| Literature DB >> 35715661 |
Taeko Minegishi1,2,3, Melissa M Garrido4,5, Eleanor T Lewis6,7, Elizabeth M Oliva6,7, Steven D Pizer4,5, Kiersten L Strombotne4,5, Jodie A Trafton6,7,8, Kertu Tenso4,5, Pooja S Sohoni6,7, Austin B Frakt4,5,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) developed a dashboard Stratification Tool for Opioid Risk Mitigation (STROM) to guide clinical practice interventions. VHA released a policy mandating that high-risk patients of an adverse event based on the STORM dashboard are to be reviewed by an interdisciplinary team of clinicians. AIM: Randomized program evaluation to evaluate if patients in the oversight arm had a lower risk of opioid-related serious adverse events (SAEs) or death compared to those in the non-oversight arm. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred and forty VHA facilities (aka medical centers) were randomly assigned to two groups: oversight and non-oversight arms. VHA patients who were prescribed opioids between April 18, 2018, and November 8, 2019, were included in the cohort. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: We hypothesized that patients cared for by VHA facilities that received the policy with the oversight accountability language would achieve lower opioid-related SAEs or death. PROGRAM EVALUATION: We did not observe a relationship between the oversight arm and opioid-related SAEs or death. Patients in the non-oversight arm had a significantly higher chance of receiving a case review compared to those in the oversight arm. DISCUSSION: Even though our findings were unexpected, the STORM policy overall was likely successful in focusing the provider's attention on very high-risk patients.Entities:
Keywords: Veterans Health Administration; opioids; policy; randomization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35715661 PMCID: PMC9585134 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07622-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gen Intern Med ISSN: 0884-8734 Impact factor: 6.473