| Literature DB >> 35720473 |
Chia-Lin Chang1, Kevin Chih-Yang Huang2,3, Tsung-Wei Chen4,5, William Tzu-Liang Chen6,7,8, Hsuan-Hua Huang9, Ya-Ling Liu10, Chia-Hui Kuo10, K S Clifford Chao4,11,12, Tao-Wei Ke8,13, Shu-Fen Chiang10.
Abstract
Rectal adenocarcinoma (READ) constitutes one-third of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer cases. Surgery, chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy are the main treatments to improve patient outcomes for READ. However, patients with READ receiving these treatments eventually relapse, leading to a poor survival outcome. The present study collected surgical specimens from patients with READ and determined that cytoplasmic cell division cycle 27 (CDC27) expression was associated with the risk of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. Nuclear CDC27 expression was negatively associated with 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates. Multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis showed that nuclear CDC27 was an independent prognostic factor in the patients with READ, especially in those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. High nuclear CDC27 expression was significantly associated with poorer 5-year DFS (HR, 2.106; 95% CI, 1.275-3.570; P=0.003) and 5-year OS (HR, 2.369; 95% CI, 1.270-4.6810; P=0.005) rates. The data indicated that cytoplasmic CDC27 expression could affect tumor progression and that it plays an important role in metastasis. Nuclear CDC27 expression was markedly associated with poorer survival outcomes and was an independent prognostic factor in patients with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy-treated READ. Thus, CDC27 expression serves as a potential prognostic marker for rectal tumor progression and chemotherapy treatment. Copyright: © Chang et al.Entities:
Keywords: CDC27; chemotherapy efficacy; cytoplasmic; metastasis; nuclear
Year: 2022 PMID: 35720473 PMCID: PMC9185143 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 3.111
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with READ (n=255).
| Clinicopathological parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Sex, n (%) | |
| Male | 159 (62) |
| Female | 96 ( |
| Age, years | |
| Mean (range) | 63.2 ( |
| <65, n (%) | 142 (56) |
| ≥65, n (%) | 113 (44) |
| Histological grading, n (%) | |
| Well to moderate | 233 (94) |
| Poor | 14 ( |
| NA | 8 |
| pTMN stage (7th AJCC), n (%) | |
| I | 61 ( |
| II | 56 ( |
| III | 104 (41) |
| IV | 34 ( |
| pN, n (%) | |
| Negative | 117 (46) |
| Positive | 138 (54) |
| Lymphovascular invasion, n (%) | |
| Absent | 151 (61) |
| Present | 98 (39) |
| NA | 6 |
| Perineural invasion, n (%) | |
| Absent | 151 (61) |
| Present | 98 (39) |
| NA | 6 |
| Preoperative CEA, n (%) | |
| <5 ng/ml | 138 (60) |
| ≥5 ng/ml | 92 (40) |
| NA | 25 |
| Postoperative chemotherapy, n (%) | |
| No | 107 (42) |
| Yes | 148 (58) |
| Kras mutation, n (%) | |
| Wild-type | 64 (53) |
| Mutant | 57 (47) |
| NA | 134 |
NA, not available; CEA, carcinoembronic antigen; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Figure 1.Representative images and analysis of CDC27 immunohistochemistry staining from the tissue microarray of specimens from patients with READ. (A) Expression of CDC27 in the nucleus and/or cytoplasm of tumor cells. Scale bars, 50 µm (magnification, ×40) and 20 µm (magnification, ×10). (B) Distribution of CDC27 expression in the cytoplasm and nucleus by the H-index. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. (C) The correlation of CDC27 expression between the cytoplasm and nucleus as determined using Spearman's correlation analysis. CDC27, cell division cycle 27.
Association between clinicopathological parameters and cell division cycle 27 expression in patients with READ.
| Cytoplasmic expression, n (%) | Nuclear expression, n (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Clinicopathological parameters | Low | High | P-value | Low | High | P-value |
| Total patients | 129 (100) | 126 (100) | 127 (100) | 128 (100) | ||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 77 (60) | 82 (65) | 0.374 | 78 (61) | 81 (63) | 0.758 |
| Female | 52 (40) | 44 ( | 49 (39) | 47 ( | ||
| Age, years | ||||||
| <65 | 75 (58) | 67 (53) | 0.424 | 71 (56) | 71 (55) | 0.944 |
| ≥65 | 54 (42) | 59 (47) | 56 (44) | 57 (45) | ||
| Histological grading | ||||||
| Well to moderate | 118 (95) | 115 (93) | 0.571 | 117 (94) | 116 (95) | 0.613 |
| Poor | 6 ( | 8 ( | 8 ( | 6 ( | ||
| NA | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 | ||
| pTNM stage (7th AJCC) | ||||||
| Early | 71 (55) | 46 ( | 0.003[ | 63 (50) | 54 (42) | 0.234 |
| Late | 58 (45) | 80 (63) | 64 (50) | 74 (58) | ||
| pN | ||||||
| Negative | 71 (55) | 46 ( | 0.003[ | 63 (50) | 54 (42) | 0.234 |
| Positive | 58 (45) | 80 (63) | 64 (50) | 74 (58) | ||
| Lymphovascular invasion | ||||||
| Absent | 90 (71) | 61 (50) | <0.001[ | 88 (70) | 63 (51) | 0.002[ |
| Present | 36 ( | 62 (50) | 38 ( | 60 (49) | ||
| NA | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||
| Perineural invasion | ||||||
| Absent | 86 (68) | 65 (53) | 0.012[ | 82 (65) | 69 (56) | 0.146 |
| Present | 40 ( | 58 (47) | 44 ( | 54 (44) | ||
| NA | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||
| Preoperative CEA, ng/ml | ||||||
| <5 | 71 (60) | 67 (60) | 0.957 | 67 (58) | 61 (62) | 0.59 |
| ≥5 | 47 (40) | 45 (40) | 48 (42) | 44 ( | ||
| NA | 11 | 14 | 12 | 13 | ||
| Kras mutation | ||||||
| Wild-type | 28 (46) | 33 (49) | 0.796 | 32 (54) | 31 (49) | 0.707 |
| Mutant | 24 (54) | 35 (51) | 27 (46) | 32 (51) | ||
| NA | 77 | 58 | 68 | 65 | ||
| CD3+ TILs | ||||||
| High | 59 (46) | 66 (52) | 0.288 | 55 (43) | 70 (55) | 0.068 |
| Low | 70 (54) | 60 (48) | 72 (57) | 58 (45) | ||
| Distant metastasis | ||||||
| No | 111 (86) | 96 (76) | 0.043[ | 106 (83) | 101 (79) | 0.351 |
| Yes | 18 ( | 30 ( | 21 ( | 27 ( | ||
P<0.05. NA, not available; CEA, carcinoembronic antigen; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Association between clinicopathological parameters and 5-year survival outcome in patients with READ (n=255).
| Clinicopathological parameters | Cases, n | 5-year DFS rate, % | P-value | 5-year OS rate, % | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total patients | 50.3 | 62.2 | |||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 159 | 48.4 | 0.433 | 61.3 | 0.548 |
| Female | 96 | 53.7 | 63.8 | ||
| Age, years | |||||
| <65 | 142 | 57.7 | 0.011[ | 75.1 | <0.0001[ |
| ≥65 | 113 | 40.2 | 44.9 | ||
| Histological grading | |||||
| Well to moderate | 14 | 50.8 | 0.310 | 55.0 | 0.449 |
| Poor | 233 | 29.7 | 61.7 | ||
| NA | 8 | ||||
| pTNM stage (7th AJCC) | |||||
| Early | 117 | 65.3 | <0.0001[ | 77.2 | <0.0001[ |
| Late | 138 | 37.8 | 49.6 | ||
| pN | |||||
| Negative | 117 | 65.3 | <0.0001[ | 77.2 | <0.0001[ |
| Positive | 138 | 37.8 | 49.6 | ||
| Lymphovascular invasion | |||||
| Absent | 151 | 53.4 | 0.213 | 66.2 | 0.121 |
| Present | 98 | 43.9 | 55.0 | ||
| NA | 6 | ||||
| Perineural invasion | |||||
| Absent | 151 | 61.5 | <0.0001[ | 71.2 | 0.0002[ |
| Present | 98 | 31.5 | 47.6 | ||
| NA | 6 | ||||
| Preoperative CEA, ng/ml | |||||
| <5 | 138 | 63.2 | <0.0001[ | 72.8 | <0.0001[ |
| ≥5 | 92 | 32.6 | 45.5 | ||
| NA | 25 | ||||
| CD3+ TILs | |||||
| High | 120 | 61.7 | 0.002[ | 71.0 | 0.0043[ |
| Low | 135 | 41.0 | 53.3 | ||
| Cytoplasmic CDC27 expression | |||||
| Low | 129 | 55.9 | 0.08 | 67.4 | 0.121 |
| High | 126 | 44.3 | 56.8 | ||
| Nuclear CDC27 expression | |||||
| Low | 127 | 56.8 | 0.028[ | 69.6 | 0.028[ |
| High | 128 | 43.8 | 55.0 |
P<0.05. NA, not available; CEA, carcinoembronic antigen; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Figure 2.Association between survival outcomes and CDC27 expression in patients with READ. Survival curves were created by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. (A) 5-year DFS and (B) 5-year OS based on the expression of CDC27 status in the cytoplasm. (C) 5-year DFS and (D) 5-year OS based on the expression of CDC27 status in the nucleus. CDC27, cell division cycle 27; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival.
Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological parameters and nuclear CDC27 expression in 5-year DFS and OS.
| A, All patients (n=225)[ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| DFS | OS | |||||
|
|
| |||||
| Variable | HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value |
| Age (≥65 years vs. <65 years) | 1.499 | 1.015-2.216 | 0.042[ | 2.735 | 1.733-4.394 | <0.0001[ |
| pTNM stage (late vs. early) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| pN stage (positive vs. negative) | 1.610 | 0.988-2.669 | 0.055 | 2.151 | 1.242-3.843 | 0.005[ |
| Perineural invasion (present vs. absent) | 1.675 | 1.074-2.369 | 0.022[ | 1.470 | 0.898-2.444 | 0.125 |
| CEA (abnormal vs. normal) | 1.940 | 1.269-2.975 | 0.002[ | 1.856 | 1.143-3.036 | 0.012[ |
| CD3+ TILs (low vs. high) | 1.599 | 1.058-2.440 | 0.025[ | 1.549 | 0.969-2.508 | 0.065 |
| Nuclear CDC27 expression (high vs. low) | 1.590 | 1.075-2.369 | 0.020[ | 1.567 | 0.998-2.492 | 0.051 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|
|
| |||||
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Age (≥65 years vs. <65 years) | 2.644 | 1.209-6.413 | 0.013[ | 6.214 | 2.332-21.550 | <0.0001[ |
| pTNM stage (late vs. early) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| pN stage (positive vs. negative) | 2.005 | 0.795-4.842 | 0.137 | 2.557 | 1.039-6.331 | 0.041[ |
| Perineural invasion (present vs. absent) | 2.484 | 1.024-5.841 | 0.044[ | 2.063 | 0.830-5.058 | 0.117 |
| CEA (abnormal vs. normal) | 0.690 | 0.283-1.613 | 0.396 | 0.664 | 0.270-1.584 | 0.359 |
| CD3+ TILs (low vs. high) | 1.884 | 0.929-3.836 | 0.078 | 2.072 | 0.957-4.597 | 0.064 |
| Nuclear CDC27 expression (high vs. low) | 1.022 | 0.501-2.040 | 0.949 | 0.874 | 0.405-1.829 | 0.724 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|
|
| |||||
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Age (≥65 years vs. <65 years) | 1.045 | 0.626-1.708 | 0.862 | 1.64 | 0.904-2.947 | 0.102 |
| pTNM stage (late vs. early) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| pN stage (positive vs. negative) | 1.734 | 0.862-3.885 | 0.127 | 3.638 | 1.284-15.267 | 0.012[ |
| Perineural invasion (present vs. absent) | 1.662 | 0.980-2.889 | 0.059 | 1.611 | 0.866-3.134 | 0.133 |
| CEA (abnormal vs. normal) | 2.813 | 1.670-4.833 | <0.0001[ | 2.995 | 1.573-5.964 | 0.0007[ |
| CD3+ TILs (low vs. high) | 1.545 | 0.921-2.646 | 0.099 | 1.433 | 0.774-2.708 | 0.254 |
| Nuclear CDC27 expression (high vs. low) | 2.106 | 1.275-3.570 | 0.003[ | 2.369 | 1.272-4.681 | 0.005[ |
A multivariate linear regression was used, and the P-value was obtained from a likelihood ratio test.
The data of 30 patients were not available (NA) for the multivariate analysis.
P<0.05. CEA, carcinoembronic antigen; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte; CDC27, cell division cycle 27; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival.
Figure 3.Nuclear CDC27 expression is associated with survival outcome in patients with chemotherapy-treated READ. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that nuclear CDC27 expression was not associated with (A) 5-year DFS or (B) 5-year OS in patients with READ who received surgery only. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that nuclear CDC27 expression was associated with (C) 5-year DFS or (D) 5-year OS in patients with READ who received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. CT, chemotherapy; CDC27, cell division cycle 27; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival.