| Literature DB >> 35719339 |
Yu Xi1,2, FangJie Liu3, Bo Qiu3, Ying Li2, XinQiang Xie2, JinYu Guo3, Lei Wu2, TingTing Liang2, DaQuan Wang3, Juan Wang2, Moutong Chen2, Liang Xue2, Yu Ding2, Jumei Zhang2, QingPing Wu2, Hui Liu3.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the association of gut microbiome signature and disease progression in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) by fecal metagenome analysis.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic resistance genes; chemoradiotherapy; disease progression; gut microbiota; metagenomes; non-small cell lung cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35719339 PMCID: PMC9200620 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.892401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
The baseline clinical characteristics of study populations.
| Characteristics | Short-PFS group (n=12) | Long-PFS group (n=6) | Healthy individuals (n=13) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | ||||
| Median (Range) | 59 (35–69) | 55 (50-63) | 53 (36-66) | 0.093 |
| Sex, n (%) | ||||
| Male | 10 (83.3) | 4 (66.7) | 7 (53.8) | 0.288 |
| Female | 2 (16.7) | 2 (33.3) | 6 (46.2) | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 24.48 (2.81) | 23.77 (3.20) | 23.52 (3.10) | 0.721 |
| Smoking history, n (%) | ||||
| Smoker | 8 (66.7) | 4 (66.7) | 7 (53.8) | 0.770 |
| Non-smoker | 4 (33.3) | 2 (33.3) | 6 (46.2) | |
| Histology, n (%) | ||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 7 (58.3) | 5 (83.3) | / | 0.600 |
| Adenocarcinoma | 5 (41.7) | 1 (16.7) | / | |
| Disease stage, n (%) | ||||
| IIIA | 1 (8.3) | 1 (16.7) | / | 0.957 |
| IIIB | 8 (66.7) | 3 (50.0) | / | |
| IIIC | 3 (25.0) | 2 (33.3) | / | |
| Chronic lung comorbidity | ||||
| Yes | 5 (41.7) | 1 (16.7) | / | 0.600 |
| No | 7 (58.3) | 5 (83.3) | / |
Figure 1Intestinal microbiota composition among long-PFS group, short-PFS group and healthy individuals (HI). (A-C) The community pie analysis at phylum level for HI, short-PFS group and long-PFS group, respectively. (D) The one-way ANOVA of the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio among three groups. (E) Stacked bar plots depicting genus-level differences in gut microbiota composition. (F) The venn diagram analysis among three groups at species level. (G) Comparison of microbial alpha diversity (shannon index) among three groups. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 2(A–C) The community pie analysis at speices level only on long-PFS group, only on short-PFS group and both long-PFS group and short-PFS group, respectively.
Figure 3The LEfSe analysis between short-PFS group and long-PFS group at genus level (A) and species level (B).
Figure 4Differences in functional profile of gut microbiome between patients in long-PFS and short-PFS groups. (A)The venn diagram analysis between short-PFS group and long-PFS group in KEGG ORTHOLOGY (KO). (B) Significant difference was observed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test at KEGG level 3 between short-PFS and long-PFS groups. (C) The one-way ANOVA of total antibiotic resistance genes. (D) The histogram shows the top 15 abundant antibiotic resistance gene types in long-PFS and short-PFS groups. (E) Significant difference was observed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test at antibiotic resistance gene types. (F) Comparison of the top 11 most abundant antibiotic resistance genes between two groups. (G) The Wilcoxon rank-sum test analysis of vancomycin resistance gene types between two groups. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 5Barplot of species and functional contribution analysis demonstrating the top 50 genus contributing to the top 15 antibiotic resistance gene types.