| Literature DB >> 35721412 |
Mehdi Hassan1,2, Safdar Ali3, Muhammad Saleem4, Muhammad Sanaullah5, Labiba Gillani Fahad6, Jin Young Kim2, Hani Alquhayz7, Syed Fahad Tahir1.
Abstract
Dengue virus (DENV) infection is one of the major health issues and a substantial epidemic infectious human disease. More than two billion humans are living in dengue susceptible regions with annual infection mortality rate is about 5%-20%. At initial stages, it is difficult to differentiate dengue virus symptoms with other similar diseases. The main objective of this research is to diagnose dengue virus infection in human blood sera for better treatment and rehabilitation process. A novel and robust approach is proposed based on Raman spectroscopy and deep learning. In this regard, the ResNet101 deep learning model is modified by exploiting transfer learning (TL) concept on Raman spectroscopic data of human blood sera. Sample size was selected using standard statistical tests. The proposed model is evaluated on 2,000 Raman spectra images in which 1,200 are DENV-infected of human blood sera samples, and 800 are healthy ones. It offers 96.0% accuracy on testing data for DENV infection diagnosis. Moreover, the developed approach demonstrated minimum improvement of 6.0% and 7.0% in terms of AUC and Kappa index respectively over the other state-of-the-art techniques. The developed model offers superior performance to capture minute Raman spectral variations due to the better residual learning capability and generalization ability compared to others deep learning models. The developed model revealed that it might be applied for diagnosis of DENV infection to save precious human lives. ©2022 Hassan et al.Entities:
Keywords: Deep Learning; Dengue; Plasma; Raman Spectroscopy; Spectra
Year: 2022 PMID: 35721412 PMCID: PMC9202626 DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ Comput Sci ISSN: 2376-5992
Figure 1Raman spectra visualization of DENV infected and healthy samples.
Figure 2Statistical G*power test for sample size selection.
Figure 3The proposed framework of the DENV-TLDNN.
Figure 4The thematic diagram for ResNet101-TL architecture for DENV identification.
Figure 5The residual learning flow of ResNet101 architecture.
Figure 6Accuracy performance of the DENV-TLDNN approach.
Figure 7Loss curves for the DENV-TLDNN approach.
Figure 8The proposed DENV-TLDNN training and testing measures.
Figure 9ROC performance of the DENV-TLDNN approach and TL-ResNet50.
Comparison of the proposed approach with other state of the art approaches.
| Models | Accuracy | Specificity | Sensitivity | F-Score | Precision | MCC | Kappa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | 0.928 | 0.895 | 0.950 | 0.941 | 0.932 | 0.850 | 0.849 |
| TL-ResNet50 | 0.914 | 0.889 | 0.933 | 0.927 | 0.922 | 0.823 | 0.823 |
| GoogleNet | 0.705 | 0.587 | 0.864 | 0.714 | 0.608 | 0.457 | 0.428 |
| InceptionV3 | 0.736 |
| 0.697 | 0.821 |
| 0.482 | 0.377 |
| MobileNetV2 | 0.815 | 0.870 | 0.794 | 0.860 | 0.939 | 0.613 | 0.595 |
| DenseNet201 | 0.826 | 0.710 | 0.955 | 0839 | 0.747 | 0.679 | 0.656 |
| The proposed |
| 0.945 |
|
| 0.961 |
|
|
Notes.
The highest values are shown in bold.
Computational complexity comparison of ResNet101, DENV-TLDNN and SVM.
| Classifiers | Classes | Frozen parameters | Parameters at ‘pool5’ | Total FLOPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ResNet101 | 1000 | 42606504 | 2048 | 44654504 |
| DENV-TLDNN | 2 | 42606504 | 2048 | 42610600 |
| SVM | 2 | – | – | O(n3) |