| Literature DB >> 35719403 |
Yong Peng1,2, Liang Meng3, Huan Zhu1, Li Wan1, Fen Chen1.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of normobaric oxygen inhalation intervention on microcirculatory blood flow of college students after exercise and the impact of the elimination of exercise-induced fatigue, to provide a theoretical and methodological reference for the rapid elimination of fatigue of college students after endurance exercise.Entities:
Keywords: atmospheric oxygen inhalation; exercise-induced fatigue; fatigue elimination; microcirculatory blood flow; muscle oxygen saturation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35719403 PMCID: PMC9198422 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.901862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
Basic information of subjects (x ± s, n = 48).
| Group | Age (years) | Height (m) | Weight (kg) | BMI (kg/M2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 21.07 ± 0.59 | 1.73 ± 0.05 | 66.80 ± 4.89 | 22.18 ± 1.02 |
| Intervention group | 21.41 ± 0.63 | 1.72 ± 0.06 | 65.40 ± 6.39 | 22.09 ± 1.27 |
FIGURE 1The test flow chart of this study.
Comparison of time and energy consumption of two groups of subjects in running 3,000 m (x ± s, n = 48).
| Group | Exercise time (s) | Energy consumption (kcal) |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | 997.13 ± 81.55 | 186.87 ± 5.77 |
| Intervention group | 975.33 ± 84.06 | 192.25 ± 6.53 |
Comparison of microcirculation perfusion in different periods between two groups of subjects (x ± s, n = 48).
| Index | Group | Before exercise | Immediately after exercise | 30 min after exercise | Interaction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | |||||
| MBP(PU) | Control group | 6.05 ± 1.86* | 37.25 ± 8.51 | 6.34 ± 2.14*& | 4.066 | 0.028 |
| Intervention group | 6.19 ± 1.91*# | 39.83 ± 5.92 | 10.13 ± 2.16* | |||
| CMBC | Control group | 62.08 ± 18.18 | 214.80 ± 66.12 | 65.57 ± 13.82 | 0.032 | 0.969 |
| Intervention group | 64.57 ± 19.82 | 220.93 ± 62.06 | 68.07 ± 9.09 | |||
| AVBC | Control group | 9.93 ± 2.60* | 18.91 ± 7.32 | 10.23 ± 2.38*& | 3.959 | 0.031 |
| Intervention group | 9.79 ± 2.03*# | 19.81 ± 6.06 | 15.49 ± 4.24* | |||
Note: * the difference is statistically significant compared with the corresponding index immediately after exercise in the group; # the difference between the corresponding index in the group and 30 min after exercise in the group is statistically significant; & the difference is statistically significant compared with the index at the same time in the group.
Comparison of SmO2, HR, BLA, BU and CK between two groups of subjects in different periods (x ± s, n = 48).
| Index | Group | Before exercise | Immediately after exercise | 30 min after exercise | Interaction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | |||||
| SmO2 | Control group | 67.91 ± 9.61*# | 48.24 ± 12.00 | 56.89 ± 9.32*& | 3.987 | 0.025 |
| Intervention group | 68.32 ± 9.44* | 46.04 ± 9.98 | 64.15 ± 8.87* | |||
| HR | Control group | 76.87 ± 8.03*# | 174.20 ± 11.53 | 91.40 ± 7.23*& | 3.693 | 0.038 |
| Intervention group | 77.13 ± 7.37* | 175.47 ± 5.94 | 82.40 ± 7.47* | |||
| BLA | Control group | 2.99 ± 0.50*# | 15.87 ± 2.54 | 6.08 ± 1.66*& | 4.771 | 0.017 |
| Intervention group | 2.88 ± 0.42*# | 16.14 ± 2.44 | 4.45 ± 1.07* | |||
| BU | Control group | 4.23 ± 0.59*# | 6.20 ± 0.89 | 6.22 ± 0.85& | 5.244 | 0.025 |
| Intervention group | 4.28 ± 0.51*# | 6.46 ± 1.06 | 5.48 ± 0.87* | |||
| CK | Control group | 122.27 ± 28.02*# | 324.60 ± 49.22 | 342.47 ± 64.38& | 11.147 | 0.000 |
| Intervention group | 125.67 ± 27.07*# | 325.73 ± 49.06 | 270.27 ± 51.29* | |||
Note: * the difference is statistically significant compared with the corresponding index immediately after exercise in the group; # the difference between the corresponding index in the group and 30 min after exercise in the group is statistically significant; & the difference is statistically significant compared with the index at the same time in the group.