| Literature DB >> 35719178 |
Arthur Rodrigues Baldan1, Vitor Luis Pereira1, Paulo Henrique Schmidt Lara1, Benno Ejnisman1, Paulo Santoro Belangero1.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to understand the way fighting athletes respond to bone block surgery in the treatment for shoulder instability.Entities:
Keywords: Athletic Injuries; Return to Sport; Shoulder Dislocation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35719178 PMCID: PMC9177064 DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220223002244517
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Ortop Bras ISSN: 1413-7852 Impact factor: 0.683
General characteristics of the sample.
| Patient sample (N = 8) | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| Average | 24.6 |
| Variation | 20-35 |
| Gender (N., %) | |
| Male | 8 (100%) |
| Affected limb (N., %) | |
| Left | 5 (55%) |
| Right | 4 (45%) |
| Dislocation Mechanism (N., %) | |
| Traumatic | 8 (88%) |
| Atraumatic | 1 (12%) |
| Category | |
| Amateur | 4 (50%) |
| Professional | 4 (40%) |
Fighting modalities practiced by the athletes.
| Case | Modalities |
|---|---|
| 1 | Olympic Wrestling |
| Jiu-Jitsu | |
| Judo | |
| 2 | Jiu-Jitsu |
| Capoeira | |
| 3 | Kickboxing |
| 4 | Muay Thai |
| Jiu-Jitsu | |
| 5 | Mixed Martial Arts |
| 6 | Jiu-Jitsu |
| 7 | Chinese Boxing |
| 8 | Mixed Martial Arts |
| 9 | Boxing |
Figure 1Evaluation protocol of the athletes.
Figure 2Surgery indication flowchart.
Description of the functional data of the individuals
| Variables | Active Lateral Rotation | Passive Lateral Rotation | Active Elevation | Passive Elevation | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | 62 | 73.2 | 163.7 | 170.4 | 9 |
| 4 weeks | 14.6 | 24.2 | 107.8 | 120 | 9 |
| 8 weeks | 25.3 | 30.7 | 115 | 123.9 | 9 |
| 12 weeks | 36.7 | 42.8 | 122 | 132.6 | 9 |
| 6 months | 52 | 56.6 | 132.6 | 140.4 | 9 |
| 1 year | 48.8 | 51 | 150 | 154.6 | 5 |
| 2 years old | 55.5 | 63.8 | 152.5 | 162.5 | 4 |
| 3 years | 75 | 80 | 159 | 165 | 2 |
| 4 years old | 75 | 80 | 158 | 160 | 1 |
Description of the results of the evaluated scores.
| Variables | ASES | WOSI | EROE | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | 47.8 | 112.9 | 47.2 | 9 |
| 6 months | 69.2 | 63.4 | 70.6 | 9 |
| 1 year | 73.2 | 42.4 | 73.4 | 5 |
| 2 years old | 78.5 | 59.3 | 82.3 | 4 |
| 3 years | 82 | 62.5 | 93 | 2 |
| 4 years old | 92 | 66 | 88 | 1 |
Distribution of athletes according to EROE Score.
| EROE | Weak | Regular | Good | Excellent | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Pre | 4 | 44.4 | 4 | 44.4 | 1 | 11.1% | 0 | 0% |
| 6 months | 2 | 22.2% | 1 | 11.1% | 5 | 55.5% | 1 | 11.1% |
| 1 years old | 1 | 20% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 60% | 1 | 20% |
| 2 years old | 0 | 0% | 1 | 25% | 2 | 50% | 1 | 25% |
| 3 years | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% |
| 4 years old | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% |
Comparison of the EROE Score in several studies.
| Study | Patients | Follow-up (months) | Redislocation rate | Excellent ROWE score | Good ROWE score | Regular ROWE score | Weak ROWE score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banas et al. 1993 | 79 | 103 | 4% | 74% | 11% | 9% | 6% |
| Singer et al. 1995 | 14 | 246 | 0% | 36% | 57% | 7% | 1% |
| Pap et al. 1997 | 31 | 31 | 3% | 45% | 39% | 6% | 10% |
| Hovelius et al. 2004 | 118 | 182 | 4% | 71% | 15% | 11% | 4% |
| Matthes et al. 2007 | 29 | 38 | 0% | 59% | 24% | 10% | 7% |
| Ruci et al. 2015 | 42 | 46 | 0% | 64% | 22% | 9.5% | 4.5% |
| Current study | 8 | 21 | 0% | 11.1% | 55.5% | 11.1% | 22.2% |