| Literature DB >> 35717156 |
Obadia Yator1, Lincoln Khasakhala2, Grace-John Stewart3, Manasi Kumar4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Task shifting is a well-tested implementation strategy within low- and middle-income countries that addresses the shortage of trained mental health personnel. Task shifting can increase access to care for patients with mental illnesses. In Kenya, community health workers (CHWs) are a combination of community health assistants and community health volunteers and have played a crucial role on this front. In our study, we seek to assess the acceptability and feasibility of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT-G) delivered by CHWs among depressed postpartum adolescents (PPAs) living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).Entities:
Keywords: Community health volunteers; Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy; HIV-related stigma; Postpartum depression; Task shifting
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35717156 PMCID: PMC9206094 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01807-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.742
Fig. 1Theorethical framework
Sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents
| Variable | Category | Overall (N = 24) | Intervention (N = 12) | Waitlist (n = 12) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 18–20 Years | 3 (12.5%) | 2 (66.7%) | 1 (33.3%) |
| 21–24 Years | 21 (87.5%) | 10 (47.6%) | 11 (52.4%) | |
| Marital status | Without a partner | 7 (29.2%) | 4 (57.1%) | 3 (42.9%) |
| With a partner | 17 (70.8%) | 8 (47.1%) | 9 (52.9%) | |
| Education level | Primary and below | 11 (45.8%) | 4 (36.4%) | 7 (63.6%) |
| Secondary and above | 13 (54.2%) | 8 (61.5%) | 5 (38.5%) | |
| Occupation | Employed | 5 (20.8%) | 4 (80.0%) | 1 (20.0%) |
| Unemployed | 19 (79.2%) | 8 (42.1%) | 11 (57.9%) | |
| Income per month (Kenya shillings) | 0–10,000 | 22 (91.7%) | 11 (50.0%) | 11 (50.0%) |
| 10,001–20,000 | 2 (8.3%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | |
| Number of children | 1 | 11 (45.8%) | 5 (45.5%) | 6 (54.5%) |
| 2 | 8 (33.3%) | 5 (62.5%) | 3 (37.5%) | |
| 3 | 3 (12.5%) | 1 (33.3%) | 2 (66.7%) | |
| 4 | 2 (8.3%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | |
| Reaction to HIV status | Accepted | 13 (54.2%) | 9 (69.2%) | 4 (30.8%) |
| Not accepted | 11 (45.8%) | 3 (27.3%) | 8 (72.7%) | |
| HIV status of child | Negative | 10 (41.7%) | 5 (50.0%) | 5 (50.0%) |
| Not sure | 14 (58.3%) | 7 (50.0%) | 7 (50.0%) | |
| Intimate partner Violence | Yes | 13 (54.2%) | 6 (46.2%) | 7 (53.8%) |
| No | 11 (45.8%) | 6 (54.5%) | 5 (45.5%) |
Data collection instruments
| Constructs/and domains | Activities | Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| IPT inventory | Assess quality of Interpersonal relationship for postpartum adolescents | Weekly questionnaire to assess interaction changes |
| Knowledge of IPT and delivery skills | Make field notes during session which records: (i) Depression symptoms for each participant (ii) Progress in IPT problem areas (iii) Plan for next session If the participant fails to attend session or dropped out, the CHWs should state the reason and plans for contacting her | CHWs weekly notes during session (Filled by the CHW) |
| IPT process monitoring | Clinical supervisor issues printed copies on protocol to CHWs to guide them on tasks, steps and techniques to be used from pre-group phase, initial phase (session 1), middle phase (session 2–7) and termination phase (session 8) | Session-by-session IPT activities (Issued by clinical supervisor to CHWs) |
| Competency: CHW’s level of IPT-G understanding from the training, piloting, supervision and mentorship. Clinical supervisor reports the strengths, difficulties and prescribe plans for improvement | Pre-group phase (Clinical supervisor asses individual CHW on their ability to administer IPT-G) | |
| Feasibility and acceptability | Clinical supervisor and research assistant conducted FGDs for CHWs prior and after IPT-G intervention. FGDs was also conducted for PPAs after intervention at the 4 months of follow-up. In-depth interviews for: Nursing officer in-charge, Laboratory technologist, PMTCT-Nurse, CHA, and Mentor -mother at the two study sites | FGDs, Key Informants interviews, and observations |
Ideas that appealed to the adolescents
| IPT-G informed themes | Relevant quotations |
|---|---|
| Improved communication | |
| Improved anger management | |
| IPT-G delivery process | |
| Overall Perceptions towards IPT by postpartum adolescents |
Postpartum adolescents’ understanding of IPT-G intervention
| IPT theme | Quotations |
|---|---|
| Overall impact of IPT (Reduce social isolation, anger, hopelessness, low mood) |
Fig. 2Collaborative structure for IPT implementation
CHWs understanding of IPT-G intervention
| IPT themes | Quotations |
|---|---|