles induced the same pattern of morphological changes as
the cationic nanoparticles (Figure ). Although the anionic particles incorporated better
than cationic particles at low calcium ion concentrations ([Ca2+] = 1.5 mM and [particles] = 0.1 wt %), a small increase
to [Ca2+] = 2.5 mM resulted in a reversal of their activities.
Homogeneous incorporation of cationic particles occurred at [Ca2+] = 2.5 mM and [particles] = 0.1 wt %, while 0.5 wt % of
the anionic particles was required to give equivalent occlusion under
the same conditions. This is attributed to the excellent colloidal
stability of the cationic particles in the crystallization solution,
which ensures that they remain well-dispersed in solutions of [Ca2+] ≤ 50 mM (Figure S6).
In contrast, the carboxyl-functionalized nanoparticles aggregated
at a much lower concentration of [Ca2+] > 5 mM (Figure S8). Strong complexation of the carboxylated
nanoparticles with Ca2+ ions in solution also screens the
negative charges and hampers their binding to the crystal surface
at higher calcium concentrations.
Figure 4
Optical (a, d) and SEM micrographs (inset
in a and b, c, e, f)
of calcite crystals precipitated in the presence of (a–c) PMMA-PEI
nanoparticles and (d–f) nonfunctionalized PS nanoparticles
at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [nanoparticles] = 0.5 wt %. (b) Surface
of PMMA-PEI/calcite nanocomposites showing embedded nanoparticles.
(c) Cross section showing uniform incorporation of the PMMA-PEI nanoparticles
in calcite. (d, e) Images of unmodified calcite crystals precipitated
in the presence of nonfunctionalized PS nanoparticles and (f) cross
section showing no incorporation of nanoparticles in the bulk of the
calcite crystals.
Figure 5
SEM micrographs of calcite
crystals precipitated at [Ca2+] = 1.5 mM (a, b) and [Ca2+] = 2.5 mM (c–l) in
the presence of carboxyl-functionalized nanoparticles at concentration
(a–d) 0.1 wt %, (e, f) 0.25 wt %, (g, h) 0.5 wt %, and (i,
j) 1 wt %, (k, l) 2.5 wt %. SEM of fractured crystals showing that
efficient incorporation is achieved at [Ca2+] = 1.5 mM
and [nanoparticles] = 0.1 wt % (b), whereas only surface-confined
occlusion is achieved at [Ca2+] = 2.5 mM and [nanoparticles]
≤ 0.25 wt % (d and f). Uniform incorporation occurs at [Ca2+] = 2.5 mM and [nanoparticle] ≥ 0.5 wt %.
Optical (a, d) and SEM micrographs (inset
in a and b, c, e, f)
of calcite crystals precipitated in the presence of (a–c) PMMA-PEI
nanoparticles and (d–f) nonfunctionalized PS nanoparticles
at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [nanoparticles] = 0.5 wt %. (b) Surface
of PMMA-PEI/calcite nanocomposites showing embedded nanoparticles.
(c) Cross section showing uniform incorporation of the PMMA-PEI nanoparticles
in calcite. (d, e) Images of unmodified calcite crystals precipitated
in the presence of nonfunctionalized PS nanoparticles and (f) cross
section showing no incorporation of nanoparticles in the bulk of the
calcite crystals.SEM micrographs of calcite
crystals precipitated at [Ca2+] = 1.5 mM (a, b) and [Ca2+] = 2.5 mM (c–l) in
the presence of carboxyl-functionalized nanoparticles at concentration
(a–d) 0.1 wt %, (e, f) 0.25 wt %, (g, h) 0.5 wt %, and (i,
j) 1 wt %, (k, l) 2.5 wt %. SEM of fractured crystals showing that
efficient incorporation is achieved at [Ca2+] = 1.5 mM
and [nanoparticles] = 0.1 wt % (b), whereas only surface-confined
occlusion is achieved at [Ca2+] = 2.5 mM and [nanoparticles]
≤ 0.25 wt % (d and f). Uniform incorporation occurs at [Ca2+] = 2.5 mM and [nanoparticle] ≥ 0.5 wt %.
Incorporation of Cationic Metal Nanoparticles in Calcite
This approach was then extended to create functional nanocomposite
crystals using cationic metal nanoparticles.[24,45,46] Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) functionalized
with branched PEI (Au/PEI) were synthesized by complexing hydrochloroauric
acid with branched PEI (MW = 1200 g mol–1) and then reduced with sodium borohydride. The average
AuNPs diameter was 5 nm (±1 nm), as determined by TEM (Figure a). The AuNPs were
highly stable in the mineralization solution, where DLS revealed only
a minor increase in the hydrodynamic diameter from ≈6.5 to
8 nm as [Ca2+] was increased from 0 to 30 mM (Figure S9). This is due to the slight expansion
of the PEI polymers capping the AuNPs. ζ-potential analysis
confirmed that the nanoparticles were positively charged at pH = 9
(Figure S8), and the invariance of the
surface plasmon resonance band at λ = 520 nm
demonstrated their stability in aqueous solutions containing [Ca2+] and [CO32–] ≤ 50 mM
(Figures S10 and S11). This is a significant
advantage over occlusion systems based on nanoparticles functionalized
with anionic polymers, where these readily aggregate in the presence
of metal ions.[24,35]
Figure 6
(a) TEM image of ≈5 nm AuNPs functionalized
with branched
PEI (Au/PEI). The inset is a HRTEM image showing Au (111) lattice
fringes. (b) Optical image of calcite crystals precipitated at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [Au/PEI] = 0.01 wt %, showing zoning effects.
(c) Optical micrograph and SEM image (inset) of dark and elongated
calcite crystals precipitated at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [Au/PEI]
= 0.1 wt %. (d–f) FIB-SEM images through crystals revealing
the dense and uniform incorporation of the AuNPs (bright spots) in
calcite. (g) HRTEM and corresponding FFT of a cross section through
a nanocomposite crystal, displaying lattice fringes that demonstrate
the single crystallinity of the calcite host. (h, i) SAED patterns
of the nanocomposites showing diffraction spots of calcite single
crystals and rings corresponding to Au. (j) HAADF-STEM and EDX-STEM
maps showing the uniform distribution of Ca, C (i.e., calcite) and
Au, N (i.e., Au/PEI nanoparticles) throughout the hybrid crystals.
(a) TEM image of ≈5 nm AuNPs functionalized
with branched
PEI (Au/PEI). The inset is a HRTEM image showing Au (111) lattice
fringes. (b) Optical image of calcite crystals precipitated at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [Au/PEI] = 0.01 wt %, showing zoning effects.
(c) Optical micrograph and SEM image (inset) of dark and elongated
calcite crystals precipitated at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [Au/PEI]
= 0.1 wt %. (d–f) FIB-SEM images through crystals revealing
the dense and uniform incorporation of the AuNPs (bright spots) in
calcite. (g) HRTEM and corresponding FFT of a cross section through
a nanocomposite crystal, displaying lattice fringes that demonstrate
the single crystallinity of the calcite host. (h, i) SAED patterns
of the nanocomposites showing diffraction spots of calcite single
crystals and rings corresponding to Au. (j) HAADF-STEM and EDX-STEM
maps showing the uniform distribution of Ca, C (i.e., calcite) and
Au, N (i.e., Au/PEI nanoparticles) throughout the hybrid crystals.Pink calcite crystals with nonuniform colors characteristic
of
intra-sectoral zoning formed on coprecipitation at very low [Au/PEI]
= 0.01 wt % (Figure b), while higher [Au/PEI] = 0.1 wt % yielded elongated, dark red/black
crystals (Figure c).
The AuNPs were uniformly distributed throughout the host crystal (Figures d–f,j and S12), and the analysis of bulk samples using
atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and TGA showed that they comprise
≈43 wt % Au and ≈28 wt % PEI (Figure S13), and thus a remarkable 70 wt % of foreign material in
calcite. While one may intuitively expect a disruption of the structure
of the host crystal, both high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) (Figure g) and selected area electron
diffraction (SAED) (Figure h,i) of a thin section cut from a nanocomposite crystal demonstrates
that the single-crystal structure of the calcite host is preserved.This approach was also successfully applied to yet smaller silver
nanoparticles (Ag/PEI) prepared by slow reduction of a solution of
silver nitrate and branched PEI (MW =
10 000 g mol–1) with l-ascorbic
acid. This gave Ag nanoclusters with <2 nm Ag cores (Figures a and S15) and ≈4 nm hydrodynamic diameter (Figure S14), which exhibit bright fluorescence under UV irradiation
(λ = 365 nm) (inset Figure d).[47] Comparison
of calcite growth in the presence of [nanoparticles] = 0.01 wt % showed
that the Ag/PEI and Au/PEI nanoparticles induced the same pattern
of morphological changes (Figure b) but that the Ag/PEI clusters were more effective.
This is attributed to a higher number density of the smaller Ag/PEI
nanoclusters. These crystals again exhibited zoning, where the nanoclusters
concentrated in the rough equatorial region of calcite (Figure c).
Figure 7
(a) TEM micrograph of
Ag nanoclusters functionalized with branched
PEI (Ag/PEI). (b) Optical and SEM (inset) images of calcite precipitated
at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [Ag/PEI] = 0.01 wt % and (c) corresponding
fluorescence image of the hybrid crystals showing zoning. (d) Optical
image, SEM image (top right), and digital image (bottom left) of calcite
precipitated at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [Ag/PEI] = 0.1 wt %,
and corresponding (e) fluorescence and (f) dark-field TEM images demonstrating
homogeneous incorporation of Ag/PEI. (g) SEM-EDX maps showing elemental
Ca and Ag of the composite crystals precipitated at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [Ag/PEI] = 0.1 wt %, and (h) corresponding XRD pattern
demonstrating the single-crystal character of the hybrid crystals.
(a) TEM micrograph of
Ag nanoclusters functionalized with branched
PEI (Ag/PEI). (b) Optical and SEM (inset) images of calcite precipitated
at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [Ag/PEI] = 0.01 wt % and (c) corresponding
fluorescence image of the hybrid crystals showing zoning. (d) Optical
image, SEM image (top right), and digital image (bottom left) of calcite
precipitated at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [Ag/PEI] = 0.1 wt %,
and corresponding (e) fluorescence and (f) dark-field TEM images demonstrating
homogeneous incorporation of Ag/PEI. (g) SEM-EDX maps showing elemental
Ca and Ag of the composite crystals precipitated at [Ca2+] = 10 mM and [Ag/PEI] = 0.1 wt %, and (h) corresponding XRD pattern
demonstrating the single-crystal character of the hybrid crystals.Higher [Ag/PEI] = 0.1 wt % resulted in their uniform
incorporation
(Figures d–g
and S16) and endowed the host crystal with
bright fluorescence under UV light (Figure e). Analysis of bulk samples using inductively
coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) revealed Ag
incorporation levels of 37.5 wt %, and TGA showed that the crystals
comprised 26.3 wt % PEI (Figure S13). This
again demonstrates that exceptional amounts—64 wt %—of
Ag clusters can be incorporated into calcite while preserving the
single-crystal structure (Figure h).
Microstructure of the Nanocomposite Crystals
The influence
of the occluded PMMA-PEI, Au/PEI, and Ag/PEI nanoparticles on the
structure of the calcite host crystal was investigated using synchrotron
high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD), where data were
compared with pure calcite and calcite containing PEI (Figures and S18). Lattice distortions, microstrain fluctuations, and coherence lengths
were measured for the (012), (104), (006), and (110) reflections,
giving information about the additive/crystal interactions along different
crystallographic directions.
Figure 8
(a–d) HRPXRD patterns and (e) microstrain
fluctuations of
the indicated reflections of pure calcite (gray), PMMA-PEI latex/calcite
(blue), PEI/calcite (purple), Ag/calcite (orange), and Au/calcite
(red). (f) Lattice distortions along the a-axis and c-axis of calcite incorporating the diverse cationic additives.
(a–d) HRPXRD patterns and (e) microstrain
fluctuations of
the indicated reflections of pure calcite (gray), PMMA-PEI latex/calcite
(blue), PEI/calcite (purple), Ag/calcite (orange), and Au/calcite
(red). (f) Lattice distortions along the a-axis and c-axis of calcite incorporating the diverse cationic additives.PMMA-PEI nanoparticles only had minor effects on
the calcite structure
even at incorporation levels of 57 vol %, causing a decrease in coherence
lengths from 650 nm in pure calcite to 540 nm and small lattice distortions
of Δa/a = 0.004% and Δc/c = 0.01%. This is consistent with previous
analysis of polymer nano-objects/calcite composites.[30] By comparison, the Bragg peaks of calcite containing ≈18
wt % PEI were significantly broadened and shifted to larger d-spacings. This sample also showed smaller coherence lengths
of 470 and 330 nm perpendicular to the (110) and (006) planes, respectively,
and lattice expansions of Δa/a = 0.013% and Δc/c = 0.095%.
The greater lattice distortions along the c-axis
than the a-axis (Figure f) are consistent with the elastic anisotropy
of calcite.[2]Incorporation of 64
wt % Ag/PEI and 70 wt % Au/PEI nanoparticles
yielded significant broadenings and shifts of the diffraction peaks
toward larger d-spacings. Coherence lengths were ≈350 and ≈210
nm perpendicular to the (110) and (006) planes for both nanocomposites,
and lattice expansions reaching up to Δc/c = 0.135% and Δa/a = 0.03% were recorded. These values are high for a brittle ceramic
and are comparable to those measured in calcite biominerals occluding
biomolecules.[48] The strong influence of
these small particles can be attributed to the large additive/host
interfacial area, where the specific surface areas of the ≈6.5
nm Au/PEI particles and ≈4 nm Ag/PEI are ≈1000 times
and ≈2500 times larger than that of the 200 nm latex particles,
respectively. That the Au/PEI nanoparticles induced slightly greater
lattice expansions and microstrains may derive from the composition
of the nanoparticles, where the Ag/PEI nanoclusters comprise a higher
percentage of polymer than the Au/PEI nanoparticles. This suggests
that the metal nanoparticle core and the polymer coating have different
effects on the crystal lattice.
Incorporation in Alternative
Host Crystals
The versatility
of this approach was then demonstrated by extending it to manganese
carbonate (MnCO3, rhodochrosite), strontium sulfate (SrSO4, celestine), calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum), and zinc
oxide (ZnO, zincite) (Figures and S19–S22). Incorporation
of AuNPs within MnCO3, SrSO4, and CaSO4·2H2O was achieved by mixing 0.1 wt % Au/PEI with
the respective crystallization solutions. Au/ZnO nanocomposites were
prepared under mild hydrothermal conditions in which 1 wt % Au/PEI
was added to an aqueous solution of zinc nitrate hexahydrate and HMTA,
and the reaction mixture was heated at 90 °C for 90 min. High
levels of occlusion were achieved in all crystals. The nanoparticles
were uniformly distributed throughout ZnO, MnCO3, and SrSO4, where the ZnO contained ≈22.5 wt % Au/PEI, and the
MnCO3 and SrSO4 over ≈65 wt %. Gypsum
displayed pronounced sectoral zoning (Figure g) that is common for this crystal and derives
from preferential binding of the AuNPs to the (011) planes.[49] Increasing the amount of Au/PEI in solution
to 0.25 wt % enabled uniform incorporation of the AuNPs in gypsum
(≈47 wt %) (Figure S22).
Figure 9
(a–c)
MnCO3, (d–f) SrSO4, (g–i)
CaSO4·2H2O and (j–l) ZnO nanocomposite
crystals incorporating Au/PEI nanoparticles. (a, d, g) Optical images
(insets are SEM images), (j) a SEM image of the Au/ZnO nanocrystals.
(b, c, e, f, h, i) FIB-SEM cross-section images revealing the high
levels of AuNP incorporation (bright spots) in the various inorganic
host crystals. (k) TEM micrograph of a thin section through an Au/ZnO
nanocomposite showing the uniformly incorporated nanoparticles (l)
and corresponding HRTEM image displaying the lattice fringes of Au
(111) and ZnO (101).
(a–c)
MnCO3, (d–f) SrSO4, (g–i)
CaSO4·2H2O and (j–l) ZnO nanocomposite
crystals incorporating Au/PEI nanoparticles. (a, d, g) Optical images
(insets are SEM images), (j) a SEM image of the Au/ZnO nanocrystals.
(b, c, e, f, h, i) FIB-SEM cross-section images revealing the high
levels of AuNP incorporation (bright spots) in the various inorganic
host crystals. (k) TEM micrograph of a thin section through an Au/ZnO
nanocomposite showing the uniformly incorporated nanoparticles (l)
and corresponding HRTEM image displaying the lattice fringes of Au
(111) and ZnO (101).
Optical Properties of the
Nanocomposite Crystals
The
experimental extinction spectra of the Au/calcite crystals show that
the Au plasmon peak is broadened and shifted to ≈557 nm as
compared with ≈520 nm for AuNPs dispersed in an aqueous solution
(Figure b). This
is consistent with finite element simulations of a pair of 5 nm AuNPs
embedded in calcite, which predict a red shift in the resonance peak
from 520 to 560 nm due to the high refractive index of the calcite
(n = 1.66) when the AuNPs are separated by 4 nm,
and ultimately, the development of two separate peaks as the interparticle
distance is decreased (Figure c).
Figure 10
(a) Raman spectra of pure crystals (gray) and Au/calcite
nanocomposites
(cyan), showing a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) effect
for the composites when irradiated with a laser source (λ =
785 nm) using 10 s exposure time and 5% laser power. The spectra are
offset for clarity. (b) UV–visible extinction spectra of Au/PEI
in pure water (gray) and in calcite (cyan), displaying a red shift
of the surface plasmon resonance band of the AuNPs when incorporated
in calcite. (c) Simulated extinction spectra for 5 nm AuNPs dimers
occluded in calcite with varying the interparticle separation between
1 and 4 nm. (d–g) FEM-simulated field enhancement |E|/|E0| along the y-axis for the 5 nm AuNPs dimers (d, e) and trimers (f, g) with an
interparticle gap of 4 nm (d, f) and 1 nm (e, g).
(a) Raman spectra of pure crystals (gray) and Au/calcite
nanocomposites
(cyan), showing a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) effect
for the composites when irradiated with a laser source (λ =
785 nm) using 10 s exposure time and 5% laser power. The spectra are
offset for clarity. (b) UV–visible extinction spectra of Au/PEI
in pure water (gray) and in calcite (cyan), displaying a red shift
of the surface plasmon resonance band of the AuNPs when incorporated
in calcite. (c) Simulated extinction spectra for 5 nm AuNPs dimers
occluded in calcite with varying the interparticle separation between
1 and 4 nm. (d–g) FEM-simulated field enhancement |E|/|E0| along the y-axis for the 5 nm AuNPs dimers (d, e) and trimers (f, g) with an
interparticle gap of 4 nm (d, f) and 1 nm (e, g).The nanocomposite crystals also display surface-enhanced Raman
scattering (SERS),[50] where this effect
arises from the close proximity of the AuNPs (down to ≈1 nm)
in the host crystals (Figure a), creating intense localized electromagnetic fields in the
regions between the AuNPs.[50,51] The main Raman peaks
(i.e., 1085 cm–1 for calcite and MnCO3, 1002 cm–1 for SrSO4, 1008 cm–1 for gypsum, and 437 cm–1 for ZnO) of the composites
are significantly more intense than those of the pure crystals, with
enhancement factors of 2 and 4.5 for ZnO and gypsum, respectively,
and ≈6 for calcite, MnCO3, and SrSO4 (Figures a and S19–S22). An inverse relationship exists
between the SERS signal enhancement and the interparticle distance
between adjacent AuNPs such that the values recorded scale with the
levels of Au incorporation within the various host crystals.[50,52]The experimental SERS data were rationalized by the simulations,
where the increase in the Raman signals, emGSERS, is proportional to the fourth power of the local
field enhancement, |E|/|E0|, where E is the local electric field and E0 is the incident electric field.[53] The simulations predict field enhancements emGSERS ≈ 103 at the midpoint between two AuNPs separated by 4 nm, where the induced
field is inversely proportional to the third power of the distance
from the particle surface.[54] Hot spots
on the AuNPs surfaces with emGSERS of 105–108 are also predicted for particle
separations of 1–4 nm (Figure d–g), but these are unlikely to be fully accessible
by the calcite crystal due to the PEI coating on the AuNPs. The field
enhancement observed in the nanocomposite will also be reduced due
to the presence of multiple AuNPs in close proximity, which will dilute
the peak field enhancement and lower emGSERS (Figures S23 and S24).
Discussion
Incorporation of soluble additives within inorganic
single crystals
holds enormous potential for the synthesis of hybrid materials with
advanced properties. However, the creation of such materials is far
from trivial, as the simple addition of particles to a crystallization
solution typically leads to low levels of occlusion.[16,17] This has been addressed by functionalizing the particles with block
copolymers that modify the interaction of the particles with the crystal
surface to enhance their occlusion and ensure their colloidal stability
in the crystallization solution.[26,35]Anionic
polyelectrolytes have been used extensively to functionalize
the particles and drive incorporation.[18,32−36] This selection is made based on the traditional choice of anionic
additives for controlling CaCO3 precipitation, where they
are often highly active in modifying morphologies and retarding nucleation.[26,35] Highly acidic macromolecules are also characteristic of calcium
carbonate biomineralization and are thus often employed in bio-inspired
mineralization.[14,23,30] However, solution conditions are restricted to low supersaturations
and particle concentrations as strong electrostatic interactions between
the calcium ions and anionic moieties on the surface of the particles
cause particle aggregation. This significantly limits the particle
loading and yield of these nanocomposites.Many studies have
been performed to determine “design rules”
that govern the occlusion of nanoparticles functionalized with polymer
chains. As a general rule, short anionic polymer chains often lead
to occlusion in the outer surface of the calcite crystals only,[17,26,35] while longer chains deliver incorporation
throughout the crystals.[14,26,30] This behavior has been attributed to the higher conformational freedom
of the longer chains, which enhances binding of the particles to the
surface of the mineral.[26] Exceptions are
noted, however, where longer sulfate chains were observed to give
less incorporation than their shorter counterparts,[34] even at low [Ca2+] = 1.5 mM.The complexity
of occluding anionic particles was further investigated
by designing block copolymer micelles in which the ratio of carboxylate-
to hydroxyl-functionalized chains could be systematically varied.[26] Nanoparticle incorporation in calcite did not
directly scale with the carboxylate content of the steric stabilizers,
where nanoparticles comprising 1:1 carboxylate/hydroxyl groups were
occluded at higher levels than those with carboxylate chains only.
In this scenario, the hydroxyl moieties were considered to reduce
ionic cross-linking between adjacent carboxylates chains, providing
higher colloidal stability and more efficient binding to the crystal
surface. These studies show that the incorporation of anionic particles
in calcite is a complex process relying on trial and error to achieve
success.Cationic polyelectrolytes, in contrast, offer a straightforward
and robust means of synthesizing hybrid crystals, where the weak interactions
between the Ca2+ ions and cationic polymers ensure excellent
colloidal stability of the nanoparticles. High concentrations of nanoparticles
can therefore be employed. Although the cationic additives bind less
strongly to the crystal surface than their anionic counterparts,[55] access to much higher particle concentrations
and supersaturations delivers exceptional occlusion levels: 57 vol
% polymer nanoparticles, 64 wt % silver nanoclusters, and 70 wt %
gold nanoparticles. This is achieved for a broad range of supersaturations
and without compromising the single crystallinity of calcite, which
enables scale-up. The polyamines employed were all commercially available,
avoiding the need for the synthesis of bespoke polymers.These
results also contribute to the growing recognition that cationic
additives can make valuable crystallization additives. While they
have been largely neglected in the control of calcium carbonate and
other inorganic crystals, some notable exceptions exist, such as the
formation of fibers and thin films of CaCO3 in the presence
of poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH).[56,57] Organic molecules bearing amine moieties,[58] basic polypeptides,[59] and cationic polyelectrolytes[40] can additionally enable polymorph selection,
delivering metastable vaterite and aragonite over calcite (the thermodynamically
stable phase).[58,60,61] Positively charged molecules may also play important roles in biogenic
systems, where the analysis of the structures of mollusk shells has
identified biomacromolecules rich in histidine, arginine, and lysine
residues.[62−64] Our demonstration that polyamines can drive the occlusion
of particles to exceptionally high levels therefore further extends
the scope of these molecules as crystallization additives.
Conclusions
While cationic additives are often overlooked in favor of their
anionic counterparts, growing evidence suggests that they can play
pivotal roles in controlling the crystallization of inorganic compounds.
This work demonstrates that functionalization of particulate additives
with commercially available cationic polyelectrolytes offers a robust
and versatile means of fabricating functional nanocomposites of a
wide range of inorganic single crystals, including carbonates, sulfates,
and oxides. Exceptional levels of occlusion of organic and inorganic
particulate additives were achieved, far exceeding those obtained
with their acidic counterparts. This work therefore provides a significant
step-change in methodology, where we envisage that SERS combined with
the intrinsic plasmonic properties of metal nanoparticles and nanoclusters
within inorganic single crystals could find immediate applications
in a wide range of areas, including catalysis, bioimaging, sensing,
and photothermal therapy.
Experimental Section
Synthesis
of the Positively Charged Particulate Additives
Synthesis of the PMMA-PEI
Latex Nanoparticles
Poly(methyl
methacrylate)-poly(ethyleneimine) (PMMA-PEI) core–shell nanoparticles
were prepared by a one-step emulsion polymerization. Briefly, 1 g
of branched PEI (MW = 25 000 g
mol–1) was dissolved in a round-bottomed flask containing
50 mL of DI water. The sealed reaction mixture was purged with N2 (g) for 1 h and was subsequently placed in an oil
bath heated at 80 °C. Then, 2 g of MMA monomer were added to
the solution under constant stirring (500 rpm) and a N2 (g) stream. After 15 min, TBHP (10 mM, 0.50 mL) was injected
into the reaction solution. The reaction mixture was allowed to react
at 80 °C for 3 h under an N2 (g) atmosphere.
The product nanoparticles were purified by repeated centrifugations
(5700 rcf, 30 min) to remove the unreacted reagents and were then
redispersed in DI water.
Synthesis of the Au/PEI Nanoparticles
Au/PEI nanoparticles
were synthesized by adding 2 mL of a 2 wt % HAuCl4·3H2O to 400 mL DI water containing 0.025 wt % PEI (MW = 1200 g mol–1) under constant stirring
(500 rpm). After 30 min, 5 mL of NaBH4 (20 mM) was injected
into the solution. The solution was further stirred for 1 h and then
subjected to multiple concentration/dilution cycles using an Amicon
stirred ultrafiltration cell (Millipore) using a 10 kDa cellulose
membrane and maintaining the pressure below 1 bar. The volume of the
solution collected was adjusted to prepare a 1 wt % Au/PEI stock solution.
Synthesis of the Ag/PEI Nanoclusters
Ag/PEI nanoclusters
were prepared by adding 250 μL of an aqueous AgNO3 solution (10 mM) dropwise to a 10 mL PEI (MW = 10 000 g mol) solution
(250 μM). The pH of the solution was subsequently adjusted to
4.5 using HCl (aq) (1 M). Then, 300 μL of l-ascorbic
acid (100 mM) was injected into the solution. After 12 h, the solution
was purified by dialysis against DI water (MWCO = 3500 Da, SpectraPor)
and the nanoclusters were isolated by lyophilization. The freeze-dried
Ag/PEI nanoparticles were then redispersed in DI water to give a 1
wt % Ag/PEI stock solution.
CaCO3 Mineralization
in the Presence of Positively
Charged Additives
Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) was
precipitated using the ammonium carbonate diffusion method[37] in the presence of the basic additives (l-lysine, l-arginine, polymer nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles,
and silver nanoclusters), the acidic polymer nanoparticles, or the
nonfunctionalized polymer nanoparticles. Briefly, 1 mL of the prepared
solution containing the desired amounts of additives and [Ca2+] = 1.5–20 mM were transferred to well plates containing glass
substrates. Calcium carbonate was precipitated by placing the well
plates in a desiccator along with a Petri dish containing 2 g of (NH4)2CO3. Crystallization was allowed to
proceed overnight (>12 h). After this time, the substrates supporting
the crystals were washed several times with DI water and then ethanol,
followed by gentle drying using a N2 (g) stream.
Mineralization of MnCO3, SrSO4, and CaSO4 in the Presence of Au/PEI Nanoparticles
MnCO3, SrSO4, and gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) crystals were precipitated in the presence of Au/PEI nanoparticles
by mixing 0.1–0.25 wt % of Au/PEI with an aqueous solution
containing [Mn2+] = 2 mM, [Sr2+] = 2 mM or [Ca2+] = 100 mM, respectively. [NaHCO3] = 100 mM, [Na2SO4] = 10 mM, or [Na2SO4]
= 100 mM were then added to the manganese, strontium, or calcium solutions,
respectively. Crystallization reactions were allowed to proceed overnight
(>12 h). The substrates supporting the crystals were then washed
several
times with DI water and then ethanol, followed by gentle drying using
an N2 (g) stream prior to characterization.
Synthesis
of Au/PEI–ZnO Composite Crystals
A
round-bottomed flask was charged with 2.5 mL of 1 wt % Au/PEI and
an aqueous solution of zinc nitrate hexahydrate (1.50 mmol) to give
a total volume of 97.5 mL. The reaction mixture was connected to a
condenser and was placed in a preheated oil bath at 90 °C and
stirred for 30 min. Crystallization of ZnO containing Au/PEI was initiated
by the slow addition of a 2.5 mL aqueous solution of HMTA (1.50 mmol).
The reaction was then allowed for 90 min and was quenched by immersing
the flask in an ice bath. The composite crystals were then isolated
by repeated centrifugations (2850 rcf, 10 min), washed with water
and ethanol, and then dried in an oven (50 °C).
Characterization
Dynamic
Light Scattering (DLS) and Electrophoretic Analyses
The hydrodynamic
diameters, particle size distributions (PDI),
and ζ-potentials of the cationic nanoparticles were measured
using a Malvern Zetasizer NanoZS at a fixed scattering angle of 173°.
The colloidal stability of the PEI-functionalized nanoparticles and
the carboxyl-functionalized nanoparticles was assessed by monitoring
the evolution of the hydrodynamic diameters of the nanoparticles in
solutions containing the nanoparticles (0.10 wt %) in [Ca2+] = 0–50 mM. The aqueous suspensions were adjusted to pH =
9 using 100 mM NaOH, which corresponds to the alkaline pH of the mineralization
solution of CaCO3.
Electron Microscopy
The crystals were imaged with scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) using an FEI NanoSEM Nova 450. The samples
were mounted on SEM stubs using carbon adhesive disks and coated with
a 4 nm iridium layer prior to imaging. Cross sections through the
composite crystals were prepared using focused ion beam (FIB) milling
with a FEI Helio G4 CX dual-beam high-resolution monochromated FEG
SEM instrument equipped with a FIB. A selected area of the crystal
was precoated with 2 μm thick Pt. The operating voltage was
30 kV, and the beam currents were varied between 0.1 and 5 nA.Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses of the cationic nanoparticles
were carried out by placing a 10 μL droplet of an aqueous suspension
of the nanoparticles (0.10 wt %) on a copper TEM grid-coated with
a continuous carbon film for 1 min. TEM analyses were conducted using
a FEI Tecnai TF20 FEGTEM with an Oxford Instruments INCA 350 EDX system/80
mm X-Max SDD detector and a Gatan Orius CCD camera operating at 200
kV.Au/calcite and Ag/calcite composite crystals were characterized
by TEM. Thin lamellae were prepared from the composite crystals using
FIB-SEM and transferred to a copper TEM grid using a Kleindiek micromanipulator.
The homogeneous incorporation of the cationic nanoparticles in calcite
was confirmed using a high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM),
in conjunction with EDX analysis mapping using a FEI Titan3 Themis
G2S/TEM operated at 300 kV and 3 nA with a FEI Super-X energy dispersive
X-ray (EDX) system and a Gatan OneView CCD camera.
Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy (AAS)
Quantification
of the amount of Au nanoparticles incorporated within calcite single
crystals was carried out using a PerkinElmer atomic absorption spectrometer
AAnalyst 400 operating with an air-acetylene flame. The Au/calcite
composite crystals were dissolved in 250 μL of concentrated aqua regia solution (HCl/HNO3 – 3:1 molar
ratio), which was then diluted to 50 mL with DI water. The amount
of elemental Au and Ca present in the sample was then measured after
calibration using Au and Ca standard solutions.
Quantification
of the amount of Ag nanoclusters incorporated within
calcite single crystals and Au nanoparticles incorporated within MnCO3, SrSO4, CaSO4, and ZnO was carried
out using a Thermo Fisher Scientific iCAP 7400 radial ICP-OES Analyzer.
The Ag/calcite composite crystals were dissolved in 250 μL of
HNO3 solution (1 M) and then diluted to 50 mL with DI water.
Au/MnCO3, Au/SrSO4, Au/CaSO4, and
Au/ZnO were first dissolved in 250 μL of concentrated aqua regia solution, which was then diluted to 50 mL with
DI water. The amount of elemental Ag, Au, Ca, Mn, Sr, and Zn present
in the samples was then measured after calibration using Au, Ca, Mn,
Sr, and Zn standard solutions.
Thermogravimetric Analysis
(TGA)
Thermogravimetric
analyses were performed from 20 to 850 °C in air, using a TA-Instruments
Q600 operating at 10 °C min.
The samples were bleached prior to characterization to remove the
surface-bound organic matter.
Single-Crystal XRD
Au/calcite and Ag/calcite composite
crystals were fixed to microloops using oil and mounted on a Rigaku
XtaLAB Synergy Custom X-ray diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation λ = 1.54184 Å). Diffraction data were collected
on a HyPix-6000HE hybrid photon counting (HPC) detector. The crystals
were kept at 293 K during data collection, which was carried out for
a 2θ range = 23.064–134.602°. Initial
data collection, indexing, and integration procedures were performed
using Rigaku Oxford Diffraction software, CrysAlisPro. The resulting
data were solved and refined within Olex2[65] with the ShelXT[66] structure solution
program using Intrinsic Phasing and refined with the ShelXL[67] refinement package using Least-squares minimization.
Synchrotron High-Resolution PXRD
Pure calcite single
crystals and calcite-incorporating PEI, Au/PEI nanoparticles, Ag/PEI
nanoclusters, and PMMA-PEI latex particles were analyzed using HRPXRD
on beamline ID22 at the European Synchrotron Research Facility (ESRF),
Grenoble, France, at a wavelength of (0.354496 ± 0.000005) Å.
Instrument calibration was carried out using a high-purity NIST SRM640c
Si(111) standard. The instrumental contribution to the peak broadening
does not exceed 0.003° (2θ), and peak
positions are accurate and reproducible to a few tenths of a millidegree.
The powder samples were loaded into 0.5 mm borosilicate glass capillaries,
and the diffractograms were recorded at room temperature.The
structural parameters were refined by Rietveld analysis using PANalytical
X’Pert HighScore Plus software. Lattice distortions, microstrain
fluctuations, and coherence lengths (i.e., crystallite sizes) were
measured for the whole spectra, and the (012), (104), (006), and (110)
reflections of calcite using Rietveld and line profile analyses. The
goodness of fit (GOF) for all analyzed samples was <8, showing
the good quality of the fittings.
Other Measurements
Optical micrographs of the specimens
were recorded using a Nikon Eclipse LV100 polarizing microscope equipped
with both transmitted and reflected light sources. Fluorescence microscopy
images of the Ag/PEI nanoclusters incorporated within calcite single
crystals were recorded using a Zeiss Axio Scope A1 microscope fitted
with an AxioCam monochrome camera light source. Individual crystal
polymorphs were obtained by Raman spectroscopy using a Renishaw 2000
Raman Microscope equipped with a 785 nm diode laser. Spectra were
recorded using 10 s exposure times and 5% laser power. Fourier transform
infrared (FTIR) spectra were acquired over the mid-infrared region
(600–2000 cm–1) using a PerkinElmer ATR-IR
instrument. UV–visible extinction measurements of the Au/PEI
nanoparticles dispersed in DI water and in the presence of [Ca2+] = 0–50 mM were carried out using a NanoDrop One/OneC Microvolume UV–Vis spectrophotometer.
Authors: C A Orme; A Noy; A Wierzbicki; M T McBride; M Grantham; H H Teng; P M Dove; J J DeYoreo Journal: Nature Date: 2001-06-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yi-Yeoun Kim; Luis Ribeiro; Fabien Maillot; Oliver Ward; Stephen J Eichhorn; Fiona C Meldrum Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Yin Ning; Lee A Fielding; John Nutter; Alexander N Kulak; Fiona C Meldrum; Steven P Armes Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Yi-Yeoun Kim; Kathirvel Ganesan; Pengcheng Yang; Alexander N Kulak; Shirly Borukhin; Sasha Pechook; Luis Ribeiro; Roland Kröger; Stephen J Eichhorn; Steven P Armes; Boaz Pokroy; Fiona C Meldrum Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2011-09-04 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Johannes Ihli; Jesse N Clark; Nasima Kanwal; Yi-Yeoun Kim; Mark A Holden; Ross J Harder; Chiu C Tang; Sharon E Ashbrook; Ian K Robinson; Fiona C Meldrum Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: David C Green; Mark A Holden; Mark A Levenstein; Shuheng Zhang; Benjamin R G Johnson; Julia Gala de Pablo; Andrew Ward; Stanley W Botchway; Fiona C Meldrum Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Alexander Broad; Robert Darkins; Dorothy M Duffy; Ian J Ford Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2022-09-13 Impact factor: 4.177