| Literature DB >> 35715766 |
Valentina Scheggi1,2, Silvia Menale3,4, Barbara Tonietti5, Costanza Bigiarini6,4, Jacopo Giovacchini3,4, Stefano Del Pace3,4, Nicola Zoppetti7, Bruno Alterini6,4, Pier Luigi Stefàno8,4, Niccolò Marchionni3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis still has high mortality and invalidating complications, such as cerebral embolism. The best strategies to prevent and manage neurologic complications remain uncertain. This study aimed to identify predictors of cerebral septic embolism and evaluate the role of surgery in these patients in a real-world surgical centre.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral embolism; Endocarditis; Infective endocarditis; Mortality; Outcome; Prognosis; Surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35715766 PMCID: PMC9206378 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07533-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.667
Demographic, clinical, echocardiographic and microbiologic characteristics of the study population, by presence of cerebral embolism
| Cerebral embolism | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| Age (years, median ± IQR) | 69 ± 22 | 69 ± 19 | NS |
| Female gender (N, %) | 140 (33.8%) | 45 (36.9%) | NS |
| BMI (median ± IQR) | 24.2 ± 5.2 | 24.0 ± 4.5 | NS |
| Diabetes (N, %) | 81 (19.1%) | 23 (18.3%) | NS |
| Dyslipidemia (N, %) | 116 (29.3%) | 37 (31.6%) | NS |
| Hypertension (N, %) | 250 (59.1%) | 73 (57.9%) | NS |
| Renal failure (N, %) | 101 (23.8%) | 31 (24.6%) | NS |
| Mild | 35 (8.2%) | 12 (9.5%) | NS |
| Moderate | 38 (8.9%) | 12 (9.5%) | |
| Severe | 13 (3.1%) | 5 (4.0%) | |
| Dyalisis | 15 (3.5%) | 2 (1.6%) | |
| Cancer (N, %) | 95 (22.4%) | 22 (17.5%) | NS |
| PM (N, %) | 56 (13.2%) | 11 (8.7%) | NS |
| Oral anticoagulant therapy (N, %) | 120 (28%) | 40 (32%) | NS |
| Drug abuse (N, %) | 47 (11.1%) | 13 (10.3%) | NS |
| Vegetation length (mm, median ± IQR) | 10 ± 11 | 11 ± 10 | 0.004 |
| Site of infection | |||
| Aortic valve (N, %) | 235 (55.3%) | 60 (47.6%) | 0.001 |
| Mitral valve (N, %) | 149 (35.1%) | 64 (50.8%) | |
| Tricuspid valve (N, %) | 41 (9.6%) | 2 (1.6%) | |
| Prosthetic valve (N, %) | 172 (40.6%) | 50 (39.7%) | NS |
| Double valve infection (N, %) | 69 (16.2%) | 23 (18.3%) | NS |
| Severe valvular dysfunction (N, %) | 213 (50.1%) | 47 (37.3%) | 0.015 |
| Paravalvular extension (N, %) | 90 (21.2%) | 26 (20.6%) | NS |
| EF (%,median ± IQR) | 58 ± 11 | 60 ± 10 | 0.008 |
| TAPSE (mm, median ± IQR) | 21 ± 6 | 19 ± 7 | NS |
| EuroSCORE2 (median ± IQR) | 7 ± 12 | 8 ± 20 | NS |
| Germ (N, %) | |||
| | 69 (16.2%) | 20 (15.9%) | 0.025 |
| | 37 (8.7%) | 4 (3.2%) | |
| | 69 (16.2%) | 34 (27.0%) | |
| | 56 (13.2%) | 12 (9.5%) | |
| | 88 (20.7%) | 18 (14.3%) | |
| Negative coltures | 77 (18.1%) | 26 (20.6%) | |
| Other | 29 (6.8%) | 12 (9.5%) | |
BMI body mass index, PM pacemaker, EF ejection fraction, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
Therapeutic strategies and mortality of patients with infective endocarditis, by presence of cerebral embolism
| Cerebral embolism | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| Treatment (N, %) | |||
| Excluded from surgery despite indication | 40 (9.5%) | 20 (15.8%) | 0.002 |
| Surgery | 329 (77.4%) | 102 (81.0%) | |
| No indication for surgery | 56 (13.1%) | 4 (3.2%) | |
| Thirty-day mortality (N, %) | 36 (8.5%) | 13 (10.3%) | NS |
| Three-year mortality (N, %) | 135 (31.8%) | 48 (38.1%) | NS |
Clinical and anatomical characteristics of patients with cerebral embolism, by therapeutic strategy
| Treatment | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excluded from surgery (N = 20) | Surgery (N = 102) | No indication for surgery (N = 4) | ||
| Age (years, median ± IQR) | 73 (66–79) | 66 (62–72) | 67 (36–78) | NS |
| Dysability at admission (N, %) | ||||
| Mild | 4 (21,1%) | 56 (62,9%) | 3 (75%) | 0.001 |
| Moderate | 1 (5,3%) | 16 (18,0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Severe | 14 (73,7%) | 17 (19,1%) | 1 (25%) | |
| Neurologic symptoms (N, %) | 18 (90,0%) | 69 (75,0%) | 2 (50%) | NS |
| Heamorrhagic cerebral lesions (N, %) | 9 (45,0%) | 25 (24,5%) | 0 (0%) | NS |
| Site of cerebral lesion (N, %) | ||||
| Basal nuclei | 1 (5,3%) | 4 (4,3%) | 1 (25%) | NS |
| Cerebral lobes | 12 (63,2%) | 61 (65,6%) | 2 (50%) | |
| Cerebellum | 0 (0,0%) | 3 (3,2%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Multiple sites | 6 (31,6%) | 25 (26,9%) | 1 (25%) | |
Fig. 1Kaplan–Meier analysis of survival probability of 551 patients with infective endocarditis with (Y) or without (N) cerebral septic embolism, divided for therapeutic strategy: excluded from surgery (E), surgery (S), medical therapy (M)
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier analysis of survival probability of 431 patients with infective endocarditis undergoing cardiac surgery with (Y) or without (N) cerebral septic embolism, divided for therapeutic strategy: early surgery or delayed surgery
Fig. 3Kaplan–Meier analysis of survival probability of 126 patients with infective endocarditis and cerebral septic embolism, divided for Barthel index, categorized in mild, moderate and severe
Fig. 4Kaplan–Meier analysis of survival probability of 126 patients with infective endocarditis and cerebral septic embolism, divided for Barthel index, categorized in mild (M), moderate (Mod) and severe (S), and for surgical intervention (Y) or not (N)