| Literature DB >> 35722186 |
Francesco Latini1, Markus Fahlström2, David Fällmar2, Niklas Marklund1,3, Janet L Cunningham4, Amalia Feresiadou5.
Abstract
Background: Neurological and psychiatric manifestations related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are widely recognised. Standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) investigations are normal in 40-80% of symptomatic patients, eventually delaying appropriate treatment when MRI is unrevealing any structural changes. The aim of this study is to investigate white matter abnormalities during an early stage of post-COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) encephalitis while conventional MRI was normal.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; DTI; MRI; encephalitis; white matter
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35722186 PMCID: PMC9169543 DOI: 10.48101/ujms.v127.8562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ups J Med Sci ISSN: 0300-9734 Impact factor: 2.646
Figure 1The trend in neuroradiological detection of white matter changes in our patient is summarised. FLAIR images from the second (top row) and the third (bottom row) MRI examinations. Several new subcortical white matter changes were found and are highlighted with yellow arrows. The discrepancy was not considered to be explained by the slight difference in image quality. All other sequences in all three MR examinations showed normal findings.
Figure 2The analysis of the diffusion parameters for different white matter pathways is displayed. In the upper part, an illustrative picture of each white matter bundle with colours based on fibre directions. In the middle part of the images, the three graphs show the regional analysis of fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD) at day 11 (red line) and at day 68 (green line) after the onset of neurological symptoms, in comparison with 10 HCs (mean values, black full line) and standard deviation (SD, black dotted line). On the axis line, separate red or green dots/lines indicate the significant difference (P < 0.05) at the Z test for each point analysed when compared with HC and corrected for multiple comparisons. False discovery rate was controlled using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure with Q = 10% keeping the number of false positives below 10% of the number of significant indices. Only group of 11 sequential significant indices to indicate a significant difference compared to HC were displayed and interpreted as potential white matter abnormalities. Additional lobar/topographic regions are provided to indicate the localisation of the white matter changes. In the lower part of the image, an interpretation of the results is provided based on the combination of FA, AD and RD, and the interpreted trend between the investigations. SMA: supplementary motor area; Fo: frontal operculum; BS: brain stem.