Literature DB >> 35716254

Systemic Sclerosis-Specific Antibodies: Novel and Classical Biomarkers.

Ilaria Cavazzana1, Tamara Vojinovic2, Paolo Airo'2, Micaela Fredi2,3, Angela Ceribelli4,5, Eleonora Pedretti3, Maria Grazia Lazzaroni2,3, Emirena Garrafa3,6, Franco Franceschini2,3.   

Abstract

Disease-specific autoantibodies are considered the most important biomarkers for systemic sclerosis (SSc), due to their ability to stratify patients with different severity and prognosis. Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), occurring in subjects with isolated Raynuad's phenomenon, are considered the strongest independent predictors of definite SSc and digital microvascular damage, as observed by nailfold videocapillaroscopy. ANA are present in more than 90% of SSc, but ANA negativity does not exclude SSc diagnosis: a little rate of SSc ANA negative exists and shows a distinct subtype of disease, with less vasculopathy, but more frequent lower gastrointestinal involvement and severe disease course. Anti-centromere, anti-Th/To, and anti-Topoisomerase I antibodies could be considered as classical biomarkers, covering about 60% of SSc and defining patients with well-described cardio-pulmonary complications. In particular, anti-Topoisomerase I represent a risk factor for development of diffuse cutaneous involvement and digital ulcers in the first 3 years of disease, as well as severe interstitial lung disease (ILD). Anti-RNA polymerase III is a biomarker with new clinical implications: very rapid skin thickness progression, gastric antral vascular ectasia, the occurrence of synchronous cancers, and possible association with silicone breast implants rupture. Moreover, novel SSc specific autoantibodies have been globally described in about 10% of "seronegative" SSc patients: anti-elF2B, anti-RuvBL1/2 complex, anti-U11/U12 RNP, and anti-BICD2 depict specific SSc subtypes with severe organ complications. Many autoantibodies could be considered markers of overlap syndromes, including SSc. Anti-Ku are found in 2-7% of SSc, strictly defining the PM/SSc overlap. They are associated with synovitis, joint contractures, myositis, and negatively associated with vascular manifestation of disease. Anti-U3RNP are associated with a well-defined clinical phenotype: Afro-Caribbean male patients, younger at diagnosis, and higher risk of pulmonary hypertension and gastrointestinal involvement. Anti-PM/Scl define SSc patients with high frequency of ILD, calcinosis, dermatomyositis skin changes, and severe myositis. The accurate detection of autoantibodies SSc specific and associated with overlap syndromes is crucial for patients' stratification. ANA should be correctly identified using indirect immunofluorescent assay and a standardized way of patterns' interpretation. The gold-standard technique for autoantibodies' identification in SSc is still considered immunoprecipitation, for its high sensitivity and specificity, but other assays have been widely used in routine practice. The identification of SSc autoantibodies with high diagnostic specificity and high predictive value is mandatory for early diagnosis, a specific follow-up and the possible definition of the best therapy for every SSc subsets. In addition, the validation of novel autoantibodies is mandatory in wider cohorts in order to restrict the gap of so-called seronegative SSc patients.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-nuclear antibodies; Disease-specific autoantibodies; Systemic sclerosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35716254     DOI: 10.1007/s12016-022-08946-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 1080-0549            Impact factor:   8.667


  143 in total

1.  2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.

Authors:  Frank van den Hoogen; Dinesh Khanna; Jaap Fransen; Sindhu R Johnson; Murray Baron; Alan Tyndall; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Raymond P Naden; Thomas A Medsger; Patricia E Carreira; Gabriela Riemekasten; Philip J Clements; Christopher P Denton; Oliver Distler; Yannick Allanore; Daniel E Furst; Armando Gabrielli; Maureen D Mayes; Jacob M van Laar; James R Seibold; Laszlo Czirjak; Virginia D Steen; Murat Inanc; Otylia Kowal-Bielecka; Ulf Müller-Ladner; Gabriele Valentini; Douglas J Veale; Madelon C Vonk; Ulrich A Walker; Lorinda Chung; David H Collier; Mary Ellen Csuka; Barri J Fessler; Serena Guiducci; Ariane Herrick; Vivien M Hsu; Sergio Jimenez; Bashar Kahaleh; Peter A Merkel; Stanislav Sierakowski; Richard M Silver; Robert W Simms; John Varga; Janet E Pope
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-10-03

2.  Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Virginia D Steen
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints: Developing Common Terminology and Definitions.

Authors:  Melissa A Robb; Pamela M McInnes; Robert M Califf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Autoantibodies as predictive tools in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Svetlana I Nihtyanova; Christopher P Denton
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 5.  Clinical interpretation of antinuclear antibody tests in systemic rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Minoru Satoh; Monica Vázquez-Del Mercado; Edward K L Chan
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.023

Review 6.  Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Sonal Mehra; Jennifer Walker; Karen Patterson; Marvin J Fritzler
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 9.754

7.  Clinical significance of coexisting antitopoisomerase I and anticentromere antibodies in patients with systemic sclerosis: a EUSTAR group-based study.

Authors:  Ingmar A F M Heijnen; C Foocharoen; Bettina Bannert; Patricia E Carreira; Roberto Caporali; Vanessa Smith; Gábor Kumánovics; Mike O Becker; Marie Vanthuyne; Ismail Simsek; Chiara Bocelli-Tyndall; Ulrich A Walker
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Interpretation of an Extended Autoantibody Profile in a Well-Characterized Australian Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma) Cohort Using Principal Components Analysis.

Authors:  K A Patterson; P J Roberts-Thomson; S Lester; J A Tan; P Hakendorf; M Rischmueller; J Zochling; J Sahhar; P Nash; J Roddy; C Hill; M Nikpour; W Stevens; S M Proudman; J G Walker
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 10.995

9.  Immune complexes containing scleroderma-specific autoantibodies induce a profibrotic and proinflammatory phenotype in skin fibroblasts.

Authors:  Elena Raschi; Cecilia Beatrice Chighizola; Laura Cesana; Daniela Privitera; Francesca Ingegnoli; Claudio Mastaglio; Pier Luigi Meroni; Maria Orietta Borghi
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Autoantibodies are present before the clinical diagnosis of systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Peter D Burbelo; Sarah M Gordon; Meryl Waldman; Jess D Edison; Dustin J Little; Rodger S Stitt; Wayne T Bailey; James B Hughes; Stephen W Olson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.