Saad Mohamed Saad Ibrahiem1,2. 1. Assistant Professor of plastic and reconstructive surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Campus, Alexandria University, 21111, Alexandria, Egypt. saad.saad@alexmed.edu.eg. 2. We Care Professionals Medical Center, Kuwait City, Kuwait. saad.saad@alexmed.edu.eg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Male chest deformity after massive weight loss is complex and challenging to treat because of differing grades of excessive parenchyma/fat ptosis, nipple malposition, over-stretched skin, ill-defined infra-mammary fold, and prominent axillary rolls. Patients are eager to restore balanced upper body dominance. Two fundamental techniques are used for large breasts with moderate to poor skin elasticity; (1) the inferior pedicle Wise skin pattern and (2) double incision with free nipple graft technique.The author presents his experience in treating such severe breast deformities, besides correcting the prominent axillary rolls using an L-shaped mastectomy excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2017 and December 2020, 55 consecutive patients were treated surgically for male chest re-contouring using the L-shaped mastectomy technique. Ages ranged from 20 to 57 years (median, 31 years). The average body mass index (BMI) was 29. The average follow-up period was 17 months (13-44 months). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (92.8%) reported greater levels of postoperative satisfaction with their results owing to lack of any major complication and minimal minor complications (two cases of minor ischemia that healed spontaneously, two small hematomas, two small seromas, and four hypertrophic scars). CONCLUSION: The L-shaped excision is a useful procedure for severe grade gynecomastia with an atypical presentation in the form of complex chest deformity and prominent axillary roll after massive weight loss patients. The technique is associated with minor complications that are treated in an office setting. The technique preserves normal pigmentation and sensitivity of the nipple-alveolar complex. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
BACKGROUND: Male chest deformity after massive weight loss is complex and challenging to treat because of differing grades of excessive parenchyma/fat ptosis, nipple malposition, over-stretched skin, ill-defined infra-mammary fold, and prominent axillary rolls. Patients are eager to restore balanced upper body dominance. Two fundamental techniques are used for large breasts with moderate to poor skin elasticity; (1) the inferior pedicle Wise skin pattern and (2) double incision with free nipple graft technique.The author presents his experience in treating such severe breast deformities, besides correcting the prominent axillary rolls using an L-shaped mastectomy excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2017 and December 2020, 55 consecutive patients were treated surgically for male chest re-contouring using the L-shaped mastectomy technique. Ages ranged from 20 to 57 years (median, 31 years). The average body mass index (BMI) was 29. The average follow-up period was 17 months (13-44 months). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (92.8%) reported greater levels of postoperative satisfaction with their results owing to lack of any major complication and minimal minor complications (two cases of minor ischemia that healed spontaneously, two small hematomas, two small seromas, and four hypertrophic scars). CONCLUSION: The L-shaped excision is a useful procedure for severe grade gynecomastia with an atypical presentation in the form of complex chest deformity and prominent axillary roll after massive weight loss patients. The technique is associated with minor complications that are treated in an office setting. The technique preserves normal pigmentation and sensitivity of the nipple-alveolar complex. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Authors: Stelios C Wilson; Shane D Morrison; Lavinia Anzai; Jonathan P Massie; Grace Poudrier; Catherine C Motosko; Alexes Hazen Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: Laura C Nuzzi; Felecia E Cerrato; Cameron R Erikson; Michelle L Webb; Heather Rosen; Erika M Walsh; Amy D DiVasta; Arin K Greene; Brian I Labow Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.730