Literature DB >> 35715615

Evaluating Eye Movement Event Detection: A Review of the State of the Art.

Mikhail Startsev1, Raimondas Zemblys2.   

Abstract

Detecting eye movements in raw eye tracking data is a well-established research area by itself, as well as a common pre-processing step before any subsequent analysis. As in any field, however, progress and successful collaboration can only be achieved provided a shared understanding of the pursued goal. This is often formalised via defining metrics that express the quality of an approach to solving the posed problem. Both the big-picture intuition behind the evaluation strategies and seemingly small implementation details influence the resulting measures, making even studies with outwardly similar procedures essentially incomparable, impeding a common understanding. In this review, we systematically describe and analyse evaluation methods and measures employed in the eye movement event detection field to date. While recently developed evaluation strategies tend to quantify the detector's mistakes at the level of whole eye movement events rather than individual gaze samples, they typically do not separate establishing correspondences between true and predicted events from the quantification of the discovered errors. In our analysis we separate these two steps where possible, enabling their almost arbitrary combinations in an evaluation pipeline. We also present the first large-scale empirical analysis of event matching strategies in the literature, examining these various combinations both in practice and theoretically. We examine the particular benefits and downsides of the evaluation methods, providing recommendations towards more intuitive and informative assessment. We implemented the evaluation strategies on which this work focuses in a single publicly available library: https://github.com/r-zemblys/EM-event-detection-evaluation .
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evaluation; Event matching; Eye movement event detection; Metrics

Year:  2022        PMID: 35715615     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01763-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  24 in total

1.  Comparing two K-category assignments by a K-category correlation coefficient.

Authors:  J Gorodkin
Journal:  Comput Biol Chem       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Human-level saccade detection performance using deep neural networks.

Authors:  Marie E Bellet; Joachim Bellet; Hendrikje Nienborg; Ziad M Hafed; Philipp Berens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Eye-tracking data quality as affected by ethnicity and experimental design.

Authors:  Pieter Blignaut; Daniël Wium
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-03

4.  One algorithm to rule them all? An evaluation and discussion of ten eye movement event-detection algorithms.

Authors:  Richard Andersson; Linnea Larsson; Kenneth Holmqvist; Martin Stridh; Marcus Nyström
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-04

5.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A novel evaluation of two related and two independent algorithms for eye movement classification during reading.

Authors:  Lee Friedman; Ioannis Rigas; Evgeny Abdulin; Oleg V Komogortsev
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-08

7.  Brief communication: Three errors and two problems in a recent paper: gazeNet: End-to-end eye-movement event detection with deep neural networks (Zemblys, Niehorster, and Holmqvist, 2019).

Authors:  Lee Friedman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-08

8.  Bias, prevalence and kappa.

Authors:  T Byrt; J Bishop; J B Carlin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 9.  Understanding Bland Altman analysis.

Authors:  Davide Giavarina
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.313

10.  Noise-robust fixation detection in eye movement data: Identification by two-means clustering (I2MC).

Authors:  Roy S Hessels; Diederick C Niehorster; Chantal Kemner; Ignace T C Hooge
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.