| Literature DB >> 35719480 |
Hong Zhao1, Yajun Zhou2.
Abstract
The booming development of educational livestreaming platforms has caused the prevalence of user experience to a certain extent, which profoundly affects users' purchase intention and behavior, and has become a hot topic of current research in the online education field. However, there is a lack of in-depth analysis on the mechanism of the role of user experience in influencing purchase intention. Based on the analysis of user experience and psychological ownership, this study constructs a moderated mediation model to investigate the mediating psychological mechanism and boundary conditions of user experience affecting purchase intention. In this study, a valid sample of 372 users was used for structural equation modeling analysis. The results of the study found that user experience not only had a significant positive effect on purchase intention but was also mediated by psychological ownership. We also found that the effect of psychological ownership on purchase intention was moderated by privacy concerns. This study examines the role of user experience in purchase intention and reveals the mechanism of the role of user experience in an educational livestreaming platform.Entities:
Keywords: educational livestreaming platform; privacy concerns; psychological ownership; purchase intention; user experience
Year: 2022 PMID: 35719480 PMCID: PMC9204627 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Theoretical model.
Variables and measurement items.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| User experience | UE1. I am very experienced using educational livestreaming platform. | Carlson and Zmud ( |
| UE2. I feel that educational livestreaming platform is easy to use. | ||
| UE3. I feel competent using educational livestreaming platform. | ||
| UE4. I understand how to use all of the features of educational livestreaming platform system. | ||
| UE5. I feel comfortable using educational livestreaming platform. | ||
| Psychological ownership | PO1. I sense that this Himalaya is our educational livestreaming platform. | Van Dyne and Pierce ( |
| PO2. I feel a very high degree of personal ownership for this Himalaya. | ||
| PO3. I sense that this is my educational livestreaming platform. | ||
| PO4. Himalaya is our educational livestreaming platform. | ||
| PO5. Most of the people that use this Himalaya feel as though they own the educational livestreaming platform. | ||
| Purchase intention | PI1. I would recommend this educational livestreaming platform to my friend. | Wang et al. ( |
| PI2. I would buy the product or service of the educational livestreaming platform. | ||
| PI3.There is a probability that I would consider buying the product or service of the educational livestreaming platform. | ||
| Privacy concerns | PC1. I am concerned that my personal information on educational livestreaming platform will have a negative impact on me. | Son and Kim ( |
| PC2. I am concerned that my personal information on the educational livestreaming platform may be misused. | ||
| PC3. I am worried that my personal information on educational livestreaming platform will be used by others. | ||
| PC4. I am concerned that using the educational livestreaming platform will reveal my private information. | ||
| PC5. I am concerned about the negative consequences of unknown parties accessing myprivate information on this educational livestreaming platform. | ||
| PC6. I am concerned that unknown parties have access to my private information on thiseducational livestreaming platform. |
Descriptive statistical analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 121 | 32.5 | 32.5 |
| Female | 251 | 67.5 | 100.0 | |
| Age (year) | 20 or less | 44 | 11.8 | 11.8 |
| 21~30 | 269 | 72.3 | 84.1 | |
| 31~40 | 17 | 4.6 | 88.7 | |
| 41~50 | 22 | 5.9 | 94.6 | |
| 51 or above | 20 | 5.4 | 100.0 | |
| Marriage | Married | 57 | 15.3 | 15.3 |
| Unmarried | 315 | 85.7 | 100.0 | |
| Education level | High school and below | 22 | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| College | 49 | 13.2 | 19.1 | |
| Undergraduate | 262 | 70.4 | 89.5 | |
| Master's degree and above | 39 | 10.5 | 100.0 | |
| Consumption (RMB) | Below 2,000 | 148 | 39.8 | 39.8 |
| 2,000~3,999 | 99 | 26.6 | 66.4 | |
| 4,000~5,999 | 53 | 14.2 | 80.6 | |
| 6,000 or more | 72 | 19.4 | 100.0 | |
| Continuous use time (year) | <1 | 148 | 39.8 | 39.8 |
| 1~2 | 134 | 36.0 | 75.8 | |
| Over 3 | 90 | 24.2 | 100.0 |
Confirmatory factor analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| User experience | UE1 | 0.734 | 0.854 | 0.854 | 0.541 |
| UE2 | 0.817 | ||||
| UE3 | 0.707 | ||||
| UE4 | 0.718 | ||||
| UE5 | 0.694 | ||||
| Psychological ownership | PO1 | 0.687 | 0.847 | 0.851 | 0.534 |
| PO2 | 0.775 | ||||
| PO3 | 0.814 | ||||
| PO4 | 0.664 | ||||
| PO5 | 0.704 | ||||
| Purchase intention | PI1 | 0.768 | 0.828 | 0.832 | 0.622 |
| PI2 | 0.801 | ||||
| PI3 | 0.797 | ||||
| Privacy concerns | PC1 | 0.640 | 0.865 | 0.868 | 0.525 |
| PC2 | 0.640 | ||||
| PC3 | 0.807 | ||||
| PC4 | 0.757 | ||||
| PC5 | 0.760 | ||||
| PC6 | 0.726 |
Discriminant validity.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| UE < ->PO | 0.607 | 0.482 | 0.710 |
| UE < ->PI | 0.607 | 0.465 | 0.715 |
| UE < ->PC | 0.726 | 0.655 | 0.795 |
| PO < ->PI | 0.715 | 0.506 | 0.878 |
| PO < ->PC | 0.726 | 0.559 | 0.857 |
| PI < ->PC | 0.725 | 0.591 | 0.821 |
UE, user experience; PO, psychological ownership; PI, purchase intention; PC, privacy concerns.
Model fit criteria.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| MLχ2 | The small the better | 70.707 |
| DF | The large the better | 62 |
| Normed Chi-sqr (χ2/DF) | 1 < χ2/DF <3 | 1.140 |
| RMSEA | <0.08 | 0.019 |
| SRMR | <0.08 | 0.028 |
| TLI (NNFI) | >0.9 | 0.996 |
| CFI | >0.9 | 0.996 |
| GFI | >0.9 | 0.972 |
| AGFI | >0.9 | 0.947 |
Path coefficient and hypothesis testing.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UE->PO | 0.528 | 0.060 | 8.863 | 0.605 |
|
| UE->PI | 0.243 | 0.060 | 4.078 | 0.269 |
|
| PO->PI | 0.573 | 0.078 | 7.391 | 0.553 |
|
p < 0.001; UE, user experience; PO, psychological ownership; PI, purchase intention; PC, privacy concerns.
Analysis of mediation effect.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Total effect: UE → PI | 0.546 | 0.081 | 6.741 | 0.005 | 0.376 | 0.694 |
| Indirect effect: UE → PO → PI | 0.303 | 0.113 | 2.681 | 0.003 | 0.132 | 0.560 |
| Direct effect:UE → PI | 0.243 | 0.120 | 2.025 | 0.054 | −0.005 | 0.475 |
UE, user experience; PO, psychological ownership; PI, purchase intention; PC, privacy concerns.
Analysis of moderating effect.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purchase intention (PI) | Psychological ownership (PO) | 0.492 | 0.078 | 6.344 |
|
| Privacy concerns (PC) | 0.406 | 0.093 | 4.385 |
| |
| Psychological ownership (PO) × privacy concerns (PC) | −0.073 | 0.024 | −3.040 |
|
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.