| Literature DB >> 35720994 |
Zexing Huang1, Jianhua Wang1, Jing Lei2, Wenguang Zhao1, Hao Chen2, Yongjun Yang2, Qiong Xu1, Xianxiang Liu1.
Abstract
Biomass, a globally available resource, is a promising alternative feedstock for fossil fuels, especially considering the current energy crisis and pollution. Biomass-derived diols, such as 2,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan, 2,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)-tetrahydrofuran, and 1,6-hexanediol, are a significant class of monomers in the polyester industry. Therefore, the catalytic conversion of biomass to valuable diols has received extensive research attention in the field of biomass conversion and is a crucial factor in determining the development of the polyester industry. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) is an important biomass-derived compound with a C6-furanic framework. The hydroconversion of HMF into diols has the advantages of being simple to operate, inexpensive, environmentally friendly, safe, and reliable. Therefore, in the field of diol synthesis, this method is regarded as a promising approach with significant industrialization potential. This review summarizes recent advances in diol formation, discusses the roles of catalysts in the hydroconversion process, highlights the reaction mechanisms associated with the specificities of each active center, and provides an outlook on the challenges and opportunities associated with the research on biomass-derived diol synthesis.Entities:
Keywords: 5-hydroxymethylfurfural; biomass; catalysis; diols; hydroconversion
Year: 2022 PMID: 35720994 PMCID: PMC9204135 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.925603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
Catalytic performance of catalysts for the conversion of HMF.
| Entry | Catalyst | Hydrogen Donor | Solvent | T (°C) |
| t (h) | Yield (%) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ru/MnCo2O4 | H2 | methanol | 100 | 8.2 | 4.0 | 98.5 |
|
| 2 | Co@C | H2 | methanol | 110 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 96.0 |
|
| 3 | meso-Cu/Al2O3 | H2 | Ethanol | 70 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 98.6 |
|
| 4 | imp-Cu/Al2O3 | H2 | Ethanol | 70 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 72.3 |
|
| 5 | cp-Cu/Al2O3 | H2 | Ethanol | 70 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 93.0 |
|
| 6 | Cu/Al2O3 | H2 | methanol | 130 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 92.1 |
|
| 7 | NixCoy | H2 | THF | 100 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 93.1 | Zhao et al. (2021) |
| 8 | Zr-DTPA | isopropanol | isopropanol | 140 | / | 4.0 | 95.2 |
|
| 9 | Zr-HTC | isopropanol | isopropanol | 120 | / | 4.0 | 99.2 |
|
| 10 | MZCCP | isopropanol | isopropanol | 140 | / | 2.0 | 93.4 |
|
| 11 | ZrBa-SBA | isopropanol | isopropanol | 150 | / | 2.5 | 90.6 |
|
| 12 | Hf-LigS | isopropanol | isopropanol | 100 | / | 2.0 | 90.0 |
|
| 13 | Zr-LigS | isopropanol | isopropanol | 100 | / | 1.0 | 60.6 |
|
| 14 | CuO-Fe3O4/AC | Ethanol | Ethanol | 150 | / | 5.0 | 92.4 | Fan et al.(2019) |
| 15 | ZrBa-SBA | isopropanol | isopropanol | 150 | / | 2.5 | 90.6 |
|
| 16 | Ru/CeOx | H2 | 1-butanol/water | 130 | 2.8 | 12.0 | 89.0 |
|
| 17 | Ru (methylallyl)2COD | H2 | toluene | 120 | 1.0 | 16.0 | 87.0 |
|
| 18 | Ni-Al | H2 | Dioxane | 60 | 6 | 6 | 96.2 |
|
| 19 | Ni-Co-Al | H2 | methanol | 120 | 4 | 4 | 89.0 |
|
yield to BHMF.
yield to BHMTHF.
FIGURE 1(A): The route of formation of 1,6-HT from HMF; (B): Mechanism for the selective conversion of HMF to BHMF over the Cu/Al2O3 catalyst (C): Mechanism for the CTH of HMF to BHMF over the Zr-based catalyst (D): Adsorption configurations of BHMF (E): Mechanism for the selective cleavage of C-OH over the Pt-WO /TiO2 catalyst.