| Literature DB >> 35719300 |
Gerard N Hinsley1, Cameron M Kewish1,2, Grant A van Riessen1,3.
Abstract
X-ray coherent diffractive imaging (CDI) techniques have been applied with widespread impact to study nanoscale material properties. New fast framing detectors may reveal dynamics that occur at millisecond timescales. This work demonstrates by simulation that kilohertz synchrotron CDI is possible, by making use of redundant information from static parts of the image field. Reconstruction ambiguities are strongly suppressed by applying a spatio-temporal constraint, obviating the need for slower methods of introducing diversity such as ptychography. The relationship between image fidelity and time resolution is investigated and shows that dynamics an order of magnitude faster can be reconstructed, compared with conventional CDI. © Gerard N. Hinsley et al. 2022.Entities:
Keywords: coherent X-ray imaging; coherent diffractive imaging; kHz X-ray imaging; nanoscale dynamics; phase retrieval
Year: 2022 PMID: 35719300 PMCID: PMC9172028 DOI: 10.1107/S1600576722003466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Crystallogr ISSN: 0021-8898 Impact factor: 4.868
Figure 1Phase images of a dynamic object: (a) indicates the different rotational ( ) and translational ( ) behaviour of the L object; (b) shows the reconstructed map of dynamic behaviour identifying time-dependent (white) and time-independent (black) areas; phase images for four different time points at a detector frame rate of 0.8 kHz reconstructed (c) using a spatiotemporal constraint and (d) using the standard CDI algorithm; (e) the SSIM compares the reconstruction quality of standard CDI (dashed line) with the spatiotemporal constraint method (solid line), where the point of convergence for both approaches is indicated by a black cross; (f) the NRMSE shows the relative error between the reconstructed object (solid) and its twin image (dashed) from the simulated object.
Figure 2Phase images for detector frame rates from f = 0.08 kHz to f = 5 kHz: reconstructions (a) using a spatiotemporal constraint and (b) using the standard CDI algorithm; (c) the SSIM compares the reconstruction quality of standard CDI (dashed line) with the spatiotemporal constraint method (solid line), where the shaded region indicates the optimal range of experimental imaging rates , delimited by twice the rotational critical sampling frequency = 0.667 kHz (lower axis intercept) and SNR = 1 (upper axis).
Figure 3Result of increasing the simulated dynamic behaviour: (a) shows simulated spatiotemporal constraint maps illustrating the increase in dynamic behaviour through the addition of independent L objects into the simulation; (b) the SSIM compares the reconstruction quality using the spatiotemporal constraint at each level of simulated dynamics, as a function of frame rate and SNR, where the colour of each line corresponds to the borders of the spatiotemporal constraint maps in (a).