Amirhossein Izadpanah1,2, Nowruz Delirezh3, Rahim Mahmodlou4. 1. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. 2. Department of Stem cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.Email: n.delirezh@urmia.ac.ir. 4. Department of Surgery, Emam Khomeini General Hospital, Urmia, Iran.
Four decades ago, the cancer stem cell (CSC) concept was proposed. It was stated
that tumor growth, like the renewal of healthy tissues, is fueled by
small numbers of so-called stem cells. It has gradually become clear that many tumors harbor
CSCs in dedicated niches, and their identification has not been as obvious as was initially
hoped. Recently developed lineage tracing has provided insights into CSC therapeutic
response.Breast cancer is the most common female neoplastic
malignancy and the most important cause of female
mortality in the world (1). Although this malignancy’s
highest incidence is in developed countries, studies
showed that its incidence in developing countries has
an increasing trend, and patients have a shorter life
expectancy (2). Most of the deaths associated with
breast cancer are due to metastasis and multiple drug
resistance (3). Studies on the tumor microenvironment
have revealed a rare cancer cell population with
stemness features that seems to be the leading cause of
the malignancy. This population is called CSCs, and
they have the ability to self-renewal and differentiation
into other progenies of cancer cells (4).CSCs first were detected in acute myeloid leukemia (5), however, their footprint was
discovered in all types of cancers later (6-9). They are assumed to be responsible for a
tumor’s main malignant characteristics, including invasion, metastasis, drug resistance, and
relapse. Although CSCs can be distinguished by surface markers (e.g. CD24) and expression of
stemness genes (e.g. OCT4, NANOG, SOX2), efforts to derivate a pure cell line of CSCs from
tumor specimens have failed till now (10). Nevertheless, it has been proved that the culture
of tumor cells in non-adherent vessels would form spheroids, which are CSCs enriched, so,
currently, tumor-derived spheres would prepare the most available models for CSCs
examinations (11).Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are necessary molecular
chaperones that play an essential role in cells. They
also play a crucial role in immunizing against tumors
by interfering with the function of professional antigenpresenting cells (APCs), T lymphocytes, and NK cells
(12-16). Hsp90B1 (gp96) is a type of HSP that plays a
vital role in directing and delivering antigens through
MHC class 1 and inducing CD8+
T cells response. This
role of HSPs has been used as a basis for clinical trials to
develop anticancer vaccines (17, 18).Despite the efforts that have been made to develop the
cancer vaccines, reaching therapeutic success still is still
far-fetched. In recent years, immunotherapy methods
have hopefully increased the survival of patients (19). To
improve the efficacy of these new treatments, boosting the
immune response against cancer cells, specifically CSCs,
is of the utmost importance. Therefore, upregulating
the expression of HSPs in CSCs seems to increase the
immunogenicity of these cells, and HSP-upregulated CSCs
would be a better tumor antigen source for immunization
and cancer vaccine production. In this study, we tried to
set up an optimized protocol for the derivation of CSCsenriched spheres from tumor tissue of breast cancer
(which is called mammospheres) and upregulation of
glycoprotein 96 (gp96) in these cells.
Materials and Methods
In the experimental study, the optimal temperature
for induction of gp96 in grade 3 breast cancer spheres
was investigated using mammosphere generation,
immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, real-time reverse
transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and
western blot techniques.
Preparing tumor sample and generation of
mammospheres
Several biopsy samples of tumor tissue were obtained from
a female patient with breast cancer during mastectomy and
stored in sterile containers containing DMEM/F12 medium
(Gibco, USA) with streptomycin-penicillin antibiotics (Sigma,
USA), then delivered to the lab. Written consent was obtained
from three patients before the surgery for using their tissue
samples in the research. Approval of the ethics committee
of Urmia University of Medical Sciences was obtained in
advance (P6/97/4/25493). At least three tumor samples were
applied to successfully generate mammospheres and the gp94
induction process as described below.Breast tumor tissues were first minced mechanically by a scalpel and then digested
enzymatically using collagenase type IV for 18 hours. Cells obtained from the digested
tissue were cultured in 24-well plates (Biofil, China) coated with a thin layer of 1.5%
agarose solution, in a low glucose DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium) medium
supplemented with epidermal growth factor (EGF, 20 ng/ml), basic fibroblast growth factor
(bFGF, 20 ng/ml), B27 (2%), bovine serum albumin (BSA, 0.5 mg/ml) and
penicillin-streptomycin at 37ºC and 5% CO2 (20). The culture medium was
refreshed every two days, and primary spheres were harvested on day 7, single cells of
each sphere were then transferred into new 24-well plates to form secondary spheres which
were then used to perform relevant tests on day 22.
Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis tissue sections were cut at 6 µm thickness,
mounted on slides, and antigen retrieval was performed. Endogenous peroxidase activity was
blocked by immersing the slides in 1.0% H2 O2 , and 0.1% NaN3 in
tris-buffered saline (TBS, Sigma, Germany) for 10 minutes. Nonspecific antibody binding
was inhibited by incubating the sections in 4% commercial nonfat skim milk powder (Sigma,
Germany) in TBS for 15 minutes; the slides were transferred to a humidified chamber and
incubated with primary anti ER (2.5 µg/ml), PR (2.5 µg/ml) and Herr-2/neu (5 µg/ml)
antibodies (Abcam, UK) overnight at room temperature. The sections were washed by TBS and
incubated with biotinylated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulins (Abcam, UK) for 45 minutes and
then with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Abcam, UK) for 15 minutes.
Antigenic sites were identified using 0.05% 3,3-diaminobenzidine with H2
O2 (Sigma, Germany) as substrate and were then lightly counterstained with
hematoxylin before being examined with light microscopy (21).
Flow cytometry
To confirm CSCs enrichment in mammospheres, the flow cytometry technique was used to
determine the percentage of CSCs population in trypsinized secondary mammospheres on the
22nd day of culture. For this assessment, CD44+ CD24-
cells were considered as CSCs, and the percentage of this population was compared with
single cells isolated from digested tumor tissue on the first day of culture.
Real-time RT-PCR was carried out according to the method described by Park et al. (22).
Briefly, single cells of trypsinized secondary mammospheres were used for total RNA
extraction by a commercially available kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Realtime RT-PCR
was then performed on the synthesized cDNA to evaluate the expression level of stemness
genes including OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2, resultant cDNA
amplified by Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Germany) in a Rotor-gene 3000 thermal cycler
device (Corbett, Australia). The Syber Green probe (Qiagen, Germany) was used for the
detection of DNA amplification signals. The expression level of each gene was normalized
to the GAPDH expression as a housekeeping gene, and breast cancer cell
line (MCF7) as a control to calculate the relative expression (2-ΔΔCt) of
stemness genes.
Western blot
To induce upregulation of gp96 expression, mammospheres
were incubated for 60 minutes at 42ºC and 43ºC in experimental
groups and at 37ºC in the control group; these spheres were
then trypsinized, and single cells were used for Western blot
analysis. Cells were lysed with lysing buffer (50 mM TrisHCl, pH=7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate,
1% NP-40) supplemented with complete protease inhibitors
(Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). Cell lysates
(20 mg) were separated by electrophoresis on 10% sodium
dodecyl-sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel and transferred
to a nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was blocked with
TBST (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH=7.6, 136 mM NaCl, and 0.1%
Tween-20) containing 5% skim milk and then incubated with
primary antibody against gp96 (2 µg, ml) and Actin (as a
housekeeping protein, Santa Cruz, USA) at 4ºC overnight.
The next day, after washing with TBST, the membrane was
incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1
hour at room temperature. The bands were amplified using a
chemiluminescent solution and photographed with the ECL
kit (GE/Amersham Healthcare, UK) and Documentation Gel
(SYNGENE, UK) (23).
Statistical analysis
Data from at least three independent experiments were
expressed as means ± standard deviation, SD. Each data
point of real-time PCR was run at least in triplicates and
independent experiments were performed at least three
times. Student’s t tests or ANOVA (SPSS, version 21,
IBM, USA) were used to determine statistically significant
differences and P<0.05 was considered to be statistically
significant unless otherwise specified.
Results
Immunohistochemistry characteristics of the tumor
sample
The histopathology report of the tumor biopsy indicated
that the patients had undergone a stage IV, grade 3 invasive
ductal carcinoma breast cancer (data not shown). Tumor size
was 3.5×2cm and involvement of axillary lymph node was
reported. IHC study showed that the tumor was triple positive
for Estrogen, Progesterone, and Her2-neu receptors (Fig .1).
Fig.1
Immunohistochemical analysis. Tumor specimen was stained
immunohistochemically using anti ER, PR and Her-2/neu monoclonal
antibodies. From left to right presents the expression of ER, PR, and Her2/neu receptors respectively (scale bar: 100 µm).
Immunohistochemical analysis. Tumor specimen was stained
immunohistochemically using anti ER, PR and Her-2/neu monoclonal
antibodies. From left to right presents the expression of ER, PR, and Her2/neu receptors respectively (scale bar: 100 µm).
Tumor-derived mammospheres generation
The culture of tumor single cells with described
protocol led to the formation of spheres after 7 days.
The morphology of spheres was similar to what has been
previously reported. The sphere trypsinized and passaged
into subsequent plates, which led to the formation of
secondary mammospheres on day 22 (Fig .2).
Fig.2
Mammospheres derived from tumor tissue. A. Cells isolated from digestion of tumor
tissue samples on the first day of culture, B. Primary mammospheres on
the 7th day of culture, and C. Secondary mammospheres formed from the
passage of primary mammospheres on the 22nd day of culture (scale bar: 100
µm).
Mammospheres derived from tumor tissue. A. Cells isolated from digestion of tumor
tissue samples on the first day of culture, B. Primary mammospheres on
the 7th day of culture, and C. Secondary mammospheres formed from the
passage of primary mammospheres on the 22nd day of culture (scale bar: 100
µm).
Flow cytometric analysis of cancer stem cells in tumorderived spheres
To determine the percentage of CSCs among other cancer cells, the population of
CD44+ CD24- cells as CSC phenotype was measured with flow
cytometry. The percentage of CSCs on the first day of culture was 2.6%, whereas this
population on the 22nd day of culture was 33.2% in trypsinized mammospheres
(Fig .3).
Fig.3
Phenotypic characterization of cancer stem cells (CSCs) enriched mammospheres. A.
Flow cytometric analysis of CSCs was carried out using anti CD24 and anti CD44
monoclonal antibodies. Forward and side scatter analysis of cells are shown. B.
Cells with CD44+ CD24- phenotype had a low percentage on
the first day of culture, and C. But the population of these cells
considerably increased in the 22nd day of culture in mammospheres.
Phenotypic characterization of cancer stem cells (CSCs) enriched mammospheres. A.
Flow cytometric analysis of CSCs was carried out using anti CD24 and anti CD44
monoclonal antibodies. Forward and side scatter analysis of cells are shown. B.
Cells with CD44+ CD24- phenotype had a low percentage on
the first day of culture, and C. But the population of these cells
considerably increased in the 22nd day of culture in mammospheres.
Stemness genes expression
Relative expression of stemness genes, including OCT4, NANOG, and
SOX2 were measured in trypsinized mammospheres in comparison with the
MCF-7 breast cancer cell line as the control by real-time RT-PCR. Relative expression of
these genes was significantly higher in mammospheres, which was 3.83 ± 0.62 fold for
OCT-4, 17.83 ± 0.6 fold for NANOG, and 7.73 ± 0.78
fold for SOX2 (P≤0.001, Fig .4).
Fig.4
Stemness genes expressioin. Expression of OCT-4, NANOG, and
SOX2 was meassured in single cells of mammospheres in comparison to
MCF-7 cell line. The expression level of genes in the MCF-7 cells was considered as 1
and the expression fold of them in single cells of cultured mammospheres was reported
(P<0.001).
Stemness genes expressioin. Expression of OCT-4, NANOG, and
SOX2 was meassured in single cells of mammospheres in comparison to
MCF-7 cell line. The expression level of genes in the MCF-7 cells was considered as 1
and the expression fold of them in single cells of cultured mammospheres was reported
(P<0.001).
Glycoprotein 96 expression
Incubation of mammospheres for a short time (60
minutes) at 42°C and 43°C led to the upregulation
of gp96 protein expression detected by Western blot.
However, the viability of mammospheres did not decline
after such incubation conditions. The sharpness of gp96
bands at 42°C and 43°C incubated mammospheres were
significantly higher than 37°C (P≤0.001), but they have no
considerable difference from each other (Fig .5).
Fig.5
Expression levels of gp96 protein. Mammospheres were incubated
in 42°C and 43°C as well as 37°C (control) for 1 hour and the expression of
gp96 protein was measured using Western bloting test. Different letters
indicate significant differences between mean values (P=0.03).
Expression levels of gp96 protein. Mammospheres were incubated
in 42°C and 43°C as well as 37°C (control) for 1 hour and the expression of
gp96 protein was measured using Western bloting test. Different letters
indicate significant differences between mean values (P=0.03).
Discussion
CSCs are a group of cancerous cells within the tumor
bulk with stem cell-like characteristics, including selfrenewal properties, due to which the term Tumor Initiating
Cells (TIC) has been used for them (11). It seems that
the stemness properties of CSCs could be an explanation
for cancer recurrence and chemoresistance. Among the
other described characteristics for CSCs, the expression
of some markers like CD44, CD133, and CD24, and on
the transcription level, the expression of SOX2, NANOG,
and OCT4 is crucial (24).One of the assays that can be applied to isolate CSCs, besides surface markers, is the
Spheroid formation assay, which is based on the capability of these cells to generate
multicellular three-dimensional (3D) spheres in vitro (25). So far, culture
methods, including organotypic multicellular spheroid model, multicellular tumor spheroids,
tissue-derived tumorspheres, and tumorspheres assay, have been developed (26). In this
study, the tumorspheres assay was applied, which is based on dissociating tumor tissue to
the suspension of single cells and culturing the obtained cellular suspension in a low
adherent surface in a serum-free media which is supplemented with EGF and b-FGF growth
factors to enrich CSCs. This condition can provide the establishment of spherical colonies.
However, the formation of tumor structure cannot be fully mimicked by using this method
(27).In the present study, we successfully achieved mammospheres from breast tumor tissue. Our
tumorderived mammospheres were typical in morphology. We also passaged primary mammospheres
to form secondary ones by trypsinization. The CSC population was enriched in mammospheres,
which were 2.6% on the first day of culture compared to 33.2% on the 22nd day of
culture.SOX2 gene belongs to the family of SRY-related high mobility group (HMG)
which is located on chorormose 3 and implicated in the cell development process by
determining their fate and preserving stemness phenotype. It is well-known that
SOX2 takes part in different molecular mechanisms and states of diseases
including cancer. It has been shown that dysregulated and increased expression of
SOX2 can impact proliferation, migration, invasion, resistance to
apoptosis, and colony formation features in CSCs and tumor cells (28).
NANOG is another master transcription factor of embryogenesis, located on
chromosome 12, and engaged in conserving pluripotency and self-renewal potential in stem
cells through the Insulin-like growth factor1 receptor (IGF1R) pathway. Overexpression of
this transcription factor has been detected in different cancers, leading to inhibiting
apoptosis and establishing chemoresistance (29). OCT4, also recognized as
POU5F1, belongs to the POU family of transcription factors on chromosome 6, and along with
NANOG and SOX2, plays a vital role in developmental
pathways and tumorigenesis. Since the enhanced expression of these genes has been linked to
poor prognosis in patients with cancer and resistance to chemotherapy (30), in the present
study, we analyzed their expression levels in ex vivo generated mammospheres and found that
stemness genes, including OCT-4, NANOG, and SOX2,
overexpressed in mammospheres compared to a regular breast cancer cell line (MCF-7).Another purpose of this study was to optimize
incubation conditions for the upregulation of HSPs in
mammospheres, which would lead to an increase in the
immunogenicity of CSCs for immunotherapy settings.
We showed that incubation of mammospheres for 60
minutes at 42-43°C upregulated GP96 protein expression
(a member of the HSP90 family) without affecting the
viability of mammospheres cells.Homologous members of the HSP family are found
in all parts of the cytosol, nucleus, mitochondria,
endosomes, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum,
intracellular membranes, and plasma membrane (31).
Thus, HSPs isolated from tumor cells are potentially rich
in tumor antigens (32). Given the role of HSP-peptide
complexes in the activation and maturation of APCs,
this complex may activate the polyclonal T lymphocyte
response against tumor antigens. Under these conditions,
even if the tumor loses some antigens under the selective
pressure of the immune system, multiple T-cell clones
will still be available to destroy the tumor cells (32, 33).
The application of this approach makes it unnecessary to
find tumor-specific antigens for each patient. Among the
most critical tumor-derived HSPs facilitating the entry of
antigenic peptides into MHC class I molecules are HSP70,
and gp96 (17, 34, 35), however, the distribution of HSP
molecules within the cell follows different prototypes.
Gp96 molecules are typically present in the endoplasmic
reticulum (36). Studies have shown that targeting HSPs,
including HSP90, induces apoptosis in cancer cells (37),
thus, it is necessary to evaluate the optimal conditions
causing induction of these molecules to obtain the
maximum potential of tumor antigenicity.According to our findings, the best temperature and
incubation time to induce maximal gp96 in breast cancer
mammospheres were 42-43°C for 1 hour. In 1998,
Madersbacher et al. (38) indicated that expression of
HSP27 in LNCaP cells treated with heat shock from 43-
49°
C for 60min could increase in a temperature-dependent
manner, though this study was performed on a cell line and
expression of HSP27 was the primary purpose. Schueller
et al. in 2001 showed that in hepatocellular carcinoma
cell line HepG2, treating cells at 41.8°
C for 60 minutes,
increased the expression level of HSP70 and HSP90,
which could substantially escalate the immunogenicity of
the tumor, as well as the immune response to heat-shocked
HepG2 cells Although the cell lines used in these two
studies, were different, both of them had an epithelial
origin and applying almost the same temperature resulted
in rising expression levels of HSP70 and HSP90, which
was consistent with the result of our study (39, 40).This study had some limitations; first, the difficulty of
preserving mammospheres for a more extended period
without causing differentiation to investigate long term
effects of heat treatment on the gp96 expression, Second,
in this study, the samples were from the same patients
of the same stage while obtaining tissue samples from
patients of different stages could impact the percentage of
the presence of CSCs and expression of gp96. Moreover,
we did not study the influence of higher temperatures than
43°C on the structure and the expression of gp96.
Conclusion
In this study, we showed that tumor-derived
mammospheres are CSCs-enriched, and the expression
level of stemness genes is higher than regular breast
cancer cell lines. It was also revealed that incubation of
these mammospheres at a temperature between 42-43°
C
for 60 minutes would upregulate gp96 protein expression
and make mammospheres a potent tool for preparing more
immunogenic tumor antigens for use in immunotherapy
modalities.
Authors: Daniel Novak; Laura Hüser; Jonathan J Elton; Viktor Umansky; Peter Altevogt; Jochen Utikal Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2019-08-11 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: Muhammad Al-Hajj; Max S Wicha; Adalberto Benito-Hernandez; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-03-10 Impact factor: 11.205