Literature DB >> 35719226

Effects of Upper Body Eccentric versus Concentric Strength Training and Detraining on Maximal Force, Muscle Activation, Hypertrophy and Serum Hormones in Women.

Keijo Häkkinen1, Robert U Newton2, Simon Walker1, Arja Häkkinen3, Sonja Krapi1, Rebekka Rekola1, Päivi Koponen3, William J Kraemer4, G Gregory Haff5, Anthony J Blazevich5, Kazunori Nosaka2,5, Juha Ahtiainen1.   

Abstract

Effects of eccentric (ECC) versus concentric (CON) strength training of the upper body performed twice a week for 10 weeks followed by detraining for five weeks on maximal force, muscle activation, muscle mass and serum hormone concentrations were investigated in young women (n = 11 and n = 12). One-repetition bench press (1RM), maximal isometric force and surface electromyography (EMG) of triceps brachii (TB), anterior deltoid (AD) and pectoralis major (PM), cross-sectional area (CSA) of TB (Long (LoH) and Lateral Head (LaH)) and thickness of PM, as well as serum concentrations of free testosterone, cortisol, follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured. ECC and CON training led to increases of 17.2 ± 11.3% (p < 0.001) and 13.1 ± 5.7% (p < 0.001) in 1RM followed by decreases of -6.6 ± 3.6% (p < 0.01) and -8.0 ± 4.5% (p < 0.001) during detraining, respectively. Isometric force increased in ECC by 11.4 ± 9.6 % (p < 0.05) from week 5 to 10, while the change in CON by 3.9±6.8% was not significant and a between group difference was noted (p < 0.05). Maximal total integrated EMG of trained muscles increased only in the whole subject group (p < 0.05). CSA of TB (LoH) increased in ECC by 8.7 ± 8.0% (p < 0.001) and in CON by 3.4 ± 1.6% (p < 0.01) and differed between groups (p < 0.05), and CSA of TB (LaH) in ECC by 15.7 ± 8.0% (p < 0.001) and CON by 9.7 ± 6.6% (p < 0.001). PM thickness increased in ECC by 17.7 ± 10.9% (p < 0.001) and CON by 14.0 ± 5.9% (p < 0.001). Total muscle sum value (LoH + LaH + PM) increased in ECC by 12.4 ± 6.9% (p < 0.001) and in CON by 7.1 ± 2.9% (p < 0.001) differing between groups (p < 0.05) and decreased during detraining in ECC by -6.5 ± 4.3% (p < 0.001) and CON by -6.1 ± 2.8% (p < 0.001). The post detraining combined sum value of CSA and thickness was in ECC higher (p < 0.05) than at pre training. No changes were detected in serum hormone concentrations, but baseline free testosterone levels in the ECC and CON group combined correlated with changes in 1RM (r = 0.520, p < 0.016) during training. Large neuromuscular adaptations of the upper body occurred in women during ECC, and CON training in 10 weeks. Isometric force increased only in response to ECC, and total muscle sum value increased more during ECC than CON training. However, no changes occurred in serum hormones, but individual serum-free testosterone baseline concentrations correlated with changes in 1RM during strength training in the entire group. Both groups showed significant decreases in neuromuscular performance and muscle mass during detraining, while post detraining muscle sum value was only in ECC significantly higher than at pre training. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; Muscle force; females; mass; testosterone; training

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35719226      PMCID: PMC9157521          DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2022.200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   4.017


  28 in total

1.  Neuromuscular adaptation during prolonged strength training, detraining and re-strength-training in middle-aged and elderly people.

Authors:  K Häkkinen; M Alen; M Kallinen; R U Newton; W J Kraemer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  The effects of eccentric versus concentric resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Roig; K O'Brien; G Kirk; R Murray; P McKinnon; B Shadgan; W D Reid
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  A comparison of concentric and eccentric muscle training.

Authors:  B L Johnson; J W Adamczyk; K O Tennoe; S B Stromme
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1976

4.  Eccentric resistance training increases and retains maximal strength, muscle endurance, and hypertrophy in trained men.

Authors:  Giuseppe Coratella; Federico Schena
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.665

5.  Muscular performance after concentric and eccentric exercise in trained men.

Authors:  Harald Vikne; Per E Refsnes; Merete Ekmark; Jon Ingulf Medbø; Vidar Gundersen; Kristian Gundersen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 6.  Hypertrophic Effects of Concentric vs. Eccentric Muscle Actions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brad J Schoenfeld; Dan I Ogborn; Andrew D Vigotsky; Martino V Franchi; James W Krieger
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Specific effects of eccentric and concentric training on muscle strength and morphology in humans.

Authors:  J Y Seger; B Arvidsson; A Thorstensson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1998-12

8.  The effects of short-term resistance training on endocrine function in men and women.

Authors:  W J Kraemer; R S Staron; F C Hagerman; R S Hikida; A C Fry; S E Gordon; B C Nindl; L A Gothshalk; J S Volek; J O Marx; R U Newton; K Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1998-06

9.  Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Lopez; Régis Radaelli; Dennis R Taaffe; Robert U Newton; Daniel A Galvão; Gabriel S Trajano; Juliana L Teodoro; William J Kraemer; Keijo Häkkinen; Ronei S Pinto
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Increased fascicle length but not patellar tendon stiffness after accentuated eccentric-load strength training in already-trained men.

Authors:  Simon Walker; Joanne Trezise; Guy Gregory Haff; Robert U Newton; Keijo Häkkinen; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.