| Literature DB >> 35720812 |
Aboluwaji Daniel Ayinmoro1, Olufunke A Fayehun1.
Abstract
Ethnicity is one of the critical factors that shape contraceptive use in Nigeria. While there are growing disparities in contraceptive uptake among women of reproductive age in the three major ethnic groups (Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba), not much is known about differentials in contraceptive use among the minority ethnic groups. This study examined differentials in contraceptive use among a sample of 1,072 respondents comprising the Ebira (352), Igala (358) and Okun (361) ethnic groups in Nigeria. Questionnaire was administered to respondents proportionately in the selected minority ethnic groups with six key informant interviews and 12 focus group discussions to generate quantitative and qualitative data among ever-married women. Quantitative data were analyzed at bivariable and multivariable levels. The qualitative data were content-analyzed. Differentials in contraception are shaped by ethnic affiliations and socio-demographic characteristics of couples. The use of modern contraceptives was low among the Ebira (25.7%) and Igala (24.1%) ethnic groups, but high among Okun (67%) women of reproductive age. The odd of using a modern contraceptive is significantly higher among the Okun women (UOR = 5.618, 95% CI 4.068-7.759) than the Ebira and Igala. There is no significant difference between the Ebira and Igala minority ethnic groups on modern contraceptive use. Ethnicity as a factor is not a stand-alone predictor of the use of modern contraception among the study groups, other socio-economic variables such as residence, religion, income and marital status were significant predictors of modern contraceptive use among minority ethnic groups. We suggest introducing reproductive health intervention programmes targeted at sensitizing the minority ethnic groups on effective modern contraceptive use while addressing their specific modern contraceptive need in Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Nigeria; husbands' disapproval; minority ethnic groups; modern contraceptive use; side effects
Year: 2022 PMID: 35720812 PMCID: PMC9204047 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.878779
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Glob Womens Health ISSN: 2673-5059
Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents.
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 15–19 | - | - | - |
| 20–24 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 3.9 |
| 25–29 | 31.6 | 17.6 | 16.3 |
| 30–34 | 26.5 | 37.4 | 28.0 |
| 35–39 | 20.9 | 25.8 | 26.9 |
| 40–44 | 10.6 | 13.6 | 14.1 |
| 45–49 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 10.8 |
| 32.30 ± 6.26 years | 34.04 ± 5.40 years | 35.00 ± 6.60 years | |
|
| |||
| Ever-married | 86.9 | 95.2 | 92.2 |
| Cohabiting | 7.5 | 2.0 | 5.8 |
| Divorced/Separated | 5.6 | 2.8 | 1.9 |
|
| |||
| Monogamy | 71.2 | 79.3 | 87.5 |
| Polygyny | 28.8 | 20.7 | 12.5 |
| Residence | |||
| Rural | 24.6 | 36.8 | 39.1 |
| Urban | 75.4 | 63.2 | 60.9 |
|
| |||
| No formal education | 13.7 | 20.4 | 14.7 |
| Primary | 4.7 | 12.5 | 3.9 |
| Secondary and higher | 81.6 | 67.1 | 81.4 |
|
| |||
| Government employees | 39.1 | 44.5 | 55.1 |
| Private/self-employed | 57.5 | 50.4 | 40.4 |
| Unemployed | 3.4 | 5.1 | 4.4 |
|
| |||
| Below 30,000 | 81.6 | 75.4 | 78.9 |
| 30,000–49,999 | 10.3 | 15.9 | 12.2 |
| 50,000 and above | 8.1 | 8.8 | 8.9 |
|
| |||
| Catholic | 7.8 | 9.1 | 12.3 |
| Other Christians | 45.1 | 37.4 | 82.9 |
| Islam | 45.9 | 51.6 | 3.9 |
| Traditionalist | 1.1 | 2.0 | 0.8 |
Percentage distribution of respondents currently using modern contraceptive.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Any modern method | 25.7 | 24.1 | 67.0 |
| Male condom | 5.9 | 7.9 | 29.3 |
| Injectables | 8.1 | 4.2 | 17.6 |
| Pills | 5.6 | 6.8 | 17.6 |
| Implants | 2.5 | 1.4 | 10.9 |
| IUD | 2.5 | 2.8 | 8.9 |
| Emergency contraception | 2.0 | 1.4 | 6.1 |
| Female condom | 0.6 | 0.8 | 5.6 |
| Foam or jelly | 0.6 | 0.6 | 4.7 |
| Diaphragm | 0.6 | - | 4.5 |
| Female sterilization | 0.6 | - | 1.4 |
| Male sterilization | - | - | 0.8 |
Results of binary logistic regression models on women currently using modern contraceptive by ethnic groups and background characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Ebira ( |
|
|
| Igala | 0.914 [0.650–1.284] | 0.879 [0.611–1.266] |
| Okun | 5.618 [4.068–7.759]** | 4.803 [3.314–6.963]** |
|
| ||
| 20–24 |
|
|
| 25–29 | 0.714 [0.342–1.490] | 1.034 [0.443–2.417] |
| 30–34 | 0.926 [0.452–1.899] | 1.261 [0.548– 2.417] |
| 35–39 | 0.949 [0.459–1.963] | 1.205 [0.517–2.806] |
| 40–44 | 1.252 [0.585–2.681] | 1.507 [0.621–3.659] |
| 45–49 | 0.881 [0.386–2.011] | 0.775 [0.300–2.006] |
|
| ||
| Rural ( |
|
|
| Urban | 0.722 [0.588–0.935]* | 0.642 [0.570–1.239] |
|
| ||
| No formal education |
|
|
| Primary | 0.676 [0.383–1.190] | 0.642 [0.332–1.239] |
| Secondary and higher | 0.860 [0.601–1.198] | 0.699 [0.477–1.029] |
|
| ||
| Catholic ( |
|
|
| Other Christians | 1.565 [1.018–2.405]* | 1.412 [0.881–2.263] |
| Islam | 0.499 [0.313–0.797]* | 0.811 [0.476–1.381] |
| Traditionalists | 0.744 [0.266–2.084] | 0.894 [0.255–3.133] |
|
| ||
| Government employees |
|
|
| Private/self employed | 0.958 [0.745–1.232] | 1.245 [0.913–1.698] |
| Unemployed | 1.297 [0.706–2.380] | 1.587 [0.782–3.218] |
|
| ||
| Below N30000 ( |
|
|
| N30000-N49999 | 1.434 [0.946–2.173] | 1.608 [1.002–2.579]* |
| N50000 and above | 1.431 [1.022–2.004]* | 1.262 [0.843–1.890] |
|
| ||
| Ever-married |
|
|
| Cohabiting | 1.807 [1.048–3.116]* | 1.816 [0.980–3.368] |
| Divorced/separated | 1.235 [0.636–2.396] | 1.532 [0.711–3.301] |
|
| ||
| Monogamy |
|
|
| Polygyny | 0.857 [0.631–1.165] | 1.129 [0.777–1.642] |
Significant at P < 0.05.