| Literature DB >> 35719516 |
Jianming Wang1, Xincheng Yang1, Zhengxia He2, Jianguo Wang1, Jing Bao1, Jian Gao1.
Abstract
The practice of green consumption has become a common initiative of the international community. Existing studies have shown that emotional factors have an important impact on consumer behavior, but few scholars in the field of green consumption behavior have explored the relationship between positive emotions and green purchase behavior in specific dimensions. This study creatively put forward two dimensions and four kinds of positive emotional appeals which include the cherishing appeal, the yearning appeal, the proud appeal, and the admiring appeal. Through the conceptual model analysis based on the data, the effects of different four positive emotional appeals on consumers' perceived green value, perceived green responsibility, and green purchase behaviors were confirmed. The results indicated that the four kinds of positive emotional appeals, perceived green value, perceived green responsibility, and green purchase behavior were positively correlated. Perceived green responsibility and perceived green value have significant mediating effect on the relationship between positive emotional appeals and green purchase behaviors. Middle doctrine significantly moderates the relationship between positive emotional appeals (Cherishing VS. Yearning) and perceived green value.Entities:
Keywords: emotional arousal; field experiment; green purchase behavior; middle doctrine; positive emotional appeal
Year: 2022 PMID: 35719516 PMCID: PMC9201963 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.716027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Value function of prospect theory.
Figure 2Conceptual model of this study (dimensions of emotions toward a better environment appeals).
Measurement items of each variable.
| Measured variables | Measurement item | Resource |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived green value | Subscribing to green electricity certificate helps to save fossil energy and improve energy structure. |
|
| Perceived green responsibility | I have the responsibility to do my best to save resources and protect the environment. | |
| Green purchase behavior | I would like to collect and learn more about subscribing to the green electricity certificate. | |
| The middle doctrine | Everything should be kept in line and I do not go to extremes. |
|
Reliability and validity test.
| Measured variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Perceived green value | 0.952 | |||
| 2 Perceived green responsibility | 0.676 | 0.877 | ||
| 3 Green purchase behavior | 0.778 | 0.684 | 0.938 | |
| 4 The middle doctrine | 0.713 | 0.651 | 0.648 | 0.880 |
| Cronbach’s alpha | 0.974 | 0.929 | 0.965 | 0.932 |
| AVE | 0.908 | 0.770 | 0.879 | 0.775 |
| CR | 0.975 | 0.931 | 0.967 | 0.932 |
The diagonal value is the square root of AVE and the lower left part is the Pearson correlation coefficient between latent variables.
Variables’ independent sample T test.
| Group | Var. | t | DF | Sig. | MD | SD | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The lower limit | The higher limit | |||||||
| 1 | PGV | −2.509 | 212 | 0.013* | −0.381 | 0.152 | −0.680 | −0.082 |
| PGR | −1.023 | 212 | 0.307 | −0.107 | 0.105 | −0.315 | 0.0996 | |
| GPB | −3.133 | 212 | 0.002** | −0.519 | 0.166 | −0.845 | −0.192 | |
| 2 | PGV | −0.456 | 217 | 0.649 | −0.076 | 0.167 | −0.404 | 0.252 |
| PGR | −2.857 | 217 | 0.005** | −0.351 | 0.123 | −0.593 | −0.109 | |
| GPB | −3.493 | 217 | 0.001** | −0.619 | 0.177 | −0.968 | −0.270 | |
PGV = Perceived green value, PGR = Perceived green responsibility, GPB = Green purchase behavior, DF = degrees of freedom, MD = mean difference, and SD=Standard error difference.
Group 1: the cherishing and the yearning group. Group 2: the proud and the admiring group. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4The mean comparison of different positive emotions.
Figure 5Mediating effect test (cherishing vs. yearning). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Mediating effect of theoretical model.
| Explanatory variables | Mediator | Coefficient | S.E. | LLCI | ULCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cherishing-Yearning group | The direct effect without the mediator | 0.192 | 0.091 | 0.014 | 0.371 |
| PGV | 0.299 | 0.119 | 0.071 | 0.533 | |
| PGR | 0.028 | 0.031 | −0.023 | 0.099 | |
| Proud-Admiring group | The direct effect without the mediator | 0.431 | 0.1162 | 0.202 | 0.660 |
| PGV | 0.045 | 0.098 | −0.165 | 0.223 | |
| PGR | 0.143 | 0.058 | 0.041 | 0.268 |
S.E. = Standard error, LLCI = Lower limit of the confidence interval, ULCI = Upper limit of the confidence interval, PGV = Perceived green value, and PGR = Perceived green responsibility.
Moderating effect test of emotional arousal.
| Group | Moderator | Antecedent | PGV | PGR | GPB | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coe. | S.E. | P | Coe. | S.E. | P | Coe. | S.E. | P | ||||||
| 1 | MD | PEA | a11 | 0.327 | 0.052 | ** | a12 | 0.071 | 0.075 | 0.350 | c1’ | 0.209 | 0.091 | * |
| PGV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | b1 | 0.734 | 0.065 | *** | ||
| PGR | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | b2 | 0.202 | 0.091 | * | ||
| MD | a21 | 0.801 | 0.053 | *** | a22 | 0.546 | 0.039 | *** | c2’ | 0.1174 | 0.071 | 0.101 | ||
| PEA*MD | a31 | −0.217 | 0.108 | * | a32 | −0.031 | 0.078 | 0.691 | c3’ | −0.025 | 0.093 | 0.786 | ||
| R2 | 0.5473*** | 0.4940*** | 0.7293*** | |||||||||||
| F | 84.6384 | 68.3525 | 112.1030 | |||||||||||
| 2 | MD | PEA | a11 | 0.031 | 0.119 | 0.794 | a12 | 0.3221 | 0.097 | ** | c1’ | 0.4465 | 0.115 | *** |
| PGV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | b1 | 0.5021 | 0.070 | *** | ||
| PGR | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | b2 | 0.3520 | 0.086 | *** | ||
| MD | a21 | 0.8151 | 0.06 | *** | a22 | 0.5244 | 0.046 | *** | c2’ | 0.1933 | 0.078 | * | ||
| PEA*MD | a31 | 0.096 | 0.112 | 0.394 | a32 | −0.077 | 0.091 | 0.401 | c3’ | 0.1094 | 0.106 | 0.304 | ||
| R2 | 0.4974*** | 0.4064*** | 0.6295*** | |||||||||||
| F | 70.9188 | 49.0587 | 213.0000 | |||||||||||
Coe. = Coefficient, S.E. = Standard error, P = p value, PGV = Perceived green value, PGR = Perceived green responsibility, GPB = Green purchase behavior, PEA = Positive emotional appeal, and MD = Middle doctrine. Group 1: cherishing vs. yearning. Group 2: proud vs. admiring. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 7The moderating effects of the middle doctrine on perceived green value and floodlight analysis.