The aminated metal-organic framework H2N-MIL-101(Cr) was used as the carbon paste electrode (CPE) modifier for the determination of tartrazine (Tz) in soft drinks. The amino material was characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and showed significantly faster electron transfer with lower charge-transfer resistance (0.13 kΩ) compared to the electrode modified with the unfunctionalized MIL-101(Cr) material (1.1 kΩ). The H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-modified CPE [H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE] was then characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) using [Fe(CN)6]3- and [Ru(NH3)6]3+ ions as the redox probes, showing good accumulation of [Fe(CN)6]3- ions on the electrode surface. A CV scan of Tz in Britton Robinson buffer solution revealed an irreversible system with an oxidation peak at +0.998 V versus Ag/AgCl/KCl. Using CV and differential pulse voltammetry, an electrochemical method for quantifying Tz in aqueous medium was then developed. Several parameters that affect the accumulation and detection steps were optimized. Optimal detection of Tz was achieved after 180 s of accumulation in Britton Robinson buffer solution (pH 2) using 2 mg of H2N-MIL-101(Cr) material. Under optimal conditions, the sensor exhibited a linear response in the concentration range of 0.004-0.1 μM and good detection sensitivity (35.4 μA μM-1), and the detection limit for Tz was found to be 1.77 nM (S/N = 3). Satisfactory repeatability, stability, and anti-interference performance were also achieved on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE. The sensor was applied to commercial juices, and the results obtained were approximately similar to those given by UV-vis spectrophotometry.
The aminated metal-organic framework H2N-MIL-101(Cr) was used as the carbon paste electrode (CPE) modifier for the determination of tartrazine (Tz) in soft drinks. The amino material was characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and showed significantly faster electron transfer with lower charge-transfer resistance (0.13 kΩ) compared to the electrode modified with the unfunctionalized MIL-101(Cr) material (1.1 kΩ). The H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-modified CPE [H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE] was then characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) using [Fe(CN)6]3- and [Ru(NH3)6]3+ ions as the redox probes, showing good accumulation of [Fe(CN)6]3- ions on the electrode surface. A CV scan of Tz in Britton Robinson buffer solution revealed an irreversible system with an oxidation peak at +0.998 V versus Ag/AgCl/KCl. Using CV and differential pulse voltammetry, an electrochemical method for quantifying Tz in aqueous medium was then developed. Several parameters that affect the accumulation and detection steps were optimized. Optimal detection of Tz was achieved after 180 s of accumulation in Britton Robinson buffer solution (pH 2) using 2 mg of H2N-MIL-101(Cr) material. Under optimal conditions, the sensor exhibited a linear response in the concentration range of 0.004-0.1 μM and good detection sensitivity (35.4 μA μM-1), and the detection limit for Tz was found to be 1.77 nM (S/N = 3). Satisfactory repeatability, stability, and anti-interference performance were also achieved on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE. The sensor was applied to commercial juices, and the results obtained were approximately similar to those given by UV-vis spectrophotometry.
Natural or synthetic
dyes are often added to food and beverages
to improve the appearance, flavor, texture, nutritional value, and
shelf life of manufactured products.[1] Compared
to natural dyes, synthetic food dyes have seen widespread use because
of their low cost as well as higher stability to light, heat, and
pH variations. One of the most common synthetic azo dyes used in foodstuffs
and drinks is tartrazine (Tz) (C16H9N4Na3O9S2, referred hereafter as Tz),
a lemon yellow colored dye also known as E102 in the food industry.[2] Unfortunately, excessive ingestion of Tz is associated
(although controversial) with potential health issues including allergies,
asthma, chronic hives, and hyperactivity in children.[3] The recommended acceptable intake of Tz is 7.5 mg/kg body
weight per day, and the maximum Tz content of 150 μg/g in milk-based
desserts, 200 μg/g in candied fruits and vegetables, and 100
μg/mL are permissible in soft drinks as prescribed by international
organizations.[4] In view of risks associated
with its abusive consumption, various methods have been developed
for the determination of Tz, including chromatographic methods,[2,5,6] spectrophotometry,[7,8] and capillary electrophoresis.[9,10] Due to their excellent
sensitivity, short analysis time, low energy consumption, and inexpensive
equipment, electrochemical techniques are also increasingly being
used and show promising applications in food safety analysis.[11] Various types of electrochemical sensors that
have already been developed include sensors based on zinc oxide nanoparticles,[12] gold nanoparticles,[13] graphitic carbon nitride,[14] and carbon
nanotubes.[15] More recently, sensors based
on metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been introduced, taking
advantage of the resultant increased electrode surface area and mass
transport, as well as rapid electron transfer.[16,17]MOFs are crystalline porous hybrid materials, consisting of
metal
cluster nodes which are bridged by polytopic organic ligands. Owing
to the tunability of their structure as well as their pore surface
chemistry via a linker or metal-cluster functionalization, MOFs show
promising applications in many fields. These applications include
gas storage, capture and separation; catalysis; heat transformation;
and electroanalysis.[18] In particular, the
chromium(III) terephthalate MOF denoted as MIL-101(Cr) has previously
been reported as an excellent electrode material for the detection
of analytes like ascorbic acid (AA) and sulfites.[19] In addition to its huge surface area (up to 4000 m2 g–1), presence of coordinatively unsaturated
Cr sites (CUS), and hydrothermal and chemical stability, MIL-101(Cr)
features a mesoporous structure to accommodate large-sized/bulky analytes
like Tz.[20,21] Moreover, functionalization of its framework
with an organic group like the amino group could further improve the
sensitivity and/or selectivity of the electrode. Amino functionalization
of MOFs was demonstrated to improve adsorptive properties toward the
uptake of target molecules such as methyl orange,[22]p-nitrophenol,[23] and CO2[24−26]Herein, we report the electrochemical detection
of Tz using a carbon
paste electrode (CPE) modified with the amino-functionalized MOF H2N-MIL-101(Cr). The electrode response was compared with the
signals recorded on the bare CPE and H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE
in order to highlight the specific input of amino functional groups
in the detection of Tz. The obtained H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE
electrode was optimized and then successfully applied for the determination
of Tz in commercial soft drink samples.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
and Characterizations
Upon synthesis, the
aminated MOF was structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD),
IR spectroscopy, and N2 sorption experiments [Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) method]. As shown by Figure S1 (Supporting Information), its powdered pattern matched well with the simulated
MIL-101(Cr) curve, characterized by a well-established crystallinity,
which is usual for this mesoporous material.[24,25] The diffraction peaks and the XRD pattern of NH2-MIL-101(Cr)
were in good agreement with those reported previously,[26,27] indicating the successful synthesis of NH2-MIL-101(Cr).As shown by Figure a, the Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of H2N-MIL-101(Cr) and MIL-101(Cr) materials exhibited similar absorption
bands in the range 1500–400 cm–1; while additional
bands appeared between 3200 and 3500 cm–1, at 1621
and 1340 cm–1 for H2N-MIL-101(Cr). The
double bands at 3490 and 3383 cm–1 were assigned
to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of –
NH2, while the bands at 1621 and 1340 cm–1 were attributed to the N–H bending vibration and CArom–N stretching, respectively. This is consistent with the amino
functionalization of H2N-MIL-101(Cr) with respect to unmodified
MIL-101(Cr) as also reported in other works.[3,28]
Figure 1
(a) FT-IR
spectra and (b) N2 adsorption–desorption
isotherms of MIL-101(Cr) and H2N-MIL-101(Cr).
(a) FT-IR
spectra and (b) N2 adsorption–desorption
isotherms of MIL-101(Cr) and H2N-MIL-101(Cr).Nitrogen sorption experiments conducted on MIL-101(Cr) and
H2N-MIL-101(Cr) at 77 K yielded type Ib isotherms[29] for both materials (Figure b), which is due to the presence of micropores
in both MOFs. The nitrogen uptake in H2N-MIL-101(Cr) was
significantly smaller compared to that in MIL-101(Cr), resulting in
a BET surface area of 1175 m2 g–1 [3100
m2 g–1 for MIL-101(Cr)] and pore volume
of 0.65 cm3 g–1 [1.5 cm3 g–1 for MIL-101(Cr)]. The decrease in the specific surface
area and pore volume in H2N-MIL-101(Cr) material was attributed
to the steric occupation of the pores by −NH2 groups.
All data obtained for the comparative characterization of MIL-101(Cr)
and H2N-MIL-101(Cr) indicated the successful modification
by grafting of the pristine MOF.
Electrochemical and Morphologic
Characterization of Modified
Electrodes
Multisweep cyclic voltammetry was applied to investigate
the charge selectivity properties of the MIL-101(Cr) MOFs before and
after its modification. Thus, unmodified CPE, MIL-101(Cr)-CPE, and
H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE were prepared and tested in 0.1 M KCl
(at pH 2) toward the accumulation of [Fe(CN)6]3– and [Ru(NH3)6]3+ electroactive
probes, as shown in Figure .
Figure 2
Multisweep cyclic voltammograms recorded at 50 mV s–1 in 0.1 M KCl solution containing 1 mM [Fe(CN)6]3– using H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (a) and MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (b).
The dot red line in b corresponds to the bare CPE.
Multisweep cyclic voltammograms recorded at 50 mV s–1 in 0.1 M KCl solution containing 1 mM [Fe(CN)6]3– using H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (a) and MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (b).
The dot red line in b corresponds to the bare CPE.One can observe in Figure a that, by continuously cycling, [Fe(CN)6]3– ions were progressively accumulated on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE as the anodic (Ia)
and cathodic (Ic) currents increased between
cycles. Upon saturation, the anodic and cathodic peak currents recorded
on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE were 260.1 and 259.5 μA, respectively.
These values were greater than those measured on MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (Ia
= 132.9 μA and Ic = 115.9 μA) and on bare CPE (Ia = 89.7
μA and Ic = 89.6 μA) (Figure b). This difference was explained by the
electrostatic attraction between the protonated NH3+ groups on H2N-MIL-101(Cr) and the negatively charged
[Fe(CN)6]3– ions. By replacing [Fe(CN)6]3– by [Ru(NH3)6]3+ ions, performing the same experiment (Figure S2a, Supporting Information) yielded stable voltammograms
with peak current values of 34.5 μA (Ia) and 46.2 μA (Ic),
suggesting no uptake of the cationic probe. Even on MIL-101(Cr)-CPE,
similar results were obtained (Figure S2b, Supporting Information). This behavior (non-accumulation) was ascribed
to the repulsion between [Ru(NH3)6]3+ ions and protonated amine groups on H2N-MIL-101(Cr),
as described by previous works performed using aminated clay minerals.[30] These results clearly show that H2N-MIL-101(Cr) materials could be applied as an electrode material
for the electrochemical detection of anionic compounds. It was further
used to build a sensor for analysis of Tz.The morphology of
the CPE before and after its modification in
turn by MIL-101(Cr) and H2N-MIL-101(Cr) was studied by
scanning and transmission electron microscopy (STEM) combined with
energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). As shown by Figure S3
(Supporting Information) and EDX data,
the STEM image for the unmodified CPE was very bright due to the high
amount of carbon (96.77 %At by EDX). The STEM–EDX of MIL-101(Cr)-CPE
showed mainly the presence of carbon (particles with less contrast)
and chrome, while H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE showed agglomerated
nanoparticles, probably Cr-NPs as compared with powder X-ray diffraction
results.The active surface areas of all the prepared working
electrodes
were evaluated by analyzing the cyclovoltammograms of these electrodes,
recorded in 0.1 M KCl + 1 mM [Fe(CN)6]3–, while the potential scan rate (v) was varied from
10 to 120 mV s–1. The peak currents (Ip) in both
anodic and cathodic directions increased proportionally with v1/2 (see Figure S4, Supporting Information), indicating that the redox process on these electrodes
is diffusion controlled. By exploiting the Randles–Sevcik equation,
the slopes of Ip versus v1/2 plots and
the diffusion coefficient (D) value for [Fe(CN)6]3– (7.6 × 10–6 cm2 s–1),[31] the
electroactive surface areas of 0.031, 0.220, and 0.086 cm2 were calculated for CPE, MIL-101(Cr)-CPE, and H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE,
respectively. Overall, the obtained values indicated that MIL-101(Cr)
displayed electroactive surface areas 7.1-fold and 2.6-fold higher
than those of bare CPE and H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE, respectively.Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was also used to assess
the electron-transfer rate of CPE, MIL-101(Cr)-CPE, and H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE using the [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– redox couple. The corresponding obtained Nyquist diagrams are shown
in Figure . A charge-transfer
resistance (RCT) of 7.8 kΩ was recorded
for the bare CPE (Figure a). Upon modification using MIL-101(Cr) MOFs, the RCT decreased to 1.1 kΩ (Figure b) and further to 0.13 kΩ
on the H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (Figure c).
Figure 3
Nyquist diagrams recorded in 0.1 M KCl containing
1 mM [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– on CPE (a),
MIL-101(Cr)-CPE
(b), and H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (c).
Nyquist diagrams recorded in 0.1 M KCl containing
1 mM [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– on CPE (a),
MIL-101(Cr)-CPE
(b), and H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (c).These data pointed out a process limited by electron transfer.
Overall, the modification of the CPE with H2N-MIL-101(Cr)
led to a higher electron-transfer capacity. The sensitivity of this
sensor was further tested toward the electrochemical behavior of Tz.
Electrochemical Behavior of Tz and Effect of Detection Medium
The redox behavior of Tz, investigated by CV on all prepared electrodes
is shown on Figure . On these electrodes, Tz exhibited an irreversible anodic peak around
+0.998 V. The peak intensity (12.40 μA) obtained on the H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (Figure a) was 1.19 and 1.40-fold greater than those obtained
on MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (Ipa = 10.46 μA, Figure b) and CPE (Ipa = 9.19 μA, Figure c). As explained in the previous section,
this result was assigned to favorable electrostatic attractions between
Tz and +H3N-MIL-101(Cr) materials. The obtained
result indicated that H2N-MIL-101(Cr) has improved the
electro-oxidation of Tz. Because the detection medium usually plays
an important role in the sensitivity of each electrochemical method,
the effect of the nature of detection solution was investigated.
Figure 4
Cyclic
voltammograms recorded at 50 mV s–1 for
0.4 mM Tz solution in 0.1 M ABS (pH 4) at (a) CPE, (b) MIL-101(Cr)-CPE,
and (c) H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE.
Cyclic
voltammograms recorded at 50 mV s–1 for
0.4 mM Tz solution in 0.1 M ABS (pH 4) at (a) CPE, (b) MIL-101(Cr)-CPE,
and (c) H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE.Thus, three media at the same concentration were tested: phosphate
buffer, Britton Robinson buffer, and acetate buffer solutions, in
the presence of 0.4 mM Tz. Figure S5 (Supporting Information) shows a CV of 0.4 mM Tz on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE
in these three media at pH 4. The results show a better anodic peak
current with Britton Robinson buffer solution, which was chosen as
the detection medium for subsequent experiments.
Effect of Potential Scan
Rate
In order to identify
the transport process of the analyte at the surface of H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE, the influence of the potential scan rate on the
electrochemical response of Tz was studied by CV. As can be seen in Figure , the anodic peak
current (Ia) increased with the scan rates
(v) in the studied range (10–100 mV s–1) (Figure a), while a linear dependence was observed between v1/2 and Ia (Figure b), expressed by eq
Figure 5
(a)
Cyclic voltammograms recorded for 0.4 mM Tz in 0.1 M BRBS (pH
2) on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE at different scan rates (10–100
mV s–1) and (b) peak current as a function of v1/2.
(a)
Cyclic voltammograms recorded for 0.4 mM Tz in 0.1 M BRBS (pH
2) on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE at different scan rates (10–100
mV s–1) and (b) peak current as a function of v1/2.This indicated a diffusion-controlled process that was also confirmed
by plotting the double logarithm of Ia versus v (see Figure S6a, Supporting Information) characterized by a slope of 0.59 greater than the expected 0.5,
the indicative and significant value for a diffusion-controlled electron-transfer
mechanism.[32] One can conclude that the
electro-oxidation of Tz is a mixture of absorption and diffusion-controlled
processes with diffusion predominating. Also, the presence of a non-zero
intercept point (−2.461) on the y-axis (Ia vs v1/2) indicated
and confirmed the presence of some adsorption process associated with
the diffusion-controlled electron-transfer mechanism. With the increase
of scan rate, the oxidation peak potentials (Ea) moved to the positive direction. The peak potential (Ep) was linearly proportional to log.v (Figure S6b, Supporting Information), according to eqConfronting eq with
the Laviron’s eq for an irreversible electrode process[33] allowed to obtain some kinetics parameters such as α (transfer
coefficient) and the standard rate constant of the reaction k0 (cm s–1).n is the
number of electrons
transferred, v is the scan rate, and E0 is the formal redox potential. From the slope of Ep vs logv, αn was calculated to be 2.31.Bard and Faulkner equation: α
= 47.7/(Ep – Ep/2) was used for the calculation
of α.[33,34] From the above-mentioned equation,
α = 1.4, while the number of electrons transferred was 1.65
≈ 2.
Effect of the Amount of H2N-MIL-101(Cr)
in the CPE
The optimal mass of H2N-MIL-101(Cr)
within the CPE is
a key data for the best response of the sensor. Hence, several H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPEs were prepared, containing 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,
and 5 mg of MIL-101(Cr)–NH2, corresponding to 0,
2, 4, 6, 8, and 10% wt MIL-101(Cr)–NH2. Afterward,
they were tested for the determination of Tz. As shown in Figure , there was a significant
increase in peak current up to 2 mg of H2N-MIL-101(Cr),
followed by a slight decrease in the electrode response as the amount
of H2N-MIL-101(Cr) increased. The increase in peak current
was probably due to the augmentation of binding sites on the electrode
surface, available to bind more Tz molecules. The decrease in peak
current observed above 2 mg was obviously due to the decrease in the
conductivity of the electrode. For further experiments, the percentage
of H2N-MIL-101(Cr) in the CPE was kept at 4% wt.
Figure 6
Effect of the
amount of H2N-MIL-101(Cr) (in mg) on the
CV peak current of 0.4 mM Tz in 0.1 M BRBS (pH 4) on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Effect of the
amount of H2N-MIL-101(Cr) (in mg) on the
CV peak current of 0.4 mM Tz in 0.1 M BRBS (pH 4) on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Effect of pH on the Peak Current and Potential
To select
the suitable pH value for Tz electrochemical determination, the pH
of Britton Robinson buffer solution employed as a detection medium
was varied between 2 and 9 (Figure ). It was observed that the signal of Tz oxidation
is highly dependent on the acidity of the supporting electrolyte (Figure a). The best electrode
signal was obtained at pH 2, while the electro-oxidation of Tz became
less significant with an increase in pH as protons are directly involved
in the redox reaction at a H2N-MIL-101(Cr) sensor. Moreover,
the peak potential of Tz shifted toward more negative values with
the increase in pH [curve (ii), Figure b] in accordance with the following equation: Ep = 1.454–0.03 pH (R2 = 0.997). The value of the slope (−0.03 V/pH)
not close to the theoretical Nernstian value of (−0.059 V/pH)
suggested that the number of electrons involved in the oxidation of
Tz is different from the number of protons. Clearly, it appeared that
two electrons and one proton are involved in the oxidation of Tz,
as proposed in Scheme . As the pH of the supporting electrolyte increased, the anodic peak
current of Tz decreased [Figure b see curve (i)]. Interestingly, the peak current rose
to the maximum value (19.63 μA) at pH 2. It is known that Tz
presents two strong sulfonic acid groups (pKa = 2), one acetate weak acid group (pKa = 5), and one azo group (pKa =
10.86).[35]
Figure 7
(a) Effect of the pH of the detection
medium on the electrochemical
response of 0.02 mM Tz-in BRBS on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE and
(b) plot of Ia versus pH (i) and peak
potential (Ep) versus pH (ii).
Scheme 1
Proposed Electrochemical Reaction of Tz at H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE
(a) Effect of the pH of the detection
medium on the electrochemical
response of 0.02 mM Tz-in BRBS on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE and
(b) plot of Ia versus pH (i) and peak
potential (Ep) versus pH (ii).From pH 2–5, the azo group is protonated
and the two strong
sulfonic acid groups are deprotonated, a charge of Tz is 1–. After pH 5 (and up to 9), the charge is 2– with
deprotonation of acetate acid group and the molecule is highly hydrophilic.In acidic media, the oxidation process is facilitated due to easy
protonation of the azo group resulting in the decreased electron density
and thus in the increased voltammetric signal. On the other hand,
the highly improved voltammetric signal over aminated MIL-101(Cr)
could be explained similarly, together with a possible ion–dipole
interaction between the −SO3– anionic
group of Tz and the −NH3+ protonated
function of H2N-MIL-101(Cr).At higher pH values,
the net charge is increased (1– to 2–) and Tz is not adsorbed on the electrode
surface, due to the electrostatic repulsion between the deprotonated
two sulfonic acid (−SO3–), one
acetate acid (−COO–) group present on Tz,
and electron pairs of oxygen in the hydroxy of terephthalic acid.Because 0.1 M BRBS (pH 2) was the optimum pH, this medium was used
in all further experiments.
Effect of the Accumulation
Time
Accumulation time is
another useful parameter in electrochemical analysis. It was investigated
and Figure shows
a rapid response of the electrode with a peak current of 19.6 μA
after 10 s of accumulation. Afterward, the peak intensity was stabilized
due to saturation of the fixation sites on the electrode surface.
180 s was therefore chosen as the optimal time for further investigation.
Figure 8
Effect
of the accumulation time on the electrochemical response
of 0.02 mM Tz –in BRBS (pH 2) on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE.
Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Effect
of the accumulation time on the electrochemical response
of 0.02 mM Tz –in BRBS (pH 2) on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE.
Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Calibration Curve
Keeping the optimized experimental
conditions, differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) was performed to
establish the relationship between the peak current and the concentration
of Tz at H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE. Figure shows the corresponding i-E curves: the
oxidation peak current increased with increasing concentration of
Tz in the range of 0.004 to 0.1 μM. The plot of anodic peak
current as a function of Tz concentration was linear, as shown by
the inset in Figure . The calibration curve followed the equation Ipa (μA) = 0.908 + 35.4[Tz] (μM), with a correlation
coefficient of 0.999. A sensitivity of 35.4 μA μM–1 obtained reflects the change in the response of a
sensor to a small change in stimulus causing the response and corresponds
to the slope of the calibration curve.[36] The limit of detection (LOD) corresponds to the lowest concentration
of an analyte that can be detected.[37] Based
on a signal-to-noise ratio of 3, a LOD of 1.77 nM was obtained using
the equation LOD = 3 S/m, where S is the standard
deviation of blank and m is the slope of the regression line. The
obtained LOD is one of the lowest values reported for Tz detection
(Table ), which reveals
that a H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE electrochemical sensor is sensitive
for the determination of Tz.
Figure 9
DPV responses recorded on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE
in 0.1
M BRBS (pH 2) containing Tz at different concentrations: (a–i):
0.004–0.1 μM. Inset shows the corresponding calibration
graph. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Table 1
Comparison of the Performance of Some
Tz Sensors Based on Modified Electrodes
DPV responses recorded on H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE
in 0.1
M BRBS (pH 2) containing Tz at different concentrations: (a–i):
0.004–0.1 μM. Inset shows the corresponding calibration
graph. Experiments were performed in triplicate.g-C3N4: graphitic
carbon nitride.MWCNTs:
multiwalled carbon nanotubes.Gr/PLPA/PGE: graphene/poly(l-phenylalanine)/pencil graphite
electrode.SWV: square wave
voltammetry.MIP: molecularly
imprinted polymer.The stability
and reproducibility of the proposed aminated MOF-modified
electrode were also checked by measuring within days and for 5 successive
days the signal (5 replicates) of 0.02 mM Tz in 0.1 M BRBS (pH 2.0).
The voltammograms obtained (Figure S7, Supporting Information) evaluated the relative standard deviation at 3.5%,
indicating an acceptable level of sensor reproducibility.
Interference
Study and Analytical Application
The influence
of potential interfering compounds such as AA, citric acid (CA), sodium
benzoate, sodium sulfite, tartaric acid (TA), lactose, gallic acid
(GA), curcumin (CUR), and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) at known
concentrations (0.2, 2, 10, and 20 μM) on an oxidation peak
current of 2 μM Tz in 0.1 M BRBS (pH 2) at H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE
was examined. The results obtained are presented in Table . The tolerance limit was considered
to be the concentration ratio of the additive to Tz causing a relative
error of less than 5.0%. The results in Table show that the tolerance limits of Tz in
the presence of 1-fold of BHA, 5-fold of lactose, and 10-fold of sodium
sulfite, Ca2+, and Cl– were less than
5%, implying that the proposed modified electrode possessed excellent
anti-interference ability and good selectivity.
Table 2
Tolerance Limits of Interfering Species
in a Determination of 2 μM Tz
interfering
species
tolerance
limit ([additive]/[Tz])
AA
<1
CA
<0.5
TA
10
GA
<0.1
curcumin, Mg2+, NO3–
0.1
BHA
1
lactose
5
sodium benzoate
<0.1
sodium sulfite, Ca2+, Cl–
10
Meanwhile,
the oxidation peak of Tz was strongly affected by the
presence of AA, CA, sodium benzoate, and GA. Thus, a sensor described
herein is not advisable for media containing such compounds.Finally, a H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE sensor was applied to
the quality control of soft drinks from two different companies. The
results obtained are presented in Table . For comparison purposes and to validate
the developed electroanalytical method, Tz content of these samples
was also determined by UV–vis spectrophotometry. In this experiment,
the concentration of Tz was calculated using the standard addition
method.
Table 3
Results of the Determination of Tz
in Juice Samples
sample
H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE (mg L–1)
UV method (mg L–1)
juice 1
7.77 ± 1.57
7.50 ± 1.10
juice 2
5.93 ± 0.96
6.30 ± 1.10
From the results obtained (Table ), it can be noticed that the data from UV–vis
spectrophotometry and voltammetric determinations are of the same
order of magnitude, as the difference between the mean values is not
significant.According to European standards, the maximum amount
of Tz present
in soft drinks should be is 100 mg·L–1. The
results of these analyses, therefore, show the compliance with the
standards by both companies. These results confirm the usefulness
of the method and the sensor proposed herein.
Conclusions
In this work, a sensitive amperometric sensor based on the aminated
H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-modified CPE was proposed for the detection
of Tz. The proposed sensor displayed great affinity toward the quantification
of Tz, allowing its detection at the lowest concentration of 1.77
nM. Nevertheless, the H2N-MIL-101(Cr)-CPE sensor showed
interesting analytical performance, good stability, and reproducibility
and may constitute an analytical tool of choice for the determination
of Tz. Finally, MOF-modified electrodes could be used to create smart
devices for the sensing of biomolecules and other compounds, with
a high level of reliability.
Authors: María J Culzoni; Agustina V Schenone; Natalia E Llamas; Mariano Garrido; Maria S Di Nezio; Beatriz S Fernández Band; Héctor C Goicoechea Journal: J Chromatogr A Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 4.759