Literature DB >> 3571710

The direct measurement of plasma colloid osmotic pressure is superior to colloid osmotic pressure derived from albumin or total protein.

S A Barclay, D Bennett.   

Abstract

Plasma colloid osmotic pressure (COP) has been calculated from both serum albumin concentration and plasma total protein concentration. These values have been compared to those measured directly using a membrane-transducer oncometer in a group of normal subjects, in a group of critically-ill patients with a variety of primary diagnoses and in a group of hypovolaemic patients before and after plasma volume replacement with 6% hydroxyethyl starch solution. In the normal samples, COP calculated from albumin (COPalb) underestimated the measured COP (COPm) by mean of 2.0 mmHg (p less than 0.002), with correlation coefficient r = 0.39(n/s). Similarly, the COPalb underestimated COPm by a mean of 5.7 mmHg (p less than 0.001) in the critically ill patient group; r = 0.38 (p less than 0.02). Furthermore, in the patients receiving plasma volume replacement serum albumin concentration fell by 13.1% (p less than 0.001) whilst COPm increased by 11.5% (p less than 0.002). In the normal subjects COP calculated from total protein concentration (COPtp) underestimated the COPm by 1.5 mmHg (p less than 0.02) with r = 0.65 (p less than 0.01). Conversely, in the patient samples, mean COPtp overestimated COPm by 3.5 mmHg (p less than 0.001) with r = 0.73 (p less than 0.002). We conclude that COPalb is an inadequate estimate of COPm particularly in patients where its use may have important clinical consequences. COPtp provides a reasonable estimate of COPm in normal subjects but in patients samples, where albumin: globulin ratio is low COPtp overestimates substantially in many cases. We advocate the direct measurement of COP in critically-ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3571710     DOI: 10.1007/bf00254796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  7 in total

1.  Routine plasma colloid osmotic pressure measurements.

Authors:  M H Weil; M Morissette; S Michaels; J Bisera; E Boycks; H Shubin; E Jacobson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1974 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  A device for the routine measurement of plasma oncotic pressure.

Authors:  S V Rithalia; J Tinker; N A Howe; D E Vence-Pastor
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1981-01

Review 3.  Colloid osmotic pressure: theoretical aspects and background.

Authors:  H L Webster
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.430

4.  Correlation between measured and calculated colloid osmotic pressure.

Authors:  J Huerta Torrijos; F Espinoza Larrañaga; M E Hernandez Rojas; E Cruz Martinez; L Montiel Cervantes; D Hernandez Lopez
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Interpretation of haemodynamic measurements.

Authors:  P A Poole-Wilson
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1978-10

6.  Comparison of measured and calculated colloid osmotic pressure of serum and pulmonary edema fluid in patients with pulmonary edema.

Authors:  C L Sprung; S K Isikoff; M Hauser; B R Eisler
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Colloid osmotic pressure as a prognostic indicator of pulmonary edema and mortality in the critically ill.

Authors:  E C Rackow; I A Fein; J Leppo
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 9.410

  7 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Colloid volume expanders. Problems, pitfalls and possibilities.

Authors:  J S Roberts; S L Bratton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Renal failure associated with unrecognized hyperoncotic states after pediatric heart surgery.

Authors:  C Bartels; B Hadzik; M Abel; B Roth
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Reliability of cardiac output estimation by thermodilution.

Authors:  A Versprille
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Intracapillary colloid osmotic pressure.

Authors:  P Reusser; G Wolff
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Oncotic pressure and the effects of water deprivation in healthy captive Asian elephants.

Authors:  Natalie H Hall; James S Hall; Ellen Wiedner; Nicole I Stacy; Carsten Bandt; Ramiro Isaza
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 1.279

Review 6.  Body fluid dynamics: back to the future.

Authors:  Gautam Bhave; Eric G Neilson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Starling pressures in the human arm and their alteration in postmastectomy oedema.

Authors:  D O Bates; J R Levick; P S Mortimer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Albumin abuse in intensive care medicine.

Authors:  A F Grootendorst; M G van Wilgenburg; P H de Laat; B van der Hoven
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Colloid osmotic pressure of contemporary and novel transfusion products.

Authors:  Robert B Klanderman; Joachim J Bosboom; Herbert Korsten; Thomas Zeiler; Ruben E A Musson; Denise P Veelo; Bart F Geerts; Robin van Bruggen; Dirk de Korte; Alexander P J Vlaar
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.144

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.