| Literature DB >> 35720895 |
Qing Zhao1,2, YunYing Ren2.
Abstract
With the development of the Internet of Things era, the Internet of Things technology has been gradually accepted by people and gradually entered the category of block management, but the specific practical application scope is not wide enough. At present, the community management of residents in blocks generally adopts closed management, and there are some problems such as insufficient scope of property management, weak strength, and serious waste of human resources. Incomplete development of the hidden value is of cultural tourism blocks. At the same time, there are still some problems in the traffic management of blocks, such as incomplete monitoring scope and weak supervision. Therefore, this study proposes a bilevel programming model to solve the optimization scheme of block road network, adopts the complete information game model to analyze the imbalance between property and residents, and adopts the AHP fuzzy evaluation method to detect the current life happiness coefficient of urban residents and collect residents' suggestions for the future planning of historical blocks. Because the perception layer of the Internet of Things has the advantages of rapidity, accuracy, and unmanned operation, it can contribute a practical force to the protection and planning of historical blocks quickly and at low cost.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35720895 PMCID: PMC9203185 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1325381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Game between owners and property management companies.
| Residents, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Regular payment | Deferred payment | ||
| Property company, | Quality service |
|
|
| Low-quality service |
|
| |
Figure 1Weight relation diagram of primary and secondary levels.
Scores of each evaluation index.
| Criterion level | Score | Index level | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 9.1 | Community security | 8.7 |
| Personal safety of residents | 8.9 | ||
| Residents' property safety | 8.1 | ||
|
| |||
| Convenience | 8.5 | Convenience of residents' life | 7.5 |
| Degree of difficulty resolution | 6.1 | ||
|
| |||
| Reliability | 7.6 | Property safety for residents | 8.3 |
| Property guarantees for residents' living services | 7.8 | ||
|
| |||
| Rapidity | 6.3 | Speed of life service provided by property | 6.5 |
| The speed of solving the difficulties of residents by property | 7.1 | ||
|
| |||
| Economy | 7.1 | Proportion of residents' contributions | 7.3 |
| Quality of property services | 8.6 | ||
|
| |||
| Comforts | 8.6 | Community greening environment | 7.8 |
| Community safety environment | 8.8 | ||
| Residents' happiness index | 7.1 | ||
| Home care | 8.7 | ||
“Security” weight set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | 0.3 | 0.1135 | 0.0748 |
|
| 5 | 1 | 1/3 | 0.2563 |
|
| 9 | 3 | 1 | 0.6754 |
Evaluation weight of residents' satisfaction with open community.
| Weight value | Safety | Convenience | Reliability | Rapidity | Economy | Comfort | Total weight value of C layer sorting | Importance ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community security | 0.0597 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2894 | 2 |
| Personal safety of residents | 0.3214 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3657 | 1 |
| Residents' property safety | 0.6950 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1357 | 4 |
| Convenience of residents' life | 0 | 0.7241 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2647 | 3 |
| Degree of difficulty resolution | 0 | 0.1883 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0134 | 15 |
| Property security for residents | 0 | 0 | 0.0532 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0754 | 6 |
| Residents' living service guarantee | 0 | 0 | 0.0401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0271 | 9 |
| Life service speed provided by property | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2374 | 0 | 0 | 0.0134 | 14 |
| The speed of solving the difficulties of residents by property | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4879 | 0 | 0 | 0.0548 | 8 |
| Residents' contribution ratio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1130 | 0 | 0.0225 | 1 |
| Property service quality | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2713 | 0 | 0.0628 | 7 |
| Community greening environment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5328 | 0.0040 | 12 |
Figure 2Functional partition.
Comparison table of speed correction factor values of small vehicles.
| Pollutant | Velocity interval (km/h) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <20 | 20–30 | 30–40 | 40–80 | >80 | |
| CO | 1.69 | 1.26 | 0.79 | 0.39 | 0.62 |
| HC | 1.68 | 1.25 | 0.78 | 0.32 | 0.59 |
| NO | 1.38 | 1.13 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.96 |
Figure 3Travel cost change.
Figure 4Total travel time of road network sections.
Figure 5Exhaust emissions and potential safety hazards.
Figure 6Average travel time of travelers.