| Literature DB >> 35720348 |
Xuan Shi1, Sheng Wang1, Yutong Wu1, Quanfu Li1, Tong Zhang1, Keting Min1, Di Feng1, Meiyun Liu1, Juan Wei1, Lina Zhu1, Wei Mo1, Zhuoran Xiao1, Hao Yang1, Yuanli Chen1, Xin Lv1.
Abstract
Background and aims: Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP)-adenosine monophosphate (AMP) (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) are key components of the innate immune system. This study aims to evaluate the research of cGAS-STING pathway and predict the hotspots and developing trends in this field using bibliometric analysis.Entities:
Keywords: CiteSpace; VOSviewer; bibliometrics; cGAS-STING pathway; innate immunity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35720348 PMCID: PMC9204223 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.916383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Flowchart of the screening process.
Figure 2(A) The total numbers of publications and top three countries from 2013 to 2021. (B) The numbers of publications by year and accumulation from 2013 to 2021.
Publications in the 10 most productive countries/regions.
| Rank | Country/Region | (Np) | % of (1047) | (Nc) | (Na) | H-index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | USA | 493 | 47.09 | 28654 | 58.12 | 88 |
| 2 | China | 370 | 35.34 | 7574 | 20.47 | 48 |
| 3 | Germany | 110 | 10.51 | 6680 | 60.73 | 40 |
| 4 | UK | 82 | 7.83 | 5011 | 61.11 | 33 |
| 5 | France | 69 | 6.59 | 2845 | 41.23 | 25 |
| 6 | Japan | 53 | 5.06 | 2453 | 46.28 | 25 |
| 7 | Denmark | 42 | 4.01 | 2007 | 47.79 | 19 |
| 8 | Italy | 36 | 3.44 | 912 | 25.33 | 15 |
| 9 | Australia | 33 | 3.15 | 1846 | 55.94 | 17 |
| 10 | Canada | 33 | 3.15 | 1379 | 41.79 | 13 |
Figure 3(A) Publications in the 10 most productive countries/regions. (B) The yearly number of local citation scores (LCS) of the 10 most productive countries/regions. (C) Distributions of countries/regions of publications. (D) The cooperation map of countries involved in the cGAS-STING pathway.
The top 10 productive affiliations.
| Rank | Affiliations | Country | (Np) | (Nc) | (Na) | H-index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UNIV OF TEXAS SYSTEM | USA | 88 | 10905 | 123.92 | 38 |
| 2 | CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES | China | 51 | 1120 | 21.96 | 21 |
| 3 | HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE | USA | 48 | 12049 | 251.02 | 37 |
| 4 | UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SYSTEM | USA | 48 | 3151 | 65.65 | 24 |
| 5 | HARVARD UNIV | USA | 48 | 836 | 17.42 | 22 |
| 6 | WUHAN UNIVERSITY | China | 36 | 671 | 18.64 | 15 |
| 7 | CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE CNRS | France | 35 | 1130 | 32.29 | 18 |
| 8 | INSTITUTION NATIONAL DE LA SANTE ET DE LA RECHERCHE MEDICALE INSERM | France | 34 | 1900 | 55.88 | 17 |
| 9 | AARHUS UNIVERSITY | Denmark | 33 | 1715 | 51.97 | 18 |
| 10 | NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH NIH USA | USA | 28 | 1591 | 56.82 | 14 |
The top 10 productive journals.
| Rank | Journal | Np | H-index | Nc | Na | IF (2020) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 55 | 10 | 338 | 6.15 | 7.561 |
| 2 | JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY | 35 | 17 | 892 | 25.49 | 5.442 |
| 3 | JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY | 31 | 18 | 915 | 29.52 | 5.078 |
| 4 | PLOS PATHOGENS | 31 | 17 | 826 | 26.65 | 6.823 |
| 5 | NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 29 | 18 | 2149 | 74.10 | 14.919 |
| 6 | CELL REPORTS | 27 | 18 | 1838 | 68.07 | 9.423 |
| 7 | NATURE | 27 | 24 | 6393 | 236.78 | 49.962 |
| 8 | PNAS | 25 | 17 | 1322 | 52.88 | 11.205 |
| 9 | IMMUNITY | 17 | 15 | 3159 | 185.82 | 31.745 |
| 10 | CELL HOST MICROBE | 13 | 13 | 1514 | 116.46 | 21.023 |
Figure 4(A) The yearly number of local citations of papers with high local citation scores (LCS). The size and colors of the circle present the LCS of papers in that year. (B) One paper cited by the other papers with the top 50 LCS. The size of each node is proportional to the frequency of this article by the other 49 articles.
Figure 5(A) CiteSpace visualization map of keywords clustering analysis related to the cGAS-STING pathway. The size of each nodes represents the frequency of occurrences. (B) Visualization of keywords according to the average publication year. Keywords in yellow appeared later than that in blue.
Figure 6(A) The clustered network map of co-cited references on the cGAS-STING pathway. (B) The timeline view of co-citation clusters with their cluster-labels on the right.
Figure 7Papers with the strongest citation bursts in original articles on the cGAS-STING pathway between 2013 and 2021.
Figure 8CiteSpace visualization map of the top 45 references with the strongest citation bursts involved in the cGAS-STING pathway.